Raps in 4 wrote:HotelVitale wrote:Raps in 4 wrote:
I agree. Masai doesn't see it that way though, which is a problem.
I'm torn on moving on from him though. He's one of the best drafting executives in the league, which is such a rare but important skill to have (I'd argue it's the most important skill for an executive).
We also have one of the dumbest owners in pro sports who would be hiring his replacement, and that does not instill me with any amount of confidence.
This is probably not the place to get into this but I really really don’t think basketball fans should think that ‘draft skill’ is a real thing. Or at least not that there’s anything remotely close to a special intuition that some GMs have that allows them to squint and which prospects will translate and develop and which won’t. GMs all see pretty similar things in most prospects and then just take guesses about translation and development, and those who are having nice runs like Masai are just having nice runs that will even out over time. Even if we admit that some depts/FOs are better than others (they are) the advantages gained are much smaller than the full ability to actually predict draft successes and failures.
There’s a lot to this argument and I don’t want to derail this But I’ll just say that this is how GMs and scouts talk about the draft and prospect eval, and that if you follow through the thought about what this draft ‘skill’ might entail—and you’re not assuming that most FOs are incompetent (they aren’t)—you’ll end up talking about quasi-magical abilities at some pt.
Anyway, just saying that if you’re only behind Masai because his picks have generally turned out well, I’d be comfortable backing off that some and not seeing that as irreplaceable.
Some FOs are objectively better than others at drafting and development. It's completely asinine to argue that it isn't a skill.
An inability to draft and develop talent is the main reason why cellar-dwelling franchises get stuck there for so long.
I think there is a skill to drafting, but luck plays a part of it too. For example, how well has the guy who drafted Giannis (John Hammond) done in the draft since that time? I'd have to look it up, but my guess is...hit or miss (and maybe more miss than hit).
I agree with you that not being able to draft is a reason why bad teams are stuck for so long. I look at the draft and think that it's important to do well every year, even if the team doesn't end up with a star player (or even great player...just get a good one). Every year a GM misses means the team is set back a bit.
The top picks are important to hit on, but even late ones matter. Look at Denver and how they drafted Braun late. Or Memphis with Jaylen Wells in the last draft.




















