ImageImageImageImageImage

How is this not a super Mid plan? what's the pitch on our direction

Moderators: DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX, 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford

Pointgod
RealGM
Posts: 24,067
And1: 24,400
Joined: Jun 28, 2014

Re: How is this not a super Mid plan? what's the pitch on our direction 

Post#141 » by Pointgod » Fri May 30, 2025 8:00 pm

canada_dry wrote:
Pointgod wrote:
Potential wrote:We'll see how we look after the offseason. I know the Pacers run to the Finals is a big inspiration right now


Huge difference with us and the Pacers is that Pacers traded away vets for young assets and picks. They traded an allstar Center for a 21 year old guard averaging 14 and 7 who turned into an all-nba player. They traded Malcolm Brogdan to get Aaron Nesmith and a first round pick. They traded Caris Levert to get picks that became Ben Shepard and Andrew Nembhard. They sucked for 3 straight seasons to end up with the 13th, 6th and 8th picks. So when it came time to trade for Siakam they got him for free without affecting their depth.

We’ve done the opposite where we’ve traded picks to save money and get veteran help, then tried to fast track a rebuild. Now we’re paying close to luxury tax for team whose ceiling is a first round knockout.
My guy. You're talking about the pacers. A team thats known for basically NEVER tanking/rebuilding historically, rather building from the middle/retooling. Just check their history dating back to the 90s. Buildung from the middle is something masai tries to do as well, historically. You're barking up the wrong tree here.

Sent from my SM-G960W using RealGM mobile app


The Pacers were also a team that didn’t trade picks for role players and were content with just building through the draft until they were in a position to make a big move for Siakam.

Masai can build a playoff team from the middle but he’s not had to start from scratch which is why he’s seemingly rushed the process in an effort to make this team a playoff team. This very much reminds me of how the Bulls and Kings have operated over the past few years.
earthtone
Junior
Posts: 474
And1: 573
Joined: Nov 25, 2024
     

Re: How is this not a super Mid plan? what's the pitch on our direction 

Post#142 » by earthtone » Fri May 30, 2025 8:01 pm

Duffman100 wrote:
M3tro wrote:Our season is hinging on Brandon Ingram and he's made of glass.

He hasn't played over 65 games in a season since his rookie year 8+ years ago. That shouldn't just be glossed over.


How has that possibly been glossed over?

It also conveniently skews that he played 64 games last season and two of those years were 72 game seasons where he played 85% of the games, which translates to 70 games in a full 82 game year. All of this while being in what's widely considered one of the worst organizations in the league when it comes to player health.

No one's confusing BI's health record with Mikal Bridges', but I don't think his track record is as horrible as it seems. Excluding this season, he played 75% of total games in his career. Not ironman status but not terrible, especially considering the state of the Pelicans franchise.
Fairview4Life
RealGM
Posts: 70,161
And1: 34,003
Joined: Jul 25, 2005
     

Re: How is this not a super Mid plan? what's the pitch on our direction 

Post#143 » by Fairview4Life » Fri May 30, 2025 8:01 pm

9. Similarly, IF THOU HAST SPENT the entire offseason predicting that thy team will stink, thou shalt not gloat, nor even be happy, shouldst thou turn out to be correct. Realistic analysis is fine, but be a fan first, a smug smarty-pants second.
User avatar
ash_k
RealGM
Posts: 16,375
And1: 9,116
Joined: Apr 14, 2010
         

Re: How is this not a super Mid plan? what's the pitch on our direction 

Post#144 » by ash_k » Fri May 30, 2025 8:06 pm

Jadoogar wrote:
ash_k wrote:
M3tro wrote:Our season is hinging on Brandon Ingram and he's made of glass.

