ImageImageImage

Free Agent, Trade, Buyout, Extension & Conversion Thread, 2025 con't

Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts

hugepatsfan
General Manager
Posts: 8,802
And1: 9,198
Joined: May 28, 2020
       

Re: Free Agent, Trade, Buyout, Extension & Conversion Thread, 2025 con't 

Post#1061 » by hugepatsfan » Tue May 27, 2025 5:12 pm

Hal14 wrote:I'd love to get PJ in the deal if we move Jrue to Dallas

Read on Twitter


PJ is only 26. Just the right age where he's in his prime, he's already had tons of development, he's already been a solid starter on an NBA finals team.

He fits the timeline with the Jays.

He can come off the bench and be a super reserve wing for us..or you could start him (JB at the 2, JT at the 3, PJ at the 4)..PJ has even been a small ball 5 at times.

He can shoot it..not great but decently well..i bet with out coaches, we could get him shooting even better, like we did for D-white and others.

PJ is also tough, gritty, fearless, a good defender. Doesn't make a ton of $.

With Tatum missing a year with achilles surgery (we'll want to watch his minutes a bit after he comes back too) and JB possibly getting meniscus surgery..having a really solid 3rd wing would be huge.


Whole heartedly agree with you here, I just think it might be too cost prohibitive. Considering age/contract/etc. I think PJ's trade value is more than Jrue, so we'd probably have to include a future 1st and we have a lot of uncertainty with our future now so that's tough to do. Also, on the DAL side, it'd probably have to be Klay in the deal with PJ to make sense. We can't afford to take both back otherwise it defeats the financial purpose of trading Jrue to begin with. So if we're keeping PJ, then that means Klay needs to be outright dumped on his two year deal which probably costs another first.

Unfortunately, I just have a hard time seeing PJ happening here. BUT, really love the player and fit. I guess it is doable if Stevens really wants to pour future resources into the team even with next year being kind of a lost year. I just don't think that's smart to do with our situation with Tatum out and Brown possibly having meniscus surgery. I don't think you start pouring more resources into the team (in terms of future draft capital) yet.
User avatar
BleedGreen1989
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,017
And1: 3,886
Joined: May 18, 2013

Re: Free Agent, Trade, Buyout, Extension & Conversion Thread, 2025 con't 

Post#1062 » by BleedGreen1989 » Tue May 27, 2025 5:14 pm

Hal14 wrote:I'd love to get PJ in the deal if we move Jrue to Dallas

Read on Twitter


PJ is only 26. Just the right age where he's in his prime, he's already had tons of development, he's already been a solid starter on an NBA finals team.

He fits the timeline with the Jays.

He can come off the bench and be a super reserve wing for us..or you could start him (JB at the 2, JT at the 3, PJ at the 4)..PJ has even been a small ball 5 at times.

He can shoot it..not great but decently well..i bet with our coaches, we could get him shooting even better, like we did for D-white and others.

PJ is also tough, gritty, fearless, a good defender. Doesn't make a ton of $.

With Tatum missing a year with achilles surgery (we'll want to watch his minutes a bit after he comes back too) and JB possibly getting meniscus surgery..having a really solid 3rd wing would be huge.


Yup. I’d be very happy with PJ.

Would be tough to take in him and Gafford though as both will be looking for extensions and it wouldn’t make a lot of sense to extend both given the C’s current situation with the cap.
User avatar
165bows
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 21,967
And1: 14,758
Joined: Jan 03, 2013
Location: The land of incremental improvement.

Re: Free Agent, Trade, Buyout, Extension & Conversion Thread, 2025 con't 

Post#1063 » by 165bows » Tue May 27, 2025 5:17 pm

hugepatsfan wrote:
Hal14 wrote:I'd love to get PJ in the deal if we move Jrue to Dallas

Read on Twitter


PJ is only 26. Just the right age where he's in his prime, he's already had tons of development, he's already been a solid starter on an NBA finals team.

He fits the timeline with the Jays.

He can come off the bench and be a super reserve wing for us..or you could start him (JB at the 2, JT at the 3, PJ at the 4)..PJ has even been a small ball 5 at times.

He can shoot it..not great but decently well..i bet with out coaches, we could get him shooting even better, like we did for D-white and others.

PJ is also tough, gritty, fearless, a good defender. Doesn't make a ton of $.

With Tatum missing a year with achilles surgery (we'll want to watch his minutes a bit after he comes back too) and JB possibly getting meniscus surgery..having a really solid 3rd wing would be huge.


