DaGawd wrote:where the donte divincenzo rumors at
?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g
Moderators: HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi
Fury wrote:?s=46&t=H2ki0687ILNfmIp5nctWVg
Jalen Bluntson wrote:Knicksfan1992 wrote:Like others have stated, I do think Mikal has the best chance to be moved if there's no extension talks. This FO tends to value player control and it's not like Mikal really proved himself an invaluable piece to the team consistently last year.
Maybe the FO talks themselves into a new coach unlocking him and don't want to sell low on a guy they paid a premium for to bring in.
But I also think they could look at this as somewhat of a sunk cost and try to extract as much value to get better fitting pieces in that enhance the core a bit more than Mikal did last season.
I just wonder how the FO would approach a Mikal trade. Would they look to bolster depth or try to use Mikal to get a perceived talent upgrade from somewhere else.
I think with Mikal, I would lean more to getting quality depth and maybe re-stocking our picks a bit but I oculd see the argument to just amplifying the talent level and hoping a coach can get something out of Dadiet, Kolek, and Huk to naturally provide depth
I think with a Mikal trade you would target middling teams looking for some more juice in their SL.
A few ideas I had:
Monk/Keon Ellis/draft comp for Mikal - This is my favorite Mikal for depth trade. Idea would be you get more shot creation and shooting off the bench with Monk. Then you can either start Deuce or Keon and have 48 minutes of good POA defense.
Coby White/Lonzo Ball 1-2 FRPs for Mikal - Similar idea to the above. Bulls have a glut of guards and probably don't want to pay Coby long term with Giddey, Dosunmo, Buzelis and Heurter all there.
Herb Jones/Jordan Hawkins/Alvarado + 7th pick for Mikal - I, admittedly, don't love this one but getting the 7th pick would allow the Knicks to then parlay a bigger deal with possibly Mitch or OG attached. Or they can try to find a productive rookie in this pretty good draft class.
These might all suck upon review but it's really hard to find a good Mikal trade because that 24 million is just tough to work with to get a real impact player or players back.
Mikal gets so underrated around here. Outside of Brunson and KAT offensively... NO ONE was consistently proving to be invaluable. As a team though, they were in the ECF with poor coaching.
We need better coaching and a deeper bench that actually gets to play. That's why we didn't get passed Indiana. It wasn't for lack of talent. It wasn't because of Mikal.
When we pick the next HC they need to build a team he thinks he can win with. Whoever has to go can be decided then. I wouldn't expect any big deals happening at all but, things pop up every year. The league is still trying to figure out how to work around these stupid apron rules. That's how we got KAT.
Mikal has a say in wherever he goes if we did trade him. He has the leverage. So, while I would keep him, it's not like we can just sit here naming players we would take back in a deal. He has an extension coming. It's not that simple
MrDollarBills wrote:BKlutch wrote:mpharris36 wrote:
Suns publicly basically saying they would trade him before the draft they basically nuked there leverage. Now Durant and Rich leaking stuff like not wanting to go to Minny and Minny doesn't want to give up Gobert/DD + whatever other assets for a 1 year rental.
The Heat are basically just offering PHX potential luxury tax relief but there package is basically going to be headlined by Jacquez? Are they even offering Ware in the deal?
Suns asking for #2 pick or Castle for 37 year old KD is comical.
They are in a **** spot from there own doing.
I guess they can get bailed out by maybe TOR just saying hey we want to win a bit more next year and get a big name like they did with Kawhi but this isn't Kawhi in his prime....KD at his age aint making a non playoff team a contender.
I'm kind of happy seeing that KD's market value has dropped. In terms of helping teams win, he's always been less than his stats. He treats fans badly, treated us badly, treated Kenny Atkinson badly, has a severe injury history and is going to be 38 before the next season starts. All in all, as MP just said, he won't make a lesser team a contender. I don't see him helping us in any way, unless he gets bought out and we replace Cam Payne with KD for the same salary.
Durant did this to himself. Phoenix was dumb to trade for him and it went exactly as I thought it would go.
KnixinSix wrote:Jalen Bluntson wrote:Knicksfan1992 wrote:Like others have stated, I do think Mikal has the best chance to be moved if there's no extension talks. This FO tends to value player control and it's not like Mikal really proved himself an invaluable piece to the team consistently last year.
Maybe the FO talks themselves into a new coach unlocking him and don't want to sell low on a guy they paid a premium for to bring in.
But I also think they could look at this as somewhat of a sunk cost and try to extract as much value to get better fitting pieces in that enhance the core a bit more than Mikal did last season.
I just wonder how the FO would approach a Mikal trade. Would they look to bolster depth or try to use Mikal to get a perceived talent upgrade from somewhere else.
