People were interested in these podcasts
Play Episode
86min
RealGM Radio
Southwest Division Preview (with Keith Parish)
The Southwest Division is STACKED with storylines heading into this NBA season. Wes Goldberg (RealGM Radio) and Keith Parrish (Fastbreak Breakfast, Grits & Grinds) break down every team—Rockets, Spurs, Pelicans, Mavericks, and Grizzlies—and make predictions for how the division will shake out. We cover Kevin Durant joining the Houston Rockets, Victor Wembanyama’s year three leap, Zion’s health, Cooper Flagg’s impact in Dallas, and Memphis’ tough decision to move Desmond Bane. 00:00 – Intro & why the Southwest Division is fascinating 02:00 – NBA division realignment talk & rivalries 08:45 – Houston Rockets: Kevin Durant trade, roster fit & concerns 20:30 – San Antonio Spurs: Year 3 of Wemby, Fox pairing & depth chart questions 30:00 – New Orleans Pelicans: Confusing offseason, Point Zion & Jordan Poole fit 42:20 – Dallas Mavericks: Cooper Flagg’s role, Kyrie injury & roster imbalance 49:30 – Memphis Grizzlies: Trading Desmond Bane, Ty Jerome & KCP additions, leadership void 59:45 – Predictions: Who wins the Southwest Division? RealGM Radio is powered in part by North Station Media (CLNS). For advertising or media inquiries, contact info@clnsmedia.com 🔔 Like, comment, and subscribe for more NBA insights and analysis! Follow RealGM Twitter: https://x.com/RealGM Follow Wes Goldberg Twitter: https://x.com/wcgoldberg PrizePicks: PrizePicks is the best place to get real money sports action. With over 10 million members and billions of dollars in awarded winnings, PrizePicks has made daily fantasy sports accessible to all. You just pick MORE or LESS on at least two players for a shot to win up to 1000x your cash! Run Your Game all season long on PrizePicks. Download the app today and use code CLNS to get $50 instantly after you play your first $5 lineup! Gametime: Take the guesswork out of buying tickets with Gametime. Download the Gametime app, create an account, and use code CLNS for $20 off your first purchase. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.f
RealGM Radio
Atlantic Division Preview with Jared Dubin and Es Baraheni
Wes Goldberg, Jared Dubin and Es Baraheni break down the offseasons for the Knicks, Celtics, Raptors, 76ers and Nets before predicting which teams will make the playoffs. 0:00 Intro 3:58 Brandon Ingram's Role and Impact 7:29 Sixers' Uncertain Season Outlook 10:44 Knicks Offense Analysis 20:21 Discussion on Boston's Roster Changes 37:19 Raptors Breakdown 45:30 Most impactful newcomer 50:48 Most interesting rookie 1:00:40 Playoff Predictions RealGM Radio is powered in part by North Station Media (CLNS). For advertising or media inquiries, contact info@clnsmedia.com 🔔 Like, comment, and subscribe for more NBA insights and analysis! Follow RealGM Twitter: https://x.com/RealGM Follow Wes Goldberg Twitter: https://x.com/wcgoldberg PrizePicks: PrizePicks is the best place to get real money sports action. With over 10 million members and billions of dollars in awarded winnings, PrizePicks has made daily fantasy sports accessible to all. You just pick MORE or LESS on at least two players for a shot to win up to 1000x your cash! Run Your Game all season long on PrizePicks. Download the app today and use code CLNS to get $50 instantly after you play your first $5 lineup! Gametime: Take the guesswork out of buying tickets with Gametime. Download the Gametime app, create an account, and use code CLNS for $20 off your first purchase. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
