Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team?
Moderators: bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Domejandro, ken6199
Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team?
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,707
- And1: 7,181
- Joined: Aug 14, 2019
-
Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team?
Uh, yeah. Those Bulls teams were absolutely stacked, and they even had the zebras to back them up
Free Luigi
Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team?
- Capn'O
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 88,803
- And1: 107,584
- Joined: Dec 16, 2005
- Location: Bone Goal
-
Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team?
I think of superteams like supergroups in rock. Dylan, Petty, Harrison, Orbison, and the other guy coming together to form The Traveling Wilburys.
Bulls don't really fit that model. Like the Warriors and Spurs they were a super team or dynasty.
Bulls don't really fit that model. Like the Warriors and Spurs they were a super team or dynasty.
BAF Clippers: Great Team. No Future.
PG: SGA | Coleworld
SG: Big Ragu | Podz
SF: Kuminga | Thybulle
PF: KAT | K. Williams
C: BroLo | D. Sharpe
Deep Bench - Merrill | Craig | Reath | Saric | Lowry

PG: SGA | Coleworld
SG: Big Ragu | Podz
SF: Kuminga | Thybulle
PF: KAT | K. Williams
C: BroLo | D. Sharpe
Deep Bench - Merrill | Craig | Reath | Saric | Lowry

Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,895
- And1: 6,746
- Joined: Feb 15, 2007
Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team?
ball_takes23 wrote:Of course everyone is going to have their own definition which makes this question pointless to ask.
You are right!
I thought I’d seen this one before!
Reinsdorf & Co. - sell the team!!
https://www.si.com/nba/2018/12/11/chicago-bulls-phoenix-suns-bad-ownership-robert-sarver-jerry-reinsdorf
https://www.si.com/nba/2018/12/11/chicago-bulls-phoenix-suns-bad-ownership-robert-sarver-jerry-reinsdorf
Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team?
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,171
- And1: 1,765
- Joined: Jan 25, 2025
-
Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team?
DirtyDez wrote:ReggiesKnicks wrote:DirtyDez wrote:
A team that wins it all for starters.
What is your definition? The 1996 Bulls weren't a super team. The 2011 Heat weren't a superteam. The 2021 Brooklyn Nets weren't a super team.
I am just trying to find out how you define the term. If you read my previous posts in this thread, I stated very clearly what my definition is.
- Russell’s Celtics
- Some of those Bird/Magic teams
- 12’ & 13’ Heat
- Warriors with KD
I thought the Celtics were close to having an argument when Derrick White or Al Horford was your 6th best player but they flamed out ultimately.
1996 Bulls should be here if you are including the Heatles, especially 2013.
Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,585
- And1: 15,041
- Joined: Oct 10, 2006
- Location: Northshore Burbs
-
Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team?
No the phrase just isn't a talented team, there's plenty of teams with immense talent like the Lakers & Celtics. The term specifically is when three #1 options from different teams join up by their own agency. Scottie was never a #1 for another team (even post Bulls) and Rodman certainly wasn't or Horace.
The 87 Lakers had an MVP, 3 all stars, and the DPOY on one team was never called a super team.
I don't think the term originated from a place of "wow this team is really very good." It was more of a reference to the Justice League and Avengers, where you have heroes who headline their own comic books coming together on one team. So the "from different teams" part is important, just IMO.
The 87 Lakers had an MVP, 3 all stars, and the DPOY on one team was never called a super team.
I don't think the term originated from a place of "wow this team is really very good." It was more of a reference to the Justice League and Avengers, where you have heroes who headline their own comic books coming together on one team. So the "from different teams" part is important, just IMO.
Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team?
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,560
- And1: 1,760
- Joined: Aug 30, 2021
Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team?
I am fine calling them a super team if we can also agree that the heatles were a super team.
Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team?
-
- Suns Forum College Scout
- Posts: 17,076
- And1: 6,823
- Joined: Jun 25, 2009
- Location: the Arizona desert
Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team?
ReggiesKnicks wrote:DirtyDez wrote:ReggiesKnicks wrote:
What is your definition? The 1996 Bulls weren't a super team. The 2011 Heat weren't a superteam. The 2021 Brooklyn Nets weren't a super team.
I am just trying to find out how you define the term. If you read my previous posts in this thread, I stated very clearly what my definition is.
- Russell’s Celtics
- Some of those Bird/Magic teams
- 12’ & 13’ Heat
- Warriors with KD
I thought the Celtics were close to having an argument when Derrick White or Al Horford was your 6th best player but they flamed out ultimately.
1996 Bulls should be here if you are including the Heatles, especially 2013.
No the Heat had crazy spacers. Look at both finals series wins.
.