He hasn't played over 65 games in a season since his rookie year 8+ years ago. That shouldn't just be glossed over.

without all the injuries
IQ|RJ|Ochai(Gradey)|Scottie|Yak would have made the playoffs! Now just add a lengthy closer in there, a super skilled one..even if he plays 65 games as long as the others play their regular number of games, the playoffs are guaranteed


lol i love how you guys say this every year.

Brandon Ingram teams haven't been great in the past.

When the Pelicans were not injured the team was actually top3 in the west but then injuries kept striking them
As I have mentioned a couple of times, that Suns series, he looked like a future great.
We have greatly benefited from those injuries, to get him at a relatively low price. In McK, new environment and our medical team we trust!
Sinant wrote:I treat the Phoenix/Cleveland/Boston Shaqs like I do Wizards MJ. Never happened.
sidsid
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,983
And1: 3,805
Joined: Jun 03, 2003

Re: How is this not a super Mid plan? what's the pitch on our direction 

Post#145 » by sidsid » Fri May 30, 2025 8:07 pm

The general strategy is very much that.

For Masai's entire tenure, the one deviation from this was the the Lowry trade being nixed by Dolan. Ever since then, the plan is to make the playoffs and various asset draining plays teeing up a potential Kawhi type move.

The Giannis FA, Durant sweepstakes, Lillard sweepstakes. The various falls into the lottery have just been failures to get to mid. Hiccups along the way.

Masai has no interest in the Ainge Celtics, Presti OKC (two times!), Hinkie Sixers version of contender building. He's a Morrey Rockets, Pacers always, Bulls type of guy.

Embiid would be a heavy favourite to end up here had the Sixers lost their pick.
TorontoRapsFan
Starter
Posts: 2,056
And1: 1,426
Joined: May 11, 2017
       

Re: How is this not a super Mid plan? what's the pitch on our direction 

Post#146 » by TorontoRapsFan » Fri May 30, 2025 8:24 pm



This should be a post you have to include in every thread starting post.
Image
User avatar
Jcity08
RealGM
Posts: 12,954
And1: 18,070
Joined: May 06, 2018
       

Re: How is this not a super Mid plan? what's the pitch on our direction 

Post#147 » by Jcity08 » Fri May 30, 2025 8:25 pm

ash_k wrote:
Jcity08 wrote:The longterm plan for Ingram I believe is to rebuild his value and move him down the line when things inevitably dont work out.

Trust me, there are other teams to support, to be a bit more joyful.

How about you find a new team? Thats the level of dailogue you like to have right? I dont leave my teams when things go sour.
Image
Image

Signed with team T.W.O for the 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 season.
earthtone
Junior
Posts: 474
And1: 573
Joined: Nov 25, 2024
     

Re: How is this not a super Mid plan? what's the pitch on our direction 

Post#148 » by earthtone » Fri May 30, 2025 8:25 pm

ash_k wrote:
Jadoogar wrote:
ash_k wrote:without all the injuries
IQ|RJ|Ochai(Gradey)|Scottie|Yak would have made the playoffs! Now just add a lengthy closer in there, a super skilled one..even if he plays 65 games as long as the others play their regular number of games, the playoffs are guaranteed


lol i love how you guys say this every year.

Brandon Ingram teams haven't been great in the past.

When the Pelicans were not injured the team was actually top3 in the west but then injuries kept striking them
As I have mentioned a couple of times, that Suns series, he looked like a future great.
We have greatly benefited from those injuries, to get him at a relatively low price. In McK, new environment and our medical team we trust!

Yah, Brandon Ingram teams haven't been great in the past because the Pelicans have been one of the worst organizations in the league for pretty much their entire existence. Pretty much everyone who makes it out of that org goes on to have more success at their next stops.

Randle moved to the East and became an all-star 3x in 5 years. Jrue moved to the East and was a starter on two championship teams. AD moved to LAL and won a chip. Dyson Daniels became the MIP and 1st-team all defence his first year outside New Orleans and called the Pelicans a "cursed" organization.

Guys like Josh Hart, Naji Marshall, and NAW all became key starters/rotation players on good teams.

