Paul George for DeAaron Fox

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

Homerclease
RealGM
Posts: 30,665
And1: 32,696
Joined: Dec 09, 2015

Paul George for DeAaron Fox 

Post#1 » by Homerclease » Tue May 27, 2025 6:45 pm

Philly gives: George, #3 pick.

Philly receives: Fox, Harrison Barnes

Spurs give: Fox/Barnes

Spurs receive: George, #3 pick.

Why for Philly: They get off the terrible PG3 contract and get back an all star caliber player in Fox along with the capable Barnes to fill the wing role in Philly. They’ve shown willingness to deal the third pick and this moves kills two birds with one stone. Getting Embiid immediate help and correcting a past error.

Why for the Spurs: when they traded for Fox they couldn’t have had any idea they’d luck into Dylan Harper. This paves the way for Harper to have an immediate impact and reunites the Rutgers duo. The spurs timeline revolves around the 21 year old Wemby, now they can grow with him, Harper, Ace and Castle. They can afford to eat the George contract in the meantime who can mentor the younger players and still see a significant role
ReggiesKnicks
Veteran
Posts: 2,747
And1: 2,269
Joined: Jan 25, 2025
   

Re: Paul George for DeAaron Fox 

Post#2 » by ReggiesKnicks » Tue May 27, 2025 6:50 pm

I don't think the Spurs want to waste another couple of years of Wemby's cheap contract by getting clearly worse on paper for a few seasons.

The trade for Fox indicated a direction to be competitive in the 2025-2026 season. This goes against that.
the_process
RealGM
Posts: 29,046
And1: 10,298
Joined: May 01, 2010

Re: Paul George for DeAaron Fox 

Post#3 » by the_process » Tue May 27, 2025 6:52 pm

Homerclease wrote:Philly gives: George, #3 pick.

Philly receives: Fox, Harrison Barnes

Spurs give: Fox/Barnes

Spurs receive: George, #3 pick.

Why for Philly: They get off the terrible PG3 contract and get back an all star caliber player in Fox along with the capable Barnes to fill the wing role in Philly. They’ve shown willingness to deal the third pick and this moves kills two birds with one stone. Getting Embiid immediate help and correcting a past error.

Why for the Spurs: when they traded for Fox they couldn’t have had any idea they’d luck into Dylan Harper. This paves the way for Harper to have an immediate impact and reunites the Rutgers duo. The spurs timeline revolves around the 21 year old Wemby, now they can grow with him, Harper, Ace and Castle. They can afford to eat the George contract in the meantime who can mentor the younger players and still see a significant role


No thank you. Hard pass from Philly.
jayjaysee
King of the Trade Board
Posts: 20,740
And1: 7,728
Joined: Aug 05, 2012

Re: Paul George for DeAaron Fox 

Post#4 » by jayjaysee » Tue May 27, 2025 6:54 pm

Maxey and Fox doesn’t seem like a good pairing. Think you need a third team that values Fox as much as SAS did.

If SAS thinks Bailey and Harper are both going to be stars, then you do this and let the team grow slow.
Jojothewhale
Junior
Posts: 477
And1: 318
Joined: Dec 20, 2011

Re: Paul George for DeAaron Fox 

Post#5 » by Jojothewhale » Tue May 27, 2025 6:54 pm

It doesn't matter who's coming back in all of these 3 + PG trades. Embiid's knees are paste. There's no way around this. They're not going to make a win now trade because there's no way to make this roster a contender without him.

All of the messaging from every reporter is if they trade out of 3, it's just for a minor move down in the same draft.
gswhoops
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 34,388
And1: 6,003
Joined: Apr 27, 2005
   

Re: Paul George for DeAaron Fox 

Post#6 » by gswhoops » Tue May 27, 2025 7:00 pm

jayjaysee wrote:Maxey and Fox doesn’t seem like a good pairing. Think you need a third team that values Fox as much as SAS did.

ReggiesKnicks wrote:I don't think the Spurs want to waste another couple of years of Wemby's cheap contract by getting clearly worse on paper for a few seasons.

The trade for Fox indicated a direction to be competitive in the 2025-2026 season. This goes against that.

