Kon Knueppel

Draft talk all year round

Moderators: Duke4life831, Marcus

Braggins
RealGM
Posts: 14,240
And1: 9,076
Joined: Jan 05, 2014

Re: Kon Knueppel 

Post#241 » by Braggins » Yesterday 7:52 pm

SNPA wrote:
Braggins wrote:Kon is 6'5" and had a slower lane agility time than Hansen Yang, who is a 7+ footer that people are worried about being too slow to be a drop coverage center in the league, and people are acting like Kon is going to a plus defender guarding NBA guards...

Another reason to join the Yang gang.

Ive been Yang Gang posting in the Charlotte sub ever since I found out about Yang lol.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 67,997
And1: 21,694
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Kon Knueppel 

Post#242 » by Klomp » Yesterday 7:59 pm

I think people are getting sucked into the white shooter stereotype, and it's affecting how they project Knueppel. I see a lot of Khris Middleton in his game, I think that's a really solid comp for him.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
greg4012
General Manager
Posts: 7,836
And1: 12,013
Joined: Jul 14, 2008

Re: Kon Knueppel 

Post#243 » by greg4012 » Today 12:15 am

Klomp wrote:I think people are getting sucked into the white shooter stereotype, and it's affecting how they project Knueppel. I see a lot of Khris Middleton in his game, I think that's a really solid comp for him.


I can see Middleton minus 2 inches in height and minus 5 inches in wingspan. Of course, the result of that isn't Khris Middleton but is a SG-sized player with the slowest feet and movement skills among any starting guard in the NBA.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 67,997
And1: 21,694
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Kon Knueppel 

Post#244 » by Klomp » Today 12:34 am

greg4012 wrote:
Klomp wrote:I think people are getting sucked into the white shooter stereotype, and it's affecting how they project Knueppel. I see a lot of Khris Middleton in his game, I think that's a really solid comp for him.


I can see Middleton minus 2 inches in height and minus 5 inches in wingspan. Of course, the result of that isn't Khris Middleton but is a SG-sized player with the slowest feet and movement skills among any starting guard in the NBA.

Still better than comps like Dalton Knecht and Luke Kennard...
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
greg4012
General Manager
Posts: 7,836
And1: 12,013
Joined: Jul 14, 2008

Re: Kon Knueppel 

Post#245 » by greg4012 » Today 1:05 am

Klomp wrote:
greg4012 wrote:
Klomp wrote:I think people are getting sucked into the white shooter stereotype, and it's affecting how they project Knueppel. I see a lot of Khris Middleton in his game, I think that's a really solid comp for him.


I can see Middleton minus 2 inches in height and minus 5 inches in wingspan. Of course, the result of that isn't Khris Middleton but is a SG-sized player with the slowest feet and movement skills among any starting guard in the NBA.

Still better than comps like Dalton Knecht and Luke Kennard...



Idk that Khris Middleton losing half the physical traits that give him advantage is as different from Luke Kennard as you seem to think
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 67,997
And1: 21,694
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Kon Knueppel 

Post#246 » by Klomp » Today 1:40 am

greg4012 wrote:
Klomp wrote:
greg4012 wrote:
I can see Middleton minus 2 inches in height and minus 5 inches in wingspan. Of course, the result of that isn't Khris Middleton but is a SG-sized player with the slowest feet and movement skills among any starting guard in the NBA.

Still better than comps like Dalton Knecht and Luke Kennard...



Idk that Khris Middleton losing half the physical traits that give him advantage is as different from Luke Kennard as you seem to think

To be fair, I thought Kennard was about 2 inches shorter than he is....so it might not be so far off. But Knueppel has like 25 lbs on him, which is the larger point.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
User avatar
EvanZ
RealGM
Posts: 14,300
And1: 3,903
Joined: Apr 06, 2011

Re: Kon Knueppel 

Post#247 » by EvanZ » Today 2:09 am

Klomp wrote:
greg4012 wrote:
Klomp wrote:Still better than comps like Dalton Knecht and Luke Kennard...



Idk that Khris Middleton losing half the physical traits that give him advantage is as different from Luke Kennard as you seem to think

To be fair, I thought Kennard was about 2 inches shorter than he is....so it might not be so far off. But Knueppel has like 25 lbs on him, which is the larger point.


