Who will likely end up as the Steve Nash, Charles Barkley, Karl Malone of this era?

Moderators: cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, ken6199, Domejandro, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid

schnakenpopanz
General Manager
Posts: 8,865
And1: 3,156
Joined: Dec 05, 2008
Location: Germany
Contact:
 

Re: Who will likely end up as the Steve Nash, Charles Barkley, Karl Malone of this era? 

Post#21 » by schnakenpopanz » Thu May 29, 2025 1:46 pm

Optms wrote:
schnakenpopanz wrote:
Kingdibs19 wrote:Nash was just overrated.

Not this again. I can write pages why he was underrated, but i think it is just an opinion.
without Nash and D#antoni and Don Nelson's Warriors we would have a different NBA today.


What did Nash's Suns change exactly? The league was still running a predominantly big man centric roster in regards to building contenders.

It was not until Curry that the game genuinely changed, seemingly overnight (2015). Comments like this that credit Nash are why people call him overrated.

The early 2000's Celtics were way ahead of the Suns of shooting 3's and running. The Wizards were playing the same way while the Suns were active and we never give those teams credit. No one ever mentions Gilbert Arenas as being the guy that all guards play like today. When in reality, those Wizards teams resemble what teams look like now way more than the Suns.

The difference was that it turned into success with an otherwise unbalanced roaster. At least in retrospective. That does not mean that the tother things you mention are wrong though.
Ishiba is a BUSINESS MAN!
The Servant
Rookie
Posts: 1,101
And1: 1,326
Joined: Dec 26, 2022
   

Re: Who will likely end up as the Steve Nash, Charles Barkley, Karl Malone of this era? 

Post#22 » by The Servant » Thu May 29, 2025 1:56 pm

Kingdibs19 wrote:
Quattro wrote:
Kingdibs19 wrote:Nash was just overrated.


Casual


The media told you Nash deserved two MVPs and you believed them. The same amount as Shaq and Kobe combined :lol: Moving goal posts to pretend Nash is an ATG is casual and we all know why you and everyone and 1 you wants to pretend he is an ATG.


50/40/90 shooter who averaged 11.5 apg and kept knocking Kobe out of the yoffs while pulling off 60 wins.

Kobe fans were celebrating his 30 ppg on 44% and 1st round exits saying it was more valuable. Its a debate.
TheGeneral99
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,079
And1: 5,373
Joined: Mar 11, 2023
   

Re: Who will likely end up as the Steve Nash, Charles Barkley, Karl Malone of this era? 

Post#23 » by TheGeneral99 » Thu May 29, 2025 1:57 pm

Chris Paul, Lillard, George, Harden, Embiid are likely the guy right now.
TheGeneral99
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,079
And1: 5,373
Joined: Mar 11, 2023
   

Re: Who will likely end up as the Steve Nash, Charles Barkley, Karl Malone of this era? 

Post#24 » by TheGeneral99 » Thu May 29, 2025 2:01 pm

Optms wrote:
schnakenpopanz wrote:
Kingdibs19 wrote:Nash was just overrated.

Not this again. I can write pages why he was underrated, but i think it is just an opinion.
without Nash and D#antoni and Don Nelson's Warriors we would have a different NBA today.


What did Nash's Suns change exactly? The league was still running a predominantly big man centric roster in regards to building contenders.

It was not until Curry that the game genuinely changed, seemingly overnight (2015). Comments like this that credit Nash are why people call him overrated.

The early 2000's Celtics were way ahead of the Suns of shooting 3's and running. The Wizards were playing the same way while the Suns were active and we never give those teams credit. No one ever mentions Gilbert Arenas as being the guy that all guards play like today. When in reality, those Wizards teams resemble what teams look like now way more than the Suns.


No this incorrect.

Suns actually were built similar to todays teams...you had Amare who was an undersized center, and then you had great shooters surrounding him like Nash, Marion, Joe Johnson, Richardson etc. They didn't play the traditional power forward and center...you had Amare who is really a power forward playing center on a small ball team.

Then in 2005-2006 with Amare injured the Suns went even smaller with Nash, Bell, Marion, Jones, Thomas. Kurt Thomas was 6'9 and not a true center, but you had 4 really good shooters around him led by the pace of Nash.

Remember the Suns in 2004-2005 led the league in 3 pointers averaging 25 a game.

