PG: And Our Daughters Shall Be Named Kat Brunson

MrDollarBills · Post #221 » by **MrDollarBills** » Fri May 30, 2025 3:24 am

Capn'O wrote:
2010 wrote:

Read on Twitter

Keep. Playing. The. Defensive. Guards.

Wright and Shamet both were +4

1 steal and 1 rebound each.

Wright had 3 assists (shot 0-4 tho). Shamet hit a 3

I think Thibs needs to keep playing these guys.

Guano · Post #222 » by **Guano** » Fri May 30, 2025 3:24 am

2010 wrote:

Read on Twitter

Siakam big mad

Watch on YouTube

HarthorneWingo · Post #223 » by **HarthorneWingo** » Fri May 30, 2025 3:24 am

Clyde_Style wrote:
2010 wrote:

Read on Twitter

Siakam big mad

This is a good sign

They shook

I think we'll be looser than a 1980s hooker on 42nd Street

Well, he’s not wrong. What else is there to say?

RHODEY · Post #224 » by **RHODEY** » Fri May 30, 2025 3:25 am

Guano wrote:I dont know why but that win changed the whole offseason

We didnt get gentleman's swept

We should be up 3-2

I feel soooo much better about this team.

Logical probably not but damn that was such a huge win. This team is really close. All that blowing up the team talk was premature.

Yeo because now we know we should be up if we had paid attention to detail in game one, and Thibs had subbed Payne out for Shamut /Delon sooner.
Our familiarity as a team might be what costs us this series....but thats fixable...and ofcourse we can beat those clowns.

Fat Kat · Post #225 » by **Fat Kat** » Fri May 30, 2025 3:25 am

Worst_to_First · Post #226 » by **Worst_to_First** » Fri May 30, 2025 3:26 am

NoDopeOnSundays wrote:It seems like they found something with KAT + Bench defenders, it's worked every time we've gone to it, and tonight is no different. Also, it seemed like a joke but Precious did give us good minutes, all we need is bodies against this team.

In his limited minutes, it looks like Precious might be our best shot in containing Siakam.

JXL · Post #227 » by **JXL** » Fri May 30, 2025 3:26 am

Read on Twitter

3toheadmelo · Post #228 » by **3toheadmelo** » Fri May 30, 2025 3:27 am

Guano wrote:

Put chahell in time out!!! The audacity of him trying to trade our cap.

And green Satan too!!

2010 · Post #229 » by **2010** » Fri May 30, 2025 3:27 am

HarthorneWingo wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:
2010 wrote:

Read on Twitter

Siakam big mad

This is a good sign

They shook

I think we'll be looser than a 1980s hooker on 42nd Street

Well, he’s not wrong. What else is there to say?

Reporter is just doing his job there. He basically just wants to know why the Pacers didn’t come out with a sense of urgency to close the series out. He’s insinuating they shouldn’t have another team playing harder than them in a close out game. Let a sleeping dog lie but the Pacers have given the Knicks hope now.

Siakam is just in his feelings and being emotional and unprofessional. Even the “Who is this guy? What’s your name?” part at the end was salty, patronizing and disrespectful.

Context · Post #230 » by **Context** » Fri May 30, 2025 3:27 am

Read on Twitter

3toheadmelo · Post #231 » by **3toheadmelo** » Fri May 30, 2025 3:27 am

Context wrote:this was funny

Read on Twitter

LMAO

Post #232 » by **Capn'O** » Fri May 30, 2025 3:28 am

MrDollarBills wrote:
Capn'O wrote:
2010 wrote:

Read on Twitter

Keep. Playing. The. Defensive. Guards.

Wright and Shamet both were +4

1 steal and 1 rebound each.

Wright had 3 assists (shot 0-4 tho). Shamet hit a 3

I think Thibs needs to keep playing these guys.

Us holding their minutes and keeping jb fresh is one of the keys.

Guano · Post #233 » by **Guano** » Fri May 30, 2025 3:28 am

RHODEY wrote:
Guano wrote:I dont know why but that win changed the whole offseason

We didnt get gentleman's swept

We should be up 3-2

I feel soooo much better about this team.

Logical probably not but damn that was such a huge win. This team is really close. All that blowing up the team talk was premature.

Yeo because now we know we should be up if we had paid attention to detail in game one, and Thibs had subbed Payne out for Shamut /Delon sooner.
Our familiarity as a team might be what costs us this series....but thats fixable...and ofcourse we can beat those clowns.

Im 100% with this.

Not only did we give one away, we have the biggest win of the series. We blew em out.

Were legit contenders. We showed oit better than the fraudulent cavs too.

We're here.

LFGK · Post #234 » by **LFGK** » Fri May 30, 2025 3:28 am

Guano wrote:
H_20 wrote:Knicks showed a lot of heart and balls. Proud of them.

Same man

Couldnt watch Hali celebrate at MSG

You won't watch him celebrate Saturday night nor Monday don't worry, they pick him up 94 feet and it isn't that easy for him, play a little aggressive(if refs allow it) and they fold

Clyde_Style · Post #235 » by **Clyde_Style** » Fri May 30, 2025 3:29 am

matchman wrote:
KnicksGadfly wrote:Good gritty defense. They took more free throws than us, made more threes, and we still won.

Scores in the paint are in huge favour at our side.

I agree.

I was arguing for it in the GT saying we should continue attacking as long as our D was disruptive and it worked.

The time to slow it down tonight was the last six minutes of the game, but prior to that attacking them in the paint worked for us.

Context · Post #236 » by **Context** » Fri May 30, 2025 3:29 am

Read on Twitter

2010 · Post #237 » by **2010** » Fri May 30, 2025 3:29 am

Read on Twitter

2010 · Post #238 » by **2010** » Fri May 30, 2025 3:29 am

Read on Twitter

Enzo954 · Post #239 » by **Enzo954** » Fri May 30, 2025 3:29 am

Lord Commander wrote:We sexed those bumboclaaaat pumpums. BOOYAKA!!!

Ona Tursday

Strick · Post #240 » by **Strick** » Fri May 30, 2025 3:29 am