If you can be good on the Pelicans, you can be great in a good franchise, and I'd bet on Ingram continuing that trend this year.
User avatar
ash_k
RealGM
Posts: 16,375
And1: 9,116
Joined: Apr 14, 2010
         

Re: How is this not a super Mid plan? what's the pitch on our direction 

Post#149 » by ash_k » Fri May 30, 2025 8:28 pm

Jcity08 wrote:
ash_k wrote:
Jcity08 wrote:The longterm plan for Ingram I believe is to rebuild his value and move him down the line when things inevitably dont work out.

Trust me, there are other teams to support, to be a bit more joyful.

How about you find a new team? Thats the level of dailogue you like to have right? I dont leave my teams when things go sour.

allright then I will leave to your "team negative"! Meanwhile I look forward to watching BI and them lead us to the playoffs
Sinant wrote:I treat the Phoenix/Cleveland/Boston Shaqs like I do Wizards MJ. Never happened.
M3tro
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,994
And1: 3,650
Joined: Mar 15, 2018

Re: How is this not a super Mid plan? what's the pitch on our direction 

Post#150 » by M3tro » Fri May 30, 2025 8:36 pm

Duffman100 wrote:
M3tro wrote:Our season is hinging on Brandon Ingram and he's made of glass.

He hasn't played over 65 games in a season since his rookie year 8+ years ago. That shouldn't just be glossed over.


How has that possibly been glossed over?


Read the thread.

His inability to stay healthy takes a backseat to the rhetoric of him being a 28 year old All-Star scorer to some posters.

The reality is that to be successful next season we need Ingram to be as healthy as he was 8+ years ago. That's asking for a lot.
YogurtProducer
RealGM
Posts: 29,928
And1: 32,727
Joined: Jul 22, 2013
Location: Saskatchewan
       

Re: How is this not a super Mid plan? what's the pitch on our direction 

Post#151 » by YogurtProducer » Fri May 30, 2025 8:36 pm

Pointgod wrote:
canada_dry wrote:
Pointgod wrote:
Huge difference with us and the Pacers is that Pacers traded away vets for young assets and picks. They traded an allstar Center for a 21 year old guard averaging 14 and 7 who turned into an all-nba player. They traded Malcolm Brogdan to get Aaron Nesmith and a first round pick. They traded Caris Levert to get picks that became Ben Shepard and Andrew Nembhard. They sucked for 3 straight seasons to end up with the 13th, 6th and 8th picks. So when it came time to trade for Siakam they got him for free without affecting their depth.

We’ve done the opposite where we’ve traded picks to save money and get veteran help, then tried to fast track a rebuild. Now we’re paying close to luxury tax for team whose ceiling is a first round knockout.
My guy. You're talking about the pacers. A team thats known for basically NEVER tanking/rebuilding historically, rather building from the middle/retooling. Just check their history dating back to the 90s. Buildung from the middle is something masai tries to do as well, historically. You're barking up the wrong tree here.

Sent from my SM-G960W using RealGM mobile app


The Pacers were also a team that didn’t trade picks for role players and were content with just building through the draft until they were in a position to make a big move for Siakam.

Masai can build a playoff team from the middle but he’s not had to start from scratch which is why he’s seemingly rushed the process in an effort to make this team a playoff team. This very much reminds me of how the Bulls and Kings have operated over the past few years.

The Pacers traded a 2020 first and 2 seconds for Malcolm Brogdon a year after winning 48 games (What? You mean we weren't the only team to do that???)

They then drafted Duarte, Mathurin, and Coulibaly (traded for Jarace Walker) over the next 3 drafts before trading for Siakam.

So just.... no. The Pacers did not build through the draft effectively at all. They traded for Halliburton. They traded for Siakam. McConnell was a free agent. They traded for Toppin. THey traded for Nesmith.