.

fromthetop321 wrote:I got Lebron number 1, he is also leading defensive player of the year. Curry's game still reminds me of Jeremy Lin to much.
Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team?
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,560
- And1: 1,760
- Joined: Aug 30, 2021
Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team?
DirtyDez wrote:ReggiesKnicks wrote:DirtyDez wrote:
- Russell’s Celtics
- Some of those Bird/Magic teams
- 12’ & 13’ Heat
- Warriors with KD
I thought the Celtics were close to having an argument when Derrick White or Al Horford was your 6th best player but they flamed out ultimately.
1996 Bulls should be here if you are including the Heatles, especially 2013.
No the Heat had crazy spacers. Look at both finals series wins.
.
.
Its interesting wade averaged 19.6ppg in the 13 finals and people were calling him washed and therefore they werent a superteam, yet we saw pippen averaging 15.7ppg in the 96 and 98 finals.
Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team?
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,089
- And1: 2,978
- Joined: Nov 18, 2023
-
Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team?
ShootersShoot wrote:DirtyDez wrote:ReggiesKnicks wrote:
1996 Bulls should be here if you are including the Heatles, especially 2013.
No the Heat had crazy spacers. Look at both finals series wins.
.
.
Its interesting wade averaged 19.6ppg in the 13 finals and people were calling him washed and therefore they werent a superteam, yet we saw pippen averaging 15.7ppg in the 96 and 98 finals.
Hear me out on this crazy idea here - it's almost as if there is more to evaluating a player than PPG.
bledredwine wrote:There were 3 times Jordan won and was considered the underdog
1989 Eastern Conference Finals against the Detroit Pistons, the 1991 NBA Finals against the Magic Johnson-led Los Angeles Lakers, and the 1995 Eastern Conference Finals against the NY Knicks
Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team?
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,353
- And1: 2,222
- Joined: Apr 28, 2017
-
Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team?
First three peat absolutely not, all 3 stars home grown and drafted.
Second three peat, i'm fifty-fifty, while the 2 main stars are still home grown, the third "Star" Rodman was not, however not a single team in the league wanted him so to me its not like he was a "big star" that everyone wanted to better their teams
A Super Team - Is like the term Super Group in Music, or Team Up in Comics, etc a manufactured team built by brining together the top notch players from other teams to create "the best"
The first 3 peat just does not fit that definition as nearly 75% of the players on the team during first 3 were drafted in-house, the rest were guys on their last legs aging Bill Cartwright, aging John Paxson, etc
The second 3 peat is slightly different, Jordan, Pippen, Longley, Kukoc were really the only in-house picks, Harper was once an all-star level, Rodman once an all-star level (though no one wanted him), Kerr was a coveted floor spacer so i could see this one going either way. 3 of their top 5, and 4 of their top 6 players though were home-grown.
Second three peat, i'm fifty-fifty, while the 2 main stars are still home grown, the third "Star" Rodman was not, however not a single team in the league wanted him so to me its not like he was a "big star" that everyone wanted to better their teams
A Super Team - Is like the term Super Group in Music, or Team Up in Comics, etc a manufactured team built by brining together the top notch players from other teams to create "the best"
The first 3 peat just does not fit that definition as nearly 75% of the players on the team during first 3 were drafted in-house, the rest were guys on their last legs aging Bill Cartwright, aging John Paxson, etc
The second 3 peat is slightly different, Jordan, Pippen, Longley, Kukoc were really the only in-house picks, Harper was once an all-star level, Rodman once an all-star level (though no one wanted him), Kerr was a coveted floor spacer so i could see this one going either way. 3 of their top 5, and 4 of their top 6 players though were home-grown.
Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team?
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,560
- And1: 1,760
- Joined: Aug 30, 2021
Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team?
ScrantonBulls wrote:ShootersShoot wrote:DirtyDez wrote:
No the Heat had crazy spacers. Look at both finals series wins.
.
.
Its interesting wade averaged 19.6ppg in the 13 finals and people were calling him washed and therefore they werent a superteam, yet we saw pippen averaging 15.7ppg in the 96 and 98 finals.
Hear me out on this crazy idea here - it's almost as if there is more to evaluating a player than PPG.
And hear me out here..not every player needs to have great offensive stats in the finals for a team to be considered a superteam.
And thanks! You actually proved my point..
