Options for This Offseason
Moderators: Chris Porter's Hair, floppymoose, Sleepy51
Re: Options for This Offseason
-
- Senior
- Posts: 621
- And1: 191
- Joined: Jul 15, 2021
-
Re: Options for This Offseason
Obviously someone didn't watch the Houston series where dray shut down sengun. And yeah dray admits that randle got hot and beat them in the series, but who the heck else on this team is capable of guarding him?
Re: Options for This Offseason
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,765
- And1: 4,025
- Joined: Dec 29, 2011
Re: Options for This Offseason
When talking about moving Dray, yes, I think everyone agrees it hurts you defensively, but the question is how much exactly? Because whoever you bring in is probably going to significantly increase your offensive production.
Let's just take a very modest example: Daniel Gafford. Dray averaged 9 points a game last year. Gafford averaged 12.3. Sounds like not a huge difference. But Gafford only played 21.5 minutes per game while Draymond sucked up 29.2. Draymond's defensive rating per 100 possessions is 109, Gafford's is 113. OK, 4 points difference in Draymond's favor. But offensive rating per 100, Draymond is 107 while Gafford is 137 (+30 Gafford). That's a net rating / 100 difference of -2 for Draymond and +24 for Gafford.
Per 100 possessions, Gafford scores at almost double the rate of Draymond, at much higher efficiency (eFG 70.9% vs. 50.3%), and with a ~50% higher rebounding rate.
Again...Daniel Gafford...hardly a high-priced superstar.
Now of course the numbers aren't the whole story, but I think some of you are underestimating just how much Draymond is hurting us on the offense end, not just with dumb turnovers and flagrant fouls and such, but just taking up so much time at a slot with so little offensive output to compensate. And Jimmy overlaps a lot with Draymond in terms of BBIQ and knowing how to deliver the ball to Steph in the optimal position.
I have a ton of respect for Draymond, I just don't think it's right to believe it's impossible for this team to function without him.
Let's just take a very modest example: Daniel Gafford. Dray averaged 9 points a game last year. Gafford averaged 12.3. Sounds like not a huge difference. But Gafford only played 21.5 minutes per game while Draymond sucked up 29.2. Draymond's defensive rating per 100 possessions is 109, Gafford's is 113. OK, 4 points difference in Draymond's favor. But offensive rating per 100, Draymond is 107 while Gafford is 137 (+30 Gafford). That's a net rating / 100 difference of -2 for Draymond and +24 for Gafford.
Per 100 possessions, Gafford scores at almost double the rate of Draymond, at much higher efficiency (eFG 70.9% vs. 50.3%), and with a ~50% higher rebounding rate.
Again...Daniel Gafford...hardly a high-priced superstar.
Now of course the numbers aren't the whole story, but I think some of you are underestimating just how much Draymond is hurting us on the offense end, not just with dumb turnovers and flagrant fouls and such, but just taking up so much time at a slot with so little offensive output to compensate. And Jimmy overlaps a lot with Draymond in terms of BBIQ and knowing how to deliver the ball to Steph in the optimal position.
I have a ton of respect for Draymond, I just don't think it's right to believe it's impossible for this team to function without him.
Re: Options for This Offseason
- Jester_
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,908
- And1: 1,488
- Joined: Mar 25, 2011
Re: Options for This Offseason
Windy reporting KD will move in a few weeks. Any shot we're in the mix?
GQ Hot Dog wrote:Kerr has done more with the least talent available of any coach in the history of the game.
Re: Options for This Offseason
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,897
- And1: 391
- Joined: Jun 26, 2008
Re: Options for This Offseason
HiRez wrote:When talking about moving Dray, yes, I think everyone agrees it hurts you defensively, but the question is how much exactly? Because whoever you bring in is probably going to significantly increase your offensive production.
Let's just take a very modest example: Daniel Gafford. Dray averaged 9 points a game last year. Gafford averaged 12.3. Sounds like not a huge difference. But Gafford only played 21.5 minutes per game while Draymond sucked up 29.2. Draymond's defensive rating per 100 possessions is 109, Gafford's is 113. OK, 4 points difference in Draymond's favor. But offensive rating per 100, Draymond is 107 while Gafford is 137 (+30 Gafford). That's a net rating / 100 difference of -2 for Draymond and +24 for Gafford.
Per 100 possessions, Gafford scores at almost double the rate of Draymond, at much higher efficiency (eFG 70.9% vs. 50.3%), and with a ~50% higher rebounding rate.
Again...Daniel Gafford...hardly a high-priced superstar.
