Pacers dynasty ?

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

SlimShady83
RealGM
Posts: 15,954
And1: 5,226
Joined: Jun 19, 2012

Re: Pacers dynasty ? 

Post#41 » by SlimShady83 » Sat Jun 14, 2025 3:38 am

Much like the OKC thread, can we just wait and see who wins the championship b4 we even talk about this BS.
My Go Team
Magic, Jordan, Bird, Duncan, Shaq

My Counter
Stockton, Kobe, Pippen, Rodman, Dirk

Today's Team
Luka, SGA, Tatum, Giannis, Wemby
User avatar
Coach Carter
General Manager
Posts: 9,203
And1: 6,933
Joined: Apr 28, 2017
   

Re: Pacers dynasty ? 

Post#42 » by Coach Carter » Sat Jun 14, 2025 3:50 am

They remind me of a march madness underdog team, overachieving due to better coaching, chemistry and intangibles.
In reference to our title winning year
Coach Carter wrote:This year is a wash and most of us know it.
Castle Black
Head Coach
Posts: 6,878
And1: 17,822
Joined: Jul 21, 2017
       

Re: Pacers dynasty ? 

Post#43 » by Castle Black » Sat Jun 14, 2025 3:54 am

Lol at OP :lol:

Pacers prob won't ever win a ring tbh. You need a superstar caliber player on your roster (top-8 guy at the very least) and they don't have one. They've had a really incredible run for a 4-Seed and they deserve a lot of credit, but they very predictably blew it tonight in large because they don't have a superstar player to help them close out games. Their season is over.
Image
tamaraw08
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,801
And1: 2,189
Joined: Feb 13, 2019
     

Re: Pacers dynasty ? 

Post#44 » by tamaraw08 » Sat Jun 14, 2025 5:33 am

Coach Carter wrote:They remind me of a march madness underdog team, overachieving due to better coaching, chemistry and intangibles.


A young version of 2020, 2023 Miami Heat, maybe a little better. Several decent to good players but not very good/great guys.
jkvonny
General Manager
Posts: 7,536
And1: 7,462
Joined: Jun 04, 2021
       

Re: Pacers dynasty ? 

Post#45 » by jkvonny » Sat Jun 14, 2025 1:02 pm

Castle Black wrote:Lol at OP :lol:

Pacers prob won't ever win a ring tbh. You need a superstar caliber player on your roster (top-8 guy at the very least) and they don't have one. They've had a really incredible run for a 4-Seed and they deserve a lot of credit, but they very predictably blew it tonight. Their season is over.

I think they'll get at least 1 championship within the next 5 yrs or so.
User avatar
Optms
RealGM
Posts: 23,930
And1: 20,418
Joined: Jun 11, 2009
 

Re: Pacers dynasty ? 

Post#46 » by Optms » Sat Jun 14, 2025 1:46 pm

We're so blessed to have 2 dynasties going toe to toe in the Finals. Peak basketball.
8305
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,493
And1: 638
Joined: Jun 11, 2009
     

Re: Pacers dynasty ? 

Post#47 » by 8305 » Sat Jun 14, 2025 3:19 pm

Dynasty? No but, I’d be thrilled to get a chip. Assuming Turner gets resigned this summer Pacers project a nice window for contention. Keep plugging away over the next 2-3 seasons and maybe the basketball gods bless them.

It’s hard to acquire the “it player” that can with the help of other good players deliver at the highest level. In Hali I think Pacers have a player like that. This franchise has never had a player of that caliber.
Darren
RealGM
Posts: 14,142
And1: 919
Joined: Nov 06, 2003

Re: Pacers dynasty ? 

Post#48 » by Darren » Sun Jun 15, 2025 12:54 am

Under the hard cap, it's difficult to keep a deep competitive core. Turner is not on contract year soon. You never know how things may look like by next contract. If you're in spot to win anything, act immediately before it's too late.

Only Wemby team or Jokic team or SGA team are on dynasty mode right now with key players on similar age in prime and bunch of 2-way players. Indy, Boston is close, though. Minny, Houston, Dallas may get a window for next couple of years.
Darren
RealGM
Posts: 14,142
And1: 919
Joined: Nov 06, 2003

Re: Pacers dynasty ? 

