What would you give for Garland ?

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

JujitsuFlip
RealGM
Posts: 14,821
And1: 9,174
Joined: Sep 10, 2021

Re: What would you give for Garland ? 

Post#121 » by JujitsuFlip » Mon Jun 9, 2025 11:24 am

shi-woo wrote:
JujitsuFlip wrote:
shi-woo wrote:Go look at recent trades for players of similar or greater skill, and what they went for.

Kyrie was traded to DAL for DFS, Spencer and a FRP
Fox was traded for Lavine
Derrick White was traded for JRich, Langford, and a FRP
Harden was traded to LAC for contracts and 2 mid FRP
Murray was traded for Daniels and 2 FRP
Dame was traded to MIL for Jrue
Jrue was traded to BOS for Malcolm, Time Lord, and 2 FRP

First and foremost, no JI is not All-Defense, he's never made a team, probably bc he's never healthy. And no, I'd much rather have actual All-Defense player Daniels over Scoot.

To your trades, they need context because your talent evaluation is very suspect.

Kyrie was 30, expiring, and had the vaccine drama.

Fox was a 1 time AS with 1.5 years left on his deal. Older than Garland too at 27, what has he ever accomplished in the playoffs?

White is a zero time AS and had accomplished exactly what in the playoffs to that point? Older than Garland at 27 too.

Harden was 34, expiring, and super overweight. Historic playoff choker.

Murray was a 1 time AS and has accomplished what exactly in the playoffs?

Dame was 33 and i believe requested a trade.

Jrue was 33 and expiring.

Out of your 7 examples you didn't name a single 2 time All-Star, who is 25, and locked up for 3 more years.

So what do i expect? A better package than anything you just listed.


But Garland is a worse player than all of those guys though, with the exception of maybe Murray who checked out. All those dudes have far more success than Garland, and they did it either as 1 options, or won rings. Saying he's an AS is meaningless in an NBA were Jamal Magloire, Kyle Korver, Mo Williams and Jeff Teague also had the honors. Derrick White is not an all star, but most people on this board would probably agree he's a better and more valuable player than Garland.

You' can nit pick the same for Garland. Doesn't fit with Mitch, silently asked out last offseason if reports are to be believed. Constant let down in the PO, and has been hurt the past two years when his team needed him. Hasn't proven to be able to play with another talented ball handler. Gets hunted like he's Trae Young on D.

Everything you said about his peers are true about him.

I'm not saying that is the best deal, but akin to what a Garland deal will probably look like, and gave you the past 7 trades of AS level to All NBA level guards to show precedence. 1 mid prospect and 2 mid picks. Reed and Brooks is the other trade example I gave, and think it would be wild if Garland went for anything more than that.

There are only a limited amount of teams who are in need of a PG, so I don't see the demand for him like that. He's not fetching young prospects like Amen or Franz, so it's either going to be okay starter level guys, or mid prospects. I think CLE would look to add depth at the wing, and add a guard piece for cheap, given they can just resign Ty to replace Garlands shooting and playmaking. Which is another aspect of the trade you are missing if it happens. The cap implications.
They're all better than Garland based on what? You being a Celtics fan? lol

More successful? I'll ask again, what have Fox and Murray ever accomplished in their careers? Really truly, put Dame in there too.

Harden went to the Finals 13 years ago as a bench player. Yes he won a MVP but he was also 9 years older than current Garland when he got traded. He was fat. He gets hunted just like Trae and Garland. And as i told you, he was expiring.

Kyrie won a ring with LeBron, as a 2nd option, he's did nothing else in his career. Was 8 years older than current Garland, expiring, and massive off court drama.

Derrick White accomplished exactly nothing until joining a stacked Boston team.

Jrue has won 2 rings now but he's always like the 4th best player on those teams, at best, he's a role player. And yet again i tell you, was expiring, old as dirt, etc etc.

