ImageImageImage

Run it Back or Upgrade?

Moderators: Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites, dVs33

Run it Back (No major changes) or Big Upgrade (Star search)

Run it Back
28
53%
Big Upgrade
25
47%
 
Total votes: 53

User avatar
BadMofoPimp
RealGM
Posts: 49,050
And1: 12,513
Joined: Oct 12, 2003
Location: In the Paint

Re: Run it Back or Upgrade? 

Post#221 » by BadMofoPimp » Fri May 23, 2025 7:35 pm

SK21209 wrote:Lakers fan here. Really enjoyed watching your team this year. I know we asked about Duren during the season, do you guys think there’s a Knecht for Duren trade that might make sense to revisit over the summer? We have our 2031 first to trade (when Luka is 31) and up to four swaps I think.

I thought Knecht could make some sense for you guys as a developmental shooter with Beasley and THJ as free agents and Ivey coming back. His defense is certainly a work in progress, but he has the size and athleticism to eventually be a passable wing defender IMO. His shot is legit and I think he’s going to get better and better at attacking close outs. I think it could work if he’s surrounded by athletes like Ausar and Holland. My impression from posts here and Reddit is that Stewart is considered a better player than Duren and the guy to be kept around long term.

But please let me know if I’m completely off on my assessment, I really try not to be the stereotypical Lakers fan demanding everyone’s good players lol. You guys have a fun, hard-working young team that I’d like to see become a mainstay in the East playoffs again.


To be honest, Centers are harder to find than guards then add in to the fact the Pistons have a bunch of guards already, so I would doubt Management would decrease the number of big men just to add another guard. Even with Beasely and THJ as free agents. Beasely wants to come back and the Pistons want him back then having Sasser off the bench with Auser, don't see a deal like this happening regardless if posters like Knect like I do as well. Duren and Cade have a chemistry and friendship as well. Good on paper, but would not happen in my opinion.
Image

Provin Ya'll Wrong!!!
MotownMadness
RealGM
Posts: 38,753
And1: 22,818
Joined: Oct 08, 2013
   

Re: Run it Back or Upgrade? 

Post#222 » by MotownMadness » Fri May 23, 2025 7:52 pm

Yeah it would be difficult to replace Duren after that trade. That a big no from me.
Kalamazoo317
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,326
And1: 2,290
Joined: Nov 23, 2018
   

Re: Run it Back or Upgrade? 

Post#223 » by Kalamazoo317 » Sat May 24, 2025 3:17 am

Snakebites wrote:
Kalamazoo317 wrote:I think it'd have to be more like Reaves for Duren and Fontecchio as a starting point for conversation. I like Duren and wouldn't want to part with him, but getting a young, secondary offensive option might make it worth considering.

There's absolutely no way they'd deal Reaves for Duren.

They can get decent bigmen more cheaply than that.


If they don't want to trade from their excess of playmaking guards, then we should feel no need to deal with them, imo.
User avatar
Snakebites
Forum Mod - Pistons
Forum Mod - Pistons
Posts: 51,184
And1: 18,202
Joined: Jul 14, 2002
Location: Looking not-so-happily deranged
   

Re: Run it Back or Upgrade? 

Post#224 » by Snakebites » Sat May 24, 2025 3:47 am

Kalamazoo317 wrote:
Snakebites wrote:
Kalamazoo317 wrote:I think it'd have to be more like Reaves for Duren and Fontecchio as a starting point for conversation. I like Duren and wouldn't want to part with him, but getting a young, secondary offensive option might make it worth considering.

There's absolutely no way they'd deal Reaves for Duren.

They can get decent bigmen more cheaply than that.


If they don't want to trade from their excess of playmaking guards, then we should feel no need to deal with them, imo.

I guess I’m thinking from a “we can’t extend all of these guys anyway” perspective. Carrying all of these young players on sizable extensions is unlikely to be a viable way forward.

I’m more inclined to package multiple guys to get upgrades, and like I said I wouldn’t do a deal like this without a center to replace Duren in mind. But I can imagine scenarios where shipping a guy like Duren out for more controllable assets might not be a terrible move- those assets can be packaged to attain upgrades, or open up other options.

That’s all I’ll say.
Kalamazoo317
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,326
And1: 2,290
Joined: Nov 23, 2018
   

Re: Run it Back or Upgrade? 

Post#225 » by Kalamazoo317 » Sat May 24, 2025 5:04 am

Trading with the Lakers isn't my favorite thing (they don't really have anything I want), but I'd at least want to go after their best (reasonable) trade asset if I was going to take an offer seriously.

I think if we *did* do a swap like Duren for Reaves, Ivey probably gets moved next, so there'd likely be a domino effect.
DET_Athletics
Pro Prospect
Posts: 984
And1: 240
Joined: Dec 17, 2014
       

Re: Run it Back or Upgrade? 

