Kasparas Jakucionis

Draft talk all year round

Moderators: Duke4life831, Marcus

User avatar
UcanUwill
RealGM
Posts: 31,920
And1: 34,984
Joined: Aug 07, 2011
 

Re: Kasparas Jakucionis 

Post#101 » by UcanUwill » Mon Jun 2, 2025 3:20 pm

JMAC3 wrote:
The-Power wrote:
Chi town wrote:
I like the Nembhard comp. He’s tough and gritty like him. KJ has a legit stepback and CS 3. I think he’d thrive early on off ball as a secondary creator.

He’d be a good fit for my Bulls as backup PG and secondary playmaker behind Giddey.

The Nembhard comp doesn't work on defense for me. Nembhard is elite at staying glued to players and that might well be his best trait. Jaku was among the worst I've seen in that regard.


Which is why the statement was "I think he could be an Andrew Nembhard type of player without the defense."


But defense is his defining trait, is that even NBA player at that point, Nembhard without defense is not more talented than lots of guys are not in the NBA.
The-Power
RealGM
Posts: 10,470
And1: 9,893
Joined: Jan 03, 2014
Location: Germany
   

Re: Kasparas Jakucionis 

Post#102 » by The-Power » Mon Jun 2, 2025 3:21 pm

Chi town wrote:He’s def not elite as a a glue on ball defender but he’s a good team defender and he competes.

I didn't see that at all but that's just where we'll have to disagree.
User avatar
JMAC3
RealGM
Posts: 13,092
And1: 6,118
Joined: May 22, 2010
     

Re: Kasparas Jakucionis 

Post#103 » by JMAC3 » Mon Jun 2, 2025 3:29 pm

UcanUwill wrote:
JMAC3 wrote:
The-Power wrote:The Nembhard comp doesn't work on defense for me. Nembhard is elite at staying glued to players and that might well be his best trait. Jaku was among the worst I've seen in that regard.


Which is why the statement was "I think he could be an Andrew Nembhard type of player without the defense."


But defense is his defining trait, is that even NBA player at that point, Nembhard without defense is not more talented than lots of guys are not in the NBA.


Nembhard is still averaging 13 ppg and 5 apg in the playoffs as an offball guard- if KJ does that I think that is valuable. IMore so I am saying that is his best role, instead of a team drafting him to be the primary ball handler and creator. Defensively he will probably be alright for his size and length but yeah nothing special on that end. His high IQ as a passer and connective piece should give him value to a wide range of teams imo.
User avatar
76ciology
RealGM
Posts: 65,526
And1: 26,571
Joined: Jun 06, 2002

Re: Kasparas Jakucionis 

Post#104 » by 76ciology » Tue Jun 3, 2025 4:09 am

JMAC3 wrote:
UcanUwill wrote:
JMAC3 wrote:
Which is why the statement was "I think he could be an Andrew Nembhard type of player without the defense."


But defense is his defining trait, is that even NBA player at that point, Nembhard without defense is not more talented than lots of guys are not in the NBA.


Nembhard is still averaging 13 ppg and 5 apg in the playoffs as an offball guard- if KJ does that I think that is valuable. IMore so I am saying that is his best role, instead of a team drafting him to be the primary ball handler and creator. Defensively he will probably be alright for his size and length but yeah nothing special on that end. His high IQ as a passer and connective piece should give him value to a wide range of teams imo.


Kasparas has significantly more offensive upside than Nembhard, and I don’t think better defense alone will make Nembhard the superior player. At 6’6” with strength, mobility and a high motor, Kasparas isn’t someone you can easily target on defense. He rebounds well, defends with energy, and navigates screens solidly. His defense is already serviceable for a potential star lead guard.

The real question is whether he can take that next step offensively. And if you think he can, then he’s worth drafting with a top 3 pick.
There’s never been a time in history when we look back and say that the people who were censoring free speech were the good guys.
User avatar
azcatz11
RealGM
Posts: 29,878
And1: 33,857
Joined: Apr 13, 2017
Location: Phoenix
   

Re: Kasparas Jakucionis 

Post#105 » by azcatz11 » Tue Jun 3, 2025 4:31 am

76ciology wrote:
JMAC3 wrote:
UcanUwill wrote:
But defense is his defining trait, is that even NBA player at that point, Nembhard without defense is not more talented than lots of guys are not in the NBA.


