ReggiesKnicks wrote:JMAC3 wrote:ReggiesKnicks wrote:
Maybe I am misreading, but I don't think the person you quoted said Beal = Bridges/Green/Williams, which is what you seem to be implying they are saying.
It looks like the overarching point here is Phoenix shouldn't send a 1st swap to move Beal for trash, which is what Charlotte is giving up. This isn't the 2000s where teams are spending multiple 1sts to get off salary or trading unprotected 1sts to acquire bad salary in a deal.
What do you think a realistic cost to move Beal should be?
I don't think the Suns should spend a "cost" to move Beal. He is a sunk-cost.
Ding ding ding.
Paying to turn Beal into some other meh players is not what Phoenix should be doing so the cost is moot. It's just a bad idea. Charlotte would correctly demand a price higher than Phoenix should be made. Add in the NTC clause and there is no deal here to discuss.