Himothy Duncan wrote:This series had a lot of promise but will end in 5. Shame.
Well, I was 100% correct on this game, so hopefully I am right about the Wolves taking game 5.
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
Himothy Duncan wrote:This series had a lot of promise but will end in 5. Shame.
Lattimer wrote:Cracks me up that people still think that Wiggins will be involved in the trade for Love. Wolves are out of their mind if they think they are getting Wiggins for Love.
azcatz11 wrote:Rubio9Guy wrote:One of the most frustrating losses I can remember.
Credit to OKC for pulling it out, but man the Wolves should have won this.
I disagree. SGA took over and Chet was huge. They are better no shame
Hoopstar23 wrote:Ant man not a top 5 player and Randle back to "Knicks Randle"
neurotik wrote:Raps Maniac wrote:Risk101 wrote:Inb4 the ass jokes.
But that's his downside.
No thats his backside.
Lowry's upside is mental and psychological.
Calinks wrote:That was a fantastic display by the Thunder, they were damn near perfect in that 4th quarter and they needed to be. What a squad man.
California Gold wrote:Another loss on Cant man.
Never wanna see anyone say he’s better than Luka. Not even close.
Tim_Hardawayy wrote:This OKC thing where they only interview together and act like they're too cool for the questions is pretty cringe. Feels like sincerity is dead in the modern age.
Domz wrote:Well Knicks fans, if the pattern follows suit, looks like the Pacers are winning tomorrow night. Can y'all be the next team to come back from a 3-1 deficit? We shall see.
Marvin Martian wrote:What does MIN do with Randle? He is the 2nd option and they cannot afford him to have 5 points in a critical playoff game
Rubio9Guy wrote:azcatz11 wrote:Rubio9Guy wrote:One of the most frustrating losses I can remember.
Credit to OKC for pulling it out, but man the Wolves should have won this.
I disagree. SGA took over and Chet was huge. They are better no shame
I mean yeah, but if Ant or Julius show up, or they give up 3 fewer offensive rebounds, or turn the ball over once or 2 fewer times, they win that games.
OKC big 3 were awesome tonight, but Wolves gave that game away.
raf1995 wrote:I just don’t think he has that kind of potential. I think we will regret not trading him for a haul in a few years when he’s a mid-tier starter with nice playmaking and defense and a shaky jumper.
dockingsched wrote:Just want to point out that after Naz made his free throws, Randle just stood there under the basket looking lost instead of guarding SGA, the ball, anyone. Just made it super easy to get the ball into SGA. What a mental blunder.
LBJKB24MJ23 wrote:Rubio9Guy wrote:azcatz11 wrote:
I disagree. SGA took over and Chet was huge. They are better no shame
I mean yeah, but if Ant or Julius show up, or they give up 3 fewer offensive rebounds, or turn the ball over once or 2 fewer times, they win that games.
OKC big 3 were awesome tonight, but Wolves gave that game away.
doesn't mean anything because then you're taking away touches from their bench if they were cooking. just because Randle and Ant go off does not mean the rest of the team get their touches and bench scoring.
Tim_Hardawayy wrote:This OKC thing where they only interview together and act like they're too cool for the questions is pretty cringe. Feels like sincerity is dead in the modern age.