Sac - Memphis
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
Sac - Memphis
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,840
- And1: 11,977
- Joined: Sep 17, 2010
-
Sac - Memphis
Lavine, Carter, 26 kings 1st, 27 spurs 1st, 28 kings 1st, 30 kings 1st, 2 Charlotte 2nds
for
Ja, Clarke, konchar
Why for sac? 1st move. Monk for pj after, then demar for rozier and JJJ. Leaves us with good size and defense around the pg/c tandem.
Ja - Keon - Keegan - washington - sabonis
Rozier - Jaime - laravia* - Clarke - Valanciunas
Why for memphis? They will be absolutely loaded with picks. They will either start the new gen okc squad, or be able to front run a giannis trade the minute he becomes available.
Pippen - lavine - wells - JJJ - edey
Anthony - Carter - kcp - GG -
for
Ja, Clarke, konchar
Why for sac? 1st move. Monk for pj after, then demar for rozier and JJJ. Leaves us with good size and defense around the pg/c tandem.
Ja - Keon - Keegan - washington - sabonis
Rozier - Jaime - laravia* - Clarke - Valanciunas
Why for memphis? They will be absolutely loaded with picks. They will either start the new gen okc squad, or be able to front run a giannis trade the minute he becomes available.
Pippen - lavine - wells - JJJ - edey
Anthony - Carter - kcp - GG -
Re: Sac - Memphis
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,790
- And1: 13,739
- Joined: Nov 13, 2019
-
Re: Sac - Memphis
if i'm memphis i would take the gamble that sacramento flames out
Re: Sac - Memphis
- Texas Chuck
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
- Posts: 92,284
- And1: 98,052
- Joined: May 19, 2012
- Location: Purgatory
-
Re: Sac - Memphis
I disagree with this belief that a Bane trade signals a Ja trade, but agree with godaddy that if I could short Sacramento in a Ja deal I'd be pretty tempted.
Don't love this for the Kings.
Don't love this for the Kings.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Re: Sac - Memphis
-
- King of the Trade Board
- Posts: 20,726
- And1: 7,720
- Joined: Aug 05, 2012
Re: Sac - Memphis
I really like the final lineup for Sac, assuming the other deals are actually there?
Don’t think Ja is really available, but owning the 2028/2030 Sac firsts should interest Memphis..
Don’t think Ja is really available, but owning the 2028/2030 Sac firsts should interest Memphis..
Re: Sac - Memphis
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,209
- And1: 631
- Joined: Jun 02, 2022
-
Re: Sac - Memphis
Lavine in Memphis will be my last day as a Grizzly as it would signal the identity and culture change the majority of Grizz fans would not appreciate.
Those remote unprotected picks has a good value, yes.
Those remote unprotected picks has a good value, yes.
Re: Sac - Memphis
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,790
- And1: 13,739
- Joined: Nov 13, 2019
-
Re: Sac - Memphis
esvl wrote:Lavine in Memphis will be my last day as a Grizzly as it would signal the identity and culture change the majority of Grizz fans would not appreciate.
Those remote unprotected picks has a good value, yes.
you can return as a fan when his contract runs out

Re: Sac - Memphis
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 26,066
- And1: 4,320
- Joined: Jul 29, 2001
-
Re: Sac - Memphis
The resulting Sacramento roster is not good enough to justify paying this for Ja, IMO.
Re: Sac - Memphis
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,821
- And1: 5,894
- Joined: Feb 12, 2016
-
Re: Sac - Memphis
Godaddycurse wrote:esvl wrote:Lavine in Memphis will be my last day as a Grizzly as it would signal the identity and culture change the majority of Grizz fans would not appreciate.
Those remote unprotected picks has a good value, yes.
you can return as a fan when his contract runs out
I will cheer every missed Lavine shot. Regarding OP… I think this is a fair offer if we decide to tear it down all the way.
Re: Sac - Memphis
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,209
- And1: 631
- Joined: Jun 02, 2022
-
Re: Sac - Memphis
Godaddycurse wrote:esvl wrote:Lavine in Memphis will be my last day as a Grizzly as it would signal the identity and culture change the majority of Grizz fans would not appreciate.
Those remote unprotected picks has a good value, yes.
you can return as a fan when his contract runs out
Lol
Re: Sac - Memphis
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,701
- And1: 35,759
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: Sac - Memphis
This would be such a meet-the-knew-boss-same-as-the-old-boss move for the Kings.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Sac - Memphis
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,646
- And1: 2,421
- Joined: Dec 19, 2018
-
Re: Sac - Memphis
I'm usually pretty critical of trades involving the Kings because I think they always seem to overvalue our players, but I think this one would be fair for both teams. Ja and Keon is a back court worth gambling on and unprotected Sacramento Kings 1sts are some of the best assets you can own as an opposing team. Memphis would also have an absolute war chest to use to build around JJJ.
Re: Sac - Memphis
- longfellow44
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,020
- And1: 233
- Joined: May 04, 2007
- Location: Washinton DC
Re: Sac - Memphis
I really don't like the idea of Ja Morant. Seems way too risky, the guy could make another stupid choice and end up suspended for an extensive period of time. We don't need that sort of player, it's too risky for the kings to give up such a large package of picks.
Re: Sac - Memphis
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,779
- And1: 5,465
- Joined: Jun 03, 2023
Re: Sac - Memphis
Memphis isn't trading Ja.
Warspite wrote:Billups was a horrible scorer who could only score with an open corner 3 or a FT.
Re: Sac - Memphis
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,351
- And1: 3,048
- Joined: Feb 09, 2017
-
Re: Sac - Memphis
Lavine is better than inefficient, non spacing, mediocre defense guards alone (Fox's replica). This is going nowhere. Ja doesn't have impact stats showing much, and will not be a target for the Kings. If its PG its Garland or Young as reported, and Lavine won't be involved, thats going in circles.
And as an aside, Memphis should have moved him, not Bane
And as an aside, Memphis should have moved him, not Bane
Return to Trades and Transactions