Dylan Harper

Draft talk all year round

Moderators: Duke4life831, Marcus

User avatar
vincecarter4pres
RealGM
Posts: 51,019
And1: 3,814
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: New Jeruz
Contact:
     

Re: Dylan Harper 

Post#121 » by vincecarter4pres » Wed Jun 4, 2025 3:34 pm

HadAnEffectHere wrote:
FarBeyondDriven wrote:
tontoz wrote:Is that clown still obsessing about Harper's hair?

:lol:


cry harder beta


I feel like I'm watching someone actually lose their mind. Do you need physical help currently? Are you a danger to yourself or others?

CptCrunch wrote:I feel like we have posters here being paid by Harper's agent or is incapable of understanding the physics of our world.

Was about to quote these and say, this is what undiagnosed schizophrenia looks like. :lol:
Image
Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 24,030
And1: 7,747
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: Dylan Harper 

Post#122 » by Dat2U » Fri Jun 6, 2025 1:02 pm

I just notice in general, the online scouts & draft geeks are lost in this archtype universe where nearly every high usage guard gets pigeon-holed as a selfish shot creator who freezes out teammates, is inefficient & doesn't play any defense.

Then I look at alot of these plus/minus advanced stats such as EPM and I see the top of the list dominated by high usage shot creators.
User avatar
NO-KG-AI
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 43,782
And1: 19,473
Joined: Jul 19, 2005
Location: The city of witch doctors, and good ol' pickpockets

Re: Dylan Harper 

Post#123 » by NO-KG-AI » Fri Jun 6, 2025 1:57 pm

Do we think he loses it at the hair thing as often as he loses it when we remind him that last year’s draft sucked? Will this go on in perpetuity? :lol:
Doctor MJ wrote:I don't understand why people jump in a thread and say basically, "This thing you're all talking about. I'm too ignorant to know anything about it. Lollerskates!"
User avatar
tontoz
RealGM
Posts: 19,888
And1: 4,767
Joined: Apr 11, 2005

Re: Dylan Harper 

Post#124 » by tontoz » Fri Jun 6, 2025 2:33 pm

Harper has a standing reach of 8'6 and a wingspan of 6'10.5. Is that because of his hair too? :confused:
"bulky agile perimeter bone crunch pick setting draymond green" WizD
User avatar
76ciology
RealGM
Posts: 65,253
And1: 26,219
Joined: Jun 06, 2002

Re: Dylan Harper 

Post#125 » by 76ciology » Sat Jun 7, 2025 3:54 am

In halfcourt

31% on mid range
30% on 3s
There’s never been a time in history when we look back and say that the people who were censoring free speech were the good guys.
User avatar
76ciology
RealGM
Posts: 65,253
And1: 26,219
Joined: Jun 06, 2002

Re: Dylan Harper 

Post#126 » by 76ciology » Sat Jun 7, 2025 3:55 am

tontoz wrote:Harper has a standing reach of 8'6 and a wingspan of 6'10.5. Is that because of his hair too? :confused:


Thats already comparable to Dwyane Wade.

Edgecombe has a wingspan of 6’8” but have a standing reach of 8’5.5”

Both Wade and Harper have broad shoulders.
There’s never been a time in history when we look back and say that the people who were censoring free speech were the good guys.
tmorgan
RealGM
Posts: 13,929
And1: 9,362
Joined: Feb 04, 2005
Location: San Francisco, CA
   

Re: Dylan Harper 

Post#127 » by tmorgan » Tue Jun 10, 2025 2:26 am

76ciology wrote:In halfcourt

31% on mid range
30% on 3s


There is zero doubt Harper’s shot selection when he couldn’t drive absolutely sucked.

If you’re pro-Harper, you note that he played on a bad team, against a packed paint, and was basically just trying out for the pros all year.

If you’re anti-Harper, you wonder if you can correct his shot selection, if he’s selfish, and if his slightly goofy flat shot is the real problem.

I don’t know. I still don’t love him the way most people seem to, but I acknowledge that his weaknesses could be baked into his situation at Rutgers and he may indeed be a star in the making. It looks like San Antonio intends to find out, so we’ll all get to see soon enough.
ReggiesKnicks
Starter
Posts: 2,180
And1: 1,770
Joined: Jan 25, 2025
   

Re: Dylan Harper 

Post#128 » by ReggiesKnicks » Tue Jun 10, 2025 2:48 am

tmorgan wrote:
76ciology wrote:In halfcourt

31% on mid range
30% on 3s


There is zero doubt Harper’s shot selection when he couldn’t drive absolutely sucked.

