LockoutSeason wrote:
I do have a question though, why are we excluding the Covid years? I mean, people couldn't do anything else but watch TV. Those should have been the most watched, honestly.
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
LockoutSeason wrote:

Anticon wrote:NBA and ESPN promoted Bronny more than either of these teams. So you reap what you sow.

adubmac wrote:As I'm not a stakeholder of the NBA, I'll take a game winner over a few more million eye balls watching the series.
Tim_Hardawayy wrote:This will be a very unpopular take for many posters here, but I think the NBA shot itself in the foot badly getting as political as it did during the covid years, and it might never recover from that.
Anticon wrote:NBA and ESPN promoted Bronny more than either of these teams. So you reap what you sow.
Tim_Hardawayy wrote:This will be a very unpopular take for many posters here, but I think the NBA shot itself in the foot badly getting as political as it did during the covid years, and it might never recover from that.
levon wrote:Anticon wrote:NBA and ESPN promoted Bronny more than either of these teams. So you reap what you sow.
Honestly this isn't true. They've been promoting the **** out of this on ESPN daytime shows this whole week. They had like a 4 hours Finals special day of too. I think you guys keep saying the same old tired stuff to farm and-1s instead of just admitting that market size matters for viewership.
Anticon wrote:levon wrote:Anticon wrote:NBA and ESPN promoted Bronny more than either of these teams. So you reap what you sow.
Honestly this isn't true. They've been promoting the **** out of this on ESPN daytime shows this whole week. They had like a 4 hours Finals special day of too. I think you guys keep saying the same old tired stuff to farm and-1s instead of just admitting that market size matters for viewership.
Of course it matters. But you can't just promote a brand the day of an event and expect people to know or care about.
ESPN simply never promotes the product that is the NBA and now they'll pay for it.

levon wrote:Anticon wrote:levon wrote:Honestly this isn't true. They've been promoting the **** out of this on ESPN daytime shows this whole week. They had like a 4 hours Finals special day of too. I think you guys keep saying the same old tired stuff to farm and-1s instead of just admitting that market size matters for viewership.
Of course it matters. But you can't just promote a brand the day of an event and expect people to know or care about.
ESPN simply never promotes the product that is the NBA and now they'll pay for it.
Do you have evidence that ESPN never promotes the product? Again, they've promoted these Finals a lot. Silver's been on a media tour defending the matchup too against naysayers.
MrGoat wrote:TV ratings aren't as important as they used to be. That just means boomers in the US have tuned out. Streaming and international markets mean a lot more now, too

djsunyc wrote:inside the nba and former players keep bringing up the negatives - which made a dent. for a mainly black league, it's so stupid to not spin the positive considering everything.

bkkrh wrote:Also that graphic from the same article makes the writing style of it really look silly:
Kinda giving the impression that people mostly care to watch a good game and start to watch if they realize it's the case.
xBulletproof wrote:LockoutSeason wrote:Spoiler:
I do have a question though, why are we excluding the Covid years? I mean, people couldn't do anything else but watch TV. Those should have been the most watched, honestly.