Warriors & Jazz

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

fluffhead
Junior
Posts: 367
And1: 35
Joined: Dec 08, 2004

Warriors & Jazz 

Post#1 » by fluffhead » Tue Jun 17, 2025 1:42 am

Collins declines player option, does a s&t with gs
3 years 60 mill
Warriors finally get a legitimate stretch big

gs sends buddy & moody
Buddy could get rerouted somewhere and moody is signed to a good contract and has shown flashes and is still only 23
User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 92,284
And1: 98,052
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Re: Warriors & Jazz 

Post#2 » by Texas Chuck » Tue Jun 17, 2025 1:49 am

I'd don't love Collins to GSW, but it seems pretty clear you started with that as your goal, found some matching money and didn't worry at all if it made any sense for Utah at all. Because it does not. Moody isn't a good contract. Buddy is a fine role player but not really a target for Utah especially not if they get to eat the Moody deal on top of it.

Deals have to make sense for both teams.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
User avatar
eminence
RealGM
Posts: 16,863
And1: 11,698
Joined: Mar 07, 2015

Re: Warriors & Jazz 

Post#3 » by eminence » Tue Jun 17, 2025 2:24 am

Count this Jazz fan in. Moody is solid at 3/37. Only just turned 23, still some upside. Would value him over Buddy in this deal pretty clearly.
I bought a boat.
azwfan
RealGM
Posts: 15,474
And1: 3,838
Joined: May 21, 2004
     

Re: Warriors & Jazz 

Post#4 » by azwfan » Tue Jun 17, 2025 2:34 am

Texas Chuck wrote:I'd don't love Collins to GSW, but it seems pretty clear you started with that as your goal, found some matching money and didn't worry at all if it made any sense for Utah at all. Because it does not. Moody isn't a good contract. Buddy is a fine role player but not really a target for Utah especially not if they get to eat the Moody deal on top of it.

Deals have to make sense for both teams.

Moody isnt a good contract?
Edit: I will say, Im not sure that Utah does it regardless but didnt know Moody was viewed as a contract another team would have to “eat”. I thought he was an asset with his contract. Interesting.
LF75 wrote: It was a dumb idea..And yes I'm a dick.
User avatar
SkyHook
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,942
And1: 3,271
Joined: Jun 24, 2002
 

Re: Warriors & Jazz 

Post#5 » by SkyHook » Tue Jun 17, 2025 3:34 am

eminence wrote:Count this Jazz fan in. Moody is solid at 3/37. Only just turned 23, still some upside. Would value him over Buddy in this deal pretty clearly.


I like Moody and wouldn't mind having him on the Jazz at that salary. Not sure if it's the right move this offseason though.
"When the mob and the press and the whole world tell you to move, your job is to plant yourself like a tree beside the river of truth, and tell the whole world...

... NO, YOU MOVE."
Daddy 801
General Manager
Posts: 8,377
And1: 2,894
Joined: May 14, 2013
 

Re: Warriors & Jazz 

Post#6 » by Daddy 801 » Tue Jun 17, 2025 5:31 am

Rather trade Collins combined with Sexton or Clarkson for picks.

Having said that I will admit I don’t know Moody enough to know if the Jazz would be interested. If it’s not picks it’s a young player rehabilitation project that Utah would want. So the Jazz fans who have watched enough of Moody would have to chime in whether they think he fits the mold of a young player worth going after.

All I know is he better be worth it because I believe Collins and Sexton/Clarkson combined could yield a unprotected pick to a team like the Bucks and I place a very high value on a unprotected 31st pick. Not because we might even use it, but because if we collect enough of them we can package them for a star in 3-4 years.

So my gut tells me no thanks. But maybe he is the one out of fifty young players worth trading for.
User avatar
babyjax13
RealGM
Posts: 34,938
And1: 17,449
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: Occupied Los Angeles
     

Re: Warriors & Jazz 

Post#7 » by babyjax13 » Tue Jun 17, 2025 7:23 am

If we can't get a pick, sure.
Image

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.

JColl
Astaluego
Starter
Posts: 2,393
And1: 907
Joined: May 02, 2020
   

Re: Warriors & Jazz 

Post#8 » by Astaluego » Tue Jun 17, 2025 7:33 am

Wouldn't this work better with Kuminga in Hield's place, especially since he's not a fit for Utah but is with the Warriors?
Moody + Kuminga (ST) for J. Collins. In this scenario, Collins accepts his PO. Maybe the Jazz will add some SRP.
Old Mike Lorenzo
User avatar
eminence
RealGM
Posts: 16,863
And1: 11,698
Joined: Mar 07, 2015

Re: Warriors & Jazz 

Post#9 » by eminence » Tue Jun 17, 2025 12:02 pm

Daddy 801 wrote:Rather trade Collins combined with Sexton or Clarkson for picks.