I think with Mikal, I would lean more to getting quality depth and maybe re-stocking our picks a bit but I oculd see the argument to just amplifying the talent level and hoping a coach can get something out of Dadiet, Kolek, and Huk to naturally provide depth
I think with a Mikal trade you would target middling teams looking for some more juice in their SL.
A few ideas I had:
Monk/Keon Ellis/draft comp for Mikal - This is my favorite Mikal for depth trade. Idea would be you get more shot creation and shooting off the bench with Monk. Then you can either start Deuce or Keon and have 48 minutes of good POA defense.
Coby White/Lonzo Ball 1-2 FRPs for Mikal - Similar idea to the above. Bulls have a glut of guards and probably don't want to pay Coby long term with Giddey, Dosunmo, Buzelis and Heurter all there.
Herb Jones/Jordan Hawkins/Alvarado + 7th pick for Mikal - I, admittedly, don't love this one but getting the 7th pick would allow the Knicks to then parlay a bigger deal with possibly Mitch or OG attached. Or they can try to find a productive rookie in this pretty good draft class.
These might all suck upon review but it's really hard to find a good Mikal trade because that 24 million is just tough to work with to get a real impact player or players back.
Mikal gets so underrated around here. Outside of Brunson and KAT offensively... NO ONE was consistently proving to be invaluable. As a team though, they were in the ECF with poor coaching.
We need better coaching and a deeper bench that actually gets to play. That's why we didn't get passed Indiana. It wasn't for lack of talent. It wasn't because of Mikal.
When we pick the next HC they need to build a team he thinks he can win with. Whoever has to go can be decided then. I wouldn't expect any big deals happening at all but, things pop up every year. The league is still trying to figure out how to work around these stupid apron rules. That's how we got KAT.
Mikal has a say in wherever he goes if we did trade him. He has the leverage. So, while I would keep him, it's not like we can just sit here naming players we would take back in a deal. He has an extension coming. It's not that simple
I can tell you with the utmost confidence Mikal HATED how Thibs utilized him in his system (especially defensively). He HATED it.
Now Thib's gone, him coming back/being extended is more a possibility but...... the Front office most defintely didn't appreciate how he went public with his thoughts.
Further complicating things he has 1 year left, and isn't CAA while the top 3: KAT, Brunson and OG are.
I like Mikal and even wouldn't hate if we kept him over OG if it were one or the other. I absolutely think he would be better here under another coach but it all depends on what they want to do with the roster moving forward.
KnixinSix wrote:Jalen Bluntson wrote:Knicksfan1992 wrote:Like others have stated, I do think Mikal has the best chance to be moved if there's no extension talks. This FO tends to value player control and it's not like Mikal really proved himself an invaluable piece to the team consistently last year.
Maybe the FO talks themselves into a new coach unlocking him and don't want to sell low on a guy they paid a premium for to bring in.
But I also think they could look at this as somewhat of a sunk cost and try to extract as much value to get better fitting pieces in that enhance the core a bit more than Mikal did last season.
I just wonder how the FO would approach a Mikal trade. Would they look to bolster depth or try to use Mikal to get a perceived talent upgrade from somewhere else.
I think with Mikal, I would lean more to getting quality depth and maybe re-stocking our picks a bit but I oculd see the argument to just amplifying the talent level and hoping a coach can get something out of Dadiet, Kolek, and Huk to naturally provide depth
I think with a Mikal trade you would target middling teams looking for some more juice in their SL.
A few ideas I had:
Monk/Keon Ellis/draft comp for Mikal - This is my favorite Mikal for depth trade. Idea would be you get more shot creation and shooting off the bench with Monk. Then you can either start Deuce or Keon and have 48 minutes of good POA defense.
Coby White/Lonzo Ball 1-2 FRPs for Mikal - Similar idea to the above. Bulls have a glut of guards and probably don't want to pay Coby long term with Giddey, Dosunmo, Buzelis and Heurter all there.
Herb Jones/Jordan Hawkins/Alvarado + 7th pick for Mikal - I, admittedly, don't love this one but getting the 7th pick would allow the Knicks to then parlay a bigger deal with possibly Mitch or OG attached. Or they can try to find a productive rookie in this pretty good draft class.
These might all suck upon review but it's really hard to find a good Mikal trade because that 24 million is just tough to work with to get a real impact player or players back.
Mikal gets so underrated around here. Outside of Brunson and KAT offensively... NO ONE was consistently proving to be invaluable. As a team though, they were in the ECF with poor coaching.
We need better coaching and a deeper bench that actually gets to play. That's why we didn't get passed Indiana. It wasn't for lack of talent. It wasn't because of Mikal.
When we pick the next HC they need to build a team he thinks he can win with. Whoever has to go can be decided then. I wouldn't expect any big deals happening at all but, things pop up every year. The league is still trying to figure out how to work around these stupid apron rules. That's how we got KAT.