Nembhard is still averaging 13 ppg and 5 apg in the playoffs as an offball guard- if KJ does that I think that is valuable. IMore so I am saying that is his best role, instead of a team drafting him to be the primary ball handler and creator. Defensively he will probably be alright for his size and length but yeah nothing special on that end. His high IQ as a passer and connective piece should give him value to a wide range of teams imo.


Kasparas has significantly more offensive upside than Nembhard, and I don’t think better defense alone will make Nembhard the superior player. At 6’6” with strength, mobility and a high motor, Kasparas isn’t someone you can easily target on defense. He rebounds well, defends with energy, and navigates screens solidly. His defense is already serviceable for a potential star lead guard.

The real question is whether he can take that next step offensively. And if you think he can, then he’s worth drafting with a top 3 pick.


I’m completely with you. People are overlooking this kid for that bum demin who legitimately sucks. He will be out of the league within 5 years. This kid is an actual shooter and the Illinois coach ran a horrible offense not highlighting any of his strengths or will Riley for that matter and running every set thru Ivisic who sucks.

Can you imagine kas with a step back? Unguardable
User avatar
76ciology
RealGM
Posts: 65,526
And1: 26,571
Joined: Jun 06, 2002

Re: Kasparas Jakucionis 

Post#106 » by 76ciology » Tue Jun 3, 2025 4:42 am

azcatz11 wrote:
76ciology wrote:
JMAC3 wrote:
Nembhard is still averaging 13 ppg and 5 apg in the playoffs as an offball guard- if KJ does that I think that is valuable. IMore so I am saying that is his best role, instead of a team drafting him to be the primary ball handler and creator. Defensively he will probably be alright for his size and length but yeah nothing special on that end. His high IQ as a passer and connective piece should give him value to a wide range of teams imo.


Kasparas has significantly more offensive upside than Nembhard, and I don’t think better defense alone will make Nembhard the superior player. At 6’6” with strength, mobility and a high motor, Kasparas isn’t someone you can easily target on defense. He rebounds well, defends with energy, and navigates screens solidly. His defense is already serviceable for a potential star lead guard.

The real question is whether he can take that next step offensively. And if you think he can, then he’s worth drafting with a top 3 pick.


I’m completely with you. People are overlooking this kid for that bum demin who legitimately sucks. He will be out of the league within 5 years. This kid is an actual shooter and the Illinois coach ran a horrible offense not highlighting any of his strengths or will Riley for that matter and running every set thru Ivisic who sucks.

Can you imagine kas with a step back? Unguardable


He shot around 36%(?) on stepback threes, scored over 1.0 points per possession in isolation, and ranked in the 98th percentile in pick-and-roll. His HC rim frequency is at 30% on 62FG%. His true shooting sits at 58%, with strong indicators like a .50 free throw rate and .50 three-point rate. While his overall three-point percentage is just 32%, his stepback numbers and 85% from the line suggest he has a strong shot profile with room to develop into an elite shooter.

He has positional size at 6’6”. He has elite feel and basketball IQ, a strong work ethic, and experience as a lead guard before transferring to Illinois. People forget he had a BPM around 8–10 midseason before a slump following his injury.

I’m higher on him than most.. he’s top 3 on my board.
There’s never been a time in history when we look back and say that the people who were censoring free speech were the good guys.
User avatar
vincecarter4pres
RealGM
Posts: 51,053
And1: 3,836
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: New Jeruz
Contact:
     

Re: Kasparas Jakucionis 

Post#107 » by vincecarter4pres » Tue Jun 3, 2025 11:54 am

76ciology wrote:
azcatz11 wrote:
76ciology wrote:
Kasparas has significantly more offensive upside than Nembhard, and I don’t think better defense alone will make Nembhard the superior player. At 6’6” with strength, mobility and a high motor, Kasparas isn’t someone you can easily target on defense. He rebounds well, defends with energy, and navigates screens solidly. His defense is already serviceable for a potential star lead guard.

The real question is whether he can take that next step offensively. And if you think he can, then he’s worth drafting with a top 3 pick.


I’m completely with you. People are overlooking this kid for that bum demin who legitimately sucks. He will be out of the league within 5 years. This kid is an actual shooter and the Illinois coach ran a horrible offense not highlighting any of his strengths or will Riley for that matter and running every set thru Ivisic who sucks.

