nagawicka wrote:MVP2110 wrote:?t=4H8L2Pdhp6TRQXoBIJemRA&s=19
Made what up. 'Reports' without sources that don't result in articles aren't really a valid storyline. Nobody's going on the record, the storyline is standard and not out of the ordinary in any way. When they can't come up with a real story then, they don't really have one now. Note well there's never a retraction or course correction when these media outlets aren't proven accurate on these unsourced stories after the fact. That's why they're not really "articles." Rasheed out, Dillon in, Doubs unhappy, TRADING FOR Adams or Metcalf when the Packers never made a call--STILL a lotta openly non-factual claims circulating among veteran Packer writers, still being repeated long after proven false. Thing is: both franchises and any players involved aren't talking while conducting their business, and that means there isn't a story until real sources prove there is.
I mean Packer beat writers early this off-season all said it was very likely the Packers would release Jaire if they couldn't find a trade and that turned out to be spot on. They got a lot of flak and ended up being right.