In 2005-2006 the Suns led the league again in 3 pointers averaging 26 a game...when the league average was closer to 16 a game.

It was also the run and gun pace that the Suns played with that we hadn't really seen before.

The Suns averaged 98.6 possessions per game that season, most in the league en route to 62 wins in D'Antoni's first full season as coach. Although the league as a whole was still playing slower than it had five years earlier, the Suns were the forerunners of a revolution. The NBA had received a jump start that would propel it into a new golden age, a better age -- one in which speed is a virtue and a pull-up 3-pointer in transition sends fans into mass hysteria. Nearly 14 years after those pickup games in Phoenix, the Western Conference finals between the Golden State Warriors and Houston Rockets are a formal celebration of the fact that what was once merely an idea has become the NBA's new normal.

Today, the Suns' "Seven Seconds or Less" offense of 2004-05 would be unexceptional when measured by possessions per 48 minutes. Back then, Phoenix's 98.6 pace was more than a possession per game faster than that of any other NBA team.
User avatar
Pattycakes
General Manager
Posts: 8,485
And1: 2,090
Joined: Nov 01, 2005
Contact:
     

Re: Who will likely end up as the Steve Nash, Charles Barkley, Karl Malone of this era? 

Post#25 » by Pattycakes » Thu May 29, 2025 2:04 pm

schnakenpopanz wrote:ATG but no championships as the leader of their team.
I can think of Luka if nothing changes soon.


Yeah Luka is gonna be ring chasing on the other pretenders soon enough..
Somewhere trying not to offend Texas Chuck.
tsherkin
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 89,680
And1: 29,636
Joined: Oct 14, 2003
 

Re: Who will likely end up as the Steve Nash, Charles Barkley, Karl Malone of this era? 

Post#26 » by tsherkin » Thu May 29, 2025 2:04 pm

schnakenpopanz wrote:What moste people forget MVP has always been a mixture of regular season success, team success and Offensive Output. Nash led the best offenses (ATG in Rating for years) that does not mean that others weren't great too. There are always multiple things true at the same time. Just because others are great does not mean the player/team you support was trash. In fact it shows how hard the competition was these days.


Indeed. And each MVP is won in a given environment, right? If Shaq hadn't been Miami Shaq at the time, then he might have taken an MVP from Nash. If Lebron had been a little further along, etc, etc.
User avatar
Chuck Everett
RealGM
Posts: 18,666
And1: 20,983
Joined: May 28, 2004
Location: Los Angeles
   

Re: Who will likely end up as the Steve Nash, Charles Barkley, Karl Malone of this era? 

Post#27 » by Chuck Everett » Thu May 29, 2025 2:06 pm

It seems like the MVP caliber players win rings in this era, so I am not sure. Guys like Lillard haven't ever been that good.

So from that criteria, it looks like Harden, Embiid and Westbrook
"Kill 'em with Grindness."
TheGeneral99
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,079
And1: 5,373
Joined: Mar 11, 2023
   

Re: Who will likely end up as the Steve Nash, Charles Barkley, Karl Malone of this era? 

Post#28 » by TheGeneral99 » Thu May 29, 2025 2:11 pm

Chuck Everett wrote:It seems like the MVP caliber players win rings in this era, so I am not sure. Guys like Lillard haven't ever been that good.

So from that criteria, it looks like Harden, Embiid and Westbrook


If your criteria is strictly MVP caliber players I agree and also CP3 should be in that list even though he never won MVP but he's always been an MVP caliber player in his prime.
FlyingArrow
Starter
Posts: 2,479
And1: 1,574
Joined: May 29, 2018
   

Re: Who will likely end up as the Steve Nash, Charles Barkley, Karl Malone of this era? 

Post#29 » by FlyingArrow » Thu May 29, 2025 2:17 pm

Embiid could be in the discussion here. If he comes back as his old self for another 2 or 3 years, then yeah he's one of the answers. (Unless, of course, it leads to a ring.)

If he doesn't, then he's more like Ralph Sampson or Grant Hill.
NZB2323
RealGM
Posts: 13,913
And1: 10,510
Joined: Aug 02, 2008

Re: Who will likely end up as the Steve Nash, Charles Barkley, Karl Malone of this era? 

Post#30 » by NZB2323 » Thu May 29, 2025 2:25 pm

Chris Paul and James Harden.