Can you imagine kas with a step back? Unguardable


He shot around 36%(?) on stepback threes, scored over 1.0 points per possession in isolation, and ranked in the 98th percentile in pick-and-roll. His HC rim frequency is at 30% on 62FG%. His true shooting sits at 58%, with strong indicators like a .50 free throw rate and .50 three-point rate. While his overall three-point percentage is just 32%, his stepback numbers and 85% from the line suggest he has a strong shot profile with room to develop into an elite shooter.

He has positional size at 6’6”. He has elite feel and basketball IQ, a strong work ethic, and experience as a lead guard before transferring to Illinois. People forget he had a BPM around 8–10 midseason before a slump following his injury.

I’m higher on him than most.. he’s top 3 on my board.

Top 3 is a little wild, but I respect the candor in breaking the standard issue rankings.

I will say, early in the season I was definitely high on him:
vincecarter4pres wrote:I’ve only seen 2 Illinois games so far, but 3 players come to mind the most:

Deron Williams

Beefier, much more athletic and much quicker first step D’Angelo Russell.

Goran Dragic.



And then don’t stone me on this one, but does anyone see some Jason Kidd when in transition? I’m not at all saying as a direct comp, but there are shades in transition.
Image
Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
User avatar
UcanUwill
RealGM
Posts: 31,920
And1: 34,984
Joined: Aug 07, 2011
 

Re: Kasparas Jakucionis 

Post#108 » by UcanUwill » Tue Jun 3, 2025 2:22 pm

vincecarter4pres wrote:
76ciology wrote:
azcatz11 wrote:
I’m completely with you. People are overlooking this kid for that bum demin who legitimately sucks. He will be out of the league within 5 years. This kid is an actual shooter and the Illinois coach ran a horrible offense not highlighting any of his strengths or will Riley for that matter and running every set thru Ivisic who sucks.

Can you imagine kas with a step back? Unguardable


He shot around 36%(?) on stepback threes, scored over 1.0 points per possession in isolation, and ranked in the 98th percentile in pick-and-roll. His HC rim frequency is at 30% on 62FG%. His true shooting sits at 58%, with strong indicators like a .50 free throw rate and .50 three-point rate. While his overall three-point percentage is just 32%, his stepback numbers and 85% from the line suggest he has a strong shot profile with room to develop into an elite shooter.

He has positional size at 6’6”. He has elite feel and basketball IQ, a strong work ethic, and experience as a lead guard before transferring to Illinois. People forget he had a BPM around 8–10 midseason before a slump following his injury.

I’m higher on him than most.. he’s top 3 on my board.

Top 3 is a little wild, but I respect the candor in breaking the standard issue rankings.

I will say, early in the season I was definitely high on him:
vincecarter4pres wrote:I’ve only seen 2 Illinois games so far, but 3 players come to mind the most:

Deron Williams

Beefier, much more athletic and much quicker first step D’Angelo Russell.

Goran Dragic


And then don’t stone me on this one, but does anyone see some Jason Kidd when in transition? I’m not at all saying as a direct comp, but there are shades in transition.


I can see some Deron and D'Angelo. I think I said this at a time, but I do not think Goran is good comparison at all. Goran was white Euro PG, but he was kinda the opposite of what you would expect from white Euro PG, he was very fast, but pretty bad shooter, at least in his 20s he was. Goran was closer to Tony Parker than a typical, slower, more methodical Euro PG. I do not see that comp, if we compare KJ to euro PGs, probably Jaric or Udrih would make more sense, hopefully he ends up better than those, but no shame in being Marko Jaric.
BlazersBroncos
RealGM
Posts: 12,169
And1: 9,690
Joined: Oct 27, 2016

Re: Kasparas Jakucionis 

Post#109 » by BlazersBroncos » Tue Jun 3, 2025 2:32 pm

UcanUwill wrote:
vincecarter4pres wrote:
76ciology wrote:
He shot around 36%(?) on stepback threes, scored over 1.0 points per possession in isolation, and ranked in the 98th percentile in pick-and-roll. His HC rim frequency is at 30% on 62FG%. His true shooting sits at 58%, with strong indicators like a .50 free throw rate and .50 three-point rate. While his overall three-point percentage is just 32%, his stepback numbers and 85% from the line suggest he has a strong shot profile with room to develop into an elite shooter.

