DonDoolie wrote:sidsid wrote:mihaic wrote:Lol.
Well if we were the Lakers, yes, it would have a chance
Edit: how about Luka for Giannis.
Legitimately the Cavs should do this for their Garland/Allen package. They wont get Giannis for it and AD provides more shooting to work with Mobley. Fixing the main problems on both ends. They'll get a SF in that deal, too.
The Mavs just reroute Allen somewhere else and sell Kyrie to the highest bidder.
Do you guys even try to use logic in these trades or just pull them out the ass? Why would the Mavs give up Davis for Garland and Allen when they just gave up a superstar player to get Davis not to mention they already have Lively and Gafford in the front court and a PG that is a million times better than Garland
Well the Luka trade was a historically awful decision. Can't make decisions around sunk costs. This upcoming offseason is likely to see the Spurs make a jump in contender rankings and the Thunder will just be 1 year more experienced. The Mavs are not contending for anything.
The Flagg draft just gave them a lifeline to pivot to youth and wash themselves of that disaster trade.
mihaic wrote:The Mavs manager Nico or what's his name said their roster is set to compete. They will not break the team apart for tanking, imo.
They surely wanted to pair Kyrie with Lively and AD. They may want to give it a try since they couldn't this year, right?
They almost certainly will, but they shouldn't. They have their draft pick next year, but not for the 2 after. They can pivot to cap space next offseason depending on the trades or just take on expensive vets instead and start climbing the ladder around a team closer to the age of their hopeful young star.




