I don’t think that Embiid and Westbrook are on that level. Embiid has never made a conference finals and Westbrook has never won a playoff series as the best player on his team.
Kingdibs19
Starter
Posts: 2,359
And1: 4,441
Joined: Aug 30, 2019

Re: Who will likely end up as the Steve Nash, Charles Barkley, Karl Malone of this era? 

Post#31 » by Kingdibs19 » Thu May 29, 2025 3:01 pm

Quattro wrote:
schnakenpopanz wrote:
Kingdibs19 wrote:Nash was just overrated.

Not this again. I can write pages why he was underrated, but i think it is just an opinion.
without Nash and D#antoni and Don Nelson's Warriors we would have a different NBA today.


Why bother? He will just cry about Kobe not winning an mvp in response. Waste of time


Not a Kobe fan at all, don’t even have him top 10. But it’s undeniable that he’s in a different class than Nash. Shaq is the most dominant player of all time. It’s amazing you guys can say with a straight face that Steve no D Nash with 0 playoff success deserves the same amount of MVPs as Kobe & Shaq. Embarrassing really, guys will bend straws to justify giving a guy averaging 15.5ppg an MVP and again we all know why you guys do that.
KembaWalker wrote:If you think you need a gun to answer the door, you probably shouldn’t answer the door. Call the police


Re: innocent ex military Roger Fortson gunned down by police at his own house
tsherkin
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 89,680
And1: 29,636
Joined: Oct 14, 2003
 

Re: Who will likely end up as the Steve Nash, Charles Barkley, Karl Malone of this era? 

Post#32 » by tsherkin » Thu May 29, 2025 3:03 pm

Kingdibs19 wrote:Shaq is the most dominant player of all time.


No he isn't, that's just something he liked to say about himself.

It’s amazing you guys can say with a straight face that Steve no D Nash with 0 playoff success deserves the same amount of MVPs as Kobe & Shaq. Embarrassing really, guys will bend straws to justify giving a guy averaging 15.5ppg an MVP and again we all know why you guys do that.


Ah. Scoring fetishism. You have a good one.
schnakenpopanz
General Manager
Posts: 8,865
And1: 3,156
Joined: Dec 05, 2008
Location: Germany
Contact:
 

Re: Who will likely end up as the Steve Nash, Charles Barkley, Karl Malone of this era? 

Post#33 » by schnakenpopanz » Thu May 29, 2025 3:11 pm

Kingdibs19 wrote:
Quattro wrote:
schnakenpopanz wrote:Not this again. I can write pages why he was underrated, but i think it is just an opinion.
without Nash and D#antoni and Don Nelson's Warriors we would have a different NBA today.


Why bother? He will just cry about Kobe not winning an mvp in response. Waste of time


Not a Kobe fan at all, don’t even have him top 10. But it’s undeniable that he’s in a different class than Nash. Shaq is the most dominant player of all time. It’s amazing you guys can say with a straight face that Steve no D Nash with 0 playoff success deserves the same amount of MVPs as Kobe & Shaq. Embarrassing really, guys will bend straws to justify giving a guy averaging 15.5ppg an MVP and again we all know why you guys do that.


0 playoff success is not true. It is not at Embiid's level. He was close to the finals multiple times.
Ishiba is a BUSINESS MAN!
celtics543
Analyst
Posts: 3,182
And1: 3,210
Joined: Dec 29, 2004
       

Re: Who will likely end up as the Steve Nash, Charles Barkley, Karl Malone of this era? 

Post#34 » by celtics543 » Thu May 29, 2025 3:15 pm

None of them will. Jordan won 6 rings in the 90's. No one is winning 6 rings in a decade. The last 7 years we've had 7 different champions. That eliminates a lot of Barkley/Malone/Nash potential.
User avatar
SkyBill40
Head Coach
Posts: 7,399
And1: 6,142
Joined: Oct 24, 2014
Location: Phoenix
       

Re: Who will likely end up as the Steve Nash, Charles Barkley, Karl Malone of this era? 

Post#35 » by SkyBill40 » Thu May 29, 2025 3:29 pm

Kingdibs19 wrote:
Quattro wrote:
Kingdibs19 wrote:Nash was just overrated.


Casual


The media told you Nash deserved two MVPs and you believed them. The same amount as Shaq and Kobe combined :lol: Moving goal posts to pretend Nash is an ATG is casual and we all know why you and everyone and 1 you wants to pretend he is an ATG.