Post#226 » by DET_Athletics » Tue May 27, 2025 1:40 pm

Both, flipping Fonteccio, Hardaway and 2nds for someone that can help rebound and spread the floor.

Sent from my SM-S908U using RealGM mobile app
Canadafan
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,127
And1: 2,018
Joined: Nov 03, 2014
       

Re: Run it Back or Upgrade? 

Post#227 » by Canadafan » Wed May 28, 2025 9:22 am

If we operate as an above the cap team, we can give our MLE to Beasley? No, right?
What kind of contracts can we give to Tim Dennis and Reed?
bstein14
RealGM
Posts: 32,789
And1: 9,650
Joined: Jun 22, 2001

Re: Run it Back or Upgrade? 

Post#228 » by bstein14 » Wed May 28, 2025 12:53 pm

Canadafan wrote:If we operate as an above the cap team, we can give our MLE to Beasley? No, right?
What kind of contracts can we give to Tim Dennis and Reed?

If we operate as an above the cap team, Beasley could get up to our full MLE ($14.1 million in year one but could be something like 4 years $60+). THJ could then get $24 million with his bird rights and Schroeder could get $17 million. Because we waived Paul Reed and then resigned him he could only get the minimum from us, or we could use the BAE (bi-annual exception) which is about $5.1 million for 1 year or $10.3 over two seasons).

That would be if we didn't want to bring in any other FAs.

We could also operate as an above the cap team and essentially give all three guys(THJ, Schroeder and Beasley) 2 year $15 million deals with 2nd year team options essentially or making the 2nd year non guaranteed and then we'd still have our full MLE because we'd be using bird, early bird, and for Beasley 120% of his previous salary to resign players instead of having to use our exception on them.

That said, I also do think there is a pretty huge incentive to go below the cap because not many teams have cap space and a few teams will desperately need to shed some salary this summer. Also as of right now, only Brooklyn and Detroit could easily have more than the MLE to offer any FAs so its a very slim pickings market. Several teams are pretty much handicapped into only being able to give out minimum contracts due to where they sit.

TL has some tough decisions but some of that could be decided during the draft if they get some good deals to operate as a team with cap space they might renounce FAs with the hope of using the room exception to resign Beasley ($8.8 million).
Crymson
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,769
And1: 765
Joined: Apr 17, 2016

Re: Run it Back or Upgrade? 

Post#229 » by Crymson » Wed May 28, 2025 2:14 pm

Canadafan wrote:If we operate as an above the cap team, we can give our MLE to Beasley? No, right?
What kind of contracts can we give to Tim Dennis and Reed?


They would gain access to the full NTP-MLE (about $14m) by operating as an above-the-cap team, which they would do by signing some combination of Schroder, Hardaway, Reed, and Waters over their cap holds.

Schroder and THJ are eligible for far larger contracts than they'll get, $23 million in year one for Dennis and $54 million (the max) for Tim. Reed can receive only a little more than the minimum.
Kalamazoo317
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,326
And1: 2,290
Joined: Nov 23, 2018
   

Re: Run it Back or Upgrade? 

Post#230 » by Kalamazoo317 » Wed May 28, 2025 2:33 pm

Poll is at 50/50. I think more folks are realizing what we'd have to actually give up in order to majorly upgrade
theBigLip
Forum Mod - Pistons
Forum Mod - Pistons
Posts: 16,879
And1: 3,468
Joined: May 22, 2001
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
       

Re: Run it Back or Upgrade? 

Post#231 » by theBigLip » Wed May 28, 2025 2:52 pm

From a good article in the FreePress:

Pistons cap space 2025

There are two different paths the Pistons can take to roster building this offseason.

In the unlikely scenario they operate as an under-the-cap team, the Pistons will have about $17 million in cap space after Cunningham made third-team All-NBA, increasing his 2025-26 salary from $38.6 million to $46.4 million. However, to use the space, the Pistons would have to renounce the rights to pending unrestricted free agents with Bird Rights in Tim Hardaway Jr. and Dennis Schröder. They could use the money to re-sign Malik Beasley or take in excess salary from another team — think Celtics 3-point shooting forward Sam Hauser — and then would have access to the $8.8 million room mid-level exception.

If the Pistons choose the more likely path to operate as an over-the-cap team (keeping the cap holds of (Hardaway and Schröder), they can use Bird Rights exceptions to re-sign the two while exceeding the salary cap. They would also have access to the non-taxpayer mid-level exception (MLE, $14.1 million) and bi-annual exception (BAE, $5.1 million). They could use the MLE to bring back Beasley, who they don’t have Bird Rights on after he signed a one-year, $6 million deal in 2024 free agency. They could opt to use the MLE to trade for a player whose salary is $14.1 million or less, like Hauser, who makes $10 million in 2025-26.
Crymson
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,769
And1: 765
Joined: Apr 17, 2016

Re: Run it Back or Upgrade? 