Nembhard was a huge hit in the draft. The rest of their draft history has actually really, really sucked.
What an absolute failure and disaster this franchise is, ran by one of the most incompetent front offices in the league.
- Raptors RealGM Forum re: Masai Ujiri - June 2023
User avatar
Jcity08
RealGM
Posts: 12,954
And1: 18,070
Joined: May 06, 2018
       

Re: How is this not a super Mid plan? what's the pitch on our direction 

Post#152 » by Jcity08 » Fri May 30, 2025 8:41 pm

ash_k wrote:
Jcity08 wrote:
ash_k wrote:Trust me, there are other teams to support, to be a bit more joyful.

How about you find a new team? Thats the level of dailogue you like to have right? I dont leave my teams when things go sour.

allright then I will leave to your "team negative"! Meanwhile I look forward to watching BI and them lead us to the playoffs


Nothing negative here, just made an innocuous statement and you found a way to turn it into a problem, that tells me all I need to know about you. Major yikes.
Image
Image

Signed with team T.W.O for the 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 season.
User avatar
Duffman100
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 47,923
And1: 72,348
Joined: Jun 27, 2002
   

Re: How is this not a super Mid plan? what's the pitch on our direction 

Post#153 » by Duffman100 » Fri May 30, 2025 8:43 pm

M3tro wrote:
Duffman100 wrote:
M3tro wrote:Our season is hinging on Brandon Ingram and he's made of glass.

He hasn't played over 65 games in a season since his rookie year 8+ years ago. That shouldn't just be glossed over.


How has that possibly been glossed over?


Read the thread.

His inability to stay healthy takes a backseat to the rhetoric of him being a 28 year old All-Star scorer to some posters.

The reality is that to be successful next season we need Ingram to be as healthy as he was 8+ years ago. That's asking for a lot.


Him being injury prone has been the main talking point since we acquired him.
tsherkin
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 92,317
And1: 31,890
Joined: Oct 14, 2003
 

Re: How is this not a super Mid plan? what's the pitch on our direction 

Post#154 » by tsherkin » Fri May 30, 2025 8:43 pm

Scase wrote:I'm not sure what is getting lost in translation here, I've been pretty clear that I expect the team to be better than last year, full stop. Same way I expected the Pistons to be better than their prior year, but them adding Harris isn't exactly something to look forward to down the line as a viable way to improve the team long term, same with BI.

And again, people need to stop with the hyperbole. I never said I expect 30 -> chip, that is literally the nonsense I was saying needs to stop.


I know you didn't say that. I was pointing out that we are in a transition phase. Bitching about our future prospects while we are in that space doesn't make a lot of sense.

I don't see how this iteration of the roster has the growth potential to eventually become a contender.


And that's precisely why I made the remark I did. No one saw the path forward with the Demar/Lowry team, either. It will either present itself, or it will not. In the meantime, we should be enjoying a return to winning basketball, and not overly concerning ourselves with contender status at this point in the team's journey. We just had a 30-win season; all talk about pathways to contention are ridiculous at this point. All analyses and considerations about whether or not we can, or how we would get there are premature and mostly inappropriate.

So I am basing my opinion on the current roster and my evaluation of their room for growth, that's all. No one is expecting the Spurs to go from 34 wins to a chip, but you can bet your ass they have a lot of expectations and justifiable hope for the long term future due to Wemby. We don't have any player on the roster to offer up even half the level of optimism he provides, hence the "Yeah, we'll be better, but to what end?" vibe that I have with this team.


Right, but this is a problematic attitude which produces nothing but negativity. Yes, we don't have a generational talent on our roster. Okay. Loads of teams don't. Until they do. Or until they find other paths to talent acquisition and get themselves to a strong level of competitive play.

There's SOME degree to which we need to start pushing away from purely negative responses and try to find some of the positives here, or all we will be doing is contributing to a toxic environment. We can't JUST be a pool of unlimited negativity, or what's the point? No one wants to come here and just be like "ugh, yeah, the Raptors are **** and aren't going anywhere. Me MIGHT win 43 games, and that'll suck."