He has positional size at 6’6”. He has elite feel and basketball IQ, a strong work ethic, and experience as a lead guard before transferring to Illinois. People forget he had a BPM around 8–10 midseason before a slump following his injury.

I’m higher on him than most.. he’s top 3 on my board.

Top 3 is a little wild, but I respect the candor in breaking the standard issue rankings.

I will say, early in the season I was definitely high on him:
vincecarter4pres wrote:I’ve only seen 2 Illinois games so far, but 3 players come to mind the most:

Deron Williams

Beefier, much more athletic and much quicker first step D’Angelo Russell.

Goran Dragic


And then don’t stone me on this one, but does anyone see some Jason Kidd when in transition? I’m not at all saying as a direct comp, but there are shades in transition.


I can see some Deron and D'Angelo. I think I said this at a time, but I do not think Goran is good comparison at all. Goran was white Euro PG, but he was kinda the opposite of what you would expect from white Euro PG, he was very fast, but pretty bad shooter, at least in his 20s he was. Goran was closer to Tony Parker than a typical, slower, more methodical Euro PG. I do not see that comp, if we compare KJ to euro PGs, probably Jaric or Udrih would make more sense, hopefully he ends up better than those, but no shame in being Marko Jaric.


I think Demin is the guy to compare to Marko Jaric. KJ has a much more refined offensive bag than either Jaric or Demin.

KJ to me plays like Hinrich on offense - but doesnt have the same juice on the other side of the ball.
User avatar
76ciology
RealGM
Posts: 65,526
And1: 26,571
Joined: Jun 06, 2002

Re: Kasparas Jakucionis 

Post#110 » by 76ciology » Tue Jun 3, 2025 3:08 pm

UcanUwill wrote:
vincecarter4pres wrote:
76ciology wrote:
He shot around 36%(?) on stepback threes, scored over 1.0 points per possession in isolation, and ranked in the 98th percentile in pick-and-roll. His HC rim frequency is at 30% on 62FG%. His true shooting sits at 58%, with strong indicators like a .50 free throw rate and .50 three-point rate. While his overall three-point percentage is just 32%, his stepback numbers and 85% from the line suggest he has a strong shot profile with room to develop into an elite shooter.

He has positional size at 6’6”. He has elite feel and basketball IQ, a strong work ethic, and experience as a lead guard before transferring to Illinois. People forget he had a BPM around 8–10 midseason before a slump following his injury.

I’m higher on him than most.. he’s top 3 on my board.

Top 3 is a little wild, but I respect the candor in breaking the standard issue rankings.

I will say, early in the season I was definitely high on him:
vincecarter4pres wrote:I’ve only seen 2 Illinois games so far, but 3 players come to mind the most:

Deron Williams

Beefier, much more athletic and much quicker first step D’Angelo Russell.

Goran Dragic


And then don’t stone me on this one, but does anyone see some Jason Kidd when in transition? I’m not at all saying as a direct comp, but there are shades in transition.


I can see some Deron and D'Angelo. I think I said this at a time, but I do not think Goran is good comparison at all. Goran was white Euro PG, but he was kinda the opposite of what you would expect from white Euro PG, he was very fast, but pretty bad shooter, at least in his 20s he was. Goran was closer to Tony Parker than a typical, slower, more methodical Euro PG. I do not see that comp, if we compare KJ to euro PGs, probably Jaric or Udrih would make more sense, hopefully he ends up better than those, but no shame in being Marko Jaric.


Somebody mentioned it here and I don’t get it back then. It may not look the same aesthetically, but I get the KJ-Hali comparison.

They’d thrive in an uptempo system, where defenses aren’t set, they can find open teammates in transition, have high IQ and feel to process executions faster than the opponent, and operate primarily through 2 man actions. They’re capable of isolation scoring, especially to exploit mismatches, but ideally, they play alongside a scoring forward like Siakam who can handle those mismatches more efficiently.