RealGM Radio
NBA Eastern Conference Win Totals & Over/Under Picks
Wes Goldberg and Matt Moore react to NBA Eastern Conference win totals for the upcoming season and make their picks for over/unders. 0:00 Intro 3:00 Atlanta Hawks 10:30 Boston Celtics 17:30 Brooklyn Nets 20:45 Charlotte Hornets 24:45 Chicago Bulls 28:00 Cleveland Cavaliers 33:00 Detroit Pistons 38:15 Indiana Pacers 43:16 Miami Heat 48:56 Milwaukee Bucks & Giannis' future 55:00 New York Knicks 57:31 Orlando Magic 1:02:00 Philadelphia 76ers 1:04:50 Toronto Raptors 1:07:45 Washington Wizards RealGM Radio is powered in part by North Station Media (CLNS). For advertising or media inquiries, contact info@clnsmedia.com 🔔 Like, comment, and subscribe for more NBA insights and analysis! Follow RealGM Twitter: https://x.com/RealGM Follow Wes Goldberg Twitter: https://x.com/wcgoldberg PrizePicks: PrizePicks is the best place to get real money sports action. With over 10 million members and billions of dollars in awarded winnings, PrizePicks has made daily fantasy sports accessible to all. You just pick MORE or LESS on at least two players for a shot to win up to 1000x your cash! Run Your Game all season long on PrizePicks. Download the app today and use code CLNS to get $50 instantly after you play your first $5 lineup! Gametime: Take the guesswork out of buying tickets with Gametime. Download the Gametime app, create an account, and use code CLNS for $20 off your first purchase. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
RealGM Radio
State of the NBA (with Dieter Kurtenbach)
Wes Goldberg and guest Dieter Kurtenbach dissect the explosive Kawhi Leonard investigation, praising Pablo Torre's groundbreaking reporting. They scrutinize Adam Silver's tenure as NBA commissioner, questioning his focus on TV deals over league health. They explore innovative ways to enhance NBA strategy discussions, comparing coverage to the NFL and proposing new systems for describing team formations. All-Star Game format changes and ideas for boosting fan engagement round out this wide-ranging NBA analysis. Tune in for a critical look at the league's present and future, including potential consequences for cap circumvention and suggestions to revolutionize NBA media coverage. 0:00 Intro 3:42 Sports media's coverage of Kawhi scandal 15:41 NBA salary cap circumvention and punishment for alleged violations 20:30 League Dynamics and Player Influence: League control by top players 24:42 NBA Star Player Movement: Failure of acquiring star players 37:47 NBA Contracts and Team Flexibility 41:54 Coverage of Basketball vs. Other Sports 55:28 Sports broadcasting and game scheduling: Importance of structured game nights 1:03:52 Naming Defensive Formations 1:12:24 Mark Cuban's defense of Steve Ballmer 1:17:03 Ideas for All-Star weekend changes 1:22:00 The Take Wheel RealGM Radio is powered in part by North Station Media (CLNS). For advertising or media inquiries, contact info@clnsmedia.com 🔔 Like, comment, and subscribe for more NBA insights and analysis! Follow RealGM Twitter: https://x.com/RealGM Follow Wes Goldberg Twitter: https://x.com/wcgoldberg PrizePicks: PrizePicks is the best place to get real money sports action. With over 10 million members and billions of dollars in awarded winnings, PrizePicks has made daily fantasy sports accessible to all. You just pick MORE or LESS on at least two players for a shot to win up to 1000x your cash! Run Your Game all season long on PrizePicks. Download the app today and use code CLNS to get $50 instantly after you play y

Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team?

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

User avatar
SkyBill40
General Manager
Posts: 7,814
And1: 6,585
Joined: Oct 24, 2014
Location: Phoenix
       

Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team? 

Post#141 » by SkyBill40 » Wed Jun 11, 2025 4:48 pm

Wingy wrote:
jkvonny wrote:Somebody said BJ Armstrong :lol:


When people cite BJ being an all star, they lose all credibility.

That was all Bulls dynasty popularity + pure fan vote at the time + the guy had a baby face and looked like a kid. :lol:


The fact remains that Armstrong WAS an All-Star, albeit once, and was a solid shooter for that team. He's a career ~ 43% 3PFG, so leaving him open was most likely a mistake. What he looked like is completely irrelevant and is puzzling as to why you'd even mention it. But you mentioning about him being an AS as a bit of Bulls glazing at that time isn't likely to be that far off base.
SweaterBae wrote:It's the perfect trade when nobody is happy.
Iwasawitness
Head Coach
Posts: 6,356
And1: 7,631
Joined: Sep 05, 2023
     

Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team? 

Post#142 » by Iwasawitness » Wed Jun 11, 2025 4:49 pm

NZB2323 wrote:
Iwasawitness wrote:
The4thHorseman wrote:He still won the rebounding title that year, his 7th consecutive. Either he wasn't a shell of his former self or it just shows how bad the league really was at the time.


He also still made first team all defense and even managed to get FMVP votes.


Not in 1998.


No, he did not. I think most people acknowledge he wasn't as good in 98 as he was in 96.
LakerLegend wrote:LeBron was literally more athletic at 35 than he was at 20
User avatar
durden_tyler
RealGM
Posts: 21,494
And1: 10,738
Joined: Jun 04, 2003
Location: 537 Paper Street, Bradford
   

Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team? 

Post#143 » by durden_tyler » Wed Jun 11, 2025 4:50 pm

Special_Puppy wrote:He had the best supporting cast in the league in 1992+1996+1996. Whether that qualifies as a superteam I don’t know

Yup. You don’t know. Jordan was simply on another level that he elevated teammates because of his play/presence.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If there is no basketball in heaven, i am not going.
Special_Puppy
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,954
And1: 2,652
Joined: Sep 23, 2023

Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team? 

Post#144 » by Special_Puppy » Wed Jun 11, 2025 4:51 pm

durden_tyler wrote:
Special_Puppy wrote:He had the best supporting cast in the league in 1992+1996+1996. Whether that qualifies as a superteam I don’t know

Yup. You don’t know. Jordan was simply on another level that he elevated teammates because of his play/presence.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Can't tell if you are trolling
Wingy
RealGM
Posts: 16,135
And1: 7,084
Joined: Feb 15, 2007

Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team? 

Post#145 » by Wingy » Wed Jun 11, 2025 4:52 pm

SkyBill40 wrote:
Wingy wrote:
jkvonny wrote:Somebody said BJ Armstrong :lol:


When people cite BJ being an all star, they lose all credibility.

That was all Bulls dynasty popularity + pure fan vote at the time + the guy had a baby face and looked like a kid. :lol:


The fact remains that Armstrong WAS an All-Star, albeit once, and was a solid shooter for that team. What he looked like is completely irrelevant and is puzzling as to why you'd even mention it. But you mentioning about him being an AS as a bit of Bulls glazing at that time isn't likely to be that far off base.


Because the only reason he made it was purely because of fan vote. His play and being a “solid shooter” wasn’t even close to warranting a berth. It’s not that complicated.
User avatar
SkyBill40
General Manager
Posts: 7,814
And1: 6,585
Joined: Oct 24, 2014
Location: Phoenix
       

Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team? 

Post#146 » by SkyBill40 » Wed Jun 11, 2025 4:53 pm

Wingy wrote:
SkyBill40 wrote:
Wingy wrote:
When people cite BJ being an all star, they lose all credibility.

That was all Bulls dynasty popularity + pure fan vote at the time + the guy had a baby face and looked like a kid. :lol:


The fact remains that Armstrong WAS an All-Star, albeit once, and was a solid shooter for that team. What he looked like is completely irrelevant and is puzzling as to why you'd even mention it. But you mentioning about him being an AS as a bit of Bulls glazing at that time isn't likely to be that far off base.


Because the only reason he made it was purely because of fan vote. His play and being a “solid shooter” wasn’t even close to warranting a berth. It’s not that complicated.


Apparently you missed the line where I agreed with you for the most part. Slow down and take it all in next time before you get all ham and feel the need to immediately retort.
SweaterBae wrote:It's the perfect trade when nobody is happy.
ball_takes23
Senior
Posts: 595
And1: 949
Joined: Mar 09, 2025
 

Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team? 

