Who will likely end up as the Steve Nash, Charles Barkley, Karl Malone of this era?

Moderators: Clav, bwgood77, bisme37, zimpy27, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, Dirk, Domejandro, ken6199, infinite11285

User avatar
NO-KG-AI
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 44,248
And1: 20,366
Joined: Jul 19, 2005
Location: The city of witch doctors, and good ol' pickpockets

Re: Who will likely end up as the Steve Nash, Charles Barkley, Karl Malone of this era? 

Post#61 » by NO-KG-AI » Thu May 29, 2025 10:01 pm

dhsilv2 wrote:
sp6r=underrated wrote:
dhsilv2 wrote:
2001 both Shaq and Duncan had a great case for it. Then somehow AI got it...


My frustration with the "OMG Shaq only has one MVP crowd" isn't that they think he should have won more MVPs. I see two other seasons where a credible case can be made for him winning MVP: 2001 and 1995. My frustration with this crowd is they treat him as an obvious MVP candidate for all of those other seasons when it really does hold up to scrutiny if you look at his RS.


99 is another one I would think. But frankly I'd have given it to Duncan and Malone. Agree 100%, Shaq was the best player in 2000 by a mile. 2001 he and Duncan were close enough. After that the man started missing games while the MVP's were playing 80ish.

Where things get annoying is the whole "nash has as many MVP's as Kobe and Shaq". Well ok? So what? Nobody ranks nash ahead of them. He was just the MVP twice and they weren't. And it was perfectly reasonable for Kobe and Shaq to have 2 combined.


Nash also peaked very high and did some historic things offensively in an opportune time… leBron was still finding his footing and was merely a top 5 player, and not the era defining player he would become. The first Nash MVP, Shaq was 2nd, and was putting up 22/10 and looked like he had fallen real far from his early 2000’s self. Kobe was hurt, and didn’t even register a single MVP vote, not even 5th place.

The next year, Shaq played 59 games and was clear second fiddle to Wade, and got 0 votes. Kobe was putting up historic scoring on a bad team, and finished closer to 5th place Chauncey Billups in voting than he did to Nash.

Nash didn’t steal any from Kobe/Shaq. Shaq honestly shouldn’t have been as close as he was to Nash in voting his first year with Miami. If anything, Amare going down, and losing Joe Johnson and Q Rich, and replacing them all with Kurt Thomas, Boris Diaw, and Raja Bell and still winning 54 games just really kept LeBron from getting his first MVP a few years sooner lol.
Doctor MJ wrote:I don't understand why people jump in a thread and say basically, "This thing you're all talking about. I'm too ignorant to know anything about it. Lollerskates!"
schnakenpopanz
General Manager
Posts: 9,037
And1: 3,329
Joined: Dec 05, 2008
Location: Germany
Contact:
 

Re: Who will likely end up as the Steve Nash, Charles Barkley, Karl Malone of this era? 

Post#62 » by schnakenpopanz » Thu May 29, 2025 10:02 pm

tonyreyes123 wrote:Lol why are people naming players whose careers are 80-90% over?

For the new guys:
Embiid
Brunson
Booker
Trae

Booker had one MVP consideration season and has regressed since. I would not put him in a top tier level though it might change so quick. Once you get a ring people judge you differentley.
Ishiba is a BUSINESS MAN!
Godymas
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,855
And1: 4,628
Joined: Feb 27, 2016

Re: Who will likely end up as the Steve Nash, Charles Barkley, Karl Malone of this era? 

Post#63 » by Godymas » Thu May 29, 2025 10:03 pm

it's gonna be Luka

he's crossing paths with SGA, Ant Edwards, eventually Wemby and San Antonio are going to be a problem.
iggymcfrack
RealGM
Posts: 12,061
And1: 9,499
Joined: Sep 26, 2017

Re: Who will likely end up as the Steve Nash, Charles Barkley, Karl Malone of this era? 

Post#64 » by iggymcfrack » Thu May 29, 2025 10:06 pm

Chris Paul for sure. Already the greatest player ever to never win a ring IMO and I really don’t see him suddenly breaking the streak at 40. Harden I don’t see quite on the level of those other guys, but he’s definitely the next greatest active player not to win a ring.

As far as more in their prime guys, it does seem like it might be kinda tough for Luka and he could enter that group at some point. With the incredible collections of young talent in Oklahoma City, San Antonio, and Houston, it’s going to be pretty difficult for Luka to win without just joining a better player in his 30s.
Hornet Mania
General Manager
Posts: 9,161
And1: 8,659
Joined: Jul 05, 2014
Location: Dornbirn, Austria
     

Re: Who will likely end up as the Steve Nash, Charles Barkley, Karl Malone of this era? 

Post#65 » by Hornet Mania » Thu May 29, 2025 10:09 pm

CP3 and Harden will always stick out for me. They're both just one ring away from vaulting way up the all-time rankings, much like the guys mentioned in the OP.

