AFM wrote:So basically he’s Jan Vesely
(Im on my phone and haven’t watched the vid)
I think you are kidding... But Beringer has natural defensive instincts, explosiveness, and reaction time that Maluach could only dream of.
Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart
AFM wrote:So basically he’s Jan Vesely
(Im on my phone and haven’t watched the vid)

Bickerstaff: who's up for kickball?!!
Ed Wood: Only if it's the no-pants variety.

NatP4 wrote:Still think they take a massive swing and trade up for Ace Bailey. Trying to talk myself into it
nate33 wrote:NatP4 wrote:Still think they take a massive swing and trade up for Ace Bailey. Trying to talk myself into it
Yeah, it'll be interesting to see how this shakes out. Kneuppel is still showing very well in most mocks. If either Charlotte or Utah secretly prefers Kneuppel to Bailey, I could see them trading down to us at #6 so they still land Kneuppel but hopefully get a little extra in the process.
Hopefully, we can do it without giving up #18. I'd certainly give up a couple of SRP's. I might give up that 2026 OKC pick if I had to, given how the recent changes in amateur pay compensation is degrading the quality of talent later in the draft.
I also think it's possible to move up to #3 with Philly. And if we get the #3, I think there's a good chance of moving up to #2 for Harper and a reasonable cost because I don't think San Antonio really wants to draft him.
pcbothwel wrote:nate33 wrote:NatP4 wrote:Still think they take a massive swing and trade up for Ace Bailey. Trying to talk myself into it
Yeah, it'll be interesting to see how this shakes out. Kneuppel is still showing very well in most mocks. If either Charlotte or Utah secretly prefers Kneuppel to Bailey, I could see them trading down to us at #6 so they still land Kneuppel but hopefully get a little extra in the process.
Hopefully, we can do it without giving up #18. I'd certainly give up a couple of SRP's. I might give up that 2026 OKC pick if I had to, given how the recent changes in amateur pay compensation is degrading the quality of talent later in the draft.
I also think it's possible to move up to #3 with Philly. And if we get the #3, I think there's a good chance of moving up to #2 for Harper and a reasonable cost because I don't think San Antonio really wants to draft him.
Good chance Kon becomes better than Ace.
The more I see/read, the more I cool on Ace. Film + interviews show a low(er) IQ player that is a little too JR Smith for my liking.
VJ is a dog with a chip and Tre also has a no-nonsense vibe. Ace has small hands and poor feel, and I just dont see the hype. Again, if he falls to 6 and Dawkins likes him...fine. But not a trade up guy.
Dat2U wrote:pcbothwel wrote:nate33 wrote:Yeah, it'll be interesting to see how this shakes out. Kneuppel is still showing very well in most mocks. If either Charlotte or Utah secretly prefers Kneuppel to Bailey, I could see them trading down to us at #6 so they still land Kneuppel but hopefully get a little extra in the process.
Hopefully, we can do it without giving up #18. I'd certainly give up a couple of SRP's. I might give up that 2026 OKC pick if I had to, given how the recent changes in amateur pay compensation is degrading the quality of talent later in the draft.
I also think it's possible to move up to #3 with Philly. And if we get the #3, I think there's a good chance of moving up to #2 for Harper and a reasonable cost because I don't think San Antonio really wants to draft him.
Good chance Kon becomes better than Ace.
The more I see/read, the more I cool on Ace. Film + interviews show a low(er) IQ player that is a little too JR Smith for my liking.
VJ is a dog with a chip and Tre also has a no-nonsense vibe. Ace has small hands and poor feel, and I just dont see the hype. Again, if he falls to 6 and Dawkins likes him...fine. But not a trade up guy.
There's a good chance that Kon is no better than Corey Kispert or Luke Kennard. I keep looking for what this imaginary on-ball upside and I don't see it. Corey got to the rack alot more in college. I appreciate Kon's connectivity as a passer but usually having no first step means your mostly going to be off the ball. Kon didn't even show much off the dribble shooting to be confident in.
And we have not even discussed him being an early target on defense until he proves he can handle it.

