Jazz get: Ivey/P.Williams/Klintman/Z.Collins/Bulls 2027 1st
Pistons get: Markkanen
Celtics get: Harris
Bulls get: Porzingis
Why Jazz - Markkanen has a bad contract and for a team that wont be going anywhere for the next couple of seasons, they get a potential inpact player they can grow around in Ivey
Why Pistons - Their time is now and decide that Markkanen is a better fit next to Duren and Thompson
Why Celtics: - Get closer to the apron and Harris fills the Tatum role
Why Bulls: They will be building around Giddey - Get out of the Williams long term contract and have a nice expiring contract in Porzingis
Jazz/Celtics/Bulls/Pistons
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
Jazz/Celtics/Bulls/Pistons
- mlloyd10
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,048
- And1: 950
- Joined: Jan 18, 2012
-
Re: Jazz/Celtics/Bulls/Pistons
- Texas Chuck
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
- Posts: 92,284
- And1: 98,052
- Joined: May 19, 2012
- Location: Purgatory
-
Re: Jazz/Celtics/Bulls/Pistons
I don't follow your logic.
Lauri is a bad contract, but Ivey on a new deal plus Williams is going to be just as expensive only worse at basketball.
Chicago gets to upgrade to KP and dump bad money for free?
I don't know that Boston or Detroit consider their parts, but I can follow the idea. For Utah this makes no sense unless they are irrationally high on Ivey and Chicago is just here stealing a bunch of value.
Lauri is a bad contract, but Ivey on a new deal plus Williams is going to be just as expensive only worse at basketball.
Chicago gets to upgrade to KP and dump bad money for free?
I don't know that Boston or Detroit consider their parts, but I can follow the idea. For Utah this makes no sense unless they are irrationally high on Ivey and Chicago is just here stealing a bunch of value.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Re: Jazz/Celtics/Bulls/Pistons
- mlloyd10
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,048
- And1: 950
- Joined: Jan 18, 2012
-
Re: Jazz/Celtics/Bulls/Pistons
Texas Chuck wrote:I don't follow your logic.
Lauri is a bad contract, but Ivey on a new deal plus Williams is going to be just as expensive only worse at basketball.
Chicago gets to upgrade to KP and dump bad money for free?
I don't know that Boston or Detroit consider their parts, but I can follow the idea. For Utah this makes no sense unless they are irrationally high on Ivey and Chicago is just here stealing a bunch of value.
Your assuming that Mark has more upside that Ivey - Paying a guy $50 mil plus in two years to put up 22/7 is really bad.
I left out the pick the bulls are giving up - My bad
Re: Jazz/Celtics/Bulls/Pistons
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,821
- And1: 5,894
- Joined: Feb 12, 2016
-
Re: Jazz/Celtics/Bulls/Pistons
Why is Chicago here? Boston likely looking for more money savings with they are moving off KP.
Re: Jazz/Celtics/Bulls/Pistons
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,955
- And1: 2,357
- Joined: Jul 02, 2014
-
Re: Jazz/Celtics/Bulls/Pistons
Not satisfied with Having Vucevic as a big limited center they add Porzingas so they have 2 big, old, 7 foot centers who think they need to take a lot of shots and score to audition for their their next contract. No the Bulls don't want to throw away this season and salivate over the few million dollars they saved in the next 2 years. And they give up a FRP to prove they're stupid
NO
NO
Re: Jazz/Celtics/Bulls/Pistons
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,916
- And1: 12,676
- Joined: Jul 15, 2013
- Location: Ogden, UT
-
Re: Jazz/Celtics/Bulls/Pistons
From Boston pov, the savings is pretty minimal. I’d pass. I’d rather keep Porzingis and hope he is healthier than last year.
Jordan Walsh > Lonnie Walker
Re: Jazz/Celtics/Bulls/Pistons
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,816
- And1: 9,237
- Joined: May 28, 2020
-
Re: Jazz/Celtics/Bulls/Pistons
Hard for me to judge this as a standalone trade for BOS. I think given the option, BOS prefers Porzingis at $30.7M over Harris at $26.6M. I understand Porzingis is injury prone, but that's going to play into his next contract and I think BOS would like to keep him at a lower number if they could. While Harris helps with Tatum out, Horford and Kornet are also FAs and both expected to walk (unless Horford is happy with his 1 ring already and just wants stability to stay with BOS for as long as he wants to keep playing) so they need Center minutes too. That being said, if that $4.1M of savings made the difference between over/under the 2nd apron then they probably have to do it. Or maybe some other team they have a cost cutting move with prefers Harris over Porzingis so they need to do this to make that work. In those cases, this is fine for BOS.
Ultimately, I'd cut BOS out of this for now. CHI is giving up the pick to dump PWilliams for expiring. I doubt they care one way or another whether it's Harris or Porzingis here. I also doubt they'd give up a pick to turn PWilliams into an expiring, but that's a different issue. But it we assume CHI does the rest of this, maybe Harris/Porzingis swap can be worked out later depending on the rest of BOS's offseason.
Ultimately, I'd cut BOS out of this for now. CHI is giving up the pick to dump PWilliams for expiring. I doubt they care one way or another whether it's Harris or Porzingis here. I also doubt they'd give up a pick to turn PWilliams into an expiring, but that's a different issue. But it we assume CHI does the rest of this, maybe Harris/Porzingis swap can be worked out later depending on the rest of BOS's offseason.
Re: Jazz/Celtics/Bulls/Pistons
-
- Forum Mod - Pistons
- Posts: 16,826
- And1: 3,417
- Joined: May 22, 2001
- Location: Santa Cruz, CA
-
Re: Jazz/Celtics/Bulls/Pistons
From a Pistons pov, Ivey/Harris for Markinen. Pistons plug one hole and open up another. Harris has been great for the Pistons, but eventually need his replacement. I think SGs are easier to find so I’d probably do it.
That being said, there’s a logical argument for the Pistons to do the opposite. Extend Ivey for 4x20? And he continues where he left off last year (better 3p%, better D) before he got hurt and becomes Cades backcourt mate for the future. Keep Tobias as the ultimate vet teammate and get a young low cost PF and hope they blossom into a starter quality PF.
That being said, there’s a logical argument for the Pistons to do the opposite. Extend Ivey for 4x20? And he continues where he left off last year (better 3p%, better D) before he got hurt and becomes Cades backcourt mate for the future. Keep Tobias as the ultimate vet teammate and get a young low cost PF and hope they blossom into a starter quality PF.
Re: Jazz/Celtics/Bulls/Pistons
- SkyHook
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,941
- And1: 3,271
- Joined: Jun 24, 2002
-
Re: Jazz/Celtics/Bulls/Pistons
The Jazz don't consider this for even a nanosecond.
"When the mob and the press and the whole world tell you to move, your job is to plant yourself like a tree beside the river of truth, and tell the whole world...
... NO, YOU MOVE."
... NO, YOU MOVE."
Return to Trades and Transactions