BKlutch wrote:Context wrote:
Damn, I wanted to see Thibs dancing in like in those AI videos!
Love the random get the fck out here
Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36
BKlutch wrote:Context wrote:
Damn, I wanted to see Thibs dancing in like in those AI videos!
Garbagelo wrote:Here is the cold hard truth about the Pacers:
Their defense is terrible and you can put anyone in the game and get offensive production vs them because they have poor defensive principles.
Their offense also tends to go cold for no reason, usually because Hali tends to go into fetal position several times a game. During these periods, you need to capitalize.
You need to play your bench because it's not a matter of if but when they produce. If you can rest your starters and have them come back with energy to finish the game, they have a better chance to close it out against the Pacers eventual comeback attempts.
TJ is a very good player but he runs out of gas quick and then becomes a major liability out there. You need to full court press this guy to finish him off quickly. Bring in Wright or Deuce when he comes in and shadow him every second he is out there with physicality.
Siakam has a tendency for hero ball and sometimes he performs well enough to carry the game. In some ways he kinda plays like Randle. Thibs had Randle for years, by now he should know how to get into these player's heads. Late doubles tend to screw this guy up.
When Turner is not in the game, you should simply penetrate 90% of the time, they are too soft to stop drives and play terrible help defense.
If Thibs doesnt get out of his stubborn ways and goes back to mismanagement of game 1 and 2 its over.

Chanel Bomber wrote:KAT's a flawed player, everybody knows that.
But he's an All-Star and All-NBA, and the impact metrics generally like him. This doesn't just happen for no reason.
His defensive impact oscillates between neutral and really bad depending on the scheme, the opposition and his mental focus. But he's an elite offensive player who opens up the entire offense by his mere presence and who also dominates on the defensive glass.
His positives are just completely taken for granted by some, as if they didn't matter in the equation.
Bigs who can give you an efficient 21 points (on 60% TS) and 11 rebounds in the postseason don't exactly grow on trees.
The only other players in the last 10 years to average 21ppg or more, 11rpg or more, with a TS of 59% or higher in the postseason (min. 10 games played) are Jokic, Giannis, AD and LeBron.
This is not to say that KAT is these guys or prime Dirk Nowitzki but how about we appreciate this level of production? We can still acklowledge his limitations. But this combination of offense and rebounding is extremely rare.
KnixinSix wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:KAT's a flawed player, everybody knows that.
But he's an All-Star and All-NBA, and the impact metrics generally like him. This doesn't just happen for no reason.
His defensive impact oscillates between neutral and really bad depending on the scheme, the opposition and his mental focus. But he's an elite offensive player who opens up the entire offense by his mere presence and who also dominates on the defensive glass.
His positives are just completely taken for granted by some, as if they didn't matter in the equation.
Bigs who can give you an efficient 21 points (on 60% TS) and 11 rebounds in the postseason don't exactly grow on trees.
The only other players in the last 10 years to average 21ppg or more, 11rpg or more, with a TS of 59% or higher in the postseason (min. 10 games played) are Jokic, Giannis, AD and LeBron.
This is not to say that KAT is these guys or prime Dirk Nowitzki but how about we appreciate this level of production? We can still acklowledge his limitations. But this combination of offense and rebounding is extremely rare.
The reason people are killing him is more Thibs fault than anyone else.
The way Thibs has been utilizing him in the postseason vs elite scoring/passing teams (Celts/Pacers) has exposed/maximized his weaknesses rather than partially cover or minimize them.
Playing him with Mitch helps but never play Brun and KAT together ....not in this matchup. You cant cover up two defensive liabilties vs this type of team. It took him 2 games to realize this.
Chanel Bomber wrote:KnixinSix wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:KAT's a flawed player, everybody knows that.
But he's an All-Star and All-NBA, and the impact metrics generally like him. This doesn't just happen for no reason.
His defensive impact oscillates between neutral and really bad depending on the scheme, the opposition and his mental focus. But he's an elite offensive player who opens up the entire offense by his mere presence and who also dominates on the defensive glass.
His positives are just completely taken for granted by some, as if they didn't matter in the equation.
Bigs who can give you an efficient 21 points (on 60% TS) and 11 rebounds in the postseason don't exactly grow on trees.
The only other players in the last 10 years to average 21ppg or more, 11rpg or more, with a TS of 59% or higher in the postseason (min. 10 games played) are Jokic, Giannis, AD and LeBron.
This is not to say that KAT is these guys or prime Dirk Nowitzki but how about we appreciate this level of production? We can still acklowledge his limitations. But this combination of offense and rebounding is extremely rare.
The reason people are killing him is more Thibs fault than anyone else.
The way Thibs has been utilizing him in the postseason vs elite scoring/passing teams (Celts/Pacers) has exposed/maximized his weaknesses rather than partially cover or minimize them.
Playing him with Mitch helps but never play Brun and KAT together ....not in this matchup. You cant cover up two defensive liabilties vs this type of team. It took him 2 games to realize this.
Unless they play 24 minutes each, their minutes will inevitably overlap.
If one of them plays 36 minutes, as they should, this leaves only 12 minutes for the other. It's not realistic.
But there should be at least one of them on the court at all times. This helps reduce the overlap.
I think they can manage to play together in this matchup with lineups that help mitigate their weaknesses and/or leverage their strengths.
In the end, they'll need to figure it out because we'll need both of them to win this series.
BKlutch wrote:Context wrote:
RESTED!
Garbagelo wrote:Here is the cold hard truth about the Pacers:
Their defense is terrible and you can put anyone in the game and get offensive production vs them because they have poor defensive principles.
Their offense also tends to go cold for no reason, usually because Hali tends to go into fetal position several times a game. During these periods, you need to capitalize.
You need to play your bench because it's not a matter of if but when they produce. If you can rest your starters and have them come back with energy to finish the game, they have a better chance to close it out against the Pacers eventual comeback attempts.
TJ is a very good player but he runs out of gas quick and then becomes a major liability out there. You need to full court press this guy to finish him off quickly. Bring in Wright or Deuce when he comes in and shadow him every second he is out there with physicality.
Siakam has a tendency for hero ball and sometimes he performs well enough to carry the game. In some ways he kinda plays like Randle. Thibs had Randle for years, by now he should know how to get into these player's heads. Late doubles tend to screw this guy up.
When Turner is not in the game, you should simply penetrate 90% of the time, they are too soft to stop drives and play terrible help defense.
If Thibs doesnt get out of his stubborn ways and goes back to mismanagement of game 1 and 2 its over.

nyknicks09 wrote:H_20 wrote:How do the knicks keep coming back by 20pts???
There’s no giving up and that’s something to admire from this team. Just when you think they’re out of it, they make these nice runs like it’s meant to happen. This series took a 20 degree turn on the Knicks favor and next game will show what we are made of.
Hart and KAT came big when it counted along with Thibs giving Wright, and Shamet the nod. He’s fighting to get wins and he matched up well versus Carlisle substitutions.
HarthorneWingo wrote:Anyone watching the replay right now?

Garbagelo wrote:We outputting 30+ in a quarter with KAT and 4 defense first players
If this isn't a revelation for Thibs then he needs to be gone
HarthorneWingo wrote:I thought Shamet gave us good energy off the bench