sodmoraes wrote:Only watched Kon highlights, so legit question: what makes him a much better prospect than Kennard? Besides the lazy both white guys comp, both were prety good shooters( but with limited shooting off the dribble), with subpar athleticism, kinda small to play sf, so both may have a hard time defending at the sg position. If we dont pick Bailey i would prefer Tre 100%( or even Edge), just another stratosphere as a shotmaker( off the dribble), with good size and athletic abilitys( altough it may not be that functional). Nipples screams roleplayer to me, like 3rd best player on a contender. Tre can be a Booker kinda player with his ceiling.
The difference between Tre and Kon is you're betting on Tre's length (6'10) helping him translate into defense potential at the next level over Kon's high effort and solid defensive stats in college. I felt Kon's eye test on defense was much better than Tre, but it wasn't as if he was going to be a major difference maker on that end in the NBA.
On offense, Tre was handed the keys and he let it fly from everywhere (and at a pretty good clip given the circumstances). Kon played his role on a stacked team and shot mind boggling percentages, particularly to end the year with even some stretches without Cooper Flagg; won the ACC tournament without him. On this end, you're betting on Tre's shotmaking ability from the perimeter and midrange translating over Kon's three level elite FG percentages and PnR passing. Kon struggled with shots off the dribble while that was Tre's forte. But Tre was useless at the rim and didn't really draw fouls.