Game 1 of the Finals posts horrific TV ratings
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
Re: Game 1 of the Finals posts horrific TV ratings
-
3ddman23
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,775
- And1: 3,388
- Joined: Jul 02, 2013
- Location: orlando
-
Re: Game 1 of the Finals posts horrific TV ratings
This type of stuff is media driven. Everyone says the series is gonna suck so the general public think it's gonna suck before the games are even played.
They ride the small market train and people stick with it. When you have people like chuck & Shaq saying they aren't gonna watch the series people listen to that and follow suit.
They ride the small market train and people stick with it. When you have people like chuck & Shaq saying they aren't gonna watch the series people listen to that and follow suit.
GO MAGIC
Re: Game 1 of the Finals posts horrific TV ratings
- Johnny Bball
- RealGM
- Posts: 55,055
- And1: 59,455
- Joined: Feb 01, 2015
-
Re: Game 1 of the Finals posts horrific TV ratings
Game 1 of the Stanley Cup finals was really low for no real good reason too so it might not be what you think.
Re: Game 1 of the Finals posts horrific TV ratings
-
Michael Bradley
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,604
- And1: 2,300
- Joined: Feb 25, 2004
Re: Game 1 of the Finals posts horrific TV ratings
levon wrote:Anticon wrote:NBA and ESPN promoted Bronny more than either of these teams. So you reap what you sow.
Honestly this isn't true. They've been promoting the **** out of this on ESPN daytime shows this whole week. They had like a 4 hours Finals special day of too. I think you guys keep saying the same old tired stuff to farm and-1s instead of just admitting that market size matters for viewership.
Yeah this isn't due to lack of promotion. When the NFL season is over, ESPN talks about nothing except the NBA. Everyone who is within ear shot of ESPN on a TV screen knew about the Finals. It's just a bad matchup that casuals aren't going to want to watch, and I think both the NBA and ESPN know it (possibly why they have half assed the production).
The NBA spent years building around stars. They trained fans to root for the back of the jersey rather than the front of it. So in the absence of a big market (Knicks, Lakers), if you have a series that doesn't have a primetime popular mega star in it, then it's going to do poorly. Some of that is the NBA's own fault. Even last year's ratings were pretty bad considering the markets involved.
Re: Game 1 of the Finals posts horrific TV ratings
- Lunartic
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,131
- And1: 9,792
- Joined: Nov 28, 2015
Re: Game 1 of the Finals posts horrific TV ratings
Ratings are down since the 90s, the 00s and the 2010s.
Less people are viewing the NBA than before. Some people will do acrobatics and contort themselves in an attempt to obfuscate or "debunk" this simple fact. It doesn't matter, they're wrong.
The NBA is less appealing than before and declining viewership is the obvious outcome.
Less people are viewing the NBA than before. Some people will do acrobatics and contort themselves in an attempt to obfuscate or "debunk" this simple fact. It doesn't matter, they're wrong.
The NBA is less appealing than before and declining viewership is the obvious outcome.
Re: Game 1 of the Finals posts horrific TV ratings
- ForeverTFC
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,092
- And1: 19,774
- Joined: Dec 07, 2004
-
Re: Game 1 of the Finals posts horrific TV ratings
Tim_Hardawayy wrote:This will be a very unpopular take for many posters here, but I think the NBA shot itself in the foot badly getting as political as it did during the covid years, and it might never recover from that.
It's more popular than you're letting on given how much it's in our daily discourse. But it's also a very bad take.
The NBA media rights are worth more today than they have ever been. The record new deal was signed last year and starts next year. Did the NBA lose some eyeballs? Maybe. Did it hurt them? Clearly no.
Re: Game 1 of the Finals posts horrific TV ratings
-
OnlyTheTruth
- Sophomore
- Posts: 236
- And1: 180
- Joined: Jan 20, 2024
-
Re: Game 1 of the Finals posts horrific TV ratings
Celtics/Lakers run this game. They always had.
Re: Game 1 of the Finals posts horrific TV ratings
-
kodo
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,277
- And1: 15,642
- Joined: Oct 10, 2006
- Location: Northshore Burbs
-
Re: Game 1 of the Finals posts horrific TV ratings
durden_tyler wrote:MrGoat wrote:TV ratings aren't as important as they used to be. That just means boomers in the US have tuned out. Streaming and international markets mean a lot more now, too
This. Someone get us those streaming numbers.
Streaming has been accounted for in ratings for many years. Nielsen started doing this in 2011, 14 years ago.