Agree with both of these - I don't think this one makes sense either way
wemby
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,890
And1: 1,232
Joined: Jun 13, 2023
 

Re: Paul George for DeAaron Fox 

Post#7 » by wemby » Tue May 27, 2025 7:31 pm

In terms of value, Fox + ridding yourself of Paul George (huge negative) > 3rd pick in this draft. On top of that, Fox is not a good fit on the 76ers and Spurs wouldn't trade him anyway, so it's dead on arrival.
User avatar
Bornstellar
General Manager
Posts: 9,475
And1: 22,610
Joined: Mar 05, 2018
 

Re: Paul George for DeAaron Fox 

Post#8 » by Bornstellar » Tue May 27, 2025 7:35 pm

God no. The #3 pick is not enough compensation to take on that disgusting PG contract, let alone having to dump Fox AND Barnes to do it. Pass
User avatar
cpower
RealGM
Posts: 20,787
And1: 8,643
Joined: Mar 03, 2011
   

Re: Paul George for DeAaron Fox 

Post#9 » by cpower » Tue May 27, 2025 8:23 pm

its not a bad trade..PG might be playing ok next year and is Fox the better player? i am not sure

Spurs might have to dump Fox in 2 years anyway
User avatar
Bornstellar
General Manager
Posts: 9,475
And1: 22,610
Joined: Mar 05, 2018
 

Re: Paul George for DeAaron Fox 

Post#10 » by Bornstellar » Tue May 27, 2025 8:46 pm

cpower wrote:its not a bad trade..PG might be playing ok next year and is Fox the better player? i am not sure

Spurs might have to dump Fox in 2 years anyway

Current Fox is a much better player than current PG. This is not 2019 prime Paul George. He is cooked. Fox is in his prime
the_process
RealGM
Posts: 29,046
And1: 10,298
Joined: May 01, 2010

Re: Paul George for DeAaron Fox 

Post#11 » by the_process » Tue May 27, 2025 8:51 pm

wemby wrote:In terms of value, Fox + ridding yourself of Paul George (huge negative) > 3rd pick in this draft. On top of that, Fox is not a good fit on the 76ers and Spurs wouldn't trade him anyway, so it's dead on arrival.


Disagree on value, flip that chevron the other way.

However, agree on the last part for both sides.
User avatar
cpower
RealGM
Posts: 20,787
And1: 8,643
Joined: Mar 03, 2011
   

Re: Paul George for DeAaron Fox 

Post#12 » by cpower » Tue May 27, 2025 9:25 pm

Bornstellar wrote:
cpower wrote:its not a bad trade..PG might be playing ok next year and is Fox the better player? i am not sure

Spurs might have to dump Fox in 2 years anyway

Current Fox is a much better player than current PG. This is not 2019 prime Paul George. He is cooked. Fox is in his prime

problems is Fox is not exactly the player you think he is. He is ranked 136 in RAPM, 120 in DARKO, 98 in EPM and 93 in BPM. If he is in his prime he is cooked as well.
User avatar
Bornstellar
General Manager
Posts: 9,475
And1: 22,610
Joined: Mar 05, 2018
 

Re: Paul George for DeAaron Fox 

Post#13 » by Bornstellar » Tue May 27, 2025 10:00 pm

cpower wrote:
Bornstellar wrote:
cpower wrote:its not a bad trade..PG might be playing ok next year and is Fox the better player? i am not sure

Spurs might have to dump Fox in 2 years anyway

Current Fox is a much better player than current PG. This is not 2019 prime Paul George. He is cooked. Fox is in his prime

problems is Fox is not exactly the player you think he is. He is ranked 136 in RAPM, 120 in DARKO, 98 in EPM and 93 in BPM. If he is in his prime he is cooked as well.

Are those last season numbers? Because I wouldn't put a lot of stock in that. He played through an injury on his shooting hand all season and was checked out before getting traded and didn't have much of a chance to play with Victor before both of their seasons ended.

We're fine with Fox. Another team can enjoy paying 38 year old PG 50M+
One_and_Done
General Manager
Posts: 8,809
And1: 5,474
Joined: Jun 03, 2023

Re: Paul George for DeAaron Fox 

Post#14 » by One_and_Done » Tue May 27, 2025 10:29 pm

Spurs would do this, but Philly never would. In a new environment PG13 likely rehabs his value, and the #3 pick is too good to pass up on. Only problem on the Spurs end would be that they promised to extend Fox, so they can' really go back on that.
Warspite wrote:Billups was a horrible scorer who could only score with an open corner 3 or a FT.
User avatar
cpower
RealGM
Posts: 20,787
And1: 8,643
Joined: Mar 03, 2011
   

Re: Paul George for DeAaron Fox 

Post#15 » by cpower » Tue May 27, 2025 10:50 pm

Bornstellar wrote:
cpower wrote:
Bornstellar wrote:Current Fox is a much better player than current PG. This is not 2019 prime Paul George. He is cooked. Fox is in his prime

problems is Fox is not exactly the player you think he is. He is ranked 136 in RAPM, 120 in DARKO, 98 in EPM and 93 in BPM. If he is in his prime he is cooked as well.

