Buff wrote:RoteSchroder wrote:
Not that I’m against Maluach (I have him at around tier 2 or 3 for a #9 selection), but to your points:
- His physical traits in terms of moving and jumping got beaten by pretty much every big in the combine. At the same time, I’m not sure if speed/agility/hops matters as much since: 1) his length will cover for some of it, 2) he seems to have a good stance on the perimeter, although I wouldn’t want him out there guarding too close to the 3 point line anyways, 3) his reaction time, staying with his opponent, and recovery ability all seem ok.
That is a point against him. But with that frame if he had good lateral numbers he would not get to 9. Still, Imma call it a draw because his good stuff is off the charts.
RoteSchroder wrote:- Was he the anchor or was Flagg? What if Maluach was just defensive help and not the main anchor or driving force (given there was minimal statistical difference with him on/off the court, which could also be due to a good defensive back-up)
Semantics, I think. What we need to be looking at is "How good was he protecting the rim", which is the skill he is getting drafted for. Let me address the on/off issue: I believe the promising numbers are FG% and Attempts at the rim on/off. Apparently bot numbers are great (like a 12% swing in FG% at the rim when on). Which means, yeah the defense was the same, it was a great defensive team regardless of KM. But, people were not getting in the pain when he was there which is the main thing for his role.
RoteSchroder wrote:- I think he was said to have a weak/mediocre feel for the game.
I don't see it. In particular, the dunks off the pick and roll are not trivial at all, takes timing, etc... It'd be great to see the assists numbers for both Flagg and Kon. Cause those boys feasted with Malauach... You have to have feel for the game, being tall is not enough.
RoteSchroder wrote:Going through different coverages on D doesn’t make him have high defensive IQ
Disagree, coverages is one of the most IQ thing in basketball. Bunch of people play drop not only because of physical limitations. I bring Gasol again, he was... not very athetic. Yet his IQ made him the best. This is where (completely in my opinion, ofc) is his real upside.
RoteSchroder wrote:- The DeAndre Jordan offense of rim running is fine, but you also need to rely on your ball-handler there. I don’t think we’d be drafting him for offense anyways.
Absolutely, but he does have a world class skill. I trust *at least* Scottie, BI and Quick to be able to find him. Cause his radius is YUGE.
My point is that, for what you are drafting him for, that's enough offense for me. And FT of course, if not unplayable.
RoteSchroder wrote:- The FT% and offensive rebs are fine. Like I said, I don’t think the O is the question. His offense is like bottom 2nd round level. The main question is how good his defense is, which dictates his draftability at 9.
Yep, that is where we have to project and it is what it is. Who do you want?