It's really not an Indiana/OKC problem, younger people just don't engage in the live broadcasts nearly as much as older people. If they're interested they watch highlights, check scores, watch the social media around the event. A 2.5 hour sit through commercials for 48 min of action is a deal killer for 18-24 year olds. They have about 10m of attention span.
Re: Game 1 of the Finals posts horrific TV ratings
- azcatz11
- RealGM
- Posts: 31,532
- And1: 35,186
- Joined: Apr 13, 2017
- Location: Phoenix
-
Re: Game 1 of the Finals posts horrific TV ratings
Cactus Jack wrote:I'm really curious how the ratings would look in a market like Seattle.
You have two common groups here: Fans who either choose not to watch or don't have any interest whatsoever & fans who still actively hate-watch.
I personally have no interest in watching that team. So, I am actively boycotting this series. But I know that I'm not alone.
Yes, there still are fans of the NBA up this way. But some of us choose when & when not to watch.
Does anyone in Seattle remain a thunder fan? I assume the answer is no?
Praying for Burrow
Re: Game 1 of the Finals posts horrific TV ratings
-
NotaHypeJob
- Starter
- Posts: 2,384
- And1: 2,960
- Joined: Feb 15, 2014
Re: Game 1 of the Finals posts horrific TV ratings
azcatz11 wrote:Cactus Jack wrote:I'm really curious how the ratings would look in a market like Seattle.
You have two common groups here: Fans who either choose not to watch or don't have any interest whatsoever & fans who still actively hate-watch.
I personally have no interest in watching that team. So, I am actively boycotting this series. But I know that I'm not alone.
Yes, there still are fans of the NBA up this way. But some of us choose when & when not to watch.
Does anyone in Seattle remain a thunder fan? I assume the answer is no?
Hell no
Re: Game 1 of the Finals posts horrific TV ratings
- G R E Y
- Senior Mod - Spurs

- Posts: 52,876
- And1: 40,353
- Joined: Mar 17, 2010
- Location: Silver and Black
-
Re: Game 1 of the Finals posts horrific TV ratings
Perhaps after Game 1's incredible finish, Game 2 will get more viewership.



The Spurs Way Ever Onward
#XX
Re: Game 1 of the Finals posts horrific TV ratings
- Raps in 4
- RealGM
- Posts: 67,218
- And1: 62,088
- Joined: Nov 01, 2008
- Location: Toronto
-
Re: Game 1 of the Finals posts horrific TV ratings
How many celebrities were in the crowd? Why would I watch a sporting event without all the top celebrities in attendance? At least in the last series I could see what Timothee Chalamet and his girfriend were up to in the crowd. That was so cool.
Also, where the **** is Oklahoma City? I've never even heard of the place. How many movies and shows are filmed there? What are the beaches like? What about the nightlife? Why would I watch a sporting event that isn't taking place in a hip city?
Also, where the **** is Oklahoma City? I've never even heard of the place. How many movies and shows are filmed there? What are the beaches like? What about the nightlife? Why would I watch a sporting event that isn't taking place in a hip city?
Re: Game 1 of the Finals posts horrific TV ratings
-
NotaHypeJob
- Starter
- Posts: 2,384
- And1: 2,960
- Joined: Feb 15, 2014
Re: Game 1 of the Finals posts horrific TV ratings
Raps in 4 wrote:How many celebrities were in the crowd? Why would I watch a sporting event without all the top celebrities in attendance? At least in the last series I could see what Timothee Chalamet and his girfriend were up to in the crowd. That was so cool.
Also, where the **** is Oklahoma City? I've never even heard of the place. How many movies and shows are filmed there? What are the beaches like? What about the nightlife? Why would I watch a sporting event that isn't taking place in a hip city?
I would rather watch dune part two than this finals tbh.
I'll check out game 2 tho, might be good
Re: Game 1 of the Finals posts horrific TV ratings
-
DavidSterned
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,086
- And1: 4,870
- Joined: Feb 18, 2010
-
Re: Game 1 of the Finals posts horrific TV ratings
azcatz11 wrote:Cactus Jack wrote:I'm really curious how the ratings would look in a market like Seattle.
You have two common groups here: Fans who either choose not to watch or don't have any interest whatsoever & fans who still actively hate-watch.
I personally have no interest in watching that team. So, I am actively boycotting this series. But I know that I'm not alone.
Yes, there still are fans of the NBA up this way. But some of us choose when & when not to watch.
Does anyone in Seattle remain a thunder fan? I assume the answer is no?
I've talked to a couple but they're rightfully treated like lepers.