People want to have conversations, not just rehashes of old battle lines, right? And sometimes we need to work on ourselves to find something more than just pessimism and dismay.
tsherkin
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 92,317
And1: 31,890
Joined: Oct 14, 2003
 

Re: How is this not a super Mid plan? what's the pitch on our direction 

Post#155 » by tsherkin » Fri May 30, 2025 8:44 pm

M3tro wrote:
Duffman100 wrote:
M3tro wrote:Our season is hinging on Brandon Ingram and he's made of glass.

He hasn't played over 65 games in a season since his rookie year 8+ years ago. That shouldn't just be glossed over.


How has that possibly been glossed over?


Read the thread.

His inability to stay healthy takes a backseat to the rhetoric of him being a 28 year old All-Star scorer to some posters.

The reality is that to be successful next season we need Ingram to be as healthy as he was 8+ years ago. That's asking for a lot.


To Duff's point, basically all conversation around Ingram has centered around his health. It has in no way been "glossed over," even if there are posters (as with any position) who hold the extreme stance.
M3tro
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,994
And1: 3,650
Joined: Mar 15, 2018

Re: How is this not a super Mid plan? what's the pitch on our direction 

Post#156 » by M3tro » Fri May 30, 2025 8:45 pm

Duffman100 wrote:
M3tro wrote:
Duffman100 wrote:
How has that possibly been glossed over?


Read the thread.

His inability to stay healthy takes a backseat to the rhetoric of him being a 28 year old All-Star scorer to some posters.

The reality is that to be successful next season we need Ingram to be as healthy as he was 8+ years ago. That's asking for a lot.


Him being injury prone has been the main talking point since we acquired him.


As it should be.

18/64/45/55 games played going back 4 seasons isn't exactly confidence building.

There's a reason we got him for peanuts...because we were the only team willing to pay $40+ mil to a guy made of glass.
Raptors Realtor
Analyst
Posts: 3,602
And1: 3,541
Joined: Jul 16, 2009
Location: Toronto, ON
Contact:

Re: How is this not a super Mid plan? what's the pitch on our direction 

Post#157 » by Raptors Realtor » Fri May 30, 2025 8:48 pm

Scase wrote:
Raptors Realtor wrote:
Scase wrote:For the last 5 or so years...I wonder why?


Likely because some posters have unrealistic expectations, and expect us to be contenders every year, not realizing all teams go through cycles. Thus, why there are different championship teams every season.

Or it's because posters like you have an inability to differentiate between contenders every year, and having a basic plan. This team has been aimless for the last 5 years with no plan in mind.

Siakam/FVV? Let's build around them, except we won't actually build a complimentary roster. Didn't work out? Better let one of them walk in FA and then hold 2 expiring players much longer than we should, but not before we make a short sighted trade for a centre who exacerbates the teams problems.

This went south? Let's trade everyone away and start a rebuild, publicly state this is year one of a rebuild, then less than 6 months later make a win now re-tool trade for BI.

People understand there are cycles, and you would be hard-pressed to find anyone complaining that we are in a downtime, what people are complaining about is the listless nature of it, and constant attempts to recapture something from 5-10 years ago that just won't work.


Or posters like you who are just inherently big complainers whose posts are rarely filled with anything but criticism. Buddy I've been watching the NBA since the mid 80s and outside of a small handful of teams who lucked out with all time Hall of Fame great level players, it's difficult to be consistent contenders for several years, which is what your expectation has been, at least based on your constant nitpicking. From 2013 (when Masai was hired) to 2023, the Raps had the 2nd most total regular season wins in the NBA during that span, having only been beat out by the Warriors who've been fortunate to have at least 3 Hall of Famers during that timeframe.