Whole heartedly agree with you here, I just think it might be too cost prohibitive. Considering age/contract/etc. I think PJ's trade value is more than Jrue, so we'd probably have to include a future 1st and we have a lot of uncertainty with our future now so that's tough to do. Also, on the DAL side, it'd probably have to be Klay in the deal with PJ to make sense. We can't afford to take both back otherwise it defeats the financial purpose of trading Jrue to begin with. So if we're keeping PJ, then that means Klay needs to be outright dumped on his two year deal which probably costs another first.

Unfortunately, I just have a hard time seeing PJ happening here. BUT, really love the player and fit. I guess it is doable if Stevens really wants to pour future resources into the team even with next year being kind of a lost year. I just don't think that's smart to do with our situation with Tatum out and Brown possibly having meniscus surgery. I don't think you start pouring more resources into the team (in terms of future draft capital) yet.

I like a PJ Washington pump and dump move. Trade for him with one of the outgoing salaries, give him a nice Brad Stevens style extension, then when Tatum is back trade him on his new deal at a net profit asset value wise.

Boston gets his value as a player this year and then his (hopefully improved) trade value a year later. Washington gets to start and take a feature role on a good team he’s prob not finding anywhere else and some solid guaranteed money.
User avatar
GoCeltics123
RealGM
Posts: 17,389
And1: 33,228
Joined: May 05, 2015
         

Re: Free Agent, Trade, Buyout, Extension & Conversion Thread, 2025 con't 

Post#1064 » by GoCeltics123 » Tue May 27, 2025 5:20 pm

Read on Twitter


It's kinda interesting that Shams doesn't guarantee that Jaylen is going to be back in this clip. Like we all know about Jrue and KP but he brought up Jaylen and didn't even mention Derrick White
yeleven11
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,309
And1: 1,633
Joined: Nov 26, 2012

Re: Free Agent, Trade, Buyout, Extension & Conversion Thread, 2025 con't 

Post#1065 » by yeleven11 » Tue May 27, 2025 5:27 pm

GoCeltics123 wrote:
Read on Twitter


It's kinda interesting that Shams doesn't guarantee that Jaylen is going to be back in this clip. Like we all know about Jrue and KP but he brought up jaylen and didn't even mention derrick white


The most interesting from this clip was shams saying “you still have a chance at potentially getting jayson tatum back at the end of the season.” This could change their approach re this upcoming season significantly. If they think he’s coming back, the pure salary dump trades we’ve been discussing here might not be it. We might trade one guy (kp) and run it back if Jt is coming back before next season ends
User avatar
Celts17Pride
RealGM
Posts: 68,028
And1: 69,466
Joined: Nov 27, 2005

Re: Free Agent, Trade, Buyout, Extension & Conversion Thread, 2025 con't 

Post#1066 » by Celts17Pride » Tue May 27, 2025 5:31 pm

I've mention before, my opinion is Porzingis and Hauser will be gone. Anyone else of significance including Jrue Holiday will be a surprise for me. Celtics possibly can move KP and Hauser and resign Horford and Kornet and still be below the 2nd apron.

I just think the Celtics "should" move Holiday because of basketball reasons (decline), age and contract.
Hal14
RealGM
Posts: 21,560
And1: 20,137
Joined: Apr 05, 2019

Re: Free Agent, Trade, Buyout, Extension & Conversion Thread, 2025 con't 

Post#1067 » by Hal14 » Tue May 27, 2025 5:39 pm

BleedGreen1989 wrote:
Hal14 wrote:I'd love to get PJ in the deal if we move Jrue to Dallas

Read on Twitter


PJ is only 26. Just the right age where he's in his prime, he's already had tons of development, he's already been a solid starter on an NBA finals team.

He fits the timeline with the Jays.

He can come off the bench and be a super reserve wing for us..or you could start him (JB at the 2, JT at the 3, PJ at the 4)..PJ has even been a small ball 5 at times.

He can shoot it..not great but decently well..i bet with our coaches, we could get him shooting even better, like we did for D-white and others.

PJ is also tough, gritty, fearless, a good defender. Doesn't make a ton of $.

With Tatum missing a year with achilles surgery (we'll want to watch his minutes a bit after he comes back too) and JB possibly getting meniscus surgery..having a really solid 3rd wing would be huge.


Yup. I’d be very happy with PJ.