If we are judging guys by having star statistical performances on the biggest stage, pippens wouldnt count is all I am saying. But if we consider his caliber of player and how teams needed to account for him on both ends, then we have to consider the same for guys like wade, bosh
Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team?
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,171
- And1: 1,765
- Joined: Jan 25, 2025
-
Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team?
ShootersShoot wrote:DirtyDez wrote:ReggiesKnicks wrote:
1996 Bulls should be here if you are including the Heatles, especially 2013.
No the Heat had crazy spacers. Look at both finals series wins.
.
.
Its interesting wade averaged 19.6ppg in the 13 finals and people were calling him washed and therefore they werent a superteam, yet we saw pippen averaging 15.7ppg in the 96 and 98 finals.
Yeah, Pippen's biggest weakness and what held him back from being a bona fide 1B to Jordan's 1A (They were instead a clear 1/2) was his scoring. He still was incredible overall in the 1996 finals with 8.2 Rebounds, 5.3 Assists (led Bulls), 2.3 Steals (led Bulls), and 1.3 Blocks with a sub 10% TOV%. Wade was similar in 2013, with 4.0 Rebounds, 4.6 Assists, 1.0 Steals, and 1.3 Blocks.
Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team?
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,849
- And1: 6,979
- Joined: Sep 05, 2023
-
Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team?
DirtyDez wrote:A superteam starting Ron Harper and Luc Longley? Stop it.
So the 2011 Heat weren't a super team either then?
ImmortalD24 wrote:Swap 2008 Mo Williams with Garland this post season and Cavs would be up right now on the verge of sweeping the Pacers.
Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team?
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,084
- And1: 792
- Joined: Jul 20, 2004
Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team?
Wallace_Wallace wrote:Relative to their peers, was there a team with its third best player that is as good as Dennis Rodman?
Shaq/Penny (Penny is starting to be injury prone)
Malone/Stockton
Payton/Kemp
Olajuwon/Drexler (not really after 96)
Ewing/Starks (not really)
Miller/Smit (not really)
None of those teams had a decent third option except for Utah with Jeff Hornacek and Seattle with Schrempf (Chicago only needed to face one each year in the finals). So yes the Bulls are a superteam.
Um ho grant was better than Rodman or at least comparable at that stage in their careers.
Houston had cassel who was def comparable talent wise.
Indy Jalen rose, Davis brothers.
Rodman was traded for Will perdue cuz no1 wanted the headache not cuz he forced himself to Chicago. He was good but was not the same guy especially in 97&98.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Move Randle and we are chip ready !
Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team?
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,560
- And1: 1,760
- Joined: Aug 30, 2021
Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team?
ReggiesKnicks wrote:ShootersShoot wrote:DirtyDez wrote:
No the Heat had crazy spacers. Look at both finals series wins.
.
.
Its interesting wade averaged 19.6ppg in the 13 finals and people were calling him washed and therefore they werent a superteam, yet we saw pippen averaging 15.7ppg in the 96 and 98 finals.
Yeah, Pippen's biggest weakness and what held him back from being a bona fide 1B to Jordan's 1A (They were instead a clear 1/2) was his scoring. He still was incredible overall in the 1996 finals with 8.2 Rebounds, 5.3 Assists (led Bulls), 2.3 Steals (led Bulls), and 1.3 Blocks with a sub 10% TOV%. Wade was similar in 2013, with 4.0 Rebounds, 4.6 Assists, 1.0 Steals, and 1.3 Blocks.
1.9 steals for wade in 13 but yea pippens greatness did stem from his all around game. In a situation like the finals sometimes its best even as a hofer, to give it to the superstar and get outta the way.
Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team?
- sashaturiaf
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,409
- And1: 3,764
- Joined: Jan 18, 2021
-
Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team?
No. They're not even close to Lebrons superteams in terms of superteamness. MJ simply isn't a good enough a GM to create a superteam, just look at his work with the Hornets.
However. MJ was just that good on court that he overcame his crap GMing by still delivering superteam results.
However. MJ was just that good on court that he overcame his crap GMing by still delivering superteam results.
Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team?
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,089
- And1: 2,978
- Joined: Nov 18, 2023
-
Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team?
sashaturiaf wrote:No. They're not even close to Lebrons superteams in terms of superteamness. MJ simply isn't a good enough a GM to create a superteam, just look at his work with the Hornets.
However. MJ was just that good on court that he overcame his crap GMing by still delivering superteam results.

