Stanford wrote:Dabods and Kyle have said from the beginning of this process that Ace's upside isn't as high as people perceive.
Literal idiots, particularly Kyle. Derek is just one of you analytic guys using the wrong math
Moderators: HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Foshan, Sixerscan, sixers hoops
Stanford wrote:Dabods and Kyle have said from the beginning of this process that Ace's upside isn't as high as people perceive.
Stanford wrote:The anti-Ace contingent has taken over the media and it's absolutely disgusting
M2J wrote:CPops57 wrote:M2J wrote:I don't think you know his mentality, all we've heard from around the team is he's selfless, terrific teammate, and did what was asked of him on a bad team.
All this other stuff is speculation.
Of course it's all speculation and there's a degree of uncertainty about everybody. None of us here know these prospects personally.
Ace Bailey might secretly be a saint. And yes, many people have said nice things about him.
But there's enough bad about the way he's answered some questions and other things that people just get put off by him and ask these things.
Ultimately, you can't really know anybody else. James Doakes was a homocide detective for the Miami Metro Police Department and a decorated war veteran. Who the hell knew he'd turn out to be the Bay Harbor Butcher? It happens.
My point is mainly the point I've always had. These teams get a lot more Intel than we do... And talk to these guys directly... While fans and even media hang onto every scrap and make bold speculations
M2J wrote:Literal idiots
LeonJordanJr24 wrote:We got lucky to be in draft and we aren't good enough or reliable enough to draft top 3 for safe high floor roleplayer. You draft star upside in Ace or move up for Harper. This whole draft is a gamble outside top pick. The Ace polarization is actually unnecessary... Come on yall VJ? Really ..
Stanford wrote:Dabods and Kyle have said from the beginning of this process that Ace's upside isn't as high as people perceive.
Negrodamus wrote:
Negrodamus wrote:LeonJordanJr24 wrote:We got lucky to be in draft and we aren't good enough or reliable enough to draft top 3 for safe high floor roleplayer. You draft star upside in Ace or move up for Harper. This whole draft is a gamble outside top pick. The Ace polarization is actually unnecessary... Come on yall VJ? Really ..
Ace is Jaden McDaniels, a role player.
VJ has a higher ceiling.
C'mon we will draft VJ, no need to overthink this! Really, we're talkin' Ace? Pfft!
Arsenal wrote:Negrodamus wrote:LeonJordanJr24 wrote:We got lucky to be in draft and we aren't good enough or reliable enough to draft top 3 for safe high floor roleplayer. You draft star upside in Ace or move up for Harper. This whole draft is a gamble outside top pick. The Ace polarization is actually unnecessary... Come on yall VJ? Really ..
Ace is Jaden McDaniels, a role player.
VJ has a higher ceiling.
C'mon we will draft VJ, no need to overthink this! Really, we're talkin' Ace? Pfft!
Ace is Jaden McDaniels that can get his own shot in the midrange and light it up from 3PT. That's a TWO-WAY superstar.
VJ is the role player. A Gary Harris type who will need others to create open shots for him. Derrick White at best, except White has handles and PG skills.
FireMorey wrote:The thing is even the Bailey detractors don't really deny that his upside is higher than VJ's.
CPops57 wrote:FireMorey wrote:The thing is even the Bailey detractors don't really deny that his upside is higher than VJ's.
"Theoretical max upside" is distinct from "realistic good case outcome".
Yes, I do concede that Ace's "theoretical max upside" is probably the highest outside of Cooper Flagg. If everything goes perfect with his development, that could be a great player. But how often does perfect development happen?
Ace's "realistic good case outcome" to me feels lower than all of the players commonly bandied about in the 3-6ish range of VJ/Kon/Tre. With all of those other players, I see a very clear path to them contributing a bit now, and especially down the road.
Ace has to change his shot selection and mentality to be a useful player, on top of all of the other things wrong with his game. His main good attribute to start with (being able to hit contested midrange shots) is one of the least useful skills in the modern game. His body needs years to fill out correctly IMO (and even then, he's stuck with a higher center of gravity). The free throw shooting on top of things is just a big warning sign about his shot translating. Just a lot of things that are potential constraints.
Again, I could be very wrong. Even the smartest basketball minds in history got different players wrong. But this is a bet that I wouldn't make.
I will say though that I do trust Hinkie and will support whoever the pick is given his good track record. I hope everybody here makes that pledge.