Paul George for DeAaron Fox

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

axeman23
Analyst
Posts: 3,698
And1: 3,610
Joined: Jul 31, 2009

Re: Paul George for DeAaron Fox 

Post#21 » by axeman23 » Wed May 28, 2025 1:22 am

tmorgan wrote:Not to mention, “reuniting” Harper and Bailey isn’t exactly the best idea anyway. It’s like reuniting oil and water.


As someone who didn't watch a second of college ball this year, what do you mean? Personality clash? Or game redundancy?
tmorgan
RealGM
Posts: 14,215
And1: 9,694
Joined: Feb 04, 2005
Location: San Francisco, CA
   

Re: Paul George for DeAaron Fox 

Post#22 » by tmorgan » Wed May 28, 2025 1:28 am

axeman23 wrote:
tmorgan wrote:Not to mention, “reuniting” Harper and Bailey isn’t exactly the best idea anyway. It’s like reuniting oil and water.


As someone who didn't watch a second of college ball this year, what do you mean? Personality clash? Or game redundancy?


I only watched a few Rutgers games (vs UM and MSU), but i don’t care how crap the rest of the roster was, if you have two freshman that are top 5 picks, there’s absolutely no way you should suck that bad. Harper didn’t pass much, and Bailey just didn’t pass at all. Your-turn-my-turn offense definitely doesn’t need to be reunited in the pros.

As I’ve stated elsewhere, I’m less than impressed with Harper as the #2 pick, and Bailey is a huge risk wherever he’s selected. Both obviously have talent, but made either made no effort to play winning basketball (Bailey) or just weren’t very good at it (Harper).
Tim Lehrbach
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 26,075
And1: 4,323
Joined: Jul 29, 2001
   

Re: Paul George for DeAaron Fox 

Post#23 » by Tim Lehrbach » Wed May 28, 2025 2:25 am

tmorgan wrote:
axeman23 wrote:
tmorgan wrote:Not to mention, “reuniting” Harper and Bailey isn’t exactly the best idea anyway. It’s like reuniting oil and water.


As someone who didn't watch a second of college ball this year, what do you mean? Personality clash? Or game redundancy?


I only watched a few Rutgers games (vs UM and MSU), but i don’t care how crap the rest of the roster was, if you have two freshman that are top 5 picks, there’s absolutely no way you should suck that bad. Harper didn’t pass much, and Bailey just didn’t pass at all. Your-turn-my-turn offense definitely doesn’t need to be reunited in the pros.

As I’ve stated elsewhere, I’m less than impressed with Harper as the #2 pick, and Bailey is a huge risk wherever he’s selected. Both obviously have talent, but made either made no effort to play winning basketball (Bailey) or just weren’t very good at it (Harper).


This is a tangent but I thought your post was worth responding to.

I'm actually a huge Harper supporter -- I think he's just one of those guys for whom the game seems to slow down, and his skills will catch up quickly -- but this is a fair take on these two. They both have a lot to prove after showing little development as freshmen. In a stronger draft their Rutgers season hurts their stock.

My defense of Harper is twofold: one, I just agree with those who say he'll flourish in a more talented environment with capable teammates; two, I think his inability to elevate Rutgers or look the part of a leader was due to him trying to do too much rather than not having a leadership mindset in him -- and if this latter seems like a distinction without a difference, my point is that while it may have hurt his college team to go helio all the time against defenses focused on stopping him, it reflects a willingness to take charge and responsibility. I think the humility that needs to complement that mindset will come from playing with and against guys who are better than he is. Or, if it doesn't, maybe he busts. I believe in him, though.

As for the trade, Fox makes no sense for Philly, and San Antonio wouldn't ship him so soon after making a blockbuster deal to bring him in. The soonest they'd move him is after he's locked into an extension and agrees to a list of destinations -- this way they recoup value and he is happy. But the more likely scenario is both sides are glad he's in San Antonio and he's in their long-term plans.
Clipsz 4 Life
January 20, 2002-May 17, 2006
Saxon
February 20, 2001-August 9, 2007
Daddy 801
General Manager
Posts: 8,383
And1: 2,896
Joined: May 14, 2013
 

Re: Paul George for DeAaron Fox 

Post#24 » by Daddy 801 » Wed May 28, 2025 5:16 am

Easy pass if I am the Spurs. They aren’t in taking on bad contract time period of the rebuild anymore. PG’s contract sucks.
wegotthabeet
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,472
And1: 3,015
Joined: Jun 29, 2021
 

Re: Paul George for DeAaron Fox 

Post#25 » by wegotthabeet » Wed May 28, 2025 1:22 pm

Jojothewhale wrote:It doesn't matter who's coming back in all of these 3 + PG trades. Embiid's knees are paste. There's no way around this. They're not going to make a win now trade because there's no way to make this roster a contender without him.

All of the messaging from every reporter is if they trade out of 3, it's just for a minor move down in the same draft.