And then you check the isolation numbers, they’re putting up elite points per possession.. and you start to wonder why they don’t do it more often. But that’s part of their strength.. they’re smart enough to pick their spots and keep the offense balanced and efficient.
There’s never been a time in history when we look back and say that the people who were censoring free speech were the good guys.
User avatar
UcanUwill
RealGM
Posts: 31,920
And1: 34,984
Joined: Aug 07, 2011
 

Re: Kasparas Jakucionis 

Post#111 » by UcanUwill » Tue Jun 3, 2025 3:29 pm

BlazersBroncos wrote:
UcanUwill wrote:
vincecarter4pres wrote:Top 3 is a little wild, but I respect the candor in breaking the standard issue rankings.

I will say, early in the season I was definitely high on him:


I can see some Deron and D'Angelo. I think I said this at a time, but I do not think Goran is good comparison at all. Goran was white Euro PG, but he was kinda the opposite of what you would expect from white Euro PG, he was very fast, but pretty bad shooter, at least in his 20s he was. Goran was closer to Tony Parker than a typical, slower, more methodical Euro PG. I do not see that comp, if we compare KJ to euro PGs, probably Jaric or Udrih would make more sense, hopefully he ends up better than those, but no shame in being Marko Jaric.


I think Demin is the guy to compare to Marko Jaric. KJ has a much more refined offensive bag than either Jaric or Demin.

KJ to me plays like Hinrich on offense - but doesnt have the same juice on the other side of the ball.


Demin is very weird prospect in a sense he is super interesting tho his ceiling is probably not very high. Most of the time, most interesting prospects are those boom or bust ones. But thats different conversation entirely. I obviously do not like his country, but Russia completely fell off a clip in Basketball, they are brutal, he is their one big hope and even if Demin is bench player in the NBA, that would easily make him best russian player these days, thats crazy.
User avatar
UcanUwill
RealGM
Posts: 31,920
And1: 34,984
Joined: Aug 07, 2011
 

Re: Kasparas Jakucionis 

Post#112 » by UcanUwill » Tue Jun 3, 2025 3:32 pm

76ciology wrote:
UcanUwill wrote:
vincecarter4pres wrote:Top 3 is a little wild, but I respect the candor in breaking the standard issue rankings.

I will say, early in the season I was definitely high on him:


I can see some Deron and D'Angelo. I think I said this at a time, but I do not think Goran is good comparison at all. Goran was white Euro PG, but he was kinda the opposite of what you would expect from white Euro PG, he was very fast, but pretty bad shooter, at least in his 20s he was. Goran was closer to Tony Parker than a typical, slower, more methodical Euro PG. I do not see that comp, if we compare KJ to euro PGs, probably Jaric or Udrih would make more sense, hopefully he ends up better than those, but no shame in being Marko Jaric.


Somebody mentioned it here and I don’t get it back then. It may not look the same aesthetically, but I get the KJ-Hali comparison.

They’d thrive in an uptempo system, where defenses aren’t set, they can find open teammates in transition, have high IQ and feel to process executions faster than the opponent, and operate primarily through 2 man actions. They’re capable of isolation scoring, especially to exploit mismatches, but ideally, they play alongside a scoring forward like Siakam who can handle those mismatches more efficiently.

And then you check the isolation numbers, they’re putting up elite points per possession.. and you start to wonder why they don’t do it more often. But that’s part of their strength.. they’re smart enough to pick their spots and keep the offense balanced and efficient.


KOC compared him to Haliburton. I said this, but one huge gripe with that comp is that Hali does not turn the ball at all, where KJ does it a lot. But then again, no comp is that good, like I can see D'Angelo comp, but then again, most limiting part about D'Angelos game is inability to draw fouls, and KJ draws a lot of fouls from my knowledge. So we could nick pick every comp I think. His scoring is a bit Guduric esque, if you know that player, but KJ is more of a true point, Guduric is just a too guard who can playmake just a bit.
User avatar
76ciology
RealGM
Posts: 65,526
And1: 26,571
Joined: Jun 06, 2002

Re: Kasparas Jakucionis 

Post#113 » by 76ciology » Tue Jun 3, 2025 3:42 pm

UcanUwill wrote:
76ciology wrote:
UcanUwill wrote:
I can see some Deron and D'Angelo. I think I said this at a time, but I do not think Goran is good comparison at all. Goran was white Euro PG, but he was kinda the opposite of what you would expect from white Euro PG, he was very fast, but pretty bad shooter, at least in his 20s he was. Goran was closer to Tony Parker than a typical, slower, more methodical Euro PG. I do not see that comp, if we compare KJ to euro PGs, probably Jaric or Udrih would make more sense, hopefully he ends up better than those, but no shame in being Marko Jaric.


