Indeed wrote:I don't buy the defense from Barrett yet, not good at positioning and the defensive IQ isn't there, but his struggle at the line more feel like in a tanking season, where he (and the team) does not caring making them or not (not the part of the development, who care attitude afterall). I think free throw will eventually be respectable, while defense is still a concern, particularly his positioning (mental / IQ will hardly change, he will need to make up with his reaction, seems borderline average eventually).
I don't think there's much to buy. He isn't an All-D guy, but he has visibly improved. He still has flaws, but he's made strides.
For my part, I don't buy the idea that a tanking season had anything to do with Barrett's FT woes. He only shot 71.5% from the line last year, he's shot under 70% from the FT line once before. It could be a mix of variance/skill deficiency and injury as much as anything else. This is his second straight season under 60 GP, after all. Obviously, I hope he doesn't shoot 63% again next season, I expect he'll be back to around 70, 71%, and that should help some. He was okay-ish before the new year and then just flubbed it from January onward, though, so maybe you're right. Hopefully, it becomes irrelevant and he shoots like 75% next year.
As for Ingram, I rather pay Siakam without the injury risk, even not having the additional asset (or I think those are cheap to acquire anyway), but keeping Siakam means we won't have the chance to prove Barnes is not the top 3 options. People will continue to accuse not giving Barnes the ball.
Siakam is irrelevant now, though. I would love to have not traded Siakam, but that genie is out of the bottle, so it isn't worth worrying about anymore. Just trying to flip gears and be a little more positive over our prospects for next season at this point.