P.S. it's hilarious you say Garland and Mitchell can't work together yet they just won 64 games together before both getting hurt in May. Jerome is also an UFA but i wouldn't expect you to know/care, as it doesn't fit your narrative.
The Big O
Sophomore
Posts: 161
And1: 147
Joined: Jun 03, 2023

Re: What would you give for Garland ? 

Post#122 » by The Big O » Mon Jun 9, 2025 1:27 pm

Garland is overall not worth much.
Chokic
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,250
And1: 996
Joined: Mar 30, 2023

Re: What would you give for Garland ? 

Post#123 » by Chokic » Mon Jun 9, 2025 1:55 pm

Garland is a steve nash level player. Lakers and spurs should have pulled the trigger when they had the chance.
User avatar
Lunartic
Head Coach
Posts: 6,086
And1: 9,746
Joined: Nov 28, 2015

Re: What would you give for Garland ? 

Post#124 » by Lunartic » Mon Jun 9, 2025 2:13 pm

Garland is good enough to need tons of money and to start but not good enough to actually be the #1 or 2 so you need to spend even more money surrounding him with actual stars.

Nuggets would look pretty good with him though
shi-woo
Veteran
Posts: 2,568
And1: 4,106
Joined: Jun 17, 2018
     

Re: What would you give for Garland ? 

Post#125 » by shi-woo » Mon Jun 9, 2025 2:37 pm

Chokic wrote:Garland is a steve nash level player. Lakers and spurs should have pulled the trigger when they had the chance.


That's wild. Nash was better at Garland's biggest strength (shooting), and literally runs circles around him in terms of running the offense. Nash imo is one of the most over rated players of all time, but he was still an offensive fulcrum you could use to create an entire offense around. 2x MVP and one of the best PG's of all time.

We have seen absolutely nothing from Garland at this point in his career to suggest he could ever reach that level...

Man it's wild how over rated this guy is on this board, I never knew how highly some people thought of Garland till this thread.
ChumboChappati
Pro Prospect
Posts: 913
And1: 545
Joined: Jul 30, 2021

Re: What would you give for Garland ? 

Post#126 » by ChumboChappati » Mon Jun 9, 2025 2:44 pm

Magic_Johnny12 wrote:Before we get heavy into this discussion, can a few Cleveland fans (that are level headed and realistic) that are in-tuned with the Cavaliers finances tell us what they might be looking for?

Positions?
Archetype?
Salary range?
Depth?
Picks?

Garland would be a godsend for Magic but I am afraid the asking price will be high like Franz
ChumboChappati
Pro Prospect
Posts: 913
And1: 545
Joined: Jul 30, 2021

Re: What would you give for Garland ? 

Post#127 » by ChumboChappati » Mon Jun 9, 2025 2:48 pm

Saul Goodman wrote:Suggs for Garland makes a lot of sense for both teams



For the Raptors I’d do Barrett and quickly for Garland

Suggs always injured is not enough for Garland.
Wingy
RealGM
Posts: 16,135
And1: 7,084
Joined: Feb 15, 2007

Re: What would you give for Garland ? 

Post#128 » by Wingy » Mon Jun 9, 2025 3:08 pm

Looking through the thread, I think it matches my gut feeling.

He’s one of those players good enough that the Cavs will struggle to get back equal value, and not good enough to get back what they need.
Magic_Johnny12
RealGM
Posts: 12,448
And1: 10,055
Joined: Sep 27, 2013
Contact:
         

Re: What would you give for Garland ? 

Post#129 » by Magic_Johnny12 » Mon Jun 9, 2025 3:10 pm

ChumboChappati wrote:
Magic_Johnny12 wrote:Before we get heavy into this discussion, can a few Cleveland fans (that are level headed and realistic) that are in-tuned with the Cavaliers finances tell us what they might be looking for?

Positions?
Archetype?
Salary range?
Depth?
Picks?

Garland would be a godsend for Magic but I am afraid the asking price will be high like Franz


Which is fine to ask for and I fully expect Cleveland to do so, however there would be negative interest from the Orlando side.

