Rank 21 Suns, 22 Celtics, 23 Heat, 24 Mavericks, 25 Pacers
Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal
Rank 21 Suns, 22 Celtics, 23 Heat, 24 Mavericks, 25 Pacers
- Dr Positivity
- RealGM
- Posts: 62,784
- And1: 16,392
- Joined: Apr 29, 2009
-
Rank 21 Suns, 22 Celtics, 23 Heat, 24 Mavericks, 25 Pacers
This group of finalists is not super imposing, nonetheless played well to get there. Which were the best?
Liberate The Zoomers
Re: Rank 21 Suns, 22 Celtics, 23 Heat, 24 Mavericks, 25 Pacers
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,229
- And1: 2,948
- Joined: Apr 13, 2013
Re: Rank 21 Suns, 22 Celtics, 23 Heat, 24 Mavericks, 25 Pacers
1. 2022 Celtics
2. 2021 Suns
3. 2024 Mavericks
4. 2025 Pacers
5. 2023 Heat
I’m fairly confident about #1 and #5, but there’s not a big difference between the middle three IMO.
I note, though, that this is separate from how impressive they had to be in the playoffs in order to get to the Finals. For instance, the 2023 Heat actually had to beat a really good Celtics team to make the Finals, while the 2021 Suns only beat injured teams. So there’s a plausible argument that the Heat were in better form in the playoffs (or at least had a tougher road to the Finals), but I just think the Suns were the better team more generally.
2. 2021 Suns
3. 2024 Mavericks
4. 2025 Pacers
5. 2023 Heat
I’m fairly confident about #1 and #5, but there’s not a big difference between the middle three IMO.
I note, though, that this is separate from how impressive they had to be in the playoffs in order to get to the Finals. For instance, the 2023 Heat actually had to beat a really good Celtics team to make the Finals, while the 2021 Suns only beat injured teams. So there’s a plausible argument that the Heat were in better form in the playoffs (or at least had a tougher road to the Finals), but I just think the Suns were the better team more generally.
OhayoKD wrote:Lebron contributes more to all the phases of play than Messi does. And he is of course a defensive anchor unlike messi.
Re: Rank 21 Suns, 22 Celtics, 23 Heat, 24 Mavericks, 25 Pacers
-
- Freshman
- Posts: 51
- And1: 41
- Joined: Jan 07, 2017
Re: Rank 21 Suns, 22 Celtics, 23 Heat, 24 Mavericks, 25 Pacers
I think most people will agree 22 Celtics are first and 23 Heat are last. Here is how SRS has them ranked:
1. 22 Celtics - 7.02
2. 21 Suns - 5.67
3. 24 Mavericks - 2.30
4. 25 Pacers - 1.68
5. 23 Heat - -0.13
That looks pretty close to me, I would personally switch the Mavs and Pacers.
1. 22 Celtics - 7.02
2. 21 Suns - 5.67
3. 24 Mavericks - 2.30
4. 25 Pacers - 1.68
5. 23 Heat - -0.13
That looks pretty close to me, I would personally switch the Mavs and Pacers.
Re: Rank 21 Suns, 22 Celtics, 23 Heat, 24 Mavericks, 25 Pacers
- Dr Positivity
- RealGM
- Posts: 62,784
- And1: 16,392
- Joined: Apr 29, 2009
-
Re: Rank 21 Suns, 22 Celtics, 23 Heat, 24 Mavericks, 25 Pacers
1. 25 Pacers - Making a bold call here even if they don't beat OKC, they have balanced offense/defense roster with Siakam/Turner frontcourt, Hali efficient playmaker (and clutch in playoffs), I like the Nembhard and Nesmith defense and some solid bench sparkplug pieces.
2. 24 Mavericks - Powerful Doncic and Kyrie combination with athletic bigs, but relatively imbalanced team talent wise and backcourt D was a hole. Still in the playoffs having shot makers matters, Doncic was one of the few stars on here at his absolute apex, and I like their bench more than 3 and 4.
3. 22 Celtics - Celtics were a beast on defense with Smart's best year allowing them to play him at PG and the rare healthy Rob Will was a difference maker, but easily my least favorite of the top 4 on offense as grinded their way through 7 game playoff rounds. White wasn't the same guy this year hurting their depth.
4. 21 Suns - Good team but their backcourt scares me less than the Mavs and they benefitted from injuries in playoffs. They have some holes that could be exploited on defense and average bench that couldn't survive Payne collapsing. Probably the worst coach on the list and actually got outadjusted by Bud.
5. 23 Heat - They aren't THAT much worse than the 22 Celtics with a similar model of D/3s/star wing, but yea the obvious pick here.
