Thomas Sorber thread

Draft talk all year round

Moderators: Duke4life831, Marcus

zzaj
General Manager
Posts: 9,124
And1: 3,665
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
 

Re: Thomas Sorber thread 

Post#81 » by zzaj » Fri May 16, 2025 7:16 pm

babyjax13 wrote:Sorber is a better defender than WCJ. He is also more athleric. He is kind of like a hybrid between WCJ and Gafford? If you were just comping to average centers?


Yeah, maybe something like that...but therein lies the problem for me. I feel like that hybrid with upside is available in most drafts.
Braggins
RealGM
Posts: 14,532
And1: 9,308
Joined: Jan 05, 2014

Re: Thomas Sorber thread 

Post#82 » by Braggins » Fri May 16, 2025 7:29 pm

This may sound kind of weird, but I actually like him on Houston to play the Steven Adams role there long term.
User avatar
EvanZ
RealGM
Posts: 14,925
And1: 4,172
Joined: Apr 06, 2011

Re: Thomas Sorber thread 

Post#83 » by EvanZ » Fri May 16, 2025 8:47 pm

babyjax13 wrote:Sorber is a better defender than WCJ. He is also more athleric. He is kind of like a hybrid between WCJ and Gafford? If you were just comping to average centers?


Horford
User avatar
babyjax13
RealGM
Posts: 35,487
And1: 17,953
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: Fresno, eating Birria
     

Re: Thomas Sorber thread 

Post#84 » by babyjax13 » Fri May 16, 2025 8:50 pm

EvanZ wrote:
babyjax13 wrote:Sorber is a better defender than WCJ. He is also more athleric. He is kind of like a hybrid between WCJ and Gafford? If you were just comping to average centers?


Horford

I agree that Horfors is the high end outcome. Sorber has a lot to like.
Image

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.

JColl
moss_is_1
RealGM
Posts: 10,971
And1: 2,385
Joined: May 20, 2009
   

Re: Thomas Sorber thread 

Post#85 » by moss_is_1 » Sat May 17, 2025 12:33 am

babyjax13 wrote:
EvanZ wrote:
babyjax13 wrote:Sorber is a better defender than WCJ. He is also more athleric. He is kind of like a hybrid between WCJ and Gafford? If you were just comping to average centers?


Horford

I agree that Horfors is the high end outcome. Sorber has a lot to like.

Yeah seems the best outcome. Bigger Horford(Al measure 6'8, 8'11" standing reach and 7'0.75" wingspan)
if he learns to shoot as good as Horford.
kobyz
Rookie
Posts: 1,122
And1: 308
Joined: Oct 31, 2006

Re: Thomas Sorber thread 

Post#86 » by kobyz » Sat May 17, 2025 7:38 pm

Don't you see an Elton Brand clone?
User avatar
EvanZ
RealGM
Posts: 14,925
And1: 4,172
Joined: Apr 06, 2011

Re: Thomas Sorber thread 

Post#87 » by EvanZ » Sat May 17, 2025 9:52 pm

kobyz wrote:Don't you see an Elton Brand clone?


Dang, that's actually one I hadn't thought of, but I like it. Brand was actually pretty awesome but on some bad teams. Huge wingspan like Sorber.
King Ken
General Manager
Posts: 9,777
And1: 5,483
Joined: Jul 01, 2014
   

Re: Thomas Sorber thread 

Post#88 » by King Ken » Sun May 18, 2025 1:08 pm

EvanZ wrote:
babyjax13 wrote:Sorber is a better defender than WCJ. He is also more athleric. He is kind of like a hybrid between WCJ and Gafford? If you were just comping to average centers?


Horford

Don't do this. Horford is miles more athletic coming out of Florida. He's also a superior Basketball player with elite feel, elite movement, he was exceptionally versatile even as a prospect and he had incredible intangibles as well. I feel like every next Horford has been atrociously mislabeled like WCJ, Favors, and now this guy.

The obvious comp is Kurt Thomas.
King Ken
General Manager
Posts: 9,777
And1: 5,483
Joined: Jul 01, 2014
   

Re: Thomas Sorber thread 

Post#89 » by King Ken » Sun May 18, 2025 1:09 pm

kobyz wrote:Don't you see an Elton Brand clone?

Not even close to the post up skills. Brand was elite in the paint. Him, Duncan, and Jah Okafor were three of the best post up guys since 1995. Sorber is good in the post and credible but he's not elite or anywhere close.
Chi town
RealGM
Posts: 29,536
And1: 9,152
Joined: Aug 10, 2004

Re: Thomas Sorber thread 

Post#90 » by Chi town » Sun May 18, 2025 1:34 pm

King Ken wrote:
kobyz wrote:Don't you see an Elton Brand clone?