It isnt Garland or bust for Orlando and they have plenty of other assets to acquire a star guard without touching their core.

I’m also not convinced Garland is “godsend” as you and many others believe. Defensive liability, injury prone and on a hefty contract that Orlando can’t afford longterm.

There will be better options for Orlando, even if that means waiting until next offseason.
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 59,047
And1: 36,110
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: What would you give for Garland ? 

Post#130 » by jbk1234 » Mon Jun 9, 2025 3:17 pm

Magic_Johnny12 wrote:
ChumboChappati wrote:
Magic_Johnny12 wrote:Before we get heavy into this discussion, can a few Cleveland fans (that are level headed and realistic) that are in-tuned with the Cavaliers finances tell us what they might be looking for?

Positions?
Archetype?
Salary range?
Depth?
Picks?

Garland would be a godsend for Magic but I am afraid the asking price will be high like Franz


Which is fine to ask for and I fully expect Cleveland to do so, however there would be negative interest from the Orlando side.

It isnt Garland or bust for Orlando and they have plenty of other assets to acquire a star guard without touching their core.

I’m also not convinced Garland is “godsend” as you and many others believe. Defensive liability, injury prone and on a hefty contract that Orlando can’t afford longterm.

There will be better options for Orlando, even if that means waiting until next offseason.


Sounds like the Cavs have no interest in sending Garland to Orlando.
https://www.fearthesword.com/2025/6/8/24445550/nba-trade-rumor-cavs-darius-garland-orland-magic-jalen-suggs-cleveland-cavaliers
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 59,047
And1: 36,110
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: What would you give for Garland ? 

Post#131 » by jbk1234 » Mon Jun 9, 2025 3:21 pm

Wingy wrote:Looking through the thread, I think it matches my gut feeling.

He’s one of those players good enough that the Cavs will struggle to get back equal value, and not good enough to get back what they need.


Then he won't be moved. If your best option is hoping he's healthy for the playoffs next season, you take the best option.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Magic_Johnny12
RealGM
Posts: 12,448
And1: 10,055
Joined: Sep 27, 2013
Contact:
         

Re: What would you give for Garland ? 

Post#132 » by Magic_Johnny12 » Mon Jun 9, 2025 3:28 pm

jbk1234 wrote:
Magic_Johnny12 wrote:
ChumboChappati wrote:Garland would be a godsend for Magic but I am afraid the asking price will be high like Franz


Which is fine to ask for and I fully expect Cleveland to do so, however there would be negative interest from the Orlando side.

It isnt Garland or bust for Orlando and they have plenty of other assets to acquire a star guard without touching their core.


I’m also not convinced Garland is “godsend” as you and many others believe. Defensive liability, injury prone and on a hefty contract that Orlando can’t afford longterm.

There will be better options for Orlando, even if that means waiting until next offseason.


Sounds like the Cavs have no interest in sending Garland to Orlando.
https://www.fearthesword.com/2025/6/8/24445550/nba-trade-rumor-cavs-darius-garland-orland-magic-jalen-suggs-cleveland-cavaliers


and that Cleveland has little interest in helping Orlando improve its standing in the Eastern Conference.


Very smart and likewise!
JujitsuFlip
RealGM
Posts: 14,821
And1: 9,174
Joined: Sep 10, 2021

Re: What would you give for Garland ? 

Post#133 » by JujitsuFlip » Mon Jun 9, 2025 3:48 pm

shi-woo wrote:Saying (Garland) is an AS is meaningless in an NBA where Jamal Magloire, Kyle Korver, Mo Williams and Jeff Teague also had the honor.

So all 1 time All-Stars. Let's see your list of 2 time All-Stars that make it 'meaningless' for Garland to hold that designation.
flow
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,682
And1: 2,842
Joined: Feb 18, 2016

Re: What would you give for Garland ? 

