Man...I'm hoping it's not the Spurs... For one I don't like the idea of trading with a FO that will definitely win the deal vs. us. Anyone here think we'd get the better end of a deal with the Spurs? They'll bend us over. But Minnesota and Houston also have quality FO so whatever.
I just don't like the hypothetical deal regardless. Vassell starting at SF is a mistake. Vassell starting at SG with Book at PG is a mistake. Vassell as 2nd (or 3rd?) string SG at ~$30 mil per for the next four years is a mistake. We going to flip him to another team? If it doesn't happen as part of a 3-teamer that means we'll probably have him until at least the trade deadline. And his value isn't going to increase after we get him because of the reasons I mention above. Also doesn't look like he's much of a better 3pt shooter than Book. It would just be more pointless ball like we saw last year.
I like the idea of Sochan. Seems like a bad ass and we need a lot more of that on this squad. But he also seems like someone who could only direct that into positive things with a strong org (Spurs, Heat, Dubs, etc.). Until I'm proven wrong that's not us. I think he'd just be unhappy here and his energies would tilt negative.
I suppose if we get more future picks other than just 14 that might make it worthwhile, but does anyone expect the Spurs to suck again any time soon? It just feels like a pointless trade. Either go all-on on young players and picks or try to get an actual good player that fits like Anunoby or something. This feels like mediocre picks and mediocre players w/o much cap savings either.
Knicks will be the most desperate, they're our best bet, hope they're in the mix.