2. 24 Mavericks - Powerful Doncic and Kyrie combination with athletic bigs, but relatively imbalanced team talent wise and backcourt D was a hole. Still in the playoffs having shot makers matters, Doncic was one of the few stars on here at his absolute apex, and I like their bench more than 3 and 4.
3. 22 Celtics - Celtics were a beast on defense with Smart's best year allowing them to play him at PG and the rare healthy Rob Will was a difference maker, but easily my least favorite of the top 4 on offense as grinded their way through 7 game playoff rounds. White wasn't the same guy this year hurting their depth.
4. 21 Suns - Good team but their backcourt scares me less than the Mavs and they benefitted from injuries in playoffs. They have some holes that could be exploited on defense and average bench that couldn't survive Payne collapsing. Probably the worst coach on the list and actually got outadjusted by Bud.
5. 23 Heat - They aren't THAT much worse than the 22 Celtics with a similar model of D/3s/star wing, but yea the obvious pick here.
Liberate The Zoomers
Re: Rank 21 Suns, 22 Celtics, 23 Heat, 24 Mavericks, 25 Pacers
- GSP
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,561
- And1: 16,036
- Joined: Dec 12, 2011
-
Re: Rank 21 Suns, 22 Celtics, 23 Heat, 24 Mavericks, 25 Pacers
24 Mavs
25 Pacers
21 Suns
22 Celtics
23 Heat
Ppl really overrating our 22 team. Having that team 1st and 23 Heat last also makes no logical sense. 23 Celtics were the same team as 22 unless you think Udoka to Mazzulla was some enormous historic downgrade. Smart as much as i love and defended him if hes your 3rd leading scorer your team isn't that great. Grant was also given too much credit for our depth he wasnt that good. Bucks w/o Middleton had us dead to rights Pat Connaughton was their 3rd leading scorer behind Giannis and Jrue that series lol that was a bad look for us
We mightve been better than Phoenix but injuries that whole playoff run just make everything specifically weird. Even Phoenix injuries. Cp3 was useless against Lakers and outproduced by Cam Payne. They had other injuries in Wcf too Iirc
25 Pacers
21 Suns
22 Celtics
23 Heat
Ppl really overrating our 22 team. Having that team 1st and 23 Heat last also makes no logical sense. 23 Celtics were the same team as 22 unless you think Udoka to Mazzulla was some enormous historic downgrade. Smart as much as i love and defended him if hes your 3rd leading scorer your team isn't that great. Grant was also given too much credit for our depth he wasnt that good. Bucks w/o Middleton had us dead to rights Pat Connaughton was their 3rd leading scorer behind Giannis and Jrue that series lol that was a bad look for us
We mightve been better than Phoenix but injuries that whole playoff run just make everything specifically weird. Even Phoenix injuries. Cp3 was useless against Lakers and outproduced by Cam Payne. They had other injuries in Wcf too Iirc
Re: Rank 21 Suns, 22 Celtics, 23 Heat, 24 Mavericks, 25 Pacers
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,229
- And1: 2,948
- Joined: Apr 13, 2013
Re: Rank 21 Suns, 22 Celtics, 23 Heat, 24 Mavericks, 25 Pacers
GSP wrote:Ppl really overrating our 22 team. Having that team 1st and 23 Heat last also makes no logical sense. 23 Celtics were the same team as 22 unless you think Udoka to Mazzulla was some enormous historic downgrade. Smart as much as i love and defended him if hes your 3rd leading scorer your team isn't that great. Grant was also given too much credit for our depth he wasnt that good. Bucks w/o Middleton had us dead to rights Pat Connaughton was their 3rd leading scorer behind Giannis and Jrue that series lol that was a bad look for us
We mightve been better than Phoenix but injuries that whole playoff run just make everything specifically weird. Even Phoenix injuries. Cp3 was useless against Lakers and outproduced by Cam Payne. They had other injuries in Wcf too Iirc
A few things on this:
1. The fact that the 2023 Heat beat the 2023 Celtics doesn’t actually mean that the 2023 Heat were a better team than the 2023 Celtics. There’s a good bit of variance in a single playoff series, and that was pretty front-and-center that series, given how the Heat shot from three. And, even so, the Heat only won in 7 games. I think it’s pretty reasonable to think that the 2023 Celtics would beat the 2023 Heat the vast majority of the time, if we ran that series over a bunch of times. And, regardless, teams can match up well or badly against specific teams, so a team can actually be better than another team and not do better in a matchup between those two teams.