Makes sense, but couldn’t they use the pick to dump George and still get a lottery pick back?
Jojothewhale
Junior
Posts: 477
And1: 318
Joined: Dec 20, 2011

Re: Paul George for DeAaron Fox 

Post#26 » by Jojothewhale » Wed May 28, 2025 1:38 pm

wegotthabeet wrote:
Jojothewhale wrote:It doesn't matter who's coming back in all of these 3 + PG trades. Embiid's knees are paste. There's no way around this. They're not going to make a win now trade because there's no way to make this roster a contender without him.

All of the messaging from every reporter is if they trade out of 3, it's just for a minor move down in the same draft.


Makes sense, but couldn’t they use the pick to dump George and still get a lottery pick back?


In the last week alone, I’ve seen PG + 3 for 21 and PG + 3 for eating Middleton and 18 deemed fair, so this is probably not the place to have that discussion.

The one thing I would say is that keeping PG and hoping for a bounce back to respectable but still well short of a star feels much more reasonable than on many teams because it doesn’t get you anywhere to move him. You’re still on the Embiid makes a miracle recovery or you’re rebuilding anyway timeline. Neither one of those options gets better by leveraging 3 to jettison the contract.
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 58,725
And1: 35,788
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: Paul George for DeAaron Fox 

Post#27 » by jbk1234 » Wed May 28, 2025 1:46 pm

Jojothewhale wrote:
wegotthabeet wrote:
Jojothewhale wrote:It doesn't matter who's coming back in all of these 3 + PG trades. Embiid's knees are paste. There's no way around this. They're not going to make a win now trade because there's no way to make this roster a contender without him.

All of the messaging from every reporter is if they trade out of 3, it's just for a minor move down in the same draft.


Makes sense, but couldn’t they use the pick to dump George and still get a lottery pick back?


In the last week alone, I’ve seen PG + 3 for 21 and PG + 3 for eating Middleton and 18 deemed fair, so this is probably not the place to have that discussion.

The one thing I would say is that keeping PG and hoping for a bounce back to respectable but still well short of a star feels much more reasonable than on many teams because it doesn’t get you anywhere to move him. You’re still on the Embiid makes a miracle recovery or you’re rebuilding anyway timeline. Neither one of those options gets better by leveraging 3 to jettison the contract.


Yeah, until the Sixers know where Embiid is at health wise, they shouldn't pay to get off of PG's money.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
BigGargamel
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,165
And1: 10,831
Joined: Jan 28, 2020
Contact:
     

Re: Paul George for DeAaron Fox 

Post#28 » by BigGargamel » Thu May 29, 2025 7:48 am

This seems to be the rare trade that would be terrible for both teams.

Philly needs to keep that #3 pick. Just hope George can come back and play some next year, and get what you can for him when his contract is one year shorter. They need a real talent on a rookie contract. Even this stubborn jackazz of a GM needs to realize that his Embiid/George duo isn't going to work long term. You got lucky and can now have a Bailey/McCain/Maxey trio moving forward.

The Spurs made that Fox trade in hopes of pushing for the playoffs. They could have made it if Wemby didn't get hurt. Getting the #2 pick is good enough fortune. No reason to switch out Fox, who helps accelerate the timeline a bit, for Bailey, who may take years to develop. You got Fox/Harper/Castle with Wemby. That's exciting.

Easy pass for both.
User avatar
Larry_Russell
RealGM
Posts: 11,372
And1: 5,996
Joined: Jun 23, 2021

Re: Paul George for DeAaron Fox 

Post#29 » by Larry_Russell » Thu May 29, 2025 12:50 pm

George looks like one of the leagues worst contracts.

no way Spurs ruin what they have going for it and the number 3 pick.



Jrue Holiday and Sam hauser to the 76ers

Paul George and Kristaps Porzingis and #3 to Brooklyn

Cam Johnson, Nick Claxton, Jared McCain and #19 to Boston
the_process
RealGM
Posts: 29,051
And1: 10,298
Joined: May 01, 2010

Re: Paul George for DeAaron Fox 

Post#30 » by the_process » Thu May 29, 2025 3:18 pm

Larry_Russell wrote:George looks like one of the leagues worst contracts.

no way Spurs ruin what they have going for it and the number 3 pick.



Jrue Holiday and Sam hauser to the 76ers

Paul George and Kristaps Porzingis and #3 to Brooklyn

Cam Johnson, Nick Claxton, Jared McCain and #19 to Boston


:lol:

Zero chance of this happening.
User avatar
enzino
Veteran
Posts: 2,611
And1: 148
Joined: Apr 24, 2004
Location: ITALIA

Re: Paul George for DeAaron Fox 

Post#31 » by enzino » Thu May 29, 2025 6:40 pm

I'd do Derrick White + 28 + FRP coming from a separate trade of Pritchard + future FRP (top 5 protected)
for
#3 & george
but it must be a very large trade since Boston cannot aggregate salaries while over the second apron
Image

Return to Trades and Transactions