Lemme see...

Gaslighting, arguing from false authority, straw man... :crazy:

We get it: You're a Lakers guy. But that doesn't mean Nash's contributions or awards were unwarranted. Your opinion is just that and isn't some absolute truth.
SweaterBae wrote:It's the perfect trade when nobody is happy.
User avatar
HMFFL
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 53,435
And1: 10,021
Joined: Mar 10, 2004

Re: Who will likely end up as the Steve Nash, Charles Barkley, Karl Malone of this era? 

Post#36 » by HMFFL » Thu May 29, 2025 3:36 pm

Kingdibs19 wrote:Nash was just overrated.
Thank you for informing the forum that you don't know a thing about basketball.
dhsilv2
RealGM
Posts: 49,051
And1: 26,456
Joined: Oct 04, 2015

Re: Who will likely end up as the Steve Nash, Charles Barkley, Karl Malone of this era? 

Post#37 » by dhsilv2 » Thu May 29, 2025 4:13 pm

Mavrelous wrote:Harden and Embiid are the obvious choices.
Lillard isn't on that tier IMO, he's a tier below.
Luka will have hard time having a proper roster around him in LA, we'll see how it goes.


Embiid is on that tier in terms of talent. But with his injuries, is he actually there?
Mavrelous
Forum Mod - Mavericks
Forum Mod - Mavericks
Posts: 18,624
And1: 16,279
Joined: Aug 20, 2020

Re: Who will likely end up as the Steve Nash, Charles Barkley, Karl Malone of this era? 

Post#38 » by Mavrelous » Thu May 29, 2025 4:18 pm

dhsilv2 wrote:
Mavrelous wrote:Harden and Embiid are the obvious choices.
Lillard isn't on that tier IMO, he's a tier below.
Luka will have hard time having a proper roster around him in LA, we'll see how it goes.


Embiid is on that tier in terms of talent. But with his injuries, is he actually there?

He was the MVP and 2 other top 2 finishes, and he was the scoring leader, this puts you at a higher tier IMO.
His career is short and his PO failures are well documented but Lillard isn't more accomplished in the PO, he has 1 conference finals IIRC.
Defense wins draft lotteries!
Statlanta
RealGM
Posts: 13,801
And1: 10,454
Joined: Mar 06, 2016

Re: Who will likely end up as the Steve Nash, Charles Barkley, Karl Malone of this era? 

Post#39 » by Statlanta » Thu May 29, 2025 4:37 pm

Kingdibs19 wrote:
Quattro wrote:
Kingdibs19 wrote:Nash was just overrated.


Casual


The media told you Nash deserved two MVPs and you believed them. The same amount as Shaq and Kobe combined :lol: Moving goal posts to pretend Nash is an ATG is casual and we all know why you and everyone and 1 you wants to pretend he is an ATG.


Nash detractors say he played on stacked casts yet nobody he played with in Phoenix post-Dallas is in the HOF.

Nash lead the greatest offenses of all time with no HOF teammates as an unathletic Canadian 6"0" PG.

He did this while Kobe was asking off his roster and Shaq was getting carried by another HOF SG.
Modern NBA footwork

GREY wrote: He steps back into another time zone
dhsilv2
RealGM
Posts: 49,051
And1: 26,456
Joined: Oct 04, 2015

Re: Who will likely end up as the Steve Nash, Charles Barkley, Karl Malone of this era? 

Post#40 » by dhsilv2 » Thu May 29, 2025 4:37 pm

Mavrelous wrote:
dhsilv2 wrote:
Mavrelous wrote:Harden and Embiid are the obvious choices.
Lillard isn't on that tier IMO, he's a tier below.
Luka will have hard time having a proper roster around him in LA, we'll see how it goes.


Embiid is on that tier in terms of talent. But with his injuries, is he actually there?

He was the MVP and 2 other top 2 finishes, and he was the scoring leader, this puts you at a higher tier IMO.
His career is short and his PO failures are well documented but Lillard isn't more accomplished in the PO, he has 1 conference finals IIRC.


Oh Lillard is completely out of this discussion. Embiid is the one who's interesting because you're right he's got some great regular seasons, but it's not even his playoff play that's in question...but he just keeps getting hurt.

Return to The General Board