
I laugh but also weep for mankind
Moderators: cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, ken6199, Domejandro, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid
Lunartic wrote:Why do you think fans of 29 teams suddenly decided to treat OKC with "vitriol"?
Lunartic wrote:We have had dozens of teams of young teams make deep runs, 2011/12 OKC would be a perfect example. Super young guys, KD/Westbrook/Harden/Ibaka (age 45) and other than Harden's flopping no one hated them when they made deep runs. 2015 GSW same story, only hated Draymond for being a thug.
Lunartic wrote:The vitriol comes when fans don't believe a team or player isn't earning their success but rather are being gifted it - at least partially.
Lunartic wrote:Can we agree that SGA does indeed get the benefit of the doubt when it comes to offensive actions? He's given leeway to push-off and he's usually the on the receiving end of FTs when there is a foul called. Can we agree ? Caruso/Dort probably should receive more fouls called on them per game? Agreed?
Handlez wrote:Pacers were favored by the refs most of the game.
OKC was too clutch to be denied.
Patches Perry wrote:It's not. From what I've gathered on this forum/reddit/X, it's disproportionately fans of the Nuggets, Mavericks and now Lakers fans. The MVP angle plays a role and I think Shai leapfrogging Luka in playoff success after Dallas beat OKC last year rubs some Luka fans the wrong way. It's very driven by fans of teams and players who were already adversarial to OKC and Shai.
There was a lot of complaining about GSW illegal screens as well as Draymond's antics, and a lot of complaining about their defense being allowed to be physical. To say otherwise is revisionist. Also, go back to May of 2018 and see how many threads there are about rigging for the 2018 Warriors.
Yes this is true, although it's very selective, which completely robs it of any credibility. When their guy does it, it's smart and crafty. When the opponent does it, it's total disrespectful and fraudulent and rigged! If the NBA wants to address this across the board, more power to them, but as long as I've been actively watching the NBA religiously, the best players have scored free points by getting defenders out of position, and then seeking the contact when defenders try to cheat their way back into position. Great players do this consistently because letting out of position defenders back in position is a disadvantage to the team. In my experience, whether fans support this or not is very outcome dependent.
I think Shai gets more benefit than the average player yes, but definitely not more than other players his caliber. If someone thinks Shai is getting benefit above and beyond what a top 5 player normally gets, I'd need to see some evidence. The surface level data seems to suggest otherwise. He drives a lot and his rate of free throws per drive suggests he gets disproportionately less free throws than you'd expect. I do understand that such data doesn't necessarily mean he isn't getting some special calls, but like I said, I need some evidence of that. Given the lack of data, the evidence for Shai getting ultra special treatment would need to be mostly anecdotal, which I'm open to, but like I said, almost every example ever provided is the right call within the context of the game (called both ways) and people are just frustrated that it turns the outcome of the game in a way they don't like. I could go find a bunch of Jokic, Luka, Giannis, Kobe, Jordan, etc examples of them doing the same thing.
Handlez wrote:Pacers were favored by the refs most of the game.
OKC was too clutch to be denied.
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
SamSepiol wrote:Yes.
People who just box score read number of fouls called think otherwise. Same with those that didn’t watch the game or understand it, will think it wasn’t fixed. No idea of momentum, runs, and timing of the fouls were being called as why it’s fixed.
Case in point, a shove not being called with 2:05 left and OKC up one - https://youtu.be/i5zdDHu-JWw?si=9XzkwSOqktgLr15N (2:26 in video)- this end of game looked like what the Pacers did all playoffs long, which was to go back n forth late and eventually end up on top. Not going to happen if they don’t call anything in crunch time.
rand wrote:LePeekaboo wrote:Does a bear **** in the woods?
What do ursine defecation habits have to do with NBA officiating?
Our tv broadcast view is not how refs view the games, but we many times forget that. I've reffed before and guys will be asking how you missed something, and I'm like, dude, I don't have magic eyes that can see through all these bodies all the time while people are in motion, settle down.Slimjimzv wrote:SamSepiol wrote:Yes.
People who just box score read number of fouls called think otherwise. Same with those that didn’t watch the game or understand it, will think it wasn’t fixed. No idea of momentum, runs, and timing of the fouls were being called as why it’s fixed.
Case in point, a shove not being called with 2:05 left and OKC up one - https://youtu.be/i5zdDHu-JWw?si=9XzkwSOqktgLr15N (2:26 in video)- this end of game looked like what the Pacers did all playoffs long, which was to go back n forth late and eventually end up on top. Not going to happen if they don’t call anything in crunch time.
I agree, that was a bad missed call, but Foster was the one watching, and his view was obstructed by Turner. It sure looks like an honest missed call to me, not rigging the game.
xdrta+ wrote:bisme37 wrote:The SGA push-off thing people are mad about...
Tatum got called for push-offs a lot early in his career. He'd actually extend his arm and push off with his hand, which is an offensive foul.
But he adjusted and stopped extending his arm. It became more of a chicken-wing with the elbow or forearm kinda doing the push-off, but his arm is kept tucked and doesn't extend.
This is the whole point. For years now, as long as you don't extend your arm they're not going to call a foul, probably because it isn't a foul. If your arm extends, even just a little, it's usually called. Perhaps because with your arm tucked in it's hard to generate much force and actually make it a push. At any rate, that's the way it's been for some time now and hardly worth complaining about.
Ayt wrote:A league that rigs games ended up with Indy - OKC in the Finals. Brilliant analysis!
vobot wrote:robbie84 wrote:MoneyMo wrote:People are just scared and upset that if Shai gets a ring it’ll propel him over their guy. Luka stans in particular are mad at that
I think people just dislike Shai's foul baiting like they dislike Embid's foul baiting. It's boring and not as fun to watch. It makes people root against him.... especially when the opponent is a monumental underdog like Indy.
Just human nature.
I get what you are saying but man.... Embiid's foul baiting in like levels above SGA and other stars. Nothing looks more ridiculous than a 7 foot 300 pound man falling over every play on the slightest contact from smaller defenders.
Alatan wrote:Ayt wrote:A league that rigs games ended up with Indy - OKC in the Finals. Brilliant analysis!
The real money is in gambling not TV ratings.