Dat2U wrote:pcbothwel wrote:nate33 wrote:Yeah, it'll be interesting to see how this shakes out. Kneuppel is still showing very well in most mocks. If either Charlotte or Utah secretly prefers Kneuppel to Bailey, I could see them trading down to us at #6 so they still land Kneuppel but hopefully get a little extra in the process.
Hopefully, we can do it without giving up #18. I'd certainly give up a couple of SRP's. I might give up that 2026 OKC pick if I had to, given how the recent changes in amateur pay compensation is degrading the quality of talent later in the draft.
I also think it's possible to move up to #3 with Philly. And if we get the #3, I think there's a good chance of moving up to #2 for Harper and a reasonable cost because I don't think San Antonio really wants to draft him.
Good chance Kon becomes better than Ace.
The more I see/read, the more I cool on Ace. Film + interviews show a low(er) IQ player that is a little too JR Smith for my liking.
VJ is a dog with a chip and Tre also has a no-nonsense vibe. Ace has small hands and poor feel, and I just dont see the hype. Again, if he falls to 6 and Dawkins likes him...fine. But not a trade up guy.
There's a good chance that Kon is no better than Corey Kispert or Luke Kennard. I keep looking for what this imaginary on-ball upside and I don't see it. Corey got to the rack alot more in college. I appreciate Kon's connectivity as a passer but usually having no first step means your mostly going to be off the ball. Kon didn't even show much off the dribble shooting to be confident in.
And we have not even discussed him being an early target on defense until he proves he can handle it.
pcbothwel wrote:NatP4 wrote:dobrojim wrote:Beringer is an interesting prospect who In addition to
attractive measurables is very young. Thing is though,
Maluach is barely older and has a more attractive
list of strengths on Tankathon. Beringer could be there
at 18, Maluach probably wouldn't be. There are obvious
reasons for this.
Beringer can also switch out and guard on the perimeter and has now grown into legit C size.
If we really believe that Sarr is going to be mid usage guy, then someone like Beringer is PERFECT. Bigger Gafford.
I would love a big swing draft and trade down and end up with a 1-5 of Traore - Coward - Bryant - Essengue - Beringer.
The guys at 6 just arent selling me as steals. Love Tre & Kon's skill, but I worry about their ceiling due to defense and creation ability. I love Fears & VJ's tools and mindset but worry about their ceiling due to vision and shooting. I would take any and all at 10, but Im not sure I see the giant gap between them and the guys above.
nate33 wrote:Dat2U wrote:pcbothwel wrote:
Good chance Kon becomes better than Ace.
The more I see/read, the more I cool on Ace. Film + interviews show a low(er) IQ player that is a little too JR Smith for my liking.
VJ is a dog with a chip and Tre also has a no-nonsense vibe. Ace has small hands and poor feel, and I just dont see the hype. Again, if he falls to 6 and Dawkins likes him...fine. But not a trade up guy.
There's a good chance that Kon is no better than Corey Kispert or Luke Kennard. I keep looking for what this imaginary on-ball upside and I don't see it. Corey got to the rack alot more in college. I appreciate Kon's connectivity as a passer but usually having no first step means your mostly going to be off the ball. Kon didn't even show much off the dribble shooting to be confident in.
And we have not even discussed him being an early target on defense until he proves he can handle it.
I'm with you. I don't understand the hype for Knueppel either, but so many mocks really like him.
He does have more ball handling chops as a freshman than Kispert had as a junior. I suppose a best case scenario is that he is the next Austin Reaves.
WizarDynasty wrote:Dat2U wrote:pcbothwel wrote:
Good chance Kon becomes better than Ace.
The more I see/read, the more I cool on Ace. Film + interviews show a low(er) IQ player that is a little too JR Smith for my liking.
VJ is a dog with a chip and Tre also has a no-nonsense vibe. Ace has small hands and poor feel, and I just dont see the hype. Again, if he falls to 6 and Dawkins likes him...fine. But not a trade up guy.
There's a good chance that Kon is no better than Corey Kispert or Luke Kennard. I keep looking for what this imaginary on-ball upside and I don't see it. Corey got to the rack alot more in college. I appreciate Kon's connectivity as a passer but usually having no first step means your mostly going to be off the ball. Kon didn't even show much off the dribble shooting to be confident in.
And we have not even discussed him being an early target on defense until he proves he can handle it.
This elite level analysis from this board. First step is absolutely the most valuable asset on all of offensive basketball. Big hands is huge too. This board really starting to think like wolves instead of sheep.
Dat2U wrote:pcbothwel wrote:nate33 wrote:Yeah, it'll be interesting to see how this shakes out. Kneuppel is still showing very well in most mocks. If either Charlotte or Utah secretly prefers Kneuppel to Bailey, I could see them trading down to us at #6 so they still land Kneuppel but hopefully get a little extra in the process.
Hopefully, we can do it without giving up #18. I'd certainly give up a couple of SRP's. I might give up that 2026 OKC pick if I had to, given how the recent changes in amateur pay compensation is degrading the quality of talent later in the draft.
I also think it's possible to move up to #3 with Philly. And if we get the #3, I think there's a good chance of moving up to #2 for Harper and a reasonable cost because I don't think San Antonio really wants to draft him.
Good chance Kon becomes better than Ace.
The more I see/read, the more I cool on Ace. Film + interviews show a low(er) IQ player that is a little too JR Smith for my liking.
VJ is a dog with a chip and Tre also has a no-nonsense vibe. Ace has small hands and poor feel, and I just dont see the hype. Again, if he falls to 6 and Dawkins likes him...fine. But not a trade up guy.
There's a good chance that Kon is no better than Corey Kispert or Luke Kennard. I keep looking for what this imaginary on-ball upside and I don't see it. Corey got to the rack alot more in college. I appreciate Kon's connectivity as a passer but usually having no first step means your mostly going to be off the ball. Kon didn't even show much off the dribble shooting to be confident in.
And we have not even discussed him being an early target on defense until he proves he can handle it.

