


Moderators: cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid
doogie_hauser wrote:Why is it most of the critics/haters of the Pacers seem to be fans of Western Conference teams and by that i mean Denver (and Joker Stans from what I am reading)
I think we all wanted (no matter who we root for) a long and dramatic finals series that goes at least 6 games, yet some fans (not OKC Stans who seemed magnanimous and gracious in defeat) seem rattled the poor plucky underdogs from small town Indiana upset the apple cart and stole game 1.
Aside from last year, I don't think I have enjoyed a more enjoyable game 1 of the Finals since 2008 !
They built their team (Indy) the right way, I remember reading somewhere they have only had one under 30 win season since the 80s, never tanked, and made some bold and aggressive trades and astute drafting.
Also suffered a ton of injuries this season.
This team is as anti trust the process tanking Sixers (a team and philosophy I truly abhor) and should be given their flowers for that.
Just thinking, if they win the chip, does this mean the Nets and Flint Tropics are the only teams left from the ABA who haven't won a championship in the NBA post merger??
#LetsGetTropical !
The-Stallion70 wrote:Reminds me of when the Sixers took game 1 against the Lakers in 2001.
I personally expect OKC to basically dominate the rest of the series.
xxSnEaKyPxx wrote:PlatinumState wrote:Its over
I just don’t personally understand this mentality.
It’s one game. It’s not super rare for the team who lost the first game to win the series. OKC did it against the Nuggets.
What do we gain by EVERYTHING being decided by the latest instance? If the Pacers lose next game, the same people saying it’s over now, will be shouting how the Thunder have dominated 99% of the minutes.
Why does the latest thing have the be the indicator of everything?
RRR3 wrote:Pacers don't start trying until the last 5 minutes I swear
Clutch time merchants
Truly incredible stuff hope they pull it off
threethehardway wrote:Mark D. is learning how to coach on the fly.
He's one of these tinkering type of coaches that likes to be creative vs liking winning.
There is no reason to go small against the Pacers.
Thunder doesn't have any offensive fire power besides Shai. The Thunder is built like the 90s Bulls. Generational defense and an ATG scoring guard that carries the offense.
There is no reason to play Ajay Mitchell or Isaiah Joe at this point.
Play JDub, IHart, and Chet. Focus on rebounding and stopping paint touches. Focus on contesting every shot.
The offense by the team isn't going to be there and there's no point in screwing around to manufacture it when everyone knows your team can't score for crap.
JWill better get his game right in the off-season. He's terrible. The Thunder's issue on offense is mostly his fault. He can't shoot 3s. He can't dribble. He can't create for others. He's useless against playoff defenses.
RookieStar wrote:I have this weird feeling. I dunno i cant explain it but... now we have had our feel good "anythin is possible" moment.... i kinda feel OKC gonna win 4 straight.
Its like they popped their cherries and now can get serious
Mavrelous wrote:The geniuses on the NBA app, sent a notification that IND won game 1, I didn't look at it except at the header, so I watched the game with that in mind, and had no clue how it went down, absolutely insane...
Edrees wrote:doogie_hauser wrote:Why is it most of the critics/haters of the Pacers seem to be fans of Western Conference teams and by that i mean Denver (and Joker Stans from what I am reading)
I think we all wanted (no matter who we root for) a long and dramatic finals series that goes at least 6 games, yet some fans (not OKC Stans who seemed magnanimous and gracious in defeat) seem rattled the poor plucky underdogs from small town Indiana upset the apple cart and stole game 1.
Aside from last year, I don't think I have enjoyed a more enjoyable game 1 of the Finals since 2008 !
They built their team (Indy) the right way, I remember reading somewhere they have only had one under 30 win season since the 80s, never tanked, and made some bold and aggressive trades and astute drafting.
Also suffered a ton of injuries this season.
This team is as anti trust the process tanking Sixers (a team and philosophy I truly abhor) and should be given their flowers for that.
Just thinking, if they win the chip, does this mean the Nets and Flint Tropics are the only teams left from the ABA who haven't won a championship in the NBA post merger??
#LetsGetTropical !
Every laker fan is rooting for the Pacers, if you check out lakers subreddit it's not even close.The-Stallion70 wrote:Reminds me of when the Sixers took game 1 against the Lakers in 2001.
I personally expect OKC to basically dominate the rest of the series.
Except the Lakers showed how dominant they actually were by being undefeated before that including sweeping a 58 win team without home court advantage. Oh and also winning a title the year before.
OKC hasn't shown that, even being extended to 7 by a team that only won 50 games. Basically OKC didn't lose this game to complacency. they lost because Pacers played out of their goddamn minds.
LAL only lost to complacency because of 11 strait playoff wins and no losses, coming off an NBA title, they thought it was going to be easy so they just relaxed. this situation isnt' remotely like that.
The-Stallion70 wrote:Reminds me of when the Sixers took game 1 against the Lakers in 2001.
I personally expect OKC to basically dominate the rest of the series.
RookieStar wrote:I have this weird feeling. I dunno i cant explain it but... now we have had our feel good "anythin is possible" moment.... i kinda feel OKC gonna win 4 straight.
Its like they popped their cherries and now can get serious
Mavrelous wrote:The geniuses on the NBA app, sent a notification that IND won game 1, I didn't look at it except at the header, so I watched the game with that in mind, and had no clue how it went down, absolutely insane...
Deivork wrote:RookieStar wrote:I have this weird feeling. I dunno i cant explain it but... now we have had our feel good "anythin is possible" moment.... i kinda feel OKC gonna win 4 straight.
Its like they popped their cherries and now can get serious
Would you say the Thunder played a non serious game? I wouldn't. They looked like often (dominant) but then missed shots in the end and lost. They have room for improvement? Sure, but so do the Pacers who, on the other hand were quite subpar.
eyeatoma wrote:?t=aoY27P1Zv6Sr76ybr3mPdw&s=19
The Pacers have been sports bettings wet dream!!
Sent from my SM-X920 using Tapatalk