Mikal has a say in wherever he goes if we did trade him. He has the leverage. So, while I would keep him, it's not like we can just sit here naming players we would take back in a deal. He has an extension coming. It's not that simple
I can tell you with the utmost confidence Mikal HATED how Thibs utilized him in his system (especially defensively). He HATED it.
Now Thib's gone, him coming back/being extended is more a possibility but...... the Front office most defintely didn't appreciate how he went public with his thoughts.
Further complicating things he has 1 year left, and isn't CAA while the top 3: KAT, Brunson and OG are.
I like Mikal and even wouldn't hate if we kept him over OG if it were one or the other. I absolutely think he would be better here under another coach but it all depends on what they want to do with the roster moving forward.
3toheadmelo wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:
KnixinSix wrote:Knicks Film School
Kris Pursiainen on the show and thinks Knicks get Walker Kessler for the Wizards 1st and 3 2nds.
dukeknicksirish wrote:KnixinSix wrote:Knicks Film School
Kris Pursiainen on the show and thinks Knicks get Walker Kessler for the Wizards 1st and 3 2nds.
If we do that, we need to capitalize on a Mitch/Hart combo deal somewhere
KnixinSix wrote:Knicks Film School
Kris Pursiainen on the show and thinks Knicks get Walker Kessler for the Wizards 1st and 3 2nds.
Knicksfan1992 wrote:Like others have stated, I do think Mikal has the best chance to be moved if there's no extension talks. This FO tends to value player control and it's not like Mikal really proved himself an invaluable piece to the team consistently last year.
Maybe the FO talks themselves into a new coach unlocking him and don't want to sell low on a guy they paid a premium for to bring in.
But I also think they could look at this as somewhat of a sunk cost and try to extract as much value to get better fitting pieces in that enhance the core a bit more than Mikal did last season.
I just wonder how the FO would approach a Mikal trade. Would they look to bolster depth or try to use Mikal to get a perceived talent upgrade from somewhere else.
I think with Mikal, I would lean more to getting quality depth and maybe re-stocking our picks a bit but I oculd see the argument to just amplifying the talent level and hoping a coach can get something out of Dadiet, Kolek, and Huk to naturally provide depth
I think with a Mikal trade you would target middling teams looking for some more juice in their SL.
A few ideas I had:
Monk/Keon Ellis/draft comp for Mikal - This is my favorite Mikal for depth trade. Idea would be you get more shot creation and shooting off the bench with Monk. Then you can either start Deuce or Keon and have 48 minutes of good POA defense.
Coby White/Lonzo Ball 1-2 FRPs for Mikal - Similar idea to the above. Bulls have a glut of guards and probably don't want to pay Coby long term with Giddey, Dosunmo, Buzelis and Heurter all there.
Herb Jones/Jordan Hawkins/Alvarado + 7th pick for Mikal - I, admittedly, don't love this one but getting the 7th pick would allow the Knicks to then parlay a bigger deal with possibly Mitch or OG attached. Or they can try to find a productive rookie in this pretty good draft class.
These might all suck upon review but it's really hard to find a good Mikal trade because that 24 million is just tough to work with to get a real impact player or players back.
DaGawd wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:
i’ll say it.. a straight up swap of kat for kd would’ve been an isiah thomas level mistake
Richard4444 wrote:Spree2Houston wrote:Had JJJ made an All-NBA team, he would have been eligible to sign a five-year extension worth up to $345.3 million this offseason. Since he didn’t, the Grizzlies can offer him no more than a four-year extension worth $146.8 million. That’s basically OG’s salary slot. Knicks could do a OG for JJJ swap and follow up with Mitch for Donte swap in some 3way trade.
If I not mistaken if the Memphis renegotiate JJJ salary (adding salary from cap space), they will could offer him a 200M extension.
Because the rookie extension Jackson signed in 2021 declines, the maximum extension allowed would be four-years, $146.8 million, which is $150 million less than what he could sign for with Memphis as a free agent in 2026 and $75 million less than he could get with another team that has cap space.
A workable solution is to renegotiate his $23.3 million salary with cap space and then extend him an additional four seasons. For example, the Grizzlies could use their $6.9 million in available room to increase his salary to $30.3 million. Memphis would then be allowed to extend him for another four years and $190 million. Jackson joined Anthony Davis and Victor Wembanyama as the only players to average 20 points and 1.5 blocks during the regular season.
What to expect: A renegotiation and extension. If the goal for Year 1 of the extension starts at $51 million (the max first-year salary), Memphis will need to have $14 million in room to increase his pay in 2025-26.
VirginiaKnickFan wrote:KnixinSix wrote:Knicks Film School
Kris Pursiainen on the show and thinks Knicks get Walker Kessler for the Wizards 1st and 3 2nds.
What's Pursisainen been smoking? The Lakers offered multiple 1st rd picks and were rejected by the pick hoarder Ainge. That Knicks offer for Kessler he is proposing is truly laughable.![]()
![]()