Somebody mentioned it here and I don’t get it back then. It may not look the same aesthetically, but I get the KJ-Hali comparison.

They’d thrive in an uptempo system, where defenses aren’t set, they can find open teammates in transition, have high IQ and feel to process executions faster than the opponent, and operate primarily through 2 man actions. They’re capable of isolation scoring, especially to exploit mismatches, but ideally, they play alongside a scoring forward like Siakam who can handle those mismatches more efficiently.

And then you check the isolation numbers, they’re putting up elite points per possession.. and you start to wonder why they don’t do it more often. But that’s part of their strength.. they’re smart enough to pick their spots and keep the offense balanced and efficient.


KOC compared him to Haliburton. I said this, but one huge gripe with that comp is that Hali does not turn the ball at all, where KJ does it a lot. But then again, no comp is that good, like I can see D'Angelo comp, but then again, most limiting part about D'Angelos game is inability to draw fouls, and KJ draws a lot of fouls from my knowledge. So we could nick pick every comp I think. His scoring is a bit Guduric esque, if you know that player, but KJ is more of a true point, Guduric is just a too guard who can playmake just a bit.


I’m not familiar with Guduric, but I know Aleksa Avramović well.. I watched almost all the FIBA World Cup games in 2023, and he really stood out. His game is simple, but he plays with a relentless motor, like Pat Beverley, and he actually knocks down his shots.

D’Lo is a solid comp too, but he’s notoriously averse to attacking the rim or drawing fouls, he prefers floaters and pull-ups. Both KJ and D’Lo struggle with ball pressure (DLo’s kryptonite was TJ McConnel), but I think KJ can clean that up with the right player development, better scheme, and improved roster around him.
There’s never been a time in history when we look back and say that the people who were censoring free speech were the good guys.
User avatar
UcanUwill
RealGM
Posts: 31,920
And1: 34,984
Joined: Aug 07, 2011
 

Re: Kasparas Jakucionis 

Post#114 » by UcanUwill » Tue Jun 3, 2025 3:59 pm

76ciology wrote:
UcanUwill wrote:
76ciology wrote:
Somebody mentioned it here and I don’t get it back then. It may not look the same aesthetically, but I get the KJ-Hali comparison.

They’d thrive in an uptempo system, where defenses aren’t set, they can find open teammates in transition, have high IQ and feel to process executions faster than the opponent, and operate primarily through 2 man actions. They’re capable of isolation scoring, especially to exploit mismatches, but ideally, they play alongside a scoring forward like Siakam who can handle those mismatches more efficiently.

And then you check the isolation numbers, they’re putting up elite points per possession.. and you start to wonder why they don’t do it more often. But that’s part of their strength.. they’re smart enough to pick their spots and keep the offense balanced and efficient.


KOC compared him to Haliburton. I said this, but one huge gripe with that comp is that Hali does not turn the ball at all, where KJ does it a lot. But then again, no comp is that good, like I can see D'Angelo comp, but then again, most limiting part about D'Angelos game is inability to draw fouls, and KJ draws a lot of fouls from my knowledge. So we could nick pick every comp I think. His scoring is a bit Guduric esque, if you know that player, but KJ is more of a true point, Guduric is just a too guard who can playmake just a bit.


I’m not familiar with Guduric, but I know Aleksa Avramović well.. I watched almost all the FIBA World Cup games in 2023, and he really stood out. His game is simple, but he plays with a relentless motor, like Pat Beverley, and he actually knocks down his shots.

D’Lo is a solid comp too, but he’s notoriously averse to attacking the rim or drawing fouls, he prefers floaters and pull-ups. Both KJ and D’Lo struggle with ball pressure (DLo’s kryptonite was TJ McConnel), but I think KJ can clean that up with the right player development, better scheme, and improved roster around him.