-2018-19 the team won the Chip
-2019-20 the team lost in game 7 to Celts in the Eastern conference finals
-2020-21 Raps win 48 games
-2021-22 Raps win 41 games
-2022-23 Raps win 25 games
-2023-24
-2024-25

You keep saying in multiple posts that the team has been crap for 5 years which simply isn't accurate. According to you we should have blown up the team after losing in game 7 of the Eastern conference finals to the Celts, a year after winning the chip, ya no hindsight there eh? The following season we win 48 games and finish 5th in the Eastern conference, so you would have blown it up then because that doesn't make sense. The season after we win 41, so before or during the 22-23 season, if we're being realistic/reasonable this is the season they should have made some moves. They then go ahead and deal OG and Siakam during the 23-24 season which is 18-24 months longer then they should have made significant moves, in hindsight.

Furthermore, they did entertain trading FVV and Siakam at the deadline of the 22-23 season... Do you remember the reported offers? As per Stein, the offer was FVV to the Clips for Kennard and modest pick compensation (likely a 2nd since they owed OKC all their 1sts). How about the reported Siakam offer at the 22-23 trade deadline, it was Wiggins and a 1st, it was reported that Warriors wouldn't even include Kuminga in a deal, not even at the '24 deadline... So do you prefer that Siakam deal to what we got from the Pacers? So essentially, we lost out on Kennard and a 2nd by letting FVV walk, after deciding to keep him for the playoff run after an underwhelming offer.

So if you want to complain, cool, but at least be reasonable, there's no need to over exaggerate to try and make your point, hindsight is fun and all, but it's not a justifiable basis for an argument.
User avatar
Duffman100
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 47,923
And1: 72,348
Joined: Jun 27, 2002
   

Re: How is this not a super Mid plan? what's the pitch on our direction 

Post#158 » by Duffman100 » Fri May 30, 2025 8:50 pm

M3tro wrote:
Duffman100 wrote:
M3tro wrote:
Read the thread.

His inability to stay healthy takes a backseat to the rhetoric of him being a 28 year old All-Star scorer to some posters.

The reality is that to be successful next season we need Ingram to be as healthy as he was 8+ years ago. That's asking for a lot.


Him being injury prone has been the main talking point since we acquired him.


As it should be.

18/64/45/55 games played going back 4 seasons isn't exactly confidence building.

There's a reason we got him for peanuts...because we were the only team willing to pay $40+ mil to a guy made of glass.


So ... not glossed over...
User avatar
ontnut
RealGM
Posts: 12,197
And1: 9,178
Joined: Jan 31, 2009
Location: Toronto
       

Re: How is this not a super Mid plan? what's the pitch on our direction 

Post#159 » by ontnut » Fri May 30, 2025 9:44 pm

Scase wrote:
ontnut wrote:To be fair, there's only an average of a 3% chance for any given team to win a championship any year. So 1% isn't THAT far off :lol:

You know damn well what I meant :lol: :lol:

Image

Nope.
Image
Appostis
Analyst
Posts: 3,633
And1: 2,966
Joined: May 11, 2021
   

Re: How is this not a super Mid plan? what's the pitch on our direction 

Post#160 » by Appostis » Fri May 30, 2025 10:44 pm

YogurtProducer wrote:
Scase wrote:
nikster wrote:Posters acting like Masai was lucky to have the collection of talent the Raptors did at the end of 2013 season are delusional

Yeah man, who needs Lowry who is the GROAT, who needs DD who was integral to trading for Kawhi, Or Jonas and Ross who we flipped to get the best big man rotation this team has ever had. He did it all on his own, built the team from the ground up.

So by this logic, GMs should get no credit unless they inherit a team that has zero players and no picks?

Are we seriously acting like Lowry/DD/Ross/Jonas was some champiosnhip contending core than Masai just had to coast with to win? :banghead:



People go quite a lengths to dismiss anything the front office office accomplished.

Return to Toronto Raptors