Re: Game 1 of the Finals posts horrific TV ratings
-
FarBeyondDriven
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,479
- And1: 2,687
- Joined: Aug 11, 2021
Re: Game 1 of the Finals posts horrific TV ratings
good. Hopefully things get bad enough for Silver to be fired and a hard salary cap can be instituted. These players and owners make way too much money for the product they're putting out
Re: Game 1 of the Finals posts horrific TV ratings
- Cactus Jack
- Forum Mod - Supersonics

- Posts: 33,285
- And1: 16,708
- Joined: Feb 25, 2015
- Location: PNW
-
Re: Game 1 of the Finals posts horrific TV ratings
azcatz11 wrote:Cactus Jack wrote:I'm really curious how the ratings would look in a market like Seattle.
You have two common groups here: Fans who either choose not to watch or don't have any interest whatsoever & fans who still actively hate-watch.
I personally have no interest in watching that team. So, I am actively boycotting this series. But I know that I'm not alone.
Yes, there still are fans of the NBA up this way. But some of us choose when & when not to watch.
Does anyone in Seattle remain a thunder fan? I assume the answer is no?
I don't know anyone from the area that is a fan of that team. The large majority despise OKC.
There are still a good amount of folks who refuse to watch anything NBA related. They're still pissed over the move. Fans are waiting for an expansion team. But some are completely apathetic when you bring it up.
I was actually listening to local sports radio earlier today & the topic came up. They we're celebrating over the fact that they lost.
Dominater wrote:Damn Cactus jack takin over
Re: Game 1 of the Finals posts horrific TV ratings
-
sammo89
- Junior
- Posts: 365
- And1: 279
- Joined: May 07, 2022
Re: Game 1 of the Finals posts horrific TV ratings
They should post the cumulative playoff numbers from the first round to the finals. Something tells me it evens out when you count all the rounds together
Re: Game 1 of the Finals posts horrific TV ratings
- LuDux1
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,905
- And1: 4,868
- Joined: Mar 22, 2009
Re: Game 1 of the Finals posts horrific TV ratings
NBA finals will never be exciting until NBA owners hire capable professionals, like Dimitrios Giannakopoulos and Evan Fournier
Re: Game 1 of the Finals posts horrific TV ratings
-
dantas
- Junior
- Posts: 252
- And1: 200
- Joined: Jun 22, 2018
Re: Game 1 of the Finals posts horrific TV ratings
I think it was a combination of a few things
1.OKC started out as the sixth biggest favorites for the NBA Finals since 1968. So there was an idea in the casual public that the series wouldn't be competitive. 2. None of the stars (SGA, Haliburton) are among the NBA's most popular players. 3. Smaller market teams
The first item can be improved as the series progresses. It could become a competitive series. But the other two can't be changed. So these finals won't be great ratings. These things happen.
1.OKC started out as the sixth biggest favorites for the NBA Finals since 1968. So there was an idea in the casual public that the series wouldn't be competitive. 2. None of the stars (SGA, Haliburton) are among the NBA's most popular players. 3. Smaller market teams
The first item can be improved as the series progresses. It could become a competitive series. But the other two can't be changed. So these finals won't be great ratings. These things happen.
Re: Game 1 of the Finals posts horrific TV ratings
- Black Jack
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,754
- And1: 7,266
- Joined: Jan 24, 2013
- Location: In the stands kicking ass
-
Re: Game 1 of the Finals posts horrific TV ratings
NBA has terrible marketing
Also I think they need less commercials and timeouts. its horrific watching a full games worth of commercials.
Can I pay like a trillion dollars to not have to watch commercials and just see stadium footage during timeouts?
Also I think they need less commercials and timeouts. its horrific watching a full games worth of commercials.
Can I pay like a trillion dollars to not have to watch commercials and just see stadium footage during timeouts?
Re: Game 1 of the Finals posts horrific TV ratings
-
xxSnEaKyPxx
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,432
- And1: 19,060
- Joined: Jun 02, 2007
Re: Game 1 of the Finals posts horrific TV ratings
NotaHypeJob wrote:azcatz11 wrote:Cactus Jack wrote:I'm really curious how the ratings would look in a market like Seattle.
You have two common groups here: Fans who either choose not to watch or don't have any interest whatsoever & fans who still actively hate-watch.
I personally have no interest in watching that team. So, I am actively boycotting this series. But I know that I'm not alone.
Yes, there still are fans of the NBA up this way. But some of us choose when & when not to watch.
Does anyone in Seattle remain a thunder fan? I assume the answer is no?
Hell no
Why you lying bro?
I have a third cousin, who gets deli salami from this guy, whose sister’s ex husband, was in the army with a guy who had a kid, who moved from OKC to Seattle 5 years ago, and is a massive Thunder fan.
People will say anything in the internet these days…