Would be tough to take in him and Gafford though as both will be looking for extensions and it wouldn’t make a lot of sense to extend both given the C’s current situation with the cap.

Yeah..given the choice, I'd prefer PJ.

I like Gafford's rebounding and rim protection and he's right in his prime. But he doesn't shoot at all from 3, so might not be the greatest fit here..
1/11/24 The birth of a new Hal. From now on being less combative, avoiding confrontation - like Switzerland :)
User avatar
Celts17Pride
RealGM
Posts: 68,028
And1: 69,466
Joined: Nov 27, 2005

Re: Free Agent, Trade, Buyout, Extension & Conversion Thread, 2025 con't 

Post#1068 » by Celts17Pride » Tue May 27, 2025 5:39 pm

GoCeltics123 wrote:
Read on Twitter


It's kinda interesting that Shams doesn't guarantee that Jaylen is going to be back in this clip. Like we all know about Jrue and KP but he brought up Jaylen and didn't even mention Derrick White

He also says the Celtics have a lot of faith in Jaylen Brown. Kind of a nothing burger. All he says is the Celtics are going to make trades. Anyone of us could have said that.
Hal14
RealGM
Posts: 21,560
And1: 20,137
Joined: Apr 05, 2019

Re: Free Agent, Trade, Buyout, Extension & Conversion Thread, 2025 con't 

Post#1069 » by Hal14 » Tue May 27, 2025 5:41 pm

yeleven11 wrote:
GoCeltics123 wrote:
Read on Twitter


It's kinda interesting that Shams doesn't guarantee that Jaylen is going to be back in this clip. Like we all know about Jrue and KP but he brought up jaylen and didn't even mention derrick white


The most interesting from this clip was shams saying “you still have a chance at potentially getting jayson tatum back at the end of the season.” This could change their approach re this upcoming season significantly. If they think he’s coming back, the pure salary dump trades we’ve been discussing here might not be it. We might trade one guy (kp) and run it back if Jt is coming back before next season ends

Nah, even before Tatum's injury, Wyc said we are gonna get under the 2nd apron this summer..

https://www.sportsbusinessjournal.com/Articles/2025/03/24/celtics-grousbeck-no-nba-team-will-stay-in-second-apron-more-than-two-years/
1/11/24 The birth of a new Hal. From now on being less combative, avoiding confrontation - like Switzerland :)
hugepatsfan
General Manager
Posts: 8,802
And1: 9,198
Joined: May 28, 2020
       

Re: Free Agent, Trade, Buyout, Extension & Conversion Thread, 2025 con't 

Post#1070 » by hugepatsfan » Tue May 27, 2025 5:52 pm

Celts17Pride wrote:I've mention before, my opinion is Porzingis and Hauser will be gone. Anyone else of significance including Jrue Holiday will be a surprise for me. Celtics possibly can move KP and Hauser and resign Horford and Kornet and still be below the 2nd apron.

I just think the Celtics "should" move Holiday because of basketball reasons (decline), age and contract.


If we draft/sign #28 and #32, that will put us $44M over the tax with 14 players signed. If you dealt KP/Hauser for nothing coming back and signed vet min deals to replace, we'd be $7.7M over the tax.

There's a certain point where if you get close enough to ducking the tax altogether, it just doesn't make sense not to take the plunge and go all the way under.
User avatar
Celts17Pride
RealGM
Posts: 68,028
And1: 69,466
Joined: Nov 27, 2005

Re: Free Agent, Trade, Buyout, Extension & Conversion Thread, 2025 con't 

Post#1071 » by Celts17Pride » Tue May 27, 2025 6:16 pm

hugepatsfan wrote:
Celts17Pride wrote:I've mention before, my opinion is Porzingis and Hauser will be gone. Anyone else of significance including Jrue Holiday will be a surprise for me. Celtics possibly can move KP and Hauser and resign Horford and Kornet and still be below the 2nd apron.

I just think the Celtics "should" move Holiday because of basketball reasons (decline), age and contract.


If we draft/sign #28 and #32, that will put us $44M over the tax with 14 players signed. If you dealt KP/Hauser for nothing coming back and signed vet min deals to replace, we'd be $7.7M over the tax.

There's a certain point where if you get close enough to ducking the tax altogether, it just doesn't make sense not to take the plunge and go all the way under.