Post#147 » by ball_takes23 » Wed Jun 11, 2025 4:53 pm

Bergmaniac wrote:
MavsDirk41 wrote:
Bergmaniac wrote:The mental gymnastics to explain to explain how a team that won 55 games and almost made ECF when they replaced Jordan with Pete Myers is not actually a superteam are just so funny to me. Myers was selected in the 6th round of the draft, had done nothing in his NBA career until 1993, had spent the previous two seasons playing in Italy and ended up averaging 8 PPG on poor efficiency when he played for the Bulls in 1993/94. If any other modern star's team had been as good when he left and he was replaced by such a scrub everyone would say they were a superteam before he left.


So that same superteam was 34-31 before Jordan came back in March of 95.

It wasn't the same team, they lost Horace Grant for nothing.


so you are able to deduce context to see why 95 was not like 94 but completely blind to context when it comes to 94 vs 93?
4 of the top 7 in minutes played in 94 were not on the team in 93.
DimesandKnicks
Head Coach
Posts: 6,519
And1: 4,068
Joined: Jun 11, 2009

Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team? 

Post#148 » by DimesandKnicks » Wed Jun 11, 2025 5:12 pm

Wingy wrote:
jkvonny wrote:Somebody said BJ Armstrong :lol:


When people cite BJ being an all star, they lose all credibility.

That was all Bulls dynasty popularity + pure fan vote at the time + the guy had a baby face and looked like a kid. :lol:


Context. Reading is fundamental…
DimesandKnicks
Head Coach
Posts: 6,519
And1: 4,068
Joined: Jun 11, 2009

Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team? 

Post#149 » by DimesandKnicks » Wed Jun 11, 2025 5:13 pm

SkyBill40 wrote:
Wingy wrote:
SkyBill40 wrote:
The fact remains that Armstrong WAS an All-Star, albeit once, and was a solid shooter for that team. What he looked like is completely irrelevant and is puzzling as to why you'd even mention it. But you mentioning about him being an AS as a bit of Bulls glazing at that time isn't likely to be that far off base.


Because the only reason he made it was purely because of fan vote. His play and being a “solid shooter” wasn’t even close to warranting a berth. It’s not that complicated.


Apparently you missed the line where I agreed with you for the most part. Slow down and take it all in next time before you get all ham and feel the need to immediately retort.


He also missed the part where I said “technically” to imply he wasn’t a genuine all-star.
DimesandKnicks
Head Coach
Posts: 6,519
And1: 4,068
Joined: Jun 11, 2009

Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team? 

Post#150 » by DimesandKnicks » Wed Jun 11, 2025 5:17 pm

OriginalRed wrote:
ScrantonBulls wrote:
OriginalRed wrote:The 1st three peat Bulls absolutely not but the 2nd 3 peat absolutely were in comparison to the rest of the league (as opposed to like the KD warriors).

55 wins in 93-94

Are you joking? Winning 55 games is absolutely no indicator of a team being a "Super Team". They had just a really good coach and a solid supporting cast. That'd be like calling the 2019 Raptors a super team because they were able to win 59 games the year before Kawhi got there or that 60 win Atlata team a super team.


If you added Kawhi to the raptors without trading Derozan, you’d have a super team :crazy:
nikster
RealGM
Posts: 14,432
And1: 12,933
Joined: Sep 08, 2013

Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team? 

Post#151 » by nikster » Wed Jun 11, 2025 5:30 pm

DimesandKnicks wrote:
OriginalRed wrote:
ScrantonBulls wrote:55 wins in 93-94

Are you joking? Winning 55 games is absolutely no indicator of a team being a "Super Team". They had just a really good coach and a solid supporting cast. That'd be like calling the 2019 Raptors a super team because they were able to win 59 games the year before Kawhi got there or that 60 win Atlata team a super team.


If you added Kawhi to the raptors without trading Derozan, you’d have a super team :crazy:

The Raptors lost Kawhi and Danny Green and went on to play at a 60 win pace the following year and had the #1 seed (highest win% in franchise history). And it's not like they were particularly healthy, Fred, Siakam, Lowry and Ibaka missed 12 to 18 games, Powell and Gasol missed 20 and 28 etc... The only real additions to the rotation were Rondae Hollis Jefferson and rookie terrance Davis, so pretty unimpactful.