Aleksa Avramovic is amazing defender, but he usually shoots below 30% from 3. If he shot better, he would be NBA player without question, he is basically Caruso esque in a lot of ways, just minus the shot, which is huge. I do not like him tho, not as player, but just who he is, guy signs with Moscow team when most players fled and boycotted whole country for obvious reason. But it is Seribian thing, most Serbs not only do not see the problem with that, but support Russia even, which is disgusting and very sad IMO. Avramovic will be back in Euroleague with debuting Dubai team next season tho, so he is very well travelled at this point, from Belgrade to Moscow to Dubai, guy will see all terrible regimes in the world at this rate. But yeah, as a player, his motor and defense makes you wonder why he is not in the NBA, but then again, you said he hit shots, but in greater sample size, he doesn't really. As I said, if he shot better, he would probably be most NBA material player in Europe. Not best player in Europe, but most NBA material. He already is in that conversation, when we talk who out of Europe could play in the NBA no problem, I think Avramovic needs to be mentioned.

His countryman Guduric played one season in the NBA for Memohis, few years ago, but it didn't work out with him. After Luka left Europe, Guduric had best step back game in Europe, I said in the past that I thought his step back is better than Lukas even. He attracted NBA attention and got a contract that one year, but as I said, didn't work out, his percentages in the NBA were terrible, but again, it was just single rookie season, if he stayed, he might have worked out in a long run. But he was older rookie and upside for NBA team to develop guy like that is just not there. Still tho, one of the better SG's currently in Europe. 6'5, strong body, step back game, decent handle, good shot, just not explosive, so I see a lot of similarities in him and KJ.
User avatar
76ciology
RealGM
Posts: 65,526
And1: 26,571
Joined: Jun 06, 2002

Re: Kasparas Jakucionis 

Post#115 » by 76ciology » Tue Jun 3, 2025 4:58 pm

https://www.hoopshq.com/nba-draft/nba-draft-intel-latest

Crickets on Kasparas Jakucionis…. Does He Have a Promise?
It’s very unusual to not hear anything about a player heading into the draft. When there are no rumors, no discussion of draft range or workouts, it typically smells like a team has made a promise. It’s both sides holding their cards close and not leaking anything. The player this year is 6-foot-6 Illinois guard Jakucionis. There hasn’t been a single word out on him. His draft range is anywhere from 6-16 and there’s a feeling that he left the draft combine with a promise. The Hawks could be targeting a bigger backup point guard to Trae Young and they’re sitting at No. 13. He could also go as high at No. 6 to Charlotte to bring some size in the backcourt. The Hornets kept things very quiet all the way up until draft day last year when they surprised a lot of people and selected Tidjan Salaun and Jakucionis could be another player they are quietly targeting this year.
There’s never been a time in history when we look back and say that the people who were censoring free speech were the good guys.
User avatar
UcanUwill
RealGM
Posts: 31,920
And1: 34,984
Joined: Aug 07, 2011
 

Re: Kasparas Jakucionis 

Post#116 » by UcanUwill » Tue Jun 3, 2025 5:04 pm

76ciology wrote:https://www.hoopshq.com/nba-draft/nba-draft-intel-latest

Crickets on Kasparas Jakucionis…. Does He Have a Promise?
It’s very unusual to not hear anything about a player heading into the draft. When there are no rumors, no discussion of draft range or workouts, it typically smells like a team has made a promise. It’s both sides holding their cards close and not leaking anything. The player this year is 6-foot-6 Illinois guard Jakucionis. There hasn’t been a single word out on him. His draft range is anywhere from 6-16 and there’s a feeling that he left the draft combine with a promise. The Hawks could be targeting a bigger backup point guard to Trae Young and they’re sitting at No. 13. He could also go as high at No. 6 to Charlotte to bring some size in the backcourt. The Hornets kept things very quiet all the way up until draft day last year when they surprised a lot of people and selected Tidjan Salaun and Jakucionis could be another player they are quietly targeting this year.


I am Lamelo Ball hator, so I would hate for him to go to the Hornets. I wish he goes to the Raptors as a low key Raptors fan (not really a fan, just a little), tho Raptors fans are very terminally online and very terminally haters when guy does not live up to expectations.
User avatar
76ciology
RealGM
Posts: 65,526
And1: 26,571
Joined: Jun 06, 2002

Re: Kasparas Jakucionis 

Post#117 » by 76ciology » Tue Jun 3, 2025 5:14 pm

UcanUwill wrote:
76ciology wrote:https://www.hoopshq.com/nba-draft/nba-draft-intel-latest