TheBlackCzar wrote:nate33 wrote:Dat2U wrote:
There's a good chance that Kon is no better than Corey Kispert or Luke Kennard. I keep looking for what this imaginary on-ball upside and I don't see it. Corey got to the rack alot more in college. I appreciate Kon's connectivity as a passer but usually having no first step means your mostly going to be off the ball. Kon didn't even show much off the dribble shooting to be confident in.
And we have not even discussed him being an early target on defense until he proves he can handle it.
I'm with you. I don't understand the hype for Knueppel either, but so many mocks really like him.
He does have more ball handling chops as a freshman than Kispert had as a junior. I suppose a best case scenario is that he is the next Austin Reaves.
Austin Reaves was a better scorer and ball handler than this Dookey..... Just cuz he white dont make them have the same skill set.... I don't care who drafts him, just don't want it to be us....
nate33 wrote:TheBlackCzar wrote:nate33 wrote:I'm with you. I don't understand the hype for Knueppel either, but so many mocks really like him.
He does have more ball handling chops as a freshman than Kispert had as a junior. I suppose a best case scenario is that he is the next Austin Reaves.
Austin Reaves was a better scorer and ball handler than this Dookey..... Just cuz he white dont make them have the same skill set.... I don't care who drafts him, just don't want it to be us....
Freshman Knueppel performed about as well as senior Reaves:
https://www.tankathon.com/players/compare?players=kon-knueppel--austin-reaves

Bickerstaff: who's up for kickball?!!
Ed Wood: Only if it's the no-pants variety.
Rafael122 wrote:So maybe I need to get out of this mindset that it takes 3 first round picks or whatever to move up 2-3 spots. It sounds very NFL-ish. If all it takes is trading 18 and swapping 6 for 3 and taking on Eric Gordon's contract, that seems kinda...low?
NatP4 wrote:Played in the ABA, same league as Topic/Jokic/Jovic/Djurisic. Been playing basketball for only 3 years now. Measured in at 6’10 in shoes a year ago.
18.8 minutes per game, per 36: 10.3 points 9.4 rebounds 0.9 assists 1.0 steals 2.6 blocks 1.3 turnovers 64% TS 125 O-rating 103 D-rating
Played in the French junior league (same as Bilal) in 23/24 and posted per 36: 15 points 14 rebounds 2.8 blocks 1.3 steals on 64% TS
FT% is brutal at both levels though
TheBlackCzar wrote:WizarDynasty wrote:Dat2U wrote:
There's a good chance that Kon is no better than Corey Kispert or Luke Kennard. I keep looking for what this imaginary on-ball upside and I don't see it. Corey got to the rack alot more in college. I appreciate Kon's connectivity as a passer but usually having no first step means your mostly going to be off the ball. Kon didn't even show much off the dribble shooting to be confident in.
And we have not even discussed him being an early target on defense until he proves he can handle it.
This elite level analysis from this board. First step is absolutely the most valuable asset on all of offensive basketball. Big hands is huge too. This board really starting to think like wolves instead of sheep.
Hence why I was intrigued by Fears, he probably has the best 1st step in this class....