dkb964 wrote:PaulKellerman wrote:dkb964 wrote:
It is easy to say that in hindsight, but at the time teams were not lining up to give away great assets for the privilegeof of paying a 31 year old Siakam almost 50M anunally over the following 4 years. The Pacers did because they can not attract free agents. I am happy that it has worked out for the Pacers and Siakam but don't act like there was some bidding war or they let some great offer pass them by.
Toronto really can't attract FAs either though. It may be a big city but it's got a lot of drawbacks (taxes, climate etc). Toronto should be in the talent retention business, not making lateral moves IMHO.
Toronto is for sure not a free agent destination to say the least. Having heard an interview with Ingram prior to any idea of a trade to Toronto he listed the city in his top three to visit. Living there is different. I get that. It does appear that he wanted to play in Toronto which has never happened before from a US born player.
It's definitely better than Indy, no doubt (the food scene here is insane) but were I multimillionaire, I'd go somewhere warm and sunny. This recent stretch of sordid weather has done a number on my mental health and I've only been back for 48hours

