If you’re pro-Harper, you note that he played on a bad team, against a packed paint, and was basically just trying out for the pros all year.

If you’re anti-Harper, you wonder if you can correct his shot selection, if he’s selfish, and if his slightly goofy flat shot is the real problem.

I don’t know. I still don’t love him the way most people seem to, but I acknowledge that his weaknesses could be baked into his situation at Rutgers and he may indeed be a star in the making. It looks like San Antonio intends to find out, so we’ll all get to see soon enough.


I think we should have learned that supremely talented players with questionable shot selection on bad teams shouldn't matter.

(Anthony Edwards)
tmorgan
RealGM
Posts: 13,929
And1: 9,362
Joined: Feb 04, 2005
Location: San Francisco, CA
   

Re: Dylan Harper 

Post#129 » by tmorgan » Tue Jun 10, 2025 4:31 am

ReggiesKnicks wrote:
tmorgan wrote:
76ciology wrote:In halfcourt

31% on mid range
30% on 3s


There is zero doubt Harper’s shot selection when he couldn’t drive absolutely sucked.

If you’re pro-Harper, you note that he played on a bad team, against a packed paint, and was basically just trying out for the pros all year.

If you’re anti-Harper, you wonder if you can correct his shot selection, if he’s selfish, and if his slightly goofy flat shot is the real problem.

I don’t know. I still don’t love him the way most people seem to, but I acknowledge that his weaknesses could be baked into his situation at Rutgers and he may indeed be a star in the making. It looks like San Antonio intends to find out, so we’ll all get to see soon enough.


I think we should have learned that supremely talented players with questionable shot selection on bad teams shouldn't matter.

(Anthony Edwards)


I’m not gonna deep dive on this, but we both know there have been plenty of very talented guys with ishtty habits that wouldn’t break them and turned into mediocre pros. Picking a guy that’s clearly a better athlete than Harper — a TON better — that it worked out for isn’t compelling evidence.

Harper’s handle is sick in a way that Ant’s never will be, I’ll give him that. But that’s no guarantee.
User avatar
76ciology
RealGM
Posts: 65,253
And1: 26,219
Joined: Jun 06, 2002

Re: Dylan Harper 

Post#130 » by 76ciology » Tue Jun 10, 2025 5:26 am

The bad % isn’t mainly because of shot selection though. He’s just got a mid at best perimeter shooting skill for now.
There’s never been a time in history when we look back and say that the people who were censoring free speech were the good guys.
User avatar
JMAC3
RealGM
Posts: 12,905
And1: 5,983
Joined: May 22, 2010
     

Re: Dylan Harper 

Post#131 » by JMAC3 » Tue Jun 10, 2025 5:57 am

76ciology wrote:The bad % isn’t mainly because of shot selection though. He’s just got a mid at best perimeter shooting skill for now.


I mean he probably shoots a significantly higher percentage if he played on one of the top 15 college teams this year where he had better spacing and more advantage creators around him to open up the game. He was actually a pretty good catch and shoot guy but for anyone who watched Rutgers...

The paint was packed, not many guys making stuff happen on offense outside of Harper and Bailey so the defense was able to load up on them constantly. The fact Harper still shot such a high percentage at the rim despite all that is what makes him a no brainer selection, he is going to be a problem in the NBA for teams to prevent getting to the rim.
User avatar
76ciology
RealGM
Posts: 65,253
And1: 26,219
Joined: Jun 06, 2002

Re: Dylan Harper 

Post#132 » by 76ciology » Tue Jun 10, 2025 6:23 am

JMAC3 wrote:
76ciology wrote:The bad % isn’t mainly because of shot selection though. He’s just got a mid at best perimeter shooting skill for now.


I mean he probably shoots a significantly higher percentage if he played on one of the top 15 college teams this year where he had better spacing and more advantage creators around him to open up the game. He was actually a pretty good catch and shoot guy but for anyone who watched Rutgers...

The paint was packed, not many guys making stuff happen on offense outside of Harper and Bailey so the defense was able to load up on them constantly. The fact Harper still shot such a high percentage at the rim despite all that is what makes him a no brainer selection, he is going to be a problem in the NBA for teams to prevent getting to the rim.