Not even close to the post up skills. Brand was elite in the paint. Him, Duncan, and Jah Okafor were three of the best post up guys since 1995. Sorber is good in the post and credible but he's not elite or anywhere close.


Thank you.

Some of these comps being thrown around are crazy.
bucknut
Senior
Posts: 526
And1: 268
Joined: Feb 27, 2012

Re: Thomas Sorber thread 

Post#91 » by bucknut » Wed May 28, 2025 5:13 am

King Ken wrote:
kobyz wrote:Don't you see an Elton Brand clone?

Not even close to the post up skills. Brand was elite in the paint. Him, Duncan, and Jah Okafor were three of the best post up guys since 1995. Sorber is good in the post and credible but he's not elite or anywhere close.


I just took a look at him vs Kalkbrenner. He couldn't move him. Tried to make post moves and then had to resort to flingy arms and wrist and hope it goes in.

Lets ask this question though - how much worse is sorbers defense and rebounding then the donovan clingan, mark williams, duren, etc ? His offense is better, and his footspeed on the perimeter is better. Do you take Sorber ahead of those guys ?
King Ken
General Manager
Posts: 9,777
And1: 5,483
Joined: Jul 01, 2014
   

Re: Thomas Sorber thread 

Post#92 » by King Ken » Wed May 28, 2025 10:34 am

bucknut wrote:
King Ken wrote:
kobyz wrote:Don't you see an Elton Brand clone?

Not even close to the post up skills. Brand was elite in the paint. Him, Duncan, and Jah Okafor were three of the best post up guys since 1995. Sorber is good in the post and credible but he's not elite or anywhere close.


I just took a look at him vs Kalkbrenner. He couldn't move him. Tried to make post moves and then had to resort to flingy arms and wrist and hope it goes in.

Lets ask this question though - how much worse is sorbers defense and rebounding then the donovan clingan, mark williams, duren, etc ? His offense is better, and his footspeed on the perimeter is better. Do you take Sorber ahead of those guys ?

His offense isn't better than those guys and I would definitely take those guys as prospects personally over Sorber.

Not a fan of guys who are 5s who struggle at PnR finishing, tend to be below the rim finishers, and lack ideal height

I always feel those guys top out at top 15 centers and while that has value, it's not that much value.

His defense is better for the NBA than those guys. Guys who can switch, protect the paint, and have bulk where they can post defend is really hard to find.
BlazersBroncos
RealGM
Posts: 12,427
And1: 9,978
Joined: Oct 27, 2016

Re: Thomas Sorber thread 

Post#93 » by BlazersBroncos » Wed May 28, 2025 3:09 pm

King Ken wrote:
bucknut wrote:
King Ken wrote:Not even close to the post up skills. Brand was elite in the paint. Him, Duncan, and Jah Okafor were three of the best post up guys since 1995. Sorber is good in the post and credible but he's not elite or anywhere close.


I just took a look at him vs Kalkbrenner. He couldn't move him. Tried to make post moves and then had to resort to flingy arms and wrist and hope it goes in.

Lets ask this question though - how much worse is sorbers defense and rebounding then the donovan clingan, mark williams, duren, etc ? His offense is better, and his footspeed on the perimeter is better. Do you take Sorber ahead of those guys ?

His offense isn't better than those guys and I would definitely take those guys as prospects personally over Sorber.

Not a fan of guys who are 5s who struggle at PnR finishing, tend to be below the rim finishers, and lack ideal height

I always feel those guys top out at top 15 centers and while that has value, it's not that much value.

His defense is better for the NBA than those guys. Guys who can switch, protect the paint, and have bulk where they can post defend is really hard to find.


Sorber isnt better defending than Clingan.

Donovan just posted a 109 DRTG, 1.4 DBPM, 7.5 BLK%, 1.0 DDARKO and 2.2 DLEBRON. Those are fantastic defensive metrics for a rookie big, especially one who had the stamina and tone of a gamer bro.
User avatar
EvanZ
RealGM
Posts: 14,925
And1: 4,172
Joined: Apr 06, 2011

Re: Thomas Sorber thread 

Post#94 » by EvanZ » Wed May 28, 2025 3:53 pm

bucknut wrote:
King Ken wrote:
kobyz wrote:Don't you see an Elton Brand clone?

Not even close to the post up skills. Brand was elite in the paint. Him, Duncan, and Jah Okafor were three of the best post up guys since 1995. Sorber is good in the post and credible but he's not elite or anywhere close.


I just took a look at him vs Kalkbrenner. He couldn't move him. Tried to make post moves and then had to resort to flingy arms and wrist and hope it goes in.

Lets ask this question though - how much worse is sorbers defense and rebounding then the donovan clingan, mark williams, duren, etc ? His offense is better, and his footspeed on the perimeter is better. Do you take Sorber ahead of those guys ?