It's even more striking because if they had just not collapsed against the Super Warriors they'd have done it in legendary fashion. It was all right in front of them.
The4thHorseman
General Manager
Posts: 9,550
And1: 6,105
Joined: Jun 18, 2011

Re: Who will likely end up as the Steve Nash, Charles Barkley, Karl Malone of this era? 

Post#66 » by The4thHorseman » Thu May 29, 2025 10:23 pm

Kingdibs19 wrote:
Quattro wrote:
Kingdibs19 wrote:Nash was just overrated.


Casual


The media told you Nash deserved two MVPs and you believed them. The same amount as Shaq and Kobe combined :lol: Moving goal posts to pretend Nash is an ATG is casual and we all know why you and everyone and 1 you wants to pretend he is an ATG.

Kobe's lucky to have his 1
MavsDirk41 wrote:

Utah was a dynasty in the 90s
Blazers had a mini dynasty late 80s early 90s
Bankai
RealGM
Posts: 33,814
And1: 28,662
Joined: Oct 16, 2006
Location: Toronto, ON
       

Re: Who will likely end up as the Steve Nash, Charles Barkley, Karl Malone of this era? 

Post#67 » by Bankai » Thu May 29, 2025 10:26 pm

Should've been Durant.
But Harden and Paul are the easy ones.
D.Brasco
RealGM
Posts: 10,689
And1: 10,451
Joined: Nov 17, 2006

Re: Who will likely end up as the Steve Nash, Charles Barkley, Karl Malone of this era? 

Post#69 » by D.Brasco » Thu May 29, 2025 11:38 pm

boomershadow wrote:Harden


This is the obvious answer. Luka's only 26, plenty of years left to win a ring. LeBron and MJ were still ringless at 26.
bkkrh
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,671
And1: 2,255
Joined: Apr 12, 2024
 

Re: Who will likely end up as the Steve Nash, Charles Barkley, Karl Malone of this era? 

Post#70 » by bkkrh » Fri May 30, 2025 12:02 am

Kingdibs19 wrote:
Quattro wrote:
Kingdibs19 wrote:Nash was just overrated.


Casual


The media told you Nash deserved two MVPs and you believed them. The same amount as Shaq and Kobe combined :lol: Moving goal posts to pretend Nash is an ATG is casual and we all know why you and everyone and 1 you wants to pretend he is an ATG.


And Moses Malone has 3. Does it maybe have to do more with the fact that this is a seasonal award and that a player can in that sense get lucky/unlucky based on who else is having a great season?
akula1488
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,495
And1: 529
Joined: Nov 12, 2006

Re: Who will likely end up as the Steve Nash, Charles Barkley, Karl Malone of this era? 

Post#71 » by akula1488 » Fri May 30, 2025 3:20 am

regular season MVPs that don't have a ring?
So it is Embiid, Harden and Westbrook.
doogie_hauser
Head Coach
Posts: 7,050
And1: 8,409
Joined: Feb 04, 2024
         

Re: Who will likely end up as the Steve Nash, Charles Barkley, Karl Malone of this era? 

Post#72 » by doogie_hauser » Fri May 30, 2025 4:56 am

My money is on Luka Doncic
Ritzo
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,967
And1: 2,883
Joined: Dec 06, 2016
 

Re: Who will likely end up as the Steve Nash, Charles Barkley, Karl Malone of this era? 

Post#73 » by Ritzo » Fri May 30, 2025 6:56 am

Kingdibs19 wrote:Nash was just overrated.

These were Nash numbers in the playoffs in his prime.
2005: 23.9 ppg, 11.3 apg, 4.8 rpg, 52% FG, 39% 3P, 92% FT (15 Games)
2006: 20.4 ppg, 10.2 apg, 3.7 rpg, 50% FG, 37% 3P, 91% FT (20 Games without Amare)
2007: 18.9 ppg, 13.3 apg, 3.2 rpg, 46% FG, 47% 3P, 89% FT (11 Games)

Without the bad luck like injuries, suspensions, Tim Donaghy, he would've won at least 1 title
User avatar
Black Jack
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,821
And1: 7,351
Joined: Jan 24, 2013
Location: In the stands kicking ass
     

Re: Who will likely end up as the Steve Nash, Charles Barkley, Karl Malone of this era? 

Post#74 » by Black Jack » Fri May 30, 2025 7:17 am

Anybody who thinks the Lakers won't somehow acquire a second star and win at least one ring with Luka is naive :lol:
Rest in peace Kobe & Gianna

my response to KD critics: https://tinyurl.com/tlgc6bf
schnakenpopanz
General Manager
Posts: 9,037
And1: 3,329
Joined: Dec 05, 2008
Location: Germany
Contact:
 

Re: Who will likely end up as the Steve Nash, Charles Barkley, Karl Malone of this era? 

Post#75 » by schnakenpopanz » Fri May 30, 2025 7:57 am

Black Jack wrote:Anybody who thinks the Lakers won't somehow acquire a second star and win at least one ring with Luka is naive :lol:

Time will tell. I think it is up to when LeBron leaves and retires. It could be so easy to pay for vet min, but you know ego...
Ishiba is a BUSINESS MAN!
MMyhre
Starter
Posts: 2,354
And1: 1,000
Joined: Jun 29, 2010

Re: Who will likely end up as the Steve Nash, Charles Barkley, Karl Malone of this era? 