Post#134 » by flow » Mon Jun 9, 2025 3:56 pm

JujitsuFlip wrote:
shi-woo wrote:Saying (Garland) is an AS is meaningless in an NBA where Jamal Magloire, Kyle Korver, Mo Williams and Jeff Teague also had the honor.

So all 1 time All-Stars. Let's see your list of 2 time All-Stars that make it 'meaningless' for Garland to hold that designation.


Do you really want that answered? You know such a list can be assembled. And I like Garland.

.
JujitsuFlip
RealGM
Posts: 14,821
And1: 9,174
Joined: Sep 10, 2021

Re: What would you give for Garland ? 

Post#135 » by JujitsuFlip » Mon Jun 9, 2025 4:20 pm

flow wrote:
JujitsuFlip wrote:
shi-woo wrote:Saying (Garland) is an AS is meaningless in an NBA where Jamal Magloire, Kyle Korver, Mo Williams and Jeff Teague also had the honor.

So all 1 time All-Stars. Let's see your list of 2 time All-Stars that make it 'meaningless' for Garland to hold that designation.


Do you really want that answered? You know such a list can be assembled. And I like Garland.

.
Yes, please do.

A Boston fan dumping on Garland and thinking his value is injury plagued Jonathon Isaac, the bust that is Scoot Henderson, and a mid 1st rounder is comical to me.
Mr Loggins
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,160
And1: 2,498
Joined: Jul 22, 2009
Location: Minneapolis, MN

Re: What would you give for Garland ? 

Post#136 » by Mr Loggins » Mon Jun 9, 2025 4:33 pm

flow wrote:
JujitsuFlip wrote:
shi-woo wrote:Saying (Garland) is an AS is meaningless in an NBA where Jamal Magloire, Kyle Korver, Mo Williams and Jeff Teague also had the honor.

So all 1 time All-Stars. Let's see your list of 2 time All-Stars that make it 'meaningless' for Garland to hold that designation.


Do you really want that answered? You know such a list can be assembled. And I like Garland.

.



please do, and remember to include the age cutoff so we don’t get a list of players with 2 all star apprarances ovet like 17 years
CoinTossRoss31
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,510
And1: 1,516
Joined: Jan 01, 2013
Location: Ottawa
         

Re: What would you give for Garland ? 

Post#137 » by CoinTossRoss31 » Mon Jun 9, 2025 4:37 pm

Should have figured something out with the Raptors when OG was on the market
Image
Magic_Johnny12
RealGM
Posts: 12,448
And1: 10,055
Joined: Sep 27, 2013
Contact:
         

Re: What would you give for Garland ? 

Post#138 » by Magic_Johnny12 » Mon Jun 9, 2025 4:58 pm

This dude can’t stay healthy, Cleveland was smart to shop him. Hes there to stay now and subsequently this injury almost forces Cleveland to try to retain Jerome by all means necessary.

Read on Twitter
?s=46&t=U-6BxaJHr50VVe8YqOpDSQ
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 59,047
And1: 36,110
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: What would you give for Garland ? 

Post#139 » by jbk1234 » Mon Jun 9, 2025 4:58 pm

CoinTossRoss31 wrote:Should have figured something out with the Raptors when OG was on the market


This assumes that the Cavs like the idea of O.G. on a 30% max more than Garland on a 25% max. I really like O.G., but fundamentally, I don't think he's the type of player you can give 30% of your cap to and still build a contending roster.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 59,047
And1: 36,110
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: What would you give for Garland ? 

Post#140 » by jbk1234 » Mon Jun 9, 2025 5:03 pm

Magic_Johnny12 wrote:This dude can’t stay healthy, Cleveland was smart to shop him. Hes there to stay now and subsequently this injury almost forces Cleveland to try to retain Jerome by all means necessary.

Read on Twitter
?s=46&t=U-6BxaJHr50VVe8YqOpDSQ


The retain-at-all-costs argument worked a lot better before Jerome was an objectively awful replacement for Garland in the Pacers series.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.

Return to The General Board