Crickets on Kasparas Jakucionis…. Does He Have a Promise?
It’s very unusual to not hear anything about a player heading into the draft. When there are no rumors, no discussion of draft range or workouts, it typically smells like a team has made a promise. It’s both sides holding their cards close and not leaking anything. The player this year is 6-foot-6 Illinois guard Jakucionis. There hasn’t been a single word out on him. His draft range is anywhere from 6-16 and there’s a feeling that he left the draft combine with a promise. The Hawks could be targeting a bigger backup point guard to Trae Young and they’re sitting at No. 13. He could also go as high at No. 6 to Charlotte to bring some size in the backcourt. The Hornets kept things very quiet all the way up until draft day last year when they surprised a lot of people and selected Tidjan Salaun and Jakucionis could be another player they are quietly targeting this year.


I am Lamelo Ball hator, so I would hate for him to go to the Hornets. I wish he goes to the Raptors as a low key Raptors fan (not really a fan, just a little), tho Raptors fans are very terminally online and very terminally haters when guy does not live up to expectations.


FWIW, my guess is its the Jazz.
There’s never been a time in history when we look back and say that the people who were censoring free speech were the good guys.
User avatar
UcanUwill
RealGM
Posts: 31,920
And1: 34,984
Joined: Aug 07, 2011
 

Re: Kasparas Jakucionis 

Post#118 » by UcanUwill » Tue Jun 3, 2025 5:21 pm

76ciology wrote:
UcanUwill wrote:


I am Lamelo Ball hator, so I would hate for him to go to the Hornets. I wish he goes to the Raptors as a low key Raptors fan (not really a fan, just a little), tho Raptors fans are very terminally online and very terminally haters when guy does not live up to expectations.


FWIW, my guess is its the Jazz.


Yeah, Utah Jazz makes sense, they do not have any young guards beside Keonte George I think. Walker Kessler is fine, Markannen I think is underrated, especially defensively. But man, they need a big star, they will tank again and hope next lottery favors them, if they get Dybantsa, that roster would start to make sense.

To me it is weird that they speculating he has a promise from teams that have 16th and 13th. picks. Yeah, they could have made promise to take him, but he is projected to go even earlier than that, so not like those promises matter much, or that he shouldn't try to impresse in workouts anymore. If he has a promise from a top 5 picking team, that makes more sense to me then.
The-Power
RealGM
Posts: 10,470
And1: 9,893
Joined: Jan 03, 2014
Location: Germany
   

Re: Kasparas Jakucionis 

Post#119 » by The-Power » Tue Jun 3, 2025 8:23 pm

UcanUwill wrote:KOC compared him to Haliburton.

I don't see that comp at all. The huge discrepancy in ball security is one big difference but there are others. Haliburton is just a way more advanced playmaker, sees the floor much better, place with a lot more pace. Even as a prospect. He's also quicker on his feet and with his hands. Meanwhile one of Jakus big strengths is his versatile scoring arsenal and physicality inside the arc which Haliburton lacked (just compare their respective FTr, for instance). Haliburton was also more disruptive defensively off the ball though both struggle to stay attached to their match-ups. So yeah, just not a comparison I understand.
FarBeyondDriven
Analyst
Posts: 3,255
And1: 2,484
Joined: Aug 11, 2021
 

Re: Kasparas Jakucionis 

Post#120 » by FarBeyondDriven » Wed Jun 4, 2025 4:54 am

UcanUwill wrote:
76ciology wrote:
UcanUwill wrote:
I am Lamelo Ball hator, so I would hate for him to go to the Hornets. I wish he goes to the Raptors as a low key Raptors fan (not really a fan, just a little), tho Raptors fans are very terminally online and very terminally haters when guy does not live up to expectations.


FWIW, my guess is its the Jazz.


Yeah, Utah Jazz makes sense, they do not have any young guards beside Keonte George I think. Walker Kessler is fine, Markannen I think is underrated, especially defensively. But man, they need a big star, they will tank again and hope next lottery favors them, if they get Dybantsa, that roster would start to make sense.

To me it is weird that they speculating he has a promise from teams that have 16th and 13th. picks. Yeah, they could have made promise to take him, but he is projected to go even earlier than that, so not like those promises matter much, or that he shouldn't try to impresse in workouts anymore. If he has a promise from a top 5 picking team, that makes more sense to me then.


they drafted Collier last year

Return to NBA Draft