bledredwine wrote:There were 3 times Jordan won and was considered the underdog
1989 Eastern Conference Finals against the Detroit Pistons, the 1991 NBA Finals against the Magic Johnson-led Los Angeles Lakers, and the 1995 Eastern Conference Finals against the NY Knicks
Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team?
-
- Suns Forum College Scout
- Posts: 17,076
- And1: 6,823
- Joined: Jun 25, 2009
- Location: the Arizona desert
Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team?
Iwasawitness wrote:DirtyDez wrote:A superteam starting Ron Harper and Luc Longley? Stop it.
So the 2011 Heat weren't a super team either then?
No they weren’t.
A.) they didn’t win the title
B.) they were nowhere as deep as their successors
fromthetop321 wrote:I got Lebron number 1, he is also leading defensive player of the year. Curry's game still reminds me of Jeremy Lin to much.
Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,419
- And1: 5,067
- Joined: Nov 04, 2017
-
Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team?
Easily...
Pippen was a 1st team all defensive 5/6 years they won and on 2nd team in 1990-1991
Horace Grant was 2nd team all defense in 1992-1993
Rodman was all 1st team defense in 1995-1996
Pippen was 2nd or 3rd team all nba 4/6 years, 1st team in in 1995-1996
So every year he had another guy on an all nba team with him except in 1990-1991 (but Pippen was still on all defense)
And a couple years he had 2 teammates on all defense
And that was in the weak and wattered down 90s....nobody had similar talent as MJ in his era
This image is before AD to the Lakers, but Lebron is thought of having a ton of help (and during an era of all time great teams and talent such as GS, Bostons big 3, LAL with Kobe, Gasol, and others), etc

Pippen was a 1st team all defensive 5/6 years they won and on 2nd team in 1990-1991
Horace Grant was 2nd team all defense in 1992-1993
Rodman was all 1st team defense in 1995-1996
Pippen was 2nd or 3rd team all nba 4/6 years, 1st team in in 1995-1996
So every year he had another guy on an all nba team with him except in 1990-1991 (but Pippen was still on all defense)
And a couple years he had 2 teammates on all defense
And that was in the weak and wattered down 90s....nobody had similar talent as MJ in his era
This image is before AD to the Lakers, but Lebron is thought of having a ton of help (and during an era of all time great teams and talent such as GS, Bostons big 3, LAL with Kobe, Gasol, and others), etc

Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team?
- prophet_of_rage
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,018
- And1: 7,280
- Joined: Jan 06, 2005
Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team?
Forget third option let's go fourrh and fiftg option with Kukoc and Harper who sacrificed his offence to win.Wallace_Wallace wrote:Relative to their peers, was there a team with its third best player that is as good as Dennis Rodman?
Shaq/Penny (Penny is starting to be injury prone)
Malone/Stockton
Payton/Kemp
Olajuwon/Drexler (not really after 96)
Ewing/Starks (not really)
Miller/Smit (not really)
None of those teams had a decent third option except for Utah with Jeff Hornacek and Seattle with Schrempf (Chicago only needed to face one each year in the finals). So yes the Bulls are a superteam.
Sent from my SM-S9080 using RealGM mobile app