Post#76 » by MMyhre » Fri May 30, 2025 9:58 am

AbeVigodaLive wrote:
MMyhre wrote:Edwards, Doncic and Brunson come to mind. The Lakers are just so ass in the frontcourt, idk how u fix that quickly, seems like Luka is potentially shaping up tho, still a long shot vs Thunder, Pacers?, Spurs?, Nuggets? (Murray shapes up again, injury free MPJ they are contenders again). I dont believe in the Wolves unless they find out the Gobert situation, not working.



Edwards is only 23. LOL. I don't think the next couple years with Gobert will define his entire career.

I doubt he wins one in Minnesota... but there are so many unknowns that I wouldn't put anyone with that much success at that young of an age on such a list.

Well he is also has subpar bball iq, a lot of odd offcourt stuff going on, and windows close fast in this league. Its easy to say Harden.
User avatar
Beethoven
General Manager
Posts: 7,756
And1: 4,701
Joined: May 03, 2012
Location: Utopian Dystopia
 

Re: Who will likely end up as the Steve Nash, Charles Barkley, Karl Malone of this era? 

Post#77 » by Beethoven » Fri May 30, 2025 2:56 pm

Optms wrote:Lakers, if nothing changes?

They literally just got Luka a few months ago. Give them a freaking off season. The Lakers track record shows Luka will win a title or two before two thirds of the league will.

Magic, Shaq, Kobe, Lebron. Luka is next in line. So enjoy your small market Finals now while you can. You will all be crying how unfair it is again. :lol:

8-)
Kobe Bryant forever
GO LAKERS
8-)
I've heard it through the grapevine..NBA gods have already designated Los Angeles LAKERS as NBA Champions in near future. The destiny is real. TRUST ME.
User avatar
KayDee35
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,530
And1: 1,839
Joined: Sep 05, 2009
Location: Whinery
   

Re: Who will likely end up as the Steve Nash, Charles Barkley, Karl Malone of this era? 

Post#78 » by KayDee35 » Fri May 30, 2025 4:46 pm

Ritzo wrote:
Kingdibs19 wrote:Nash was just overrated.

These were Nash numbers in the playoffs in his prime.
2005: 23.9 ppg, 11.3 apg, 4.8 rpg, 52% FG, 39% 3P, 92% FT (15 Games)
2006: 20.4 ppg, 10.2 apg, 3.7 rpg, 50% FG, 37% 3P, 91% FT (20 Games without Amare)
2007: 18.9 ppg, 13.3 apg, 3.2 rpg, 46% FG, 47% 3P, 89% FT (11 Games)

Without the bad luck like injuries, suspensions, Tim Donaghy, he would've won at least 1 title


Nash was an offensive savant. The MVPs were well deserved and the offensive dominance of those teams was greater than the sum of their parts, made possible only by Nash's running the point.

One of the few players who actually improved his numbers in the postseason!
Jokic can't jump because of his gravity
There's only one GOAT and it's the Billy GOAT
User avatar
SkyBill40
General Manager
Posts: 8,273
And1: 6,938
Joined: Oct 24, 2014
Location: Phoenix
       

Re: Who will likely end up as the Steve Nash, Charles Barkley, Karl Malone of this era? 

Post#79 » by SkyBill40 » Sat May 31, 2025 3:38 am

KayDee35 wrote:
Ritzo wrote:
Kingdibs19 wrote:Nash was just overrated.

These were Nash numbers in the playoffs in his prime.
2005: 23.9 ppg, 11.3 apg, 4.8 rpg, 52% FG, 39% 3P, 92% FT (15 Games)
2006: 20.4 ppg, 10.2 apg, 3.7 rpg, 50% FG, 37% 3P, 91% FT (20 Games without Amare)
2007: 18.9 ppg, 13.3 apg, 3.2 rpg, 46% FG, 47% 3P, 89% FT (11 Games)

Without the bad luck like injuries, suspensions, Tim Donaghy, he would've won at least 1 title


Nash was an offensive savant. The MVPs were well deserved and the offensive dominance of those teams was greater than the sum of their parts, made possible only by Nash's running the point.

One of the few players who actually improved his numbers in the postseason!
Also, seeing the true nature of the award itself, if you take Nash off any of those teams... there's no way they are as successful. No way.

Sent from my SM-F936U using RealGM mobile app
SweaterBae wrote:It's the perfect trade when nobody is happy.
Biff
Veteran
Posts: 2,783
And1: 1,570
Joined: Jun 10, 2007
Contact:
 

Re: Who will likely end up as the Steve Nash, Charles Barkley, Karl Malone of this era? 

Post#80 » by Biff » Sat May 31, 2025 6:04 am

Luka if he doesn't start taking conditioning seriously. Reports are he is taking it more seriously this offseason though.
"Now everybody wanna play for the heat and the Lakers? Let's go back to being competitive and going at these peoples!" - Kevin Durant

Return to The General Board