I know super team is generally reserved for multiple stars, and some of the Raptors players got better after kawhi left, but they were pretty damn close to a super team
OriginalRed
Starter
Posts: 2,254
And1: 3,460
Joined: Mar 16, 2017
Contact:
         

Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team? 

Post#152 » by OriginalRed » Wed Jun 11, 2025 5:35 pm

Bergmaniac wrote:
OriginalRed wrote:
ScrantonBulls wrote:55 wins in 93-94

Are you joking? Winning 55 games is absolutely no indicator of a team being a "Super Team". They had just a really good coach and a solid supporting cast. That'd be like calling the 2019 Raptors a super team because they were able to win 59 games the year before Kawhi got there or that 60 win Atlata team a super team.

Winning 55 teams after replacing Jordan with a scrub like Pete Myers is certainly an indicator of a super team.

Except they didn't just add Pete Myers but also Kerr, Kukoc, and Longley. That's not a super team that's just a team with a superstar, a great coach with a working system and a bunch of solid roleplayers. Adding Jordan and Rodman to a roster like that would make them a super team, which is why I said the 2nd three peat Bulls team was one and not the first because the first didn't have Rodman, Kukoc, or Kerr.
jkvonny
General Manager
Posts: 7,536
And1: 7,462
Joined: Jun 04, 2021
       

Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team? 

Post#153 » by jkvonny » Wed Jun 11, 2025 5:37 pm

Wingy wrote:
jkvonny wrote:Somebody said BJ Armstrong :lol:


When people cite BJ being an all star, they lose all credibility.

That was all Bulls dynasty popularity + pure fan vote at the time + the guy had a baby face and looked like a kid. :lol:

True.

He was their baby faced fan favorite. :lol: :razz:

Good 3 pt shooter at times tho.
MavsDirk41
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,760
And1: 4,470
Joined: Dec 07, 2022
     

Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team? 

Post#154 » by MavsDirk41 » Wed Jun 11, 2025 5:39 pm

Wingy wrote:
jkvonny wrote:Somebody said BJ Armstrong :lol:


When people cite BJ being an all star, they lose all credibility.

That was all Bulls dynasty popularity + pure fan vote at the time + the guy had a baby face and looked like a kid. :lol:



The guy who mentioned BJ Armstrong said the Bulls basically had 3 allstars during the first 3 peat because they had BJ. Some of the stuff on here lol
xinxin
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,807
And1: 1,518
Joined: Jul 01, 2018
 

Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team? 

Post#155 » by xinxin » Wed Jun 11, 2025 5:43 pm

LePeekaboo wrote:No.

I believe super teams must have 3+ All Stars or All NBA players. Jordan only had Pippen (and Rodman for a bit).

What about 4 HOFs?

MJ, Pippen, Rodman and Kukoc


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
lessthanjake
Analyst
Posts: 3,360
And1: 3,014
Joined: Apr 13, 2013

Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team? 

Post#156 » by lessthanjake » Wed Jun 11, 2025 5:44 pm

Jordan’s Bulls were not a “superteam” because a “superteam” is a specific term that has a particular meaning that isn’t just “this team is really good.”

“Superteams” are commonly understood to be those that have at least three players that could be franchise players. The Bulls never had that. Jordan and Pippen both fit the bill, but guys like Rodman and Grant did not. Those guys would simply never be the #1 guy on a team. Arguably, that’s not necessarily a bad thing, since, for fit reasons, it may be as good or better to have two franchise-player type of guys and another guy that is a really good complementary piece, rather than having three franchise players. But that’s a discussion about whether the “superteam” model is the best way to go, which is a separate question. The Bulls were not a superteam, but their model of team building was still obviously very good.

