LookToShoot wrote:R-DAWG wrote:LookToShoot wrote:
I’d keep KAT if meant playing him next to Giannis. I’d get rid of the “Nova Bros”.
It’s not a surprise that the Pacers and Thunder are up 2-0. Their teams are just as balanced as their payroll. They’re not spending $100 million on three role players/false stars.
Overpaying role players is always risky. It can work, but you need efficiencies in other places on the roster. The Knicks really don’t have that since KAT’s deal offsets Brunson’s discount and Hart/OG offset Bridges being slightly below market value.
We should appreciate the season that we are having, but looking forward we have a flawed roster with a bloated payroll and no draft capital.
Pacers’ best perimeter defenders, Nembhard and Nesmith, are making a combined $29 million next season. And they’re on their second contracts. OG and Bridges are making $65 million combined for similar duties and production.
I think what Brunson is getting paid is his value, I don’t consider it a discount. He was smart to take the money because he has limitations.
Are Nembhard and Nesmith being asked to hide two bad defenders in KAT and Brunson? I don’t think so. Mikal and OG aren’t the problem. Lowkey individually I don’t think KaT or Brunson is either. It’s when the two of them together on the floor that is the issue. A good defensive team can hide one bad defender, no way can they hide two. Don’t even get me started on how we really don’t have depth either we are asking Mikal and OG to play even more defensively than other teams because even if you sit one of Brunson or KAT down we still got to compensate for the other one.
I think the Knicks got to move KAT to deal with the holes on the roster. We don’t got a back up center (Maybe Huk but we don’t know), we don’t got a second scorer (if we move KAT), we don’t got a back up PG, and lowkey we need someone talented enough to push Hart back on the bench.