JMAC3 wrote:
Nobody is pulling up Dylan Harper numbers to show he scored more points per 100 possession with Bailey on the bench right? You know why? Because Harper was awesome scoring all the time and there is no need to try to oversell it. He is just good at scoring.
Late response to your comment, but I thought this merited a reply.
The reason for Kon being alone in garnering this type of scrutiny and back and forth seems fairly obvious: there is only one true superstar talent in college basketball in 2025 and Kon Kneuppel was on the same team as him so he spent less time than other top tier draft prospects as the #1 offensive option to prove his abilities.
Unlike say Dylan Harper or Tre Johnson, Kon Kneuppel was on a team with a generational draft prospect who clearly deserved being the primary offensive option whenever he was on the court. Unlike other top-level prospects, Kneuppel spent less time being the #1 offensive option on his team: only for a few games in the ACC tournament when Flagg was hurt, or a few minutes here and there when Flagg was on the bench.
This is why people are asking questions and diving deeper into Kon's stats. Personally, I think he did really well in the limited sample size of him having to be a #1 option. But it is fair to point out that it is a limited sample size so it will bring up questions and analysis that other top level draft prospects aren't facing.