Even after that Windy bomb the odds are not jumping much
Clear to me the Giannis stuff is a smoke screen, and unbelievable. Doug Smith was all I needed for confirmation.
Moderators: HiJiNX, 7 Footer, DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, Morris_Shatford, lebron stopper

OakleyDokely wrote:My hunch is the Bucks ask for too much and he starts the season with the Bucks.

RapsFanInOhio wrote:I’m pretty convinced there is no Giannis deal without including Barnes. It just doesn’t make sense.
JB7 wrote:earthtone wrote:JB7 wrote:
Getting FRPs from a team that is going to end up being one of the top teams in the league because of Giannis, means those FRPs have less value. Combined with the fact that the Bucks don't control their own picks, they are better off with a package of Barnes (4th pick), Gradey (13th pick), Ochai (14th pick) and the 2025 9th pick, which can all help the Bucks get back into development mode much quicker, than waiting on FRPs way out into the future that will probably be nowhere near the lottery.
Masai values holding onto the teams own picks, because if a season goes off the rails, they can easily pivot to tanking to get a higher pick. Better to have the control over your own pick, then hoping for another team to fall apart if you have their pick (and they have no incentive to tank).
I mean it’s clear why Masai would want to hold on to future firsts, but the same reason he’d want to hold on to them the same reason the Bucks would want them. You never know where a team will be in 5-6 years from now, having their unprotected firsts is a good gamble to make.
They also give you way more tradable assets, which is valuable for a team like the Bucks with no picks and very little talent. If Scottie/Ochai/Dick is the base package, I don’t see a reason to settle for only one first when you could get unprotected picks/swaps for the next 5 years and still have it be a fair deal.
The Raps only have to beat the next best offer, and if they are offering up young talent like Barnes, Gradey and Ochai, plus the 9th pick, that right there can rebuild 4/5's of the Bucks starting lineup. I think Masai has proven in past deals, trading away all future control of their draft picks is not something he likes to do.
And it just might lineup nicely with the Bucks current situation, where they probably want young players over future draft picks, since they have no incentive to suck right now.

Tor_Raps wrote:I understand Windy first mentioned we're big game hunting but cant believe this blew up like this because of Doug friggin Smith. He knows NOTHING lol
AbC? wrote:The career of a tier 1 superstar like Giannis is a precious thing - he would be foolish to waste his remaining prime years in Toronto. If the front office had better positioned themselves the last 3+ years in terms of accumulating surplus assets this might've been a conversation. Why would he want to hitch his wagon to an oft-injured Ingram and a bunch of unproven, largely mediocre young guys? Of course from the Raptors POV if he's willing to come you do whatever it takes and figure out the rest later.
WuTang_OG wrote:JB7 wrote:WuTang_OG wrote:
I'm more than fine dealing Barnes. And quite honestly, I don't even think Barnes/Giannis would work all that well or I should say it wouldn't be Giannis' fully optimal lineup offensively.
Giannis wants to be the sole downhill initiator from his end of season comments. He would have BI and IQ on the side and we would need another 3 and D guy
They had RJ playing the right way when he first came to the Raps, focusing on open 3's and just slashing to the basket. That went out the window last year with sitting so many players. But I think that efficiency could come back in a lineup with Giannis, BI & IQ.
I think RJ is a player worth holding onto, because Giannis is going to need guys that can get a bucket in the crunch, and I would think that would be left to BI and RJ.
You need defense and 3's and good free throw shooting to compliment. The defense got better but still not at the level we need. If Giannis comes, I would gladly deal RJ - if not to Bucks if they dont want him then to someone else.
Duffman100 wrote:OakleyDokely wrote:My hunch is the Bucks ask for too much and he starts the season with the Bucks.
And fair, they'd need a haul to restart their organization. Right now they're in BIG trouble.
LoveMyRaps wrote:NinjaBro wrote:We found Pensare's burner account!LoveMyRaps wrote:Scottie is the last guy I'd trade for Giannis.
Was a lil comprehension test.
It's pretty simple: everyone is on the table for Giannis, but Scottie is the last guy I'd want to trade.
I hope we can build a package that doesn't include Scottie.
Didn't say I wouldn't trade Scottie for Giannis
OakleyDokely wrote:I think KD is the sneaky play. You'd be able to get him without giving up Barnes and people are sorta forgetting he had a very productive season despite the Suns disaster of a season. Nearly 27 PPG on 53/43/84 splits and he's averaged about 68 games played over the past couple years.
OakleyDokely wrote:I think the Bucks would prefer young talent they can plug into their lineup right away as opposed to unknown picks 3-5 years from now. Barnes+9 is a pretty strong core structure of a deal.
Dalek wrote:Unless we are talking about hockey, no one forces their way to Toronto.
This isn't a great situation to go to being a lotto team for the past two years and your marquee players is like the fourth or fifth best prospects in his class and more of a defensive one at that.
This is just Masai and co. doing the usual. Looking to make waves, taking too long to put the deal together, and likely just used as leverage for the star to go to x team.
If he wants to be in the East Brooklyn has a big market, loads of picks (especially later Knicks picks from the Bridges deal).
If West, Spurs have the best team situation for Giannis and they have draft assets and players that might intrigue Bucks. Can't think of a better restart than Dylan Harper.