Post#49 » by Darren » Sun Jun 15, 2025 12:57 am

Good to great coaching, assets' management , wealthy owned and great player development staff are also needed.
ChumboChappati
Pro Prospect
Posts: 918
And1: 558
Joined: Jul 30, 2021

Re: Pacers dynasty ? 

Post#50 » by ChumboChappati » Sun Jun 15, 2025 2:29 am

bucknut wrote:If OKC has a thread on this why not Indy

All these critical depth pieces are locked in for multi year deals , and of course siakam hali locked in

They just have a decision to make on Turner. Matherin is locked in next year and then he is the one depth guy that contract is up after next year

But everyone else ? Nembhard just locked in to a great value deal until 28-29 Mcconnel up 30-31., toppin 28-29.. Neismith and Sheppard locked into value deals till 27-28

And guys like jarace walker and Enrique freeman on ice on rookie deals who can play

They have a first round draft pick this year, and 3 second round draft picks this year

The front office has been absolute nails.

The only upgrades for this team could be better rebounding big,, and maybe more free throw/iso driver half court guys since Matherin and siakam are the only ones

They probably keep Turner due to his history with the team and not to mess with a good thing, but could be argued that he is replaceable with that large contract and some of his limitations

To be very honest, Hali is #2 and Siakam is #3 on a real championship team. So Pacers are still missing a #1 to be consider a dynasty.
Marrs-Law
Sophomore
Posts: 156
And1: 217
Joined: Mar 31, 2025
   

Re: Pacers dynasty ? 

Post#51 » by Marrs-Law » Sun Jun 15, 2025 2:37 am

ChumboChappati wrote: To be very honest, Hali is #2 and Siakam is #3 on a real championship team. So Pacers are still missing a #1 to be consider a dynasty.


In a vacuum, Siakam should be good enough to be a championship 2, as he was in 2019, and I don't believe he is any worse now. Hali is a unicorn of a #1, and so I think it's fair to have doubts about him seeing as he's not an all-nba self-creator like the other guys. I think they just have to hope for internal development from Hali/Mathurin/Nembhard and assume that sooner or later they get back here. *assuming a loss
User avatar
durden_tyler
RealGM
Posts: 21,574
And1: 10,830
Joined: Jun 04, 2003
Location: 537 Paper Street, Bradford
   

Re: Pacers dynasty ? 

Post#52 » by durden_tyler » Sun Jun 15, 2025 10:55 am

RealGM Jinx thread just never fails. From a 3-1 series lead and now, 10% chance of winning the title.

Sure let’s talk more dynastic probablilities for these teams


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If there is no basketball in heaven, i am not going.
ChumboChappati
Pro Prospect
Posts: 918
And1: 558
Joined: Jul 30, 2021

Re: Pacers dynasty ? 

Post#53 » by ChumboChappati » Sun Jun 15, 2025 9:07 pm

Marrs-Law wrote:
ChumboChappati wrote: To be very honest, Hali is #2 and Siakam is #3 on a real championship team. So Pacers are still missing a #1 to be consider a dynasty.


In a vacuum, Siakam should be good enough to be a championship 2, as he was in 2019, and I don't believe he is any worse now. Hali is a unicorn of a #1, and so I think it's fair to have doubts about him seeing as he's not an all-nba self-creator like the other guys. I think they just have to hope for internal development from Hali/Mathurin/Nembhard and assume that sooner or later they get back here. *assuming a loss

Siakam was not #2 on 2019 Raptors, that team had no clear #2. Kawhi was clear #1 and after him the drop in quality was huge. They had bunch of #3s like Lowry, Siakam and Fred. Kawhi carried the whole team and also luck comes in huge for them to win that championship. By the time they won, Kawhi was fed up for carrying the team so much. I remember in one of the games Kawhi had done all the hard work and Siakam had to just make his FTs in the end to win the game, and he botched them to send the game to OT :lol: . The look on Kawhi's was like WTF I am doing here. :lol:

Anyway point is Siakam was never #2, and Hali's game is definitely not #1 type. They need a true #1. If they fail to win this year, then they should seriously think about trading Siakam + fillers for a true #1.
Marrs-Law
Sophomore
Posts: 156
And1: 217
Joined: Mar 31, 2025
   

Re: Pacers dynasty ? 