Now of course the numbers aren't the whole story, but I think some of you are underestimating just how much Draymond is hurting us on the offense end, not just with dumb turnovers and flagrant fouls and such, but just taking up so much time at a slot with so little offensive output to compensate. And Jimmy overlaps a lot with Draymond in terms of BBIQ and knowing how to deliver the ball to Steph in the optimal position.
I have a ton of respect for Draymond, I just don't think it's right to believe it's impossible for this team to function without him.
Impossible to function? No. No one has intimated as much. What I (and a few others) have said is, this is a top defense in the league with dray being the only obvious defensive plus. If you do trade him, our defense will sink to the bottom of the league and there is no amount of offense that will allow us to compete, at the highest level, with a bottom 10 defense. I see no way to move dray without completely tanking the defense. If the answer to that problem is to juice the offense, I don't think it's the right answer.
Yes, dray's finishing and shooting are a headwind for the offense. He does, however, add some very important dimensions to the offense: mainly the point forward that allows steph to play off ball. Can Jimmy to that? Sure, but that will take away from some of the things jimmy does best. In addition to the passing, Dray is one of the best screen setters in the league, a communicator, and terrific at ripping the rebounding and pushing the pace (he's done that less and less with age). Yes, he is a big negative on offense when it comes to scoring the ball. That's not the only thing that matters to an offense despite being the easiest to notice/criticize.
Re: Options for This Offseason
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,897
- And1: 391
- Joined: Jun 26, 2008
Re: Options for This Offseason
Jester_ wrote:Windy reporting KD will move in a few weeks. Any shot we're in the mix?
bill simmons is pretty confident the deal with the spurs is done and we'll all find out around draft time. I don't have the sources but, from a logic perspective, it makes a lot of sense.
Re: Options for This Offseason
- Jester_
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,908
- And1: 1,488
- Joined: Mar 25, 2011
Re: Options for This Offseason
vvoland wrote:Jester_ wrote:Windy reporting KD will move in a few weeks. Any shot we're in the mix?
bill simmons is pretty confident the deal with the spurs is done and we'll all find out around draft time. I don't have the sources but, from a logic perspective, it makes a lot of sense.
yeah seems to be the case. that team with Fox, KD and 3rd year Wemby is going to be nasty.
bummer Pop went through this whole rebuild but will miss the big leap
GQ Hot Dog wrote:Kerr has done more with the least talent available of any coach in the history of the game.
Re: Options for This Offseason
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,897
- And1: 391
- Joined: Jun 26, 2008
Re: Options for This Offseason
Jester_ wrote:vvoland wrote:Jester_ wrote:Windy reporting KD will move in a few weeks. Any shot we're in the mix?
bill simmons is pretty confident the deal with the spurs is done and we'll all find out around draft time. I don't have the sources but, from a logic perspective, it makes a lot of sense.
yeah seems to be the case. that team with Fox, KD and 3rd year Wemby is going to be nasty.
bummer Pop went through this whole rebuild but will miss the big leap
The west is going to be brutal next year and that's before Giannis gets here. The only hope for a team getting worse in the offseason might be Minny, if the ownership balks at paying a large tax bill. It's 13 teams for 8 spots; going to be a bloodbath.
Re: Options for This Offseason
- cpower
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,643
- And1: 8,461
- Joined: Mar 03, 2011
-
Re: Options for This Offseason
Jester_ wrote:Windy reporting KD will move in a few weeks. Any shot we're in the mix?
yeah Curry for KD works
Re: Options for This Offseason
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,023
- And1: 3,703
- Joined: Jul 02, 2014
- Location: Romania
-
Re: Options for This Offseason
We should blow it up, but we won't
''You don't need to be serious to be focused"
Philosopher and basketball player JaVale McGee
Philosopher and basketball player JaVale McGee
Re: Options for This Offseason
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,897
- And1: 391
- Joined: Jun 26, 2008
Re: Options for This Offseason
Zvaart wrote:We should blow it up, but we won't
Meaning you'd like to trade steph and watch him play elsewhere in order to get a few years' head start on the rebuild? Hoping for a few extra picks, as well?
I'll pass but I understand the sentiment. For me, watching steph play in another jersey far outweighs the theoretical benefit of starting the suck now.
Re: Options for This Offseason
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,023
- And1: 3,703
- Joined: Jul 02, 2014
- Location: Romania
-
Re: Options for This Offseason
vvoland wrote:Zvaart wrote:We should blow it up, but we won't
Meaning you'd like to trade steph and watch him play elsewhere in order to get a few years' head start on the rebuild? Hoping for a few extra picks, as well?
