Gravy wrote:Hit both of your free throws and the game is over. smh
We missed a bunch of free throws the whole second half which hurt
Moderators: Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi, NoLayupRule, HerSports85, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23
Gravy wrote:Hit both of your free throws and the game is over. smh
KnixinSix wrote:Thibs subbing KAT to be on floor same time with Brunson up 14 with 3:44 left was the collosal mistake. It should have never got to having to make those free throws to keep the Pacers from tying it in the first place. Pacers already showed they were ready to cook that line up when they started the game a blistering 9 for 9. Why in the world is not Mitch your defensive closer in that situation is absolutely mind boggling. I said it the moment he made the substitution too. Mitch 100% needed to be the closer for the final 3:44. That was the biggest mistake of the game by far.
You are up 14 and Pacers were scoring in bunches every single time those 2 were out there together. Every. Single. Time. ANY coach with a true feel for the game that is actually happening in front of him and considering score and time left would NEVER bring in the two weakest defenders at that point (especially with how they were playing together).
I am not mad anymore but was caught up in the moment bc I SAW IT COMING. I posted it the moment he subbed in KAT to be out there with JB in that situation (up 14 with 3:44 left).
Pacers were no joke like 70%+ insane shooting with both Brun and KAT in together all game long. They had a plan vs that lineup and were absolutely smoking it.
A smart coach simply says, Im up 14 so I am not going to put my pure offensive lineup in there thats been clearly getting cooked but more of a defensive line up ESPECIALLY when the in game advanced analytics are showing a HUGE change in defensive rating with Mitch on the floor.
This is prolly going to get picked up on very soon by the smart analysts and there will be a bunch of posts about it

KnixinSix wrote:Thibs subbing KAT to be on floor same time with Brunson up 14 with 3:44 left was the collosal mistake. It should have never got to having to make those free throws to keep the Pacers from tying it in the first place. Pacers already showed they were ready to cook that line up when they started the game a blistering 9 for 9. Why in the world is not Mitch your defensive closer in that situation is absolutely mind boggling. I said it the moment he made the substitution too. Mitch 100% needed to be the closer for the final 3:44. That was the biggest mistake of the game by far.
You are up 14 and Pacers were scoring in bunches every single time those 2 were out there together. Every. Single. Time. ANY coach with a true feel for the game that is actually happening in front of him and considering score and time left would NEVER bring in the two weakest defenders at that point (especially with how they were playing together).
I am not mad anymore but was caught up in the moment bc I SAW IT COMING. I posted it the moment he subbed in KAT to be out there with JB in that situation (up 14 with 3:44 left).
Pacers were no joke like 70%+ insane shooting with both Brun and KAT in together all game long. They had a plan vs that lineup and were absolutely smoking it.
A smart coach simply says, Im up 14 so I am not going to put my pure offensive lineup in there thats been clearly getting cooked but more of a defensive line up ESPECIALLY when the in game advanced analytics are showing a HUGE change in defensive rating with Mitch on the floor.
This is prolly going to get picked up on very soon by the smart analysts and there will be a bunch of posts about it
8516knicks wrote:dakomish23 wrote:Our Josh Hart was better than their Josh Hart for 3 1/2 quarters. Then their Josh Hart took over
Apparently Obi has some value.
NiceLikeChrist wrote:Anyone who thinks pacers win this series is crazy. It’s unfortunate that making the finals will probably save thibs job and we’ll have him against next season but there’s no way we lose this.
I had us in 5 going in. Maybe 6 now after this miracle win they squeaked out
Bob Ross wrote:I know some of you say it's just one game, but I've seen this movie before over the last 30+ years. Pacers OKC finals. To think otherwise is to ignore recent and old history
Jay10 wrote:It took Thibodeau 6 games until his team started defending the 3 point line against the Celtics, and today he took players out the game that got the lead to 17 points for a player with 5 fouls.