Post#232 » by Crymson » Wed May 28, 2025 4:57 pm

theBigLip wrote:From a good article in the FreePress:


Yep. Feel free to ask me anything about the CBA -- I've spent a lot of time learning it over the past however many years.
Canadafan
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,127
And1: 2,018
Joined: Nov 03, 2014
       

Re: Run it Back or Upgrade? 

Post#233 » by Canadafan » Wed May 28, 2025 6:25 pm

Crymson wrote:
theBigLip wrote:From a good article in the FreePress:


Yep. Feel free to ask me anything about the CBA -- I've spent a lot of time learning it over the past however many years.


It will be interesting to see which way we go with this
theBigLip
Forum Mod - Pistons
Forum Mod - Pistons
Posts: 16,879
And1: 3,468
Joined: May 22, 2001
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
       

Re: Run it Back or Upgrade? 

Post#234 » by theBigLip » Wed May 28, 2025 6:34 pm

Canadafan wrote:
Crymson wrote:
theBigLip wrote:From a good article in the FreePress:


Yep. Feel free to ask me anything about the CBA -- I've spent a lot of time learning it over the past however many years.


It will be interesting to see which way we go with this


It seems better to be an over the cap team. So something like this:

Keep the cap holds of Hardaway and Schröder, w Bird Rights
Sign Beasley w non-taxpayer mid-level exception $14.1M max
Get backup PF (don’t know who) w bi-annual exception $5.1M max
Resign Hardaway and Schroder (or use one in sign/trade)

Look for minor trades w Fontecchio and Sassar
Canadafan
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,127
And1: 2,018
Joined: Nov 03, 2014
       

Re: Run it Back or Upgrade? 

Post#235 » by Canadafan » Wed May 28, 2025 6:47 pm

theBigLip wrote:
Canadafan wrote:
Crymson wrote:
Yep. Feel free to ask me anything about the CBA -- I've spent a lot of time learning it over the past however many years.


It will be interesting to see which way we go with this


It seems better to be an over the cap team. So something like this:

Keep the cap holds of Hardaway and Schröder, w Bird Rights
Sign Beasley w non-taxpayer mid-level exception $14.1M max
Get backup PF (don’t know who) w bi-annual exception $5.1M max
Resign Hardaway and Schroder

Look for minor trades w Fontecchio and Sassar


Yes it does.

The other way, we use cap space to sign Beasley. Then use remaining to bring thjr back cheap or use it in a trade(with Fontecchio and Sasser for PJ or Portis?)Then give Shröder 8.8 exception. Hmmmm

Definitely seems more useful to be over the cap.
We could reward Shröder and Tim with fat 1 year deals. To lineup with Tobias expiring and make big splash at deadline with those expiring deals.
Reward Beasley with full MLE deal on multi year deal
Still have BAE of $5.1mil(who could we get with that?)
Still have opportunity to trade Fontecchio and Sasser
theBigLip
Forum Mod - Pistons
Forum Mod - Pistons
Posts: 16,879
And1: 3,468
Joined: May 22, 2001
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
       

Re: Run it Back or Upgrade? 

Post#236 » by theBigLip » Wed May 28, 2025 6:58 pm

Canadafan wrote:
theBigLip wrote:
Canadafan wrote:
It will be interesting to see which way we go with this


It seems better to be an over the cap team. So something like this:

Keep the cap holds of Hardaway and Schröder, w Bird Rights
Sign Beasley w non-taxpayer mid-level exception $14.1M max
Get backup PF (don’t know who) w bi-annual exception $5.1M max
Resign Hardaway and Schroder

Look for minor trades w Fontecchio and Sassar


Yes it does.

The other way, we use cap space to sign Beasley. Then use remaining to bring thjr back cheap or use it in a trade(with Fontecchio and Sasser for PJ or Portis?)Then give Shröder 8.8 exception. Hmmmm

Definitely seems more useful to be over the cap.
We could reward Shröder and Tim with fat 1 year deals. To lineup with Tobias expiring and make big splash at deadline with those expiring deals.
Reward Beasley with full MLE deal on multi year deal
Still have BAE of $5.1mil(who could we get with that?)
Still have opportunity to trade Fontecchio and Sasser


We’d have Bird rights on Schroeder so no exceptions needed.

I don’t think we are getting anything for THJ unless someone is desperate to find an expiring.
Canadafan
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,127
And1: 2,018
Joined: Nov 03, 2014
       

Re: Run it Back or Upgrade? 