I'll pass but I understand the sentiment. For me, watching steph play in another jersey far outweighs the theoretical benefit of starting the suck now.
i see it as offering him a chance to win one more, by also helping the rebuild
but it's up to him.
''You don't need to be serious to be focused"
Philosopher and basketball player JaVale McGee
Philosopher and basketball player JaVale McGee
Re: Options for This Offseason
- EvanZ
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,315
- And1: 3,915
- Joined: Apr 06, 2011
Re: Options for This Offseason
We're going after Bobby Portis apparently.
Subscribe to my 100% FREE email newsletter summarizing top college performances:
https://toplines.mailchimpsites.com/
https://toplines.mailchimpsites.com/
Re: Options for This Offseason
- Onus
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,814
- And1: 6,911
- Joined: May 12, 2008
- Location: NOA
Re: Options for This Offseason
EvanZ wrote:We're going after Bobby Portis apparently.
We'd have to convince him to opt out and then sign him for the full tpmle? or do you think we do a S&T? Would love to trade TJD for him. Guess we can tell him that he would be the starting center.
Curry/JK/JB/Dray/Portis?
I read somewhere Kerr really liked Portis on team USA.
Most 4th Quarter Points in Final since 1991
1995 Shaquille O'Neal 11.5
2000 Shaquille O'Neal 11.5 (61.1% TS)
2015 Stephen Curry 10.8 (75.1% TS)
1997 Michael Jordan 10.7 (55.1% TS)
1998 Michael Jordan 10.6 (50.6% TS)
2011 Dirk Nowitzki 10.3 (68.0% TS)
1995 Shaquille O'Neal 11.5
2000 Shaquille O'Neal 11.5 (61.1% TS)
2015 Stephen Curry 10.8 (75.1% TS)
1997 Michael Jordan 10.7 (55.1% TS)
1998 Michael Jordan 10.6 (50.6% TS)
2011 Dirk Nowitzki 10.3 (68.0% TS)
Re: Options for This Offseason
- EvanZ
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,315
- And1: 3,915
- Joined: Apr 06, 2011
Re: Options for This Offseason
Onus wrote:EvanZ wrote:We're going after Bobby Portis apparently.
We'd have to convince him to opt out and then sign him for the full tpmle? or do you think we do a S&T? Would love to trade TJD for him. Guess we can tell him that he would be the starting center.
Curry/JK/JB/Dray/Portis?
I read somewhere Kerr really liked Portis on team USA.
Hard to see how he could be a center with so little rim protection. I think Draymond would still be the de facto center in any lineup with those two on the court. I'm not opposed to Portis in general, but I don't think it saves Draymond much grind.
Subscribe to my 100% FREE email newsletter summarizing top college performances:
https://toplines.mailchimpsites.com/
https://toplines.mailchimpsites.com/
Re: Options for This Offseason
- Onus
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,814
- And1: 6,911
- Joined: May 12, 2008
- Location: NOA
Re: Options for This Offseason
EvanZ wrote:Onus wrote:EvanZ wrote:We're going after Bobby Portis apparently.
We'd have to convince him to opt out and then sign him for the full tpmle? or do you think we do a S&T? Would love to trade TJD for him. Guess we can tell him that he would be the starting center.
Curry/JK/JB/Dray/Portis?
I read somewhere Kerr really liked Portis on team USA.
Hard to see how he could be a center with so little rim protection. I think Draymond would still be the de facto center in any lineup with those two on the court. I'm not opposed to Portis in general, but I don't think it saves Draymond much grind.
Let Portis bang with centers while letting Dray guard the weaker offensive player so he can roam and be the rim protector?
So like against minnesota, let Portis guard Randle and then Dray guards Rudy and Ant at the rim. Against OKC if they play their double big we can let Portis guard iHart and Dray guard Chet or probably the other way around since ihart is closer to the rim. Against Hou let Portis guard Adams and then Dray guards Sengun. I think it just gives us some better matchups against double big lineups.
Most 4th Quarter Points in Final since 1991
1995 Shaquille O'Neal 11.5
2000 Shaquille O'Neal 11.5 (61.1% TS)
2015 Stephen Curry 10.8 (75.1% TS)
1997 Michael Jordan 10.7 (55.1% TS)
1998 Michael Jordan 10.6 (50.6% TS)
2011 Dirk Nowitzki 10.3 (68.0% TS)
1995 Shaquille O'Neal 11.5
2000 Shaquille O'Neal 11.5 (61.1% TS)
2015 Stephen Curry 10.8 (75.1% TS)
1997 Michael Jordan 10.7 (55.1% TS)
1998 Michael Jordan 10.6 (50.6% TS)
2011 Dirk Nowitzki 10.3 (68.0% TS)
Re: Options for This Offseason
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,897
- And1: 391
- Joined: Jun 26, 2008
Re: Options for This Offseason
Onus wrote:EvanZ wrote:Onus wrote:We'd have to convince him to opt out and then sign him for the full tpmle? or do you think we do a S&T? Would love to trade TJD for him. Guess we can tell him that he would be the starting center.