Kalkbrenner is 23 and Sorber is 19. By the time Sorber is done maturing physically it won't even be close between those two.

But it's a silly discussion anyway because there essentially are no post-up bigs in the NBA anymore other than Jokic. It's just not how NBA offense works and it's not how Sorber is going to succeed so it's a moot point.
bucknut
Senior
Posts: 526
And1: 268
Joined: Feb 27, 2012

Re: Thomas Sorber thread 

Post#95 » by bucknut » Wed May 28, 2025 4:38 pm

EvanZ wrote:
bucknut wrote:
King Ken wrote:Not even close to the post up skills. Brand was elite in the paint. Him, Duncan, and Jah Okafor were three of the best post up guys since 1995. Sorber is good in the post and credible but he's not elite or anywhere close.


I just took a look at him vs Kalkbrenner. He couldn't move him. Tried to make post moves and then had to resort to flingy arms and wrist and hope it goes in.

Lets ask this question though - how much worse is sorbers defense and rebounding then the donovan clingan, mark williams, duren, etc ? His offense is better, and his footspeed on the perimeter is better. Do you take Sorber ahead of those guys ?


Kalkbrenner is 23 and Sorber is 19. By the time Sorber is done maturing physically it won't even be close between those two.

But it's a silly discussion anyway because there essentially are no post-up bigs in the NBA anymore other than Jokic. It's just not how NBA offense works and it's not how Sorber is going to succeed so it's a moot point.



Post ups are not irrelevant when guys like Julius randle been posting up all playoffs and even Myles Turner been scoring on some post move banks every now and then. Its a tertiary way for non dominant bigs to still score points same as they would from a lob.

Sorbers not s black hole as someone with 7-6 wingspan who can hold the middle. Id take him over maulach.
User avatar
EvanZ
RealGM
Posts: 14,925
And1: 4,172
Joined: Apr 06, 2011

Re: Thomas Sorber thread 

Post#96 » by EvanZ » Wed May 28, 2025 5:18 pm

bucknut wrote:
EvanZ wrote:
bucknut wrote:
I just took a look at him vs Kalkbrenner. He couldn't move him. Tried to make post moves and then had to resort to flingy arms and wrist and hope it goes in.

Lets ask this question though - how much worse is sorbers defense and rebounding then the donovan clingan, mark williams, duren, etc ? His offense is better, and his footspeed on the perimeter is better. Do you take Sorber ahead of those guys ?


Kalkbrenner is 23 and Sorber is 19. By the time Sorber is done maturing physically it won't even be close between those two.

But it's a silly discussion anyway because there essentially are no post-up bigs in the NBA anymore other than Jokic. It's just not how NBA offense works and it's not how Sorber is going to succeed so it's a moot point.



Post ups are not irrelevant when guys like Julius randle been posting up all playoffs and even Myles Turner been scoring on some post move banks every now and then. Its a tertiary way for non dominant bigs to still score points same as they would from a lob.

Sorbers not s black hole as someone with 7-6 wingspan who can hold the middle. Id take him over maulach.


Randle was posting up against Lakers and Warriors. Not as easy against OKC who has legit big men. :lol: :lol: :lol:
Braggins
RealGM
Posts: 14,532
And1: 9,308
Joined: Jan 05, 2014

Re: Thomas Sorber thread 

Post#97 » by Braggins » Wed May 28, 2025 7:21 pm

Im still not really sure how Sorber isn't considered the top center in this class.
User avatar
eminence
RealGM
Posts: 17,124
And1: 11,910
Joined: Mar 07, 2015

Re: Thomas Sorber thread 

Post#98 » by eminence » Wed May 28, 2025 7:45 pm

Braggins wrote:Im still not really sure how Sorber isn't considered the top center in this class.


Similar here. Given passing medicals he’s #3 on my board overall.

Great measurables, smart player on both ends.
I bought a boat.
HadAnEffectHere
Veteran
Posts: 2,776
And1: 1,524
Joined: May 19, 2023

Re: Thomas Sorber thread 

Post#99 » by HadAnEffectHere » Thu May 29, 2025 12:02 am

Athletically this guy seems pretty ehhhhhhh.

Not much pop.
EMG518
Veteran
Posts: 2,842
And1: 942
Joined: Mar 11, 2012

Re: Thomas Sorber thread 

Post#100 » by EMG518 » Thu May 29, 2025 3:39 am

eminence wrote:
Braggins wrote:Im still not really sure how Sorber isn't considered the top center in this class.


Similar here. Given passing medicals he’s #3 on my board overall.

Great measurables, smart player on both ends.


Who's game do you see his looking like at the next level which has you taking him at 3.

Return to NBA Draft