Post#237 » by Canadafan » Wed May 28, 2025 7:00 pm

theBigLip wrote:
Canadafan wrote:
theBigLip wrote:
It seems better to be an over the cap team. So something like this:

Keep the cap holds of Hardaway and Schröder, w Bird Rights
Sign Beasley w non-taxpayer mid-level exception $14.1M max
Get backup PF (don’t know who) w bi-annual exception $5.1M max
Resign Hardaway and Schroder

Look for minor trades w Fontecchio and Sassar


Yes it does.

The other way, we use cap space to sign Beasley. Then use remaining to bring thjr back cheap or use it in a trade(with Fontecchio and Sasser for PJ or Portis?)Then give Shröder 8.8 exception. Hmmmm

Definitely seems more useful to be over the cap.
We could reward Shröder and Tim with fat 1 year deals. To lineup with Tobias expiring and make big splash at deadline with those expiring deals.
Reward Beasley with full MLE deal on multi year deal
Still have BAE of $5.1mil(who could we get with that?)
Still have opportunity to trade Fontecchio and Sasser


We’d have Bird rights on Schroeder so no exceptions needed.

I don’t think we are getting anything for THJ unless someone is desperate to find an expiring.
Canadafan
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,127
And1: 2,018
Joined: Nov 03, 2014
       

Re: Run it Back or Upgrade? 

Post#238 » by Canadafan » Wed May 28, 2025 7:02 pm

theBigLip wrote:
Canadafan wrote:
theBigLip wrote:
It seems better to be an over the cap team. So something like this:

Keep the cap holds of Hardaway and Schröder, w Bird Rights
Sign Beasley w non-taxpayer mid-level exception $14.1M max
Get backup PF (don’t know who) w bi-annual exception $5.1M max
Resign Hardaway and Schroder

Look for minor trades w Fontecchio and Sassar


Yes it does.

The other way, we use cap space to sign Beasley. Then use remaining to bring thjr back cheap or use it in a trade(with Fontecchio and Sasser for PJ or Portis?)Then give Shröder 8.8 exception. Hmmmm

Definitely seems more useful to be over the cap.
We could reward Shröder and Tim with fat 1 year deals. To lineup with Tobias expiring and make big splash at deadline with those expiring deals.
Reward Beasley with full MLE deal on multi year deal
Still have BAE of $5.1mil(who could we get with that?)
Still have opportunity to trade Fontecchio and Sasser


We’d have Bird rights on Schroeder so no exceptions needed.

I don’t think we are getting anything for THJ unless someone is desperate to find an expiring.


Oh, I just meant if we were a cap space team. We'd have to use the exception on Shröder and cap space on Beasley and still have 5mil leftover. We could combine that in trading Fontecchio and sasser to afford Portis PJ or other
In this scenario we let Hardaway walk. Shröder takes smaller contract.
Canadafan
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,127
And1: 2,018
Joined: Nov 03, 2014
       

Re: Run it Back or Upgrade? 

Post#239 » by Canadafan » Wed May 28, 2025 7:05 pm

bstein14-
If we operate as an above the cap team, Beasley could get up to our full MLE ($14.1 million in year one but could be something like 4 years $60+). THJ could then get $24 million with his bird rights and Schroeder could get $17 million. Because we waived Paul Reed and then resigned him he could only get the minimum from us, or we could use the BAE (bi-annual exception) which is about $5.1 million for 1 year or $10.3 over two seasons).

Crymson-
Schroder and THJ are eligible for far larger contracts than they'll get, $23 million in year one for Dennis and $54 million (the max) for Tim. Reed can receive only a little more than the minimum

Who's right here?
tmorgan
RealGM
Posts: 14,294
And1: 9,793
Joined: Feb 04, 2005
Location: San Francisco, CA
   

Re: Run it Back or Upgrade? 

Post#240 » by tmorgan » Wed May 28, 2025 7:22 pm

Canadafan wrote:bstein14-
If we operate as an above the cap team, Beasley could get up to our full MLE ($14.1 million in year one but could be something like 4 years $60+). THJ could then get $24 million with his bird rights and Schroeder could get $17 million. Because we waived Paul Reed and then resigned him he could only get the minimum from us, or we could use the BAE (bi-annual exception) which is about $5.1 million for 1 year or $10.3 over two seasons).

Crymson-
Schroder and THJ are eligible for far larger contracts than they'll get, $23 million in year one for Dennis and $54 million (the max) for Tim. Reed can receive only a little more than the minimum

Who's right here?


They’re both right.

Bstein is talking about what we could likely offer in that situation, operating as an over the cap team.
Crymson is talking about what they are eligible for in general from us.

Return to Detroit Pistons