We all will see but I don''t think right now getting under the tax is something the Celtics are concerned about. The salary cap and aprons are going up every year and I think the Celtics are more concerned with contending in the Tatum/Brown era then ducking the tax. Like I said, we all will find out soon enough.
User avatar
165bows
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 21,967
And1: 14,758
Joined: Jan 03, 2013
Location: The land of incremental improvement.

Re: Free Agent, Trade, Buyout, Extension & Conversion Thread, 2025 con't 

Post#1072 » by 165bows » Tue May 27, 2025 6:29 pm

If there is one thing the Celtics have been elite tier at in this current era it’s knowing which of their guys to move on from.

I think the list of guys who’ve gotten worse is everyone except for Nesmith and Mo Wagner. Everyone else they moved at the peak time.
User avatar
Celts17Pride
RealGM
Posts: 68,028
And1: 69,466
Joined: Nov 27, 2005

Re: Free Agent, Trade, Buyout, Extension & Conversion Thread, 2025 con't 

Post#1073 » by Celts17Pride » Tue May 27, 2025 6:34 pm

165bows wrote:If there is one thing the Celtics have been elite tier at in this current era it’s knowing which of their guys to move on from.

I think the list of guys who’ve gotten worse is everyone except for Nesmith and Mo Wagner. Everyone else they moved at the peak time.

That comment screams Holiday and Porzingis
djFan71
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 13,944
And1: 20,074
Joined: Jul 24, 2010
 

Re: Free Agent, Trade, Buyout, Extension & Conversion Thread, 2025 con't 

Post#1074 » by djFan71 » Tue May 27, 2025 7:38 pm

Celts17Pride wrote:
hugepatsfan wrote:
Celts17Pride wrote:I've mention before, my opinion is Porzingis and Hauser will be gone. Anyone else of significance including Jrue Holiday will be a surprise for me. Celtics possibly can move KP and Hauser and resign Horford and Kornet and still be below the 2nd apron.

I just think the Celtics "should" move Holiday because of basketball reasons (decline), age and contract.


If we draft/sign #28 and #32, that will put us $44M over the tax with 14 players signed. If you dealt KP/Hauser for nothing coming back and signed vet min deals to replace, we'd be $7.7M over the tax.

There's a certain point where if you get close enough to ducking the tax altogether, it just doesn't make sense not to take the plunge and go all the way under.

We all will see but I don''t think right now getting under the tax is something the Celtics are concerned about. The salary cap and aprons are going up every year and I think the Celtics are more concerned with contending in the Tatum/Brown era then ducking the tax. Like I said, we all will find out soon enough.

I’ve been thinking similarly. I don’t think they give up on contending when JT is back. If it costs $20-50M more over a couple years, they could decide it’s worth it.
User avatar
Celts17Pride
RealGM
Posts: 68,028
And1: 69,466
Joined: Nov 27, 2005

Re: Free Agent, Trade, Buyout, Extension & Conversion Thread, 2025 con't 

Post#1075 » by Celts17Pride » Tue May 27, 2025 7:44 pm

Read on Twitter


"Rival teams are expecting Marks to try and acquire a second lottery pick by utilizing the 19th, 26th, and 27th picks in the first round of this year's draft," ClutchPoints wrote. "Talk from Chicago's combine also points to Brooklyn leveraging the eighth pick in a package to try and acquire Harper."
djFan71
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 13,944
And1: 20,074
Joined: Jul 24, 2010
 

Re: Free Agent, Trade, Buyout, Extension & Conversion Thread, 2025 con't 

Post#1076 » by djFan71 » Tue May 27, 2025 7:47 pm

cl2117 wrote:
playa-hater wrote:
cl2117 wrote:BOS in: Patrick William 3/18, Kevin Porter Jr (expiring 2.5m)
BOS out: Jrue, KP, #28

C's shave $42.5m off the books for next year taking them below the tax line with room to spare. Eating Pat Williams contract is tough but next year it doesn't matter and that summer he'll only have 2 years left at $18m which isn't bad trade ballast, especially when you can aggregate again.

MIL in: Jrue
MIL out: Kuzma, Kevin Porter Jr.

Milwaukee brings Jrue back for another go w/ Giannis.

CHI in: KP, Kuzma, Vincent (taken into TPE)
CHI out: Vucevic, Pat Williams, Jevon Carter

Chicago upgrade from Vucevic to KP, shave off a year of Pat Williams contract in exchange for taking on an extra $18m in payroll.