2. The logic of the 2023 Heat beating the 2023 Celtics could be reversed completely, by looking at the 2022 Celtics beating the 2022 Heat. And that happened despite the fact that the 2022 Heat had had a way better year than the 2023 Heat. This either suggests the 2022 Celtics were better than the 2023 Celtics (more on that below) or that the 2023 result was just kind of random. Or probably a combination of the two.
3. The 2022 Celtics were at least a little better than the 2023 Celtics, IMO. For one thing, the 2022 Celtics had a 7.02 SRS, while the 2023 Celtics had a 6.38 SRS. Not a big difference, but the 2022 Celtics were a bit higher. Even that obscures how well the Celtics were playing by the end, though. They’d started 25-25, and then went 26-6 to finish the season, with a +14.53 net rating. I don’t think the 2023 Celtics reached the level that the 2022 Celtics had gotten to. And yeah, Idoka > Mazzulla is probably part of why that is.
OhayoKD wrote:Lebron contributes more to all the phases of play than Messi does. And he is of course a defensive anchor unlike messi.
Re: Rank 21 Suns, 22 Celtics, 23 Heat, 24 Mavericks, 25 Pacers
- GSP
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,561
- And1: 16,036
- Joined: Dec 12, 2011
-
Re: Rank 21 Suns, 22 Celtics, 23 Heat, 24 Mavericks, 25 Pacers
MrIrrelevant wrote:I think most people will agree 22 Celtics are first and 23 Heat are last. Here is how SRS has them ranked:
1. 22 Celtics - 7.02
2. 21 Suns - 5.67
3. 24 Mavericks - 2.30
4. 25 Pacers - 1.68
5. 23 Heat - -0.13
That looks pretty close to me, I would personally switch the Mavs and Pacers.
Srs severely underrates the Mavs team that was in playoffs since post trade they were a completely different team

They were a top 5 defense after the trade deadline when they got Pj and Gafford 2 starters and Pj was their 3rd best player. Full season Srs for the 24 Mavs is meaningless when there are 50 games w/o Pj or Gafford. They were 29-24 before trades and defense was a massive problem. Making playoffs wasnt a lock for them until the trades and they were a dominant force after going 21-9 and that was w/ games not having their starting lineup in tact then the playoff run they had beating 3 50 win teams 2 great teams in Okc and Minny who are in the Wcf season after granted w/ some changes in roster
24 Mavs are easily 1st here only Pacers are close
Re: Rank 21 Suns, 22 Celtics, 23 Heat, 24 Mavericks, 25 Pacers
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,764
- And1: 4,131
- Joined: Jul 26, 2012
-
Re: Rank 21 Suns, 22 Celtics, 23 Heat, 24 Mavericks, 25 Pacers
GSP wrote:MrIrrelevant wrote:I think most people will agree 22 Celtics are first and 23 Heat are last. Here is how SRS has them ranked:
1. 22 Celtics - 7.02
2. 21 Suns - 5.67
3. 24 Mavericks - 2.30
4. 25 Pacers - 1.68
5. 23 Heat - -0.13
That looks pretty close to me, I would personally switch the Mavs and Pacers.
Srs severely underrates the Mavs team that was in playoffs since post trade they were a completely different team
They were a top 5 defense after the trade deadline when they got Pj and Gafford 2 starters and Pj was their 3rd best player. Full season Srs for the 24 Mavs is meaningless when there are 50 games w/o Pj or Gafford. They were 29-24 before trades and defense was a massive problem. Making playoffs wasnt a lock for them until the trades and they were a dominant force after going 21-9 and that was w/ games not having their starting lineup in tact then the playoff run they had beating 3 50 win teams 2 great teams in Okc and Minny who are in the Wcf season after granted w/ some changes in roster
24 Mavs are easily 1st here only Pacers are close
The same with BOS in 2022. They finished season 24W and 6L with +14.4nrtg. BOS dominance was on absurd level. Also these teams looked very different in the Finals. Doncic played like a chair on defence b/c of injuries. The same with MIA, they looked gassed in the Finals.
BOS
PHO
DAL
IND
MIA
BOS was 5min away from taking the series to 3w-1L, like PHO.