Leaving aside the “superteam” question, I also think people need to really realize that the first-three-peat Bulls and second-three-peat Bulls did not have comparable supporting casts. The first-three-peat Bulls were basically just Jordan, Pippen, Grant, and a bunch of negative-impact guys. The second-three peat Bulls were Jordan, Pippen, Rodman, and also several genuinely positive-impact guys like Kukoc, Harper, and Kerr. As a result, the second-three-peat team was better than the first-three-peat team, even though Jordan himself wasn’t as good in the second-three-peat years and 1991-1993 Horace Grant was definitely better than 1996-1998 Dennis Rodman. The second-three-peat team was a genuinely deep team, while the first-three-peat team was much more top-heavy.
OhayoKD wrote:Lebron contributes more to all the phases of play than Messi does. And he is of course a defensive anchor unlike messi.
OriginalRed
Starter
Posts: 2,254
And1: 3,460
Joined: Mar 16, 2017
Contact:
         

Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team? 

Post#157 » by OriginalRed » Wed Jun 11, 2025 5:52 pm

ScrantonBulls wrote:They lost Michael Freaking Jordan in his prime for nothing and still managed to win 55 games.

You'd have a point if the only roster change was losing Jordan but it wasn't. They added several solid roleplayers including Kukoc (a future 6MOTY) and Kerr and got a much better Scottie Pippen year.
ScrantonBulls wrote:That 93-94 team had 3 all-stars that were all part of the 1st 3-peat. That's how good the supporting cast was on that first 3-peat.

No they most certainly did not. Horace Grant and BJ Armstrong were not stars. Making the all star team once in your entire career because your team won a bunch of games is no indicator of being a star. That's like saying Kyle Korver and Jeff Teague were star players cuz they made it once on that 60 win Atlanta team. Nobody in their right mind would call those guys star players. Pippen was the only true star Jordan had on his team during the 1st three peat, that's a fact.
ScrantonBulls wrote:Did you forgot the part about the Raptors trading back to back to back all-star DeMar DeRozan for Kawhi? Acting like they just got Kawhi for nothing :lol: a bit disingenuous, but ok.

Yes but your missing the point. Nobody was calling the 2019 Raptors a super team. Then they lose Kawhi the following year, add no one, and still managed to win 53 games in a shortened season. Did anyone call them a super team after that? No, that's my point. Just winning 50 or so games with a great coach and supporting cast doesn't automatically equate to being a super team. Ya'll throw around that term so easily nowadays.
tsherkin
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 92,286
And1: 31,868
Joined: Oct 14, 2003
 

Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team? 

Post#158 » by tsherkin » Wed Jun 11, 2025 5:56 pm

I definitely consider the title Bulls a super team. And I think that people overfocus on this as a problem, because it's what is NECESSARY to contend for that long. It's impossible not to be a super team and still win like that.
OriginalRed
Starter
Posts: 2,254
And1: 3,460
Joined: Mar 16, 2017
Contact:
         

Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team? 

Post#159 » by OriginalRed » Wed Jun 11, 2025 6:17 pm

DimesandKnicks wrote:
OriginalRed wrote:
ScrantonBulls wrote:55 wins in 93-94

Are you joking? Winning 55 games is absolutely no indicator of a team being a "Super Team". They had just a really good coach and a solid supporting cast. That'd be like calling the 2019 Raptors a super team because they were able to win 59 games the year before Kawhi got there or that 60 win Atlata team a super team.


If you added Kawhi to the raptors without trading Derozan, you’d have a super team :crazy:

Yes, but that wasn't the point I was making. I was more so referring to the number of games a team won. The Raptors won 53 games without Kawhi or Derozan in 2020 and yet nobody called the 2019 Raptors a super team is my point.
User avatar
durden_tyler
RealGM
Posts: 21,494
And1: 10,738
Joined: Jun 04, 2003
Location: 537 Paper Street, Bradford
   

Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team? 

Post#160 » by durden_tyler » Wed Jun 11, 2025 6:20 pm

Special_Puppy wrote:
durden_tyler wrote:
Special_Puppy wrote:He had the best supporting cast in the league in 1992+1996+1996. Whether that qualifies as a superteam I don’t know

Yup. You don’t know. Jordan was simply on another level that he elevated teammates because of his play/presence.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Can't tell if you are trolling

You are confusing me with LeBron nuthuggers


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If there is no basketball in heaven, i am not going.

Return to The General Board