QB_Eagles wrote:Cactus Jack wrote:QB_Eagles wrote:I like it for the Steelers. Either it works or it will be a disaster. I think the latter is much more likely but at least it's better than certain other teams that give big contracts to QBs who are proven liabilities in the playoffs. On the flip side, both P. Manning and Brady got carried to SBs by great teams while they were old and declining.
Are we talking about Carson Wentz?
Darnold's deal is very team friendly. It's basically a 1 year guarantee with team options. If he's terrible, he won't be around for long.
A 41 year old Rodgers with his entourage is not a preferable option.
Fwiw the Steelers wanted to sign Darnold. But he chose Seattle instead.
I was thinking more about Dak Prescott.
I'm aware the Seahawks can move onto the next bridge QB smoothly.
My bad.