Having said that I will admit I don’t know Moody enough to know if the Jazz would be interested. If it’s not picks it’s a young player rehabilitation project that Utah would want. So the Jazz fans who have watched enough of Moody would have to chime in whether they think he fits the mold of a young player worth going after.

All I know is he better be worth it because I believe Collins and Sexton/Clarkson combined could yield a unprotected pick to a team like the Bucks and I place a very high value on a unprotected 31st pick. Not because we might even use it, but because if we collect enough of them we can package them for a star in 3-4 years.

So my gut tells me no thanks. But maybe he is the one out of fifty young players worth trading for.


I think of Moody as a mostly actualized Cody Williams.

You won't run your offense through him, but he'll hit open shots and attack the closeout at times. Defensively he's decent, can defend 1-3 and do it pretty well, maybe even some smaller modern 4s at times.
I bought a boat.
User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 92,284
And1: 98,052
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Re: Warriors & Jazz 

Post#10 » by Texas Chuck » Tue Jun 17, 2025 12:59 pm

okay guess I am wrong on Moody. I thought he was a bit of a disappointment and was barely in the rotation come playoff time. But sounds like his contract is fine to everyone else so I can concede I was way off.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
gswhoops
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 34,372
And1: 5,990
Joined: Apr 27, 2005
   

Re: Warriors & Jazz 

Post#11 » by gswhoops » Tue Jun 17, 2025 2:49 pm

I don't love Collins on the Warriors either; I don't think he's worth hardcapping ourselves at the first apron and I don't think he's worth giving a multiyear contract to. I'd pass on this and use our ammo elsewhere.
User avatar
SkyHook
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,942
And1: 3,271
Joined: Jun 24, 2002
 

Re: Warriors & Jazz 

Post#12 » by SkyHook » Tue Jun 17, 2025 2:54 pm

gswhoops wrote:I don't love Collins on the Warriors either; I don't think he's worth hardcapping ourselves at the first apron and I don't think he's worth giving a multiyear contract to. I'd pass on this and use our ammo elsewhere.


I understand the contractual and cap concerns (I'm not convinced that this is the right move for Utah either), but Collins might be the perfect fit for what the Dubs need.
"When the mob and the press and the whole world tell you to move, your job is to plant yourself like a tree beside the river of truth, and tell the whole world...

... NO, YOU MOVE."
gswhoops
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 34,372
And1: 5,990
Joined: Apr 27, 2005
   

Re: Warriors & Jazz 

Post#13 » by gswhoops » Tue Jun 17, 2025 3:03 pm

SkyHook wrote:
gswhoops wrote:I don't love Collins on the Warriors either; I don't think he's worth hardcapping ourselves at the first apron and I don't think he's worth giving a multiyear contract to. I'd pass on this and use our ammo elsewhere.


I understand the contractual and cap concerns (I'm not convinced that this is the right move for Utah either), but Collins might be the perfect fit for what the Dubs need.

Collins definitely brings some useful skills, but my main concerns are (1) he's not a great defender and (2) he's not big enough to be a 5.

Perfect fit (of guys who are somewhat vaguely attainable) would be someone like Brook Lopez IMO.
User avatar
SkyHook
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,942
And1: 3,271
Joined: Jun 24, 2002
 

Re: Warriors & Jazz 

Post#14 » by SkyHook » Tue Jun 17, 2025 3:26 pm

gswhoops wrote:
SkyHook wrote:
gswhoops wrote:I don't love Collins on the Warriors either; I don't think he's worth hardcapping ourselves at the first apron and I don't think he's worth giving a multiyear contract to. I'd pass on this and use our ammo elsewhere.


I understand the contractual and cap concerns (I'm not convinced that this is the right move for Utah either), but Collins might be the perfect fit for what the Dubs need.

Collins definitely brings some useful skills, but my main concerns are (1) he's not a great defender and (2) he's not big enough to be a 5.

Perfect fit (of guys who are somewhat vaguely attainable) would be someone like Brook Lopez IMO.


No, he's not a great defender, but he's been competent. He's played a fair amount at the 5, at least in Utah, despite what the overly simplistic BBREF numbers say. And given that you're one of the biggest advocates for on/off metrics that I've seen on this board (admittedly I'm not), you may find this interesting.

https://www.basketball-reference.com/players/c/collijo01/on-off/2025
"When the mob and the press and the whole world tell you to move, your job is to plant yourself like a tree beside the river of truth, and tell the whole world...

... NO, YOU MOVE."

Return to Trades and Transactions