Marrs-Law wrote:It's a very good sign for the Pacers that Brunson & Kat, even though they played less than Tyrese/Siakem, and Brunson had what felt like an abnormally long time on the bench, seemed to be too tired to match the Pacers in the last 3 minutes + overtime. The Knicks won't be able to get this done in four or five anymore, and game 1 really seemed to suggest to me that they won't be able to keep up with the Pacers over 6 or 7 games. For getting out-played overall (sans the end), I am feeling really confident about the rest of the series.
Turner is 29, Siakam is 31, I suspect TJ only has one more year in him as a decently solid role player, Obi probably doesn't get paid, I suspect they'll try to trade Mathurin. I think the Pacers have a good system and should hopefully have a championship-caliber backcourt for the next 5-10 years, so I think they can remain competitive fringe contenders for a while. What with the potential of teams like OKC, the idea of a healthy Cleveland, the top-end potentials of teams like San Antonio, and a likely better 5-8 in the East next year, I don't think things get any easier next year, even if we get any significant player development jumps.
Point is, to me, if this core wants to win a championship, this moment, right now, up 1-0 in the ECF with NYK and what will probably be an elite but inconsistent OKC team standing in the way, may be the best opportunity that this core may ever get.
True the Pacers are in a perfect spot with their cap right now, but tough decisions are looming. Was discussing this in hypothetical Giannis to Indy trade theories, and my opinion was the Bucks would not want to allow Indy to flip assets that they'd otherwise lose. For example if there was a package with guys like Siakam, Mathurin, Sheppard, with some picks it would be an absolute steal for the Pacers because they might lose a good chunk of those guys to FA eventually anyways.