letsgobulls23 wrote:JayMKE wrote:Texas Chuck wrote:
I proposed nothing. But when you are a top 4 team, your core isn't trash. The truth is teh Knicks core is stronger than the Bucks core and thats with Giannis.
Because the Bucks 2nd best player is hurt with an injury and an age that makes a successful return very unlikely, then you are looking at guys like Portis and Kuzma as your next best players which is tragic, and finally they have very few assets to improve.
So yeah, I have the Knicks being much closer to contending than the Bucks.
I’m sure your esteem for them is appreciated lol
Why can’t you answer the simple yes or no questions? I do not care what your opinion of the Bucks nor is that relevant to the quality of the Knicks core. It’s a bad core and a bad trade, simple as that.
Mind you that the Knicks won a total more of… *checks notes* 3 games. So if the Bucks finished 3 games better your entire opinion would be different?
Says who? You?
Haven't the Bucks lost in the 1st round... *checks notes* 3 years in a row? Feels like the "trash core" label could be better used on teams that didn't just lose in the ECF.
My team has actually seen a championship in my lifetime! Maybe one day the Knicks will get back there. Just won’t be with this core and not with Giannis.