LAL in: Vucevic, Carter
LAL out: Maxi, Vincent

Upgrade at C for basically free

WAS in: Maxi (taken into NTMLE), #28
WAS out: nothing

Sell cap space for a late first.

I'm wondering if upgrading from Vuc to KP and shaving a year off Pat Williams deal is worth moving back from #12 to #18 w/Washington for Chicago. That's probably considerably more appealing to them for eating money (and you could probably have them eat even more). Ideally get some additional scraps off MIL/CHI/LAL who I think all do well here given their limited assets/options.


Not bad ideas. My hard sell would be the difficulty of multi-team trades like this.

Yeah realistically it's 2-3 individually agreed deals stitched together. I think Brad's order of operations is:

1) agree deal to move Jrue
2) agree deal to move KP
3) agree deal to offload contracts we get back from 1/2.

Ideally part of the payment we receive for 1 & 2 ends up being eating salary or assets we can flip to team X to eat money, thereby achieving #3.

djFan71 wrote:Not directly to your proposal. I appreciate the math of this and have made similar ones myself (without 28}. But more and more I’m thinking regardless of what the trade board and Cs writers are saying, both Jrue and KP have real positive value. Jrue will be by far the best player involved in this and most other proposed deals for the next 2 years, and probably the 3rd of his deal as well. Players as good as him just aren’t available that often. KP is more a roll of the dice, but no long term risk due to expiring, and huge upside.

I know the cost savings has some real value that other teams should be compensated for, and new CBA, etc, etc. But, I feel the talent upgrade of acquiring our guys seems to be vastly under valued or forgotten. think we’ll all be pleasantly surprised at what they fetch in deals.
I vacillate between thinking we have to pay to offload both to thinking we could actually end up netting something for either, depends on the day.

I think GM's will ultimately talk themselves into Jrue. His counting stats dipping combined with age/contract are going to scare off armchair GM's, I think real ones will be able to see the on court impact is still there, but there is no denying those last two years at age 36/37 and $35/37m could end up real ugly if Jrue slows down or gets nagged by injuries. KP seems like an easy flip given his production and the lack of long-term commitment that needs to be made to him.

Together I think they should be able to land you back at least all expiring/neutral deals and some savings. The issue comes when you've then got to ditch some of those expiring to get below the line. That's a separate payment and where #28/32 etc. might start coming into play.

So I think we can get Gafford/Klay for Jrue, which is a neutral package, but if we want to dump Klay then that's going to cost a bit and Dallas I don't think will foot the bill (same w/ Milwaukee w/ Kuz and Sac with Derozan etc.).

KP can go to Vuc from the Bulls and/or Maxi/Vincent from the Lakers, but to turn either of those packages into mostly cap space will cost a bit. I think CHI/LAL should pay some/all of that given what they're sending back but depends on the ultimate price from the team eating money for assets.

But yeah I think we can get neutral/positive value for both, but even then there's a 2nd step of paying cap space/TPE/exception teams to absorb whatever we need to get below the line.

I think I just disagree that Gafford / Klay is neutral for Jrue. That is my main difference. I totally agree with everything else you said, and I vacillate quite a bit myself. But, I still believe Jrue will be a flat out better player the next few years for a winning team. Gafford will also probably cost quite a bit more than he currently does for years 2 and 3. Then Klay is also a negative contract at this point. I think it’s on Dallas to upgrade to Jrue and figure out whether to send Klay or a platter of other guys elsewhere. I very well be wrong, though. Cuz of all the reasons you mentioned.
playa-hater
RealGM
Posts: 22,258
And1: 23,879
Joined: Aug 29, 2020
 

Re: Free Agent, Trade, Buyout, Extension & Conversion Thread, 2025 con't 

Post#1077 » by playa-hater » Tue May 27, 2025 7:50 pm

I think Gafford would be a perfect Celtic in that he can play the same way. Cornet did and just roll the rim. And be a vertical space and dunka, while providing a much better defender.

But I also do like p j washington...
2 things need to go.. my lack of spell check and Joe.. :nod:
User avatar
165bows
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 21,967
And1: 14,758
Joined: Jan 03, 2013
Location: The land of incremental improvement.

Re: Free Agent, Trade, Buyout, Extension & Conversion Thread, 2025 con't 

Post#1078 » by 165bows » Tue May 27, 2025 7:52 pm

Celts17Pride wrote:
Read on Twitter


"Rival teams are expecting Marks to try and acquire a second lottery pick by utilizing the 19th, 26th, and 27th picks in the first round of this year's draft," ClutchPoints wrote. "Talk from Chicago's combine also points to Brooklyn leveraging the eighth pick in a package to try and acquire Harper."