There are way too many K’s in this post including the author.
Subscribe to my 100% FREE email newsletter summarizing top college performances:

https://toplines.mailchimpsites.com/
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 67,997
And1: 21,694
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Kon Knueppel 

Post#248 » by Klomp » Today 3:14 am

Here's a pretty good one I just heard in an interview with Kon's uncle: Desmond Bane
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
MrTribbiani
Junior
Posts: 498
And1: 289
Joined: Sep 19, 2023

Re: Kon Knueppel 

Post#249 » by MrTribbiani » Today 3:19 am

The highest I would place him on my mock is at 10 to Houston. It's laughable that Jonathan Givony has him at number 4 (higher than Ace Bailey, a superior prospect despite his flaws). Any team that picks Kon in the top five is smoking crack lol.
MrTribbiani
Junior
Posts: 498
And1: 289
Joined: Sep 19, 2023

Re: Kon Knueppel 

Post#250 » by MrTribbiani » Today 3:23 am

2weekswithpay wrote:
Read on Twitter


He definitely did the same trickery that Reed Sheppard did last year to make his vertical look more impressive than it actually is :lol:
EmpireFalls
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,792
And1: 7,841
Joined: Jun 16, 2015
   

Re: Kon Knueppel 

Post#251 » by EmpireFalls » Today 2:45 pm

greg4012 wrote:
Klomp wrote:
greg4012 wrote:
I can see Middleton minus 2 inches in height and minus 5 inches in wingspan. Of course, the result of that isn't Khris Middleton but is a SG-sized player with the slowest feet and movement skills among any starting guard in the NBA.

Still better than comps like Dalton Knecht and Luke Kennard...



Idk that Khris Middleton losing half the physical traits that give him advantage is as different from Luke Kennard as you seem to think

Im from the triangle. Luke Kennard was much, much more dynamic and quicker than Kon. It’s not even close. Kennard is slippery and had an advanced handle for the college game. Kon has zero wiggle and is incredibly slow.

I cannot understate how slow Kon will look next to legit NBA athletes.
greg4012
General Manager
Posts: 7,836
And1: 12,013
Joined: Jul 14, 2008

Re: Kon Knueppel 

Post#252 » by greg4012 » Today 3:06 pm

Klomp wrote:Here's a pretty good one I just heard in an interview with Kon's uncle: Desmond Bane


That's the highest end outcome I see reasonably possible (bc of his positional size limitations). But I have not seen any tape of Kon moving his feet on the perimeter with anything near the quickness that Bane possesses. I also think that Kon's handle is VERY rudimentary.

He exists in a weird space where he spent the college season being marketed as a 6'7 strong wing with shooting so people hyped up his solid handle and playmaking for his size/position and dismissed his slow-footedness and lack of athleticism, but the reality (that was already obvious to me) that he actually did not have NBA wing size and was squarely an average-sized NBA SG with way below average footspeed and athleticism for a SG started slowly setting in with his draft measurements. So, people still want to consider things like his handle and passing a positional strength, when really it's average at best (handle below average IMO) for a guard prospect.

Joe Ingles minus 5+ inches in length is no longer Joe Ingles. But that is Kon.
User avatar
EvanZ
RealGM
Posts: 14,300
And1: 3,903
Joined: Apr 06, 2011

Re: Kon Knueppel 

Post#253 » by EvanZ » Today 3:09 pm

It's too bad David Kahn is gone.
Subscribe to my 100% FREE email newsletter summarizing top college performances:

https://toplines.mailchimpsites.com/
User avatar
CPops57
RealGM
Posts: 15,382
And1: 69
Joined: Sep 04, 2001
Location: NYC

Re: Kon Knueppel 

Post#254 » by CPops57 » Today 5:30 pm

JMAC3 wrote:
Nobody is pulling up Dylan Harper numbers to show he scored more points per 100 possession with Bailey on the bench right? You know why? Because Harper was awesome scoring all the time and there is no need to try to oversell it. He is just good at scoring.



Late response to your comment, but I thought this merited a reply.