I’m not disagreeing, but as unfair as it sounds, his career still largely depends on his shooting. Right now, it’s not at the level needed to be a lead guard in the NBA. There’s definitely room for improvement, but it’s something to seriously consider if you’re drafting him. And thats probably why Spurs isn’t 100% sure in drafting him.
There’s never been a time in history when we look back and say that the people who were censoring free speech were the good guys.
Upperclass
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,772
And1: 2,145
Joined: Aug 09, 2005

Re: Dylan Harper 

Post#133 » by Upperclass » Yesterday 10:20 am

Harper is who everyone thinks Kon is. Slow, cant turn the corner, overrated shooter, mediocre, unwilling passer. Just a dude whos game looks close enough to Hardens to go top 5.
User avatar
EvanZ
RealGM
Posts: 14,279
And1: 3,898
Joined: Apr 06, 2011

Re: Dylan Harper 

Post#134 » by EvanZ » Yesterday 5:30 pm

Upperclass wrote:Harper is who everyone thinks Kon is. Slow, cant turn the corner, overrated shooter, mediocre, unwilling passer. Just a dude whos game looks close enough to Hardens to go top 5.


"Unwilling passer" with 4 ast/g on a team with crap scorers. RealGM logic checks out. :lol: :lol: :lol:
Subscribe to my 100% FREE email newsletter summarizing top college performances:

https://toplines.mailchimpsites.com/
User avatar
vincecarter4pres
RealGM
Posts: 51,019
And1: 3,814
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: New Jeruz
Contact:
     

Re: Dylan Harper 

Post#135 » by vincecarter4pres » Yesterday 5:47 pm

Upperclass wrote:Harper is who everyone thinks Kon is. Slow, cant turn the corner, overrated shooter, mediocre, unwilling passer. Just a dude whos game looks close enough to Hardens to go top 5.

Bro have you even watched him lol?

I mean I’ve watched a lot of Rutgers games, both with and without him, but it just takes highlights to see he jumps off the page with his first step, explosiveness and change of direction, footwork and ability to switch gears.

And mediocre unwilling passer? C’mon man.

The only thing to question about Harper is his motor, lack of aggression and leadership/maturity.

I’m willing to gamble on him coming around with all the tools and skills he has, he’s young and man does his tape look good when he’s got it going.
Image
Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
Upperclass
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,772
And1: 2,145
Joined: Aug 09, 2005

Re: Dylan Harper 

Post#136 » by Upperclass » Today 12:39 am

vincecarter4pres wrote:
Upperclass wrote:Harper is who everyone thinks Kon is. Slow, cant turn the corner, overrated shooter, mediocre, unwilling passer. Just a dude whos game looks close enough to Hardens to go top 5.

Bro have you even watched him lol?

I mean I’ve watched a lot of Rutgers games, both with and without him, but it just takes highlights to see he jumps off the page with his first step, explosiveness and change of direction, footwork and ability to switch gears.

And mediocre unwilling passer? C’mon man.

The only thing to question about Harper is his motor, lack of aggression and leadership/maturity.

I’m willing to gamble on him coming around with all the tools and skills he has, he’s young and man does his tape look good when he’s got it going.


His burst and overall game are quite similar to Deangelo Russell. Will he become as good of a shooter? Maybe..Also 4 assists with another top 4 pick on the team vs average comp.. is not great.
User avatar
vincecarter4pres
RealGM
Posts: 51,019
And1: 3,814
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: New Jeruz
Contact:
     

Re: Dylan Harper 

Post#137 » by vincecarter4pres » Today 1:29 am

Upperclass wrote:
vincecarter4pres wrote:
Upperclass wrote:Harper is who everyone thinks Kon is. Slow, cant turn the corner, overrated shooter, mediocre, unwilling passer. Just a dude whos game looks close enough to Hardens to go top 5.

Bro have you even watched him lol?

I mean I’ve watched a lot of Rutgers games, both with and without him, but it just takes highlights to see he jumps off the page with his first step, explosiveness and change of direction, footwork and ability to switch gears.

And mediocre unwilling passer? C’mon man.

The only thing to question about Harper is his motor, lack of aggression and leadership/maturity.

I’m willing to gamble on him coming around with all the tools and skills he has, he’s young and man does his tape look good when he’s got it going.


His burst and overall game are quite similar to Deangelo Russell. Will he become as good of a shooter? Maybe..Also 4 assists with another top 4 pick on the team vs average comp.. is not great.

Bro you’re on one.
Image
Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
tmorgan
RealGM
Posts: 13,929
And1: 9,362
Joined: Feb 04, 2005
Location: San Francisco, CA
   

Re: Dylan Harper 

Post#138 » by tmorgan » 48 minutes ago

Harper is not a great athlete, but DLo? C’mon now. Everyone knew DLo was getting by with size and craftiness at OSU and was going to struggle getting into the paint in the pros. Harper is not going to have that problem. I think he’ll have some other issues, but that’s not one of them.

Return to NBA Draft