Mark Williams Trade Value

[MasterIchiro]

Defending LAL is pathetic

The Lakers pushed their narrative through mainstream NBA media.

It's understandable.

But over for Hornets fans.

Virtually all of us. We are tired of non-Lakers fans not hearing our side.

Tell the Grizz fans about it

I know what I witnessed watching every single game Mark played in since the rescind.

But the non-Lakers fans weirdly and insultingly regurgitating the Lakers narrative right now (then playing the victim which is something bullies do when you confront them) will continue to eat the mystery meat the Lakers front office peddled at the deli.

Ghost injury report. Notice the Lakers never specified their findings. The rule is you don't have to so it makes sense.

He did not for one second look like damaged goods. His reaction speed, agility, motor all improved in the second half of the season.

I think when the masses side with the predominant narrative in any story with 2 sides, they do it because they need to feel better about their own team by putting down the victim.

There would be no way to know if the Lakers actually found something specific and legitimate. Not required either.

The proof would be if Mark look crippled out there or compromised. He looked great. But non-Hornets fans don't watch Hornets games and for some reason in this particular forum have grown accustomed and cozy not listening to our perspectives.

Then put us down.

I'm out.

We are not trading Mark.

[esvl]

The Lakers pushed their narrative through mainstream NBA media.

It's understandable.

But over for Hornets fans.

Virtually all of us. We are tired of non-Lakers fans not hearing our side.

Tell the Grizz fans about it

I know what I witnessed watching every single game Mark played in since the rescind.

But the non-Lakers fans weirdly and insultingly regurgitating the Lakers narrative right now (then playing the victim which is something bullies do when you confront them) will continue to eat the mystery meat the Lakers front office peddled at the deli.

Ghost injury report. Notice the Lakers never specified their findings. The rule is you don't have to so it makes sense.

He did not for one second look like damaged goods. His reaction speed, agility, motor all improved in the second half of the season.

I think when the masses side with the predominant narrative in any story with 2 sides, they do it because they need to feel better about their own team by putting down the victim.

There would be no way to know if the Lakers actually found something specific and legitimate. Not required either.

The proof would be if Mark look crippled out there or compromised. He looked great. But non-Hornets fans don't watch Hornets games and for some reason in this particular forum have grown accustomed and cozy not listening to our perspectives.

Then put us down.

I'm out.

We are not trading Mark.

I saw how Mark destroyed the Grizzlies front court in the 2nd part of the season

PS @@@@ Lebron, Silver, Lakers and their servants. Pathetic clowns.

[babyjax13]

These are some of the weirdest reactions I have ever seen. If Charlotte doesn't like the offers, they can keep him, but are we seriously going to argue that teams should not be worried about a player whose career high games played is 44? And then throw a fit when people assume that someone with that track record has a good chance of having a bad physical?