The reason for Kon being alone in garnering this type of scrutiny and back and forth seems fairly obvious: there is only one true superstar talent in college basketball in 2025 and Kon Kneuppel was on the same team as him so he spent less time than other top tier draft prospects as the #1 offensive option to prove his abilities.

Unlike say Dylan Harper or Tre Johnson, Kon Kneuppel was on a team with a generational draft prospect who clearly deserved being the primary offensive option whenever he was on the court. Unlike other top-level prospects, Kneuppel spent less time being the #1 offensive option on his team: only for a few games in the ACC tournament when Flagg was hurt, or a few minutes here and there when Flagg was on the bench.

This is why people are asking questions and diving deeper into Kon's stats. Personally, I think he did really well in the limited sample size of him having to be a #1 option. But it is fair to point out that it is a limited sample size so it will bring up questions and analysis that other top level draft prospects aren't facing.
greg4012
General Manager
Posts: 7,836
And1: 12,013
Joined: Jul 14, 2008

Re: Kon Knueppel 

Post#255 » by greg4012 » 46 minutes ago

CPops57 wrote:
JMAC3 wrote:
Nobody is pulling up Dylan Harper numbers to show he scored more points per 100 possession with Bailey on the bench right? You know why? Because Harper was awesome scoring all the time and there is no need to try to oversell it. He is just good at scoring.



Late response to your comment, but I thought this merited a reply.

The reason for Kon being alone in garnering this type of scrutiny and back and forth seems fairly obvious: there is only one true superstar talent in college basketball in 2025 and Kon Kneuppel was on the same team as him so he spent less time than other top tier draft prospects as the #1 offensive option to prove his abilities.

Unlike say Dylan Harper or Tre Johnson, Kon Kneuppel was on a team with a generational draft prospect who clearly deserved being the primary offensive option whenever he was on the court. Unlike other top-level prospects, Kneuppel spent less time being the #1 offensive option on his team: only for a few games in the ACC tournament when Flagg was hurt, or a few minutes here and there when Flagg was on the bench.

This is why people are asking questions and diving deeper into Kon's stats. Personally, I think he did really well in the limited sample size of him having to be a #1 option. But it is fair to point out that it is a limited sample size so it will bring up questions and analysis that other top level draft prospects aren't facing.


Kon's ACC tourney stretch without Flagg is one of the most overrated narratives about him. He played excellent in the game where Flagg got injured (note: Flagg still played 15 minutes in that game). In the next 2 games, Kon ended up with more turnovers than assists and basically kept his same rate of scoring per minute.
2weekswithpay
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,218
And1: 2,413
Joined: Dec 22, 2020
     

Re: Kon Knueppel 

Post#256 » by 2weekswithpay » 15 minutes ago

greg4012 wrote:
CPops57 wrote:
JMAC3 wrote:
Nobody is pulling up Dylan Harper numbers to show he scored more points per 100 possession with Bailey on the bench right? You know why? Because Harper was awesome scoring all the time and there is no need to try to oversell it. He is just good at scoring.



Late response to your comment, but I thought this merited a reply.

The reason for Kon being alone in garnering this type of scrutiny and back and forth seems fairly obvious: there is only one true superstar talent in college basketball in 2025 and Kon Kneuppel was on the same team as him so he spent less time than other top tier draft prospects as the #1 offensive option to prove his abilities.

Unlike say Dylan Harper or Tre Johnson, Kon Kneuppel was on a team with a generational draft prospect who clearly deserved being the primary offensive option whenever he was on the court. Unlike other top-level prospects, Kneuppel spent less time being the #1 offensive option on his team: only for a few games in the ACC tournament when Flagg was hurt, or a few minutes here and there when Flagg was on the bench.

This is why people are asking questions and diving deeper into Kon's stats. Personally, I think he did really well in the limited sample size of him having to be a #1 option. But it is fair to point out that it is a limited sample size so it will bring up questions and analysis that other top level draft prospects aren't facing.


Kon's ACC tourney stretch without Flagg is one of the most overrated narratives about him. He played excellent in the game where Flagg got injured (note: Flagg still played 15 minutes in that game). In the next 2 games, Kon ended up with more turnovers than assists and basically kept his same rate of scoring per minute.


If you expand the sample size to the entire college season, Kon's numbers when he played without Flagg are still great.

Return to NBA Draft