islandboy53 wrote:Zeno wrote:islandboy53 wrote:
I don't see any motivation for Brooklyn to send Claxton out. He needs to bring back some draft capital for them to be involved. That said, this trade hard caps Minnesota at the 1st apron, while leaving them about only $200k under the apron to bring back NAW, assuming Reid picks up his option. In order for Minnesota to have any substantial hope of bringing back Reid and NAW, they need to send out more salary than they bring back, so they aren't hard capped. so, for example, they could do this.
Minnesota out: Gobert and DiVincenzo and 17 to Phoenix, 2 future 2nds and Conley to Brooklyn
Minnesota in: Durant
Phoenix sends Durant to Minnesota and a future 2nd to Brooklyn for Gobert, Divincenzo and 17, and Brooklyn takes on Conley for 3 future 2nds.
In this scenario, Minnesota gets a realistic shot at retaining Reid and NAW, and at the same time the trade doesn't depend on Randle picking up his option before the draft.
They just need to throw in a minimum-like salary to make up the 2.1 million to not be hard capped at the 1st apron.
Fair enough, but why does Randle opt in early, and why does Brooklyn using $6 million of cap space for no return?
Randle might just really want to be in NY again? Nets would have to have a plan for another star(s) and truly believe Claxton is a toxic contract. I admit the Nets motivation is elusive but there have been quotes about them not wanting to rebuild for long. They owe their 2027 pick.