Curry/JK/JB/Dray/Portis?
I read somewhere Kerr really liked Portis on team USA.
Hard to see how he could be a center with so little rim protection. I think Draymond would still be the de facto center in any lineup with those two on the court. I'm not opposed to Portis in general, but I don't think it saves Draymond much grind.
Let Portis bang with centers while letting Dray guard the weaker offensive player so he can roam and be the rim protector?
So like against minnesota, let Portis guard Randle and then Dray guards Rudy and Ant at the rim. Against OKC if they play their double big we can let Portis guard iHart and Dray guard Chet or probably the other way around since ihart is closer to the rim. Against Hou let Portis guard Adams and then Dray guards Sengun. I think it just gives us some better matchups against double big lineups.
Portis makes 13.4M next year. Moody and TJD would match salary, i believe. If bobby doesn't opt out, sure. If he does, why would he take 5M to play here?
Re: Options for This Offseason
- whatisacenter
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,815
- And1: 14,999
- Joined: Aug 05, 2013
-
Re: Options for This Offseason
vvoland wrote:Onus wrote:EvanZ wrote:
Hard to see how he could be a center with so little rim protection. I think Draymond would still be the de facto center in any lineup with those two on the court. I'm not opposed to Portis in general, but I don't think it saves Draymond much grind.
Let Portis bang with centers while letting Dray guard the weaker offensive player so he can roam and be the rim protector?
So like against minnesota, let Portis guard Randle and then Dray guards Rudy and Ant at the rim. Against OKC if they play their double big we can let Portis guard iHart and Dray guard Chet or probably the other way around since ihart is closer to the rim. Against Hou let Portis guard Adams and then Dray guards Sengun. I think it just gives us some better matchups against double big lineups.
Portis makes 13.4M next year. Moody and TJD would match salary, i believe. If bobby doesn't opt out, sure. If he does, why would he take 5M to play here?
Is there anything more than the wire tap article from Jake Fisher on Portis to the Warriors?
Doesn’t seem like a likely move to me, considering our salary cap and players on our roster
Madvillain been as high as Kathmandu
And tilted to the side like that fat man's shoe
And tilted to the side like that fat man's shoe
Re: Options for This Offseason
- EvanZ
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,315
- And1: 3,915
- Joined: Apr 06, 2011
Re: Options for This Offseason
whatisacenter wrote:vvoland wrote:Onus wrote:Let Portis bang with centers while letting Dray guard the weaker offensive player so he can roam and be the rim protector?
So like against minnesota, let Portis guard Randle and then Dray guards Rudy and Ant at the rim. Against OKC if they play their double big we can let Portis guard iHart and Dray guard Chet or probably the other way around since ihart is closer to the rim. Against Hou let Portis guard Adams and then Dray guards Sengun. I think it just gives us some better matchups against double big lineups.
Portis makes 13.4M next year. Moody and TJD would match salary, i believe. If bobby doesn't opt out, sure. If he does, why would he take 5M to play here?
Is there anything more than the wire tap article from Jake Fisher on Portis to the Warriors?
Doesn’t seem like a likely move to me, considering our salary cap and players on our roster
I've seen 100-page megathreads built off less solid intel



Subscribe to my 100% FREE email newsletter summarizing top college performances:
https://toplines.mailchimpsites.com/
https://toplines.mailchimpsites.com/
Re: Options for This Offseason
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,395
- And1: 3,815
- Joined: May 21, 2004
-
Re: Options for This Offseason
Maybe Milwaukee wants JK
LF75 wrote: It was a dumb idea..And yes I'm a dick.
Re: Options for This Offseason
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,603
- And1: 7,804
- Joined: Jun 18, 2018
-
Re: Options for This Offseason
EvanZ wrote:whatisacenter wrote:
Is there anything more than the wire tap article from Jake Fisher on Portis to the Warriors?
Doesn’t seem like a likely move to me, considering our salary cap and players on our roster
I've seen 100-page megathreads built off less solid intel![]()
![]()
It's the offseason bro!
Exactly right. Fischer's comment "Golden State has always been a team to monitor for Portis..." because Kerr was a fan, turn into headlines like, "Warriors Are Reportedly Interested In Bucks' Power Forward"
Return to Golden State Warriors