dhsilv2 wrote:sp6r=underrated wrote:dhsilv2 wrote:
2001 both Shaq and Duncan had a great case for it. Then somehow AI got it...
My frustration with the "OMG Shaq only has one MVP crowd" isn't that they think he should have won more MVPs. I see two other seasons where a credible case can be made for him winning MVP: 2001 and 1995. My frustration with this crowd is they treat him as an obvious MVP candidate for all of those other seasons when it really does hold up to scrutiny if you look at his RS.
99 is another one I would think. But frankly I'd have given it to Duncan and Malone. Agree 100%, Shaq was the best player in 2000 by a mile. 2001 he and Duncan were close enough. After that the man started missing games while the MVP's were playing 80ish.
Where things get annoying is the whole "nash has as many MVP's as Kobe and Shaq". Well ok? So what? Nobody ranks nash ahead of them. He was just the MVP twice and they weren't. And it was perfectly reasonable for Kobe and Shaq to have 2 combined.
Nash also peaked very high and did some historic things offensively in an opportune time… leBron was still finding his footing and was merely a top 5 player, and not the era defining player he would become. The first Nash MVP, Shaq was 2nd, and was putting up 22/10 and looked like he had fallen real far from his early 2000’s self. Kobe was hurt, and didn’t even register a single MVP vote, not even 5th place.
The next year, Shaq played 59 games and was clear second fiddle to Wade, and got 0 votes. Kobe was putting up historic scoring on a bad team, and finished closer to 5th place Chauncey Billups in voting than he did to Nash.
Nash didn’t steal any from Kobe/Shaq. Shaq honestly shouldn’t have been as close as he was to Nash in voting his first year with Miami. If anything, Amare going down, and losing Joe Johnson and Q Rich, and replacing them all with Kurt Thomas, Boris Diaw, and Raja Bell and still winning 54 games just really kept LeBron from getting his first MVP a few years sooner lol.


