Post#54 » by Marrs-Law » Mon Jun 16, 2025 12:13 am

ChumboChappati wrote:
Marrs-Law wrote:
ChumboChappati wrote: To be very honest, Hali is #2 and Siakam is #3 on a real championship team. So Pacers are still missing a #1 to be consider a dynasty.


In a vacuum, Siakam should be good enough to be a championship 2, as he was in 2019, and I don't believe he is any worse now. Hali is a unicorn of a #1, and so I think it's fair to have doubts about him seeing as he's not an all-nba self-creator like the other guys. I think they just have to hope for internal development from Hali/Mathurin/Nembhard and assume that sooner or later they get back here. *assuming a loss

Siakam was not #2 on 2019 Raptors, that team had no clear #2. Kawhi was clear #1 and after him the drop in quality was huge. They had bunch of #3s like Lowry, Siakam and Fred. Kawhi carried the whole team and also luck comes in huge for them to win that championship. By the time they won, Kawhi was fed up for carrying the team so much. I remember in one of the games Kawhi had done all the hard work and Siakam had to just make his FTs in the end to win the game, and he botched them to send the game to OT :lol: . The look on Kawhi's was like WTF I am doing here. :lol:

Anyway point is Siakam was never #2, and Hali's game is definitely not #1 type. They need a true #1. If they fail to win this year, then they should seriously think about trading Siakam + fillers for a true #1.


They aren't trading Pascal; he's performed to well that it would look really bad. Beyond that, the only upgrade would be someone like Giannis and they would be giving away way to much.

Similar to the Raptors, the Pacers design is that a lot of different players are going to be taking a lot of shots, so even if he's not quite a #2 it hopefully won't matter here in the long run
One Last Shot
Starter
Posts: 2,429
And1: 3,636
Joined: Mar 04, 2018

Re: Pacers dynasty ? 

Post#55 » by One Last Shot » Thu Jun 19, 2025 1:12 pm

It ends tonight
User avatar
RHODEY
RealGM
Posts: 25,286
And1: 22,796
Joined: May 18, 2007
Location: Straight out of a comic book

Re: Pacers dynasty ? 

Post#56 » by RHODEY » Thu Jun 19, 2025 2:06 pm

Charlie Sollers wrote:I can't see any team pushing the pacers for the next few years. They are head and shoulders above everyone else..........and it's not even close.

:lol:
Ssj16
Starter
Posts: 2,267
And1: 2,676
Joined: Jun 29, 2021
 

Re: Pacers dynasty ? 

Post#57 » by Ssj16 » Thu Jun 19, 2025 5:51 pm

bucknut wrote:Pacers disrespect still continues to be rampant.still not being giving credit for this playoff performance due to lucky shots and injuries.

The pacers have not even been pushed this playoffs until now

The finals has consistently had rematches and the same few teams. Could easily be OKC vs Indiana again next year

Sure the new cap makes it harder , except when you already have your contracts locked in and depth unlike the nuggets did.

The club is very opposite of Celtics iso ball.

Definitely can see a golden state type run for Indiana , or Spurs. And many don't consider them dynasties, only the bulls. But pacers can be in the finals mix for next five years.


This is definitely false. The last rematch that I can remember is GS vs Cleveland in 2018. Since then with all the cap rules changes, we haven't had rematches in the finals much less the same team making it back to the finals 2 years in a row.
User avatar
Optms
RealGM
Posts: 23,930
And1: 20,418
Joined: Jun 11, 2009
 

Re: Pacers dynasty ? 

Post#58 » by Optms » Fri Jun 20, 2025 2:13 am

Back on the Dynasty train. All aboard.
User avatar
JimmyPlopper
General Manager
Posts: 7,534
And1: 10,205
Joined: Sep 25, 2020
Location: Donald B's is the place to give me the pace

Re: Pacers dynasty ? 

Post#59 » by JimmyPlopper » Fri Jun 20, 2025 2:19 am

Optms wrote:Back on the Dynasty train. All aboard.


:lol:
a slave stood behind the conqueror holding a golden crown, and whispering in his ear a warning: that all glory is fleeting
bucknut
Senior
Posts: 526
And1: 268
Joined: Feb 27, 2012

Re: Pacers dynasty ? 

Post#60 » by bucknut » Fri Jun 20, 2025 2:51 am

The fact that they are getting nothing from Turner is remarkable. That's the core piece you could use to upgrade and his contract is up. I'm letting him walk

Return to The General Board