whocares1 wrote:KnixinSix wrote:Thibs subbing KAT to be on floor same time with Brunson up 14 with 3:44 left was the collosal mistake. It should have never got to having to make those free throws to keep the Pacers from tying it in the first place. Pacers already showed they were ready to cook that line up when they started the game a blistering 9 for 9. Why in the world is not Mitch your defensive closer in that situation is absolutely mind boggling. I said it the moment he made the substitution too. Mitch 100% needed to be the closer for the final 3:44. That was the biggest mistake of the game by far.
You are up 14 and Pacers were scoring in bunches every single time those 2 were out there together. Every. Single. Time. ANY coach with a true feel for the game that is actually happening in front of him and considering score and time left would NEVER bring in the two weakest defenders at that point (especially with how they were playing together).
I am not mad anymore but was caught up in the moment bc I SAW IT COMING. I posted it the moment he subbed in KAT to be out there with JB in that situation (up 14 with 3:44 left).
Pacers were no joke like 70%+ insane shooting with both Brun and KAT in together all game long. They had a plan vs that lineup and were absolutely smoking it.
A smart coach simply says, Im up 14 so I am not going to put my pure offensive lineup in there thats been clearly getting cooked but more of a defensive line up ESPECIALLY when the in game advanced analytics are showing a HUGE change in defensive rating with Mitch on the floor.
This is prolly going to get picked up on very soon by the smart analysts and there will be a bunch of posts about it
A smart coach just tells players to switch on the screen when Nesmith made two in a row. OG’s reluctance to switch immediately was the problem. It isn’t deeper than that. Knicks escape with the win if they force Nesmith to miss.
whocares1 wrote:KnixinSix wrote:Thibs subbing KAT to be on floor same time with Brunson up 14 with 3:44 left was the collosal mistake. It should have never got to having to make those free throws to keep the Pacers from tying it in the first place. Pacers already showed they were ready to cook that line up when they started the game a blistering 9 for 9. Why in the world is not Mitch your defensive closer in that situation is absolutely mind boggling. I said it the moment he made the substitution too. Mitch 100% needed to be the closer for the final 3:44. That was the biggest mistake of the game by far.
You are up 14 and Pacers were scoring in bunches every single time those 2 were out there together. Every. Single. Time. ANY coach with a true feel for the game that is actually happening in front of him and considering score and time left would NEVER bring in the two weakest defenders at that point (especially with how they were playing together).
I am not mad anymore but was caught up in the moment bc I SAW IT COMING. I posted it the moment he subbed in KAT to be out there with JB in that situation (up 14 with 3:44 left).
Pacers were no joke like 70%+ insane shooting with both Brun and KAT in together all game long. They had a plan vs that lineup and were absolutely smoking it.
A smart coach simply says, Im up 14 so I am not going to put my pure offensive lineup in there thats been clearly getting cooked but more of a defensive line up ESPECIALLY when the in game advanced analytics are showing a HUGE change in defensive rating with Mitch on the floor.
This is prolly going to get picked up on very soon by the smart analysts and there will be a bunch of posts about it
A smart coach just tells players to switch on the screen when Nesmith made two in a row. OG’s reluctance to switch immediately was the problem. It isn’t deeper than that. Knicks escape with the win if they force Nesmith to miss.

Bob Ross wrote:I know some of you say it's just one game, but I've seen this movie before over the last 30+ years. Pacers OKC finals. To think otherwise is to ignore recent and old history
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor
2010 wrote:Another thing. I’m tired of that starting lineup. It needs to change but stubborn Thibs refuses to adjust.
They can’t defend and we start off almost every game facing a deficit.
What more evidence does Thibs need?
2010 wrote:Another thing. I’m tired of that starting lineup. It needs to change but stubborn Thibs refuses to adjust.
They can’t defend and we start off almost every game facing a deficit.
What more evidence does Thibs need?
2010 wrote:Another thing. I’m tired of that starting lineup. It needs to change but stubborn Thibs refuses to adjust.
They can’t defend and we start off almost every game facing a deficit.
What more evidence does Thibs need?

bronxknicksfan1 wrote:2010 wrote:Another thing. I’m tired of that starting lineup. It needs to change but stubborn Thibs refuses to adjust.
They can’t defend and we start off almost every game facing a deficit.
What more evidence does Thibs need?
?s=46