Are those last season numbers? Because I wouldn't put a lot of stock in that. He played through an injury on his shooting hand all season and was checked out before getting traded and didn't have much of a chance to play with Victor before both of their seasons ended.

We're fine with Fox. Another team can enjoy paying 38 year old PG 60M+

sure but even previous season he is not a top 20 guy in the league by all stats. I think Wemby deserves a better 2nd option.
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 58,723
And1: 35,786
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: Paul George for DeAaron Fox 

Post#16 » by jbk1234 » Tue May 27, 2025 10:55 pm

jayjaysee wrote:Maxey and Fox doesn’t seem like a good pairing. Think you need a third team that values Fox as much as SAS did.

If SAS thinks Bailey and Harper are both going to be stars, then you do this and let the team grow slow.


I actually have the Sixers passing here. Fox and Maxey is just an awful pairing.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 69,873
And1: 22,285
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Paul George for DeAaron Fox 

Post#17 » by nate33 » Tue May 27, 2025 11:25 pm

I just don't know how to assess the viability of trading the #3 to offload Paul's contract. We have a reasonable idea of what it costs to buy SRP's and late FRP's because it happens all the time. But we don't really have a frame of reference to assess the cost of buying a #3 pick (or selling a gargantuan bad contract). I just don't think us fans have the perspective. Obviously, no fan wants to sacrifice a high lotto pick just to save money because it's not THEIR money. But presumably, for an owner, there is a dollar value that makes it worth it. What that dollar value is, I can't say.
User avatar
Bornstellar
General Manager
Posts: 9,475
And1: 22,610
Joined: Mar 05, 2018
 

Re: Paul George for DeAaron Fox 

Post#18 » by Bornstellar » Tue May 27, 2025 11:44 pm

cpower wrote:
Bornstellar wrote:
cpower wrote:problems is Fox is not exactly the player you think he is. He is ranked 136 in RAPM, 120 in DARKO, 98 in EPM and 93 in BPM. If he is in his prime he is cooked as well.

Are those last season numbers? Because I wouldn't put a lot of stock in that. He played through an injury on his shooting hand all season and was checked out before getting traded and didn't have much of a chance to play with Victor before both of their seasons ended.

We're fine with Fox. Another team can enjoy paying 38 year old PG 60M+

sure but even previous season he is not a top 20 guy in the league by all stats. I think Wemby deserves a better 2nd option.


I don't necessarily disagree with you there but I don't think he's necessarily Wemby's #2 forever just because he's here now. Spurs can always go out and get another star player at some point. Or if Castle or Harper are that guy in the future then we already have Wemby's #2 and they just need to develop.

I think Fox is a top 25-30ish player in the league but that's not even my point. I'm just saying Spurs dumping their two best vets and taking on PGs horrendous contact isn't enough value for the third pick. There's too big a drop off from Flagg/Harper to the next tier of prospects and tying up 56M in cap for a 38 year old beyond cooked PG sounds awful
tmorgan
RealGM
Posts: 14,214
And1: 9,693
Joined: Feb 04, 2005
Location: San Francisco, CA
   

Re: Paul George for DeAaron Fox 

Post#19 » by tmorgan » Wed May 28, 2025 1:17 am

Not to mention, “reuniting” Harper and Bailey isn’t exactly the best idea anyway. It’s like reuniting oil and water.
axeman23
Analyst
Posts: 3,698
And1: 3,610
Joined: Jul 31, 2009

Re: Paul George for DeAaron Fox 

Post#20 » by axeman23 » Wed May 28, 2025 1:20 am

That PG contract is an UGLY swallow. But if Harper and Ace both hit, they've got 4/5 of a starting line-up for the next 7 or 8 years. And by the time PG has a year to go, you still have the 27 ATL 1st, the 28 Boston 1st, the 2030 Dallas/Minny swap, and the 31 Sac swap to add to him. You also have Vassell and Sochan, and to a lesser extent Johnson and Champagnie, as depth.

Return to Trades and Transactions