Why for Jazz, one of the most athletic gifted players who needs playing time and won't be replaced after making a mistake immediately. Inconsistent playing time is hurting his development. The Jazz are a younger team that can live with his mistakes as he is only 22.
Why for Dubs, they some more size and consistency and Collins gives them an inside/outside presence it badly needs. And only 27 years old he just has more experience.
Both need new contracts so a sign and trade hopefully at somewhat matching salary of between 25-30 million a year for both players at 5 years each will do.
Linings for Collins
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
Re: Linings for Collins
- babyjax13
- RealGM
- Posts: 34,976
- And1: 17,492
- Joined: Jul 02, 2006
- Location: Occupied Los Angeles
-
Re: Linings for Collins
Is this ... Kuminga? Golden State effectively can't sign and trade him unless it is for the MLE or less. I'm also not interested in him for anything more than that, certainly not over 20 million.

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.
JColl
Re: Linings for Collins
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,821
- And1: 4,087
- Joined: May 27, 2004
- Location: Masalaland
-
Re: Linings for Collins
Who?
Deuteronomy 30:19 wrote:I call heaven and earth to witness against you today, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and curse. Therefore choose life, that you and your offspring may live
Re: Linings for Collins
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,747
- And1: 2,269
- Joined: Jan 25, 2025
-
Re: Linings for Collins
While the idea of S+T two similar salary should be simple, it isn't. It hard caps both teams and requires both players to agree to go to the other team.
Re: Linings for Collins
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,899
- And1: 1,572
- Joined: Jun 19, 2007
-
Re: Linings for Collins
Autocorrect got us all like huh?
Yeah, I don't see Utah making a hard push for Kuminga, and accepting him via sign and trade would hard cap them. GSW would probably prefer the cap savings if letting him walk, if they can't orchestrate a S&T that simply nets them a TPE and future draft assets.
Yeah, I don't see Utah making a hard push for Kuminga, and accepting him via sign and trade would hard cap them. GSW would probably prefer the cap savings if letting him walk, if they can't orchestrate a S&T that simply nets them a TPE and future draft assets.
Some people really have a way with words. Other people... not... have... way.
-- Steve Martin
-- Steve Martin
Re: Linings for Collins
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,899
- And1: 11,108
- Joined: Mar 29, 2014
-
Re: Linings for Collins
If Utah wants to move Collins I'd bet the Hornets would be one of the more interested teams. They've been interested in him before and they have contracts/picks to spare.
Re: Linings for Collins
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 34,461
- And1: 6,079
- Joined: Apr 27, 2005
-
Re: Linings for Collins
Collins is fine, and he does some things we could use, but he wouldn't be my first choice this offseason and so I'd probably be more inclined to just S&T Kuminga for a TPE and then explore trade options with that.
Less than zero interest in Collins if he's coming attached to a $100 million plus extension like the OP's suggesting.
Less than zero interest in Collins if he's coming attached to a $100 million plus extension like the OP's suggesting.
Re: Linings for Collins
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 34,461
- And1: 6,079
- Joined: Apr 27, 2005
-
Re: Linings for Collins
babyjax13 wrote:Is this ... Kuminga? Golden State effectively can't sign and trade him unless it is for the MLE or less. I'm also not interested in him for anything more than that, certainly not over 20 million.
Why is that? IIRC sending out a player via S&T only hard caps you at the second apron, but I feel like there's always some angle I'm missing with this new CBA.
Return to Trades and Transactions