Seems like Houston is a prime spot that could make a trade. Not sure they need more young guys with high expectations of playing time.

New Orleans also seems to have a penchant for doing something rash these days as well.
djFan71
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 13,944
And1: 20,074
Joined: Jul 24, 2010
 

Re: Free Agent, Trade, Buyout, Extension & Conversion Thread, 2025 con't 

Post#1079 » by djFan71 » Tue May 27, 2025 7:54 pm

hugepatsfan wrote:
djFan71 wrote:
cl2117 wrote:BOS in: Patrick William 3/18, Kevin Porter Jr (expiring 2.5m)
BOS out: Jrue, KP, #28

C's shave $42.5m off the books for next year taking them below the tax line with room to spare. Eating Pat Williams contract is tough but next year it doesn't matter and that summer he'll only have 2 years left at $18m which isn't bad trade ballast, especially when you can aggregate again.

MIL in: Jrue
MIL out: Kuzma, Kevin Porter Jr.

Milwaukee brings Jrue back for another go w/ Giannis.

CHI in: KP, Kuzma, Vincent (taken into TPE)
CHI out: Vucevic, Pat Williams, Jevon Carter

Chicago upgrade from Vucevic to KP, shave off a year of Pat Williams contract in exchange for taking on an extra $18m in payroll.

LAL in: Vucevic, Carter
LAL out: Maxi, Vincent

Upgrade at C for basically free

WAS in: Maxi (taken into NTMLE), #28
WAS out: nothing

Sell cap space for a late first.

I'm wondering if upgrading from Vuc to KP and shaving a year off Pat Williams deal is worth moving back from #12 to #18 w/Washington for Chicago. That's probably considerably more appealing to them for eating money (and you could probably have them eat even more). Ideally get some additional scraps off MIL/CHI/LAL who I think all do well here given their limited assets/options.

Not directly to your proposal. I appreciate the math of this and have made similar ones myself (without 28}. But more and more I’m thinking regardless of what the trade board and Cs writers are saying, both Jrue and KP have real positive value. Jrue will be by far the best player involved in this and most other proposed deals for the next 2 years, and probably the 3rd of his deal as well. Players as good as him just aren’t available that often. KP is more a roll of the dice, but no long term risk due to expiring, and huge upside.

I know the cost savings has some real value that other teams should be compensated for, and new CBA, etc, etc. But, I feel the talent upgrade of acquiring our guys seems to be vastly under valued or forgotten. think we’ll all be pleasantly surprised at what they fetch in deals.


I think the problem is that a lot of people post "lazy" deals. Not CL, who posted a well thought out idea. But what happens for "casual" discussion is that people just say ok BOS needs to dump a lot of salary and one team has cap space so they get held at gunpoint to give up tons of pick value to clear it all at once". And honestly, if the front office tries to do it all in one swoop like that, they will pay through the nose.

But the smarter thing to do is these type of multi team deals and series of trades vs. one move. Like you said, KP and Holiday still have value on the court. You have to make trades that maximize that value and shave the salary off gradually. This isn't going to get done in one huge move, but non-Celtics fans on the general board and NBA-wide reporters don't usually want to sift through all of that. It's much easier to post one big deal where BOS dumps it all at once.

Absolutely. And, I know it’s fun to figure those things out. I do it all the time myself. But, what I think Brad is great at, that these boards lose sight of sometimes, is knowing the true goal is to keep a contender for JT to rejoin. Ducking the tax this year makes things more sustainable going forward, but at some point the talent/ asset loss outweighs that. Pick 28 isn’t some giant tipping point or anything, but if you come out of this summer with no Jrue, no KP, no Hauser, no pick 28 and no other good players to replace them and your only accomplishment is ducking the tax, you failed.
playa-hater
RealGM
Posts: 22,258
And1: 23,879
Joined: Aug 29, 2020
 

Re: Free Agent, Trade, Buyout, Extension & Conversion Thread, 2025 con't 

Post#1080 » by playa-hater » Tue May 27, 2025 7:55 pm

If I got to mention Gafford and PJ Washington either. Or both would be great role players for a future championship run if possible
2 things need to go.. my lack of spell check and Joe.. :nod:

Return to Boston Celtics