mdenny wrote:Tripod wrote:mdenny wrote:
It's disingenuous to assert that my defense of fred is extreme. Think about all the false narratives that CONTINUE on this board that have been proven to be completely false.
The raptor beat writers were biased against scotty, Jack Armstrong was biased against scotty, Fred held scotty back, Pascal held scotty back, Nurse held scotty back, thaddeus young (yet another vet) was out of line for calling out scotty, we had no leaders, Fred is not a real point guard, Pascal is selfish, etc etc etc.
Ppl needed to make a laundry list of false claims just to maintain a pipe dream vision of what scotty was.
It could not be more clear, at this time, that all of those beliefs were the exact opposite of the truth. Scotty has been the problem. And the increased scrutiny is coming. Trust me. He's been treated with kid gloves up til now.
I'm kinda concerned....because of my prediction is correct and scotty's rep takes a huge hit next season....it's gonna significantly depreciate our most important asset.
So yes, you are related to Fred?
You talk about Barnes and cult but you are the cult leader for Fred. It's all good, you are allowed to have your favorites.
I just genuinely wondered if you were related to Fred since he does no wrong in your eyes. And yes, you are extreme.
Dude....anyone who didn't believe a whole bunch of false claims about Fred was called a "Fred stan". That's how far the Overton window had shifted because of the scotty cult.
You had to believe that he was a selfish player who couldn't play point guard and was a horrible teammate or YOUR view was perceived as extreme.
Go read the 100 page thread announcing Fred had signed with the rockets and see how wrong everyone was. And also how extreme the median perception had become.
Hell go read the 8 pages of fred hate after game 1 of the rockets/warriors series. This board has a seriously warped perception of fred.
Are you able to possibly come to terms with the fact that what was said about FVV was accurate about his tenure here, and that he may have changed his mindset elsewhere?
There is a large difference in being the incumbent on the team, and things "always being this way" with a new high draft pick coming in as the "saviour" vs going to a completely new team where you are probably told at your contract signing/negoatiations, that your role is to mentor.
I would bet my last dollar that the expectation of FVV on the Rockets was VASTLY different than the inherited expectation of him here. It's not too wild of an assumption.
Different situation, different results. Take a look at Siakams play in IND as the #2 vs here as the #1m, he didn't magically learn how to shoot the 3 7% better, they just use him better/have a more complimentary roster.