AirP. wrote:vvoland wrote:AirP. wrote:I do get why you hate them...
Here's the stats for all the playoffs for GS, the bigs minus Post did well. Draymond was just bad but also played out of position and really seemed to get worse when Curry was ruled out.
Here's just the Minnesota series...
A lot of Warriors stunk led by Draymond, Podz and GP2.
Here's the regular season (the whole season, Butler was only around for the high level winning so his numbers are only based on that, not the .500 ball the team was playing for over half the season)...
I hear that yet year after year they seem to be very good at showing who did well and who didn't since they try to extract the player's involvement in the offense / defense without giving EVERYONE credit for every play on the court.
It's almost like you can see who is or who isn't contributing to winning. Of course, there are low amounts of data for the fringe guys so they could be much higher or much lower than what they probably should be because of that.
Yes, and yet the lineup data (you can find that in the JK/Kerr fault poll thread) paint the picture that JK did very well with Steph and Dray on the court, particularly when paired with a podz and either moody/buddy.
Playing JK with our santa cruz bench mob was a terrible idea, both for the team's and JK's success.
So, you're saying a coach who has multiple championships as a coach and as a player is tanking GS's potential on purpose because he just doesn't like Kuminga, not because Kuminga refuses to do what he's asked to do? For instance, let's say it's the last possession of game 7, down by 1 and Kuminga is on the court with Curry, I can't trust that Kuminga will do what it takes to run the offense or possibly try to get Curry open for a shot before Kuminga calls his own number.
I don't think many are saying Kuminga isn't talented (maybe nobody is, he is talented), the problem is that he wants to be able to call his own number whenever he wants and in 4 years in the NBA not being able to do that, he's still not willing to give in. He wants to be the main guy and I say, let him go be that main guy for a lot of money somewhere else.
That's not what I'm saying and I challenge you to find anything I wrote that would imply that.
What I am saying is, JK can play with Dray/Steph, despite the narrative on this board and other places. Kerr believed that JK couldn't play with Dray/Curry/Wigs but then changed his mind when the early lineup data or injuries or losses or all 3 started to pile up. In fact, I think if JK never got hurt, he would have played a ton w/ Jimmy and, eventually, found a way to fit with him as well, as he kinda did in the minny series. JK came back from his injury to a team playing very differently and Steve went away from JK before pulling the plug completely. THAT'S what I disagreed with. I think we could have used him in the clipper game, not to "turn the offense over" or whatever the strawman is. Just to guard kawhi on a few possessions and attack the rim when the offense slowed down. Same thing in the Mem play-in. Same thing to start the Hou series. The fact that he responded well and was able to come out firing tells me enough about his attitude and approach.
What I am also saying is that this whole "he thinks he's kobe" narrative is also overblown. Again, the lineup data suggests he plays better with Steph/Dray AND that Steph/Dray play better with JK than almost anyone else on the roster (ex. podz, i believe). In fact, I think JK would be fine as the 5th starter next to Dray/Jimmy/Steph or even as the 6th man, logging 25-35 minutes. He clearly wants to play and most people think he only wants to shoot. Getting DNP-CDs while the Gui Santos and Pat Spencers of the world get run in big games must have been infuriating especially as the team was losing those games as he watched from the bench.