Re: Rank 21 Suns, 22 Celtics, 23 Heat, 24 Mavericks, 25 Pacers
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 128
- And1: 111
- Joined: Apr 09, 2023
-
Re: Rank 21 Suns, 22 Celtics, 23 Heat, 24 Mavericks, 25 Pacers
'22 Celtics
'24 Mavs
'21 Suns
'25 Pacers
'23 Heat
'24 Mavs
'21 Suns
'25 Pacers
'23 Heat
Re: Rank 21 Suns, 22 Celtics, 23 Heat, 24 Mavericks, 25 Pacers
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,845
- And1: 9,363
- Joined: Sep 26, 2017
Re: Rank 21 Suns, 22 Celtics, 23 Heat, 24 Mavericks, 25 Pacers
1. Celtics
2. Suns
3. Pacers
4. Mavericks
5. Heat
Pacers vs. Mavericks is definitely the closest. However, while the Mavericks may have had better all-around numbers and better numbers from their late season improvement, they were also relying on a very injured star by the time they reached the Finals who was easily exploited by a smart coach who could easily take away his efficacy by attacking him repeatedly on his defensive possessions. The Mavs were fundamentally flawed. The Pacers on the other hand have been peaking with a star playing at his absolute best and no obvious counters to render him ineffective.
2. Suns
3. Pacers
4. Mavericks
5. Heat
Pacers vs. Mavericks is definitely the closest. However, while the Mavericks may have had better all-around numbers and better numbers from their late season improvement, they were also relying on a very injured star by the time they reached the Finals who was easily exploited by a smart coach who could easily take away his efficacy by attacking him repeatedly on his defensive possessions. The Mavs were fundamentally flawed. The Pacers on the other hand have been peaking with a star playing at his absolute best and no obvious counters to render him ineffective.
Re: Rank 21 Suns, 22 Celtics, 23 Heat, 24 Mavericks, 25 Pacers
- TheGOATRises007
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,498
- And1: 20,152
- Joined: Oct 05, 2013
-
Re: Rank 21 Suns, 22 Celtics, 23 Heat, 24 Mavericks, 25 Pacers
iggymcfrack wrote:1. Celtics
2. Suns
3. Pacers
4. Mavericks
5. Heat
Pacers vs. Mavericks is definitely the closest. However, while the Mavericks may have had better all-around numbers and better numbers from their late season improvement, they were also relying on a very injured star by the time they reached the Finals who was easily exploited by a smart coach who could easily take away his efficacy by attacking him repeatedly on his defensive possessions. The Mavs were fundamentally flawed. The Pacers on the other hand have been peaking with a star playing at his absolute best and no obvious counters to render him ineffective.
I mean this isn't true considering we just saw him be very ineffective in game 2 and his numbers for the finals so far are fairly average.
He's not outshining Siakam or Turner by a clear margin at all thus far in the finals.
Re: Rank 21 Suns, 22 Celtics, 23 Heat, 24 Mavericks, 25 Pacers
- Narigo
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,792
- And1: 879
- Joined: Sep 20, 2010
-
Re: Rank 21 Suns, 22 Celtics, 23 Heat, 24 Mavericks, 25 Pacers
Suns
Mavericks
Celtics
Pacers
Heat
Mavericks
Celtics
Pacers
Heat
Narigo's Fantasy Team
PG: Damian Lillard
SG: Sidney Moncrief
SF:
PF: James Worthy
C: Tim Duncan
BE: Robert Horry
BE:
BE:
PG: Damian Lillard
SG: Sidney Moncrief
SF:
PF: James Worthy
C: Tim Duncan
BE: Robert Horry
BE:
BE:
Re: Rank 21 Suns, 22 Celtics, 23 Heat, 24 Mavericks, 25 Pacers
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,253
- And1: 5,615
- Joined: Jun 03, 2023
Re: Rank 21 Suns, 22 Celtics, 23 Heat, 24 Mavericks, 25 Pacers
1. 2022 Celtics
2. 2021 Suns
3. 2025 Pacers
4. 2024 Mavs
5. 2023 Heat
2. 2021 Suns
3. 2025 Pacers
4. 2024 Mavs
5. 2023 Heat
Warspite wrote:Billups was a horrible scorer who could only score with an open corner 3 or a FT.
Re: Rank 21 Suns, 22 Celtics, 23 Heat, 24 Mavericks, 25 Pacers
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,334
- And1: 1,512
- Joined: Nov 20, 2017
Re: Rank 21 Suns, 22 Celtics, 23 Heat, 24 Mavericks, 25 Pacers
Yeah, the 2022 Celtics are seriously overrated. Back-to-back 7 game series against a Bucks team without Middleton and a Heat team with a hobbled Butler and poor shooting performances from their role players. The finals, despite going 6 games, wasn't all that close and it's not like the 2022 Warriors were juggernauts.
I don't see how they rank higher than the 25 Pacers, 24 Mavs, and 23 Heat who played and beat stronger teams in the playoffs.
I don't see how they rank higher than the 25 Pacers, 24 Mavs, and